With a strange Ashes done, what next for Australia and England?

By Geoff Lemon / Expert

So that’s that. A 2015 Ashes conclusion that leaves us poking around in the same confusion and bemusement as during the opening paragraphs, when the Australian favourites suddenly found themselves being spanked around the wider environs of Cardiff.

It’s been a bizarre series, demonstrating that momentum is but the frailest of illusions, as each side has lurched back and forth like a Punch and Judy set in receiving and handing out beltings.

Basically, we’ve been watching two sides that aren’t very good. With about five reliable performers between the central 22, the rest have collapsed into a mud-wrestle of competing incompetence.

It’s not that they haven’t tried, it’s that they haven’t known how to succeed. It’s been like a high-school drama class trying to stage Carmen in a packed opera house, live horses and all.

England came away having collapsed one time fewer than Australia. Congratulations, you win this really unreliable car.

That primacy was based on a few spells of top-notch bowling in English seaming conditions, a couple of hours of inept Australian batsmanship in the same, and the lone talent of Joe Root, who acted as the binding glue on the crumbling plaster fresco of England’s batting order.

For their part Australia used scoreboard pressure to squash England in the two matches when they batted first and batted big, but were squished themselves the other two times they batted first.

Only Chris Rogers dealt with the moving ball, and Cricket Australia will have to find a way to give players time in county cricket to have any hope in four years’ time.

As for their vaunted bowling, it couldn’t rein in England when it mattered. Dan Brettig’s last book analogised the 2006-07 England Ashes team as an army preparing for the last war. This time Australia’s management was guilty of the same. The presence of Patrick Cummins in the squad – so undercooked that he could have been pizza dough – tells all you need to know.

With visions of the 2013-14 Ashes and the home World Cup, Australia arrived with the same simplistic plan of blasting England out. The problem is that dynamite and matches don’t tend to work so well in the wet. Britain’s natural moisture dampened the squib, and Australia never achieved ignition.

Mitchell Johnson was his old self in bursts: a day at Lord’s, an over at Birmingham, but overall a disappointment with well under half the wickets of his last Ashes. Josh Hazlewood couldn’t find his groove on local tracks and faded as the series went on.

Mitchell Starc’s MO was set from the Essex tour match: five and a half hours of spraying the ball short and wide and high and wild, then half an hour of stumps flying to the tune of six wickets.

Once the Tests began he sustained the former mode but rarely the latter. He was looked to as the spearhead but couldn’t break the skin. He led the Australians for wickets, but that tally of 18 was mostly made up of two bags that look good on paper but mean nothing.

In Cardiff he took 5-114 but England still romped to 430. At Trent Bridge his 6-111 didn’t keep England from a declaration at nearly 400 and an innings win.

A good bowling average is in the 20s, but that includes the best days and the worst. To dominate an innings a bowler needs to strike at well below that mark.

Admittedly Australia could have picked an attack of Laker, Trueman, Gandalf and Rambo and it wouldn’t have helped in a match where they were rolled for 60 batting first. But Starc totalled two wickets across Australia’s two Test wins, and three at Birmingham where salvage was possible, even if unlikely.

No doubt he’ll be better for the experience, and his potential upside remains high. It’s just a matter of how long it might take to realise that in the Test arena.

Coupled with Hazlewood, Cummins, James Pattinson, Gurinder Sandhu, Nathan Coulter-Nile and the rejuvenated Peter Siddle, Australia’s fast bowling looks well set for the years ahead. Nathan Lyon, if he stays fit, is another reliable component.

The top seven is another matter. Peter Nevill has just replaced Brad Haddin. Ditto Mitchell Marsh for Shane Watson. Adam Voges is newly arrived. Rogers is gone. Michael Clarke is gone. Replacing them, the nation barely has a batsman who has a first-class average over 40.

Of those who do, Mark Cosgrove isn’t judged to have the physique, Cameron White has been and gone, Matthew Wade is a peripheral wicketkeeper, and it’ll be a cold day in hell before Darren Lehmann recalls Ed Cowan. David Hussey is miles ahead of everyone, averaging 52, but 38-year-olds don’t make Test sides. The best chance lies with Joe Burns, who debuted last summer, and Chris Lynn.

Outside that group, Usman Khawaja is the other obvious chance, making his way back from a knee injury, recovering form and captaining Queensland and Australia A.

There’s talk about Cameron Bancroft, Jordan Silk and Nic Maddinson, but none has yet entered a compelling argument.

Marcus Stoinis is in the ODI squad for the upcoming series against England, but has a stronger first-class record. Callum Ferguson is a relatively sprightly 30. Or if they go back to the senior route, Michael Klinger has just turned 35, and like Rogers, has been a prolific recent scorer in all formats.

Many options, all of them gambles. The way forward for Australia is not known. Their Ashes opponent has a much clearer future.

England may already be turning nervous eyes towards a meeting with Pakistan in the United Arab Emirates – the green team is formidable in that part of the world, and with little spin nor capacity to play it, England could find their trip as embarrassing as Australia’s there last November.

But in the main, England have won the Ashes with a largely young team that could largely be together for a long time to come. An opener must be found – Alex Hales, probably – and Ian Bell may not have much time.

But a refreshed Alastair Cook now has captaincy miles left in him, Root will only get better, Gary Ballance will be back at first drop before too long, and there is a potentially incredible axis of batting power in Ben Stokes at six, Jos Buttler at seven and Moeen Ali at eight.

England’s seamers have shown they can cover Jimmy Anderson, with Mark Wood coming through and Steven Finn coming good.

After three Ashes series in two years, it will now be two and a half before England next visit Australian shores. Time then to breathe a sigh of relief.

England’s team could by then be a cohesive outfit. Australia’s team could be anything. With any luck, by that stage both sides will have grasped a little more firmly how to go about this cricket caper.

This article was first published on Wisden India.

The Crowd Says:

2015-08-27T13:10:21+00:00

Sylvester

Guest


Interesting. They haven't lost a series - home or away - since May 2013. There's been seven series since then, only 3 were in NZ.

2015-08-26T13:09:41+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Yep...why is everyone so glum. This next year is such an exciting prospect.

2015-08-26T12:59:35+00:00

Bert

Guest


I just had a look at the ICC Rankings Australia is ranked: 2nd behind SA in Test Cricket 1st in ODIs 2nd behind Sri Lanka in 20/20 We have the number 1 ranked batsman in the world - S Smith The number one ODI bowler in the world Mitch Starc. Not a bad effort and I can't see us falling to far if at all. The players that are leaving the game (apart from Rogers) have all had modest performances over the last 12-18 months. If anything the injection of new blood may improve our performance.

2015-08-26T09:07:44+00:00

Broken-hearted Toy

Guest


I feel for Steve Smith, not his greatest fan (based on how clumsy he can look as a batsman not his output) but he's going to skipperinng some stinkin' line-ups. Good luck to him.

2015-08-26T07:40:49+00:00

Joel

Roar Rookie


The truth is that if australia had batted properly through the series and the bowlers did exactly the same job we would all be hailing their brilliance as a bowling unit. Why are we looking at the bowlers when it's the batting side that failed so miserably? You can look at the run rates of the bowlers and point at those stats as a failure but the bowlers aren't the ones setting the fields, which for the most part were overly aggressive and mostly unnecessarily so. Sure, they could have been better at times but the all round bowling performance was actually pretty good.

2015-08-26T07:32:29+00:00

Joel

Roar Rookie


I think NZ are the best cricket team in the world... when they play in NZ. Everywhere else they are average at best.

2015-08-26T07:27:19+00:00

Joel

Roar Rookie


Bancroft also just made 150 in a first class match in India against a team full of spinners. I would be taking him to Bangladesh for sure.

2015-08-26T01:24:26+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


I don't know that the Saffers are the only side to do that. Oz has just won 2 of 5 in England, both in the Windies and won in South Africa. Oz A won in India. The Baggy Greens are pretty good.

2015-08-26T00:01:52+00:00

ChrisB

Guest


As i said earlier. I don't really think any team's prospects are particularly awesome. In theory it should be good for international cricket to have a period without an out-an-out number one a la Windies (79-91) or Australia (94-07) but people seem to pine for that for some reason. One interesting observation of recent years that i'd be interested to see what others think about is the seeming inability of any team (barring South Africa up to a year or two ago) to be able to win away from favourable conditions. This does seem to have intensified around the world, yet you'd think that the reverse should occur given the extra movement of players around the world these days

2015-08-25T23:57:44+00:00

ChrisB

Guest


My squad for Bangladesh: Warner, Smith, Burns, Voges, Bancroft, Khawaja, Ferguson, Maxwell, M Marsh, Neville, Lyon, Ahmad, Johnson, Hazlewood, Starc, Siddle

2015-08-25T13:32:29+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


Geoff, you mention CA sorting out stints for the Aussie batsmen in county cricket (why do Aussies believe that their players have a divine right to play county cricket?!), however given how Australia's best batsmen have gone in 'English conditions', why would any counties want them? (genuine question btw, honestly not trying to be facetious...much).

2015-08-25T13:23:57+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


You keep repeating it Targa in the hope that it will become received wisdom, but please explain, why exactly should NZ have won the series in England? They weren't diddled, they lost the first Test comfortably and won the second comfortably. It's called a drawn series mate.

2015-08-25T12:19:55+00:00

TheCunningLinguistic

Guest


Which is ludicrous, Rob, as S Marsh excels at One Day, much more so than Tests!

2015-08-25T11:54:50+00:00

TheCunningLinguistic

Guest


It remains a daily puzzle to me why SOK is not in the Test team. I rate Lyon, I really do, but SOK has a better record. When they've bowled together, SOK has out bowled Lyon most times. Lyon is probably the best No 11 batsman in the world, but SOK is still a better bat, by a significant margin! It's one of life's great unsolved mysteries...

2015-08-25T11:54:04+00:00

Amith

Guest


Khawaja has to be the first guy in, he has been the highest scorer in the matador and Aus A list A games and should get that opening slot. For the spinners i would go for Agar and SOK to support Lyon. Stark and Johnson should not be part of the same test bowling attack together. It should be either of them based on form, and for tests especially, I will always prefer the older Mitch, the more ferocious one and give him the liberty to go all out. The current problem with Aus bowling attack is the dent created by the departure of Rhino who could attack as well as contain based on match situation. Josh will probably be there one day, but in short term future either of Mitchs, Josh and Siddle will form a more balanced attack.

2015-08-25T11:49:55+00:00

Perry Bridge

Guest


Very true - Hazlewood eventually fell out of the side - but injured? Starc had a dodgey ankle early days but battled through it so credits there. Johnson just couldn't get it right and bled runs. And - the selectors left the bowling line up on automatic pilot - didn't 'manage' the bowlers at all - and waited until change was forced upon them. Ironically at home we'd probably have rotated - but that more so in recent years to nurse Harris through. The lack of pressure was made obvious when Siddle returned to highlight what had been absent. Ironically though too - in recent times - Watson when able to bowl was generally able to apply the brakes too.

2015-08-25T10:30:41+00:00

Rob JM

Guest


Flat pitches have made the batsmen soft and the bowlers hard!

2015-08-25T10:27:14+00:00

Rob JM

Guest


Burns is opening the ODIs, S Marsh was not even selected.

2015-08-25T09:54:19+00:00

Worlds Biggest

Guest


Nice one Geoff and thanks for your efforts covering the series, can't believe it's all over, it went quick that's for sure. Whilst England will bring out a good team next Ashes, our lads will be no shrinking violets either. Smith, Warner, M Marsh, Hazlewood, Cummins, Patto, Starc and Lyon all will be in there prime.

2015-08-25T09:29:00+00:00

JoM

Roar Rookie


None of the quicks produced sustained pressure, not just Starc, but as usual it is him that everyone is laying into. Hazlewood didn't perform as expected and Johnson certainly didn't either.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar