Purple Daze: Figuring out Freo's confusing 2015 season

By Jay Croucher / Expert

It’s unlikely that there has ever been a team that has spent 18 consecutive weeks on top of the AFL ladder and been accorded as little respect as the 2015 Dockers.

Fremantle is currently third in premiership betting and the fact that they’re even that high is probably more a product of their ladder position than anything to do with their form on the field.

Since Round 10, the Dockers have been nothing more than an average side. They might be a respectable 7-4 in that time but they’ve only outscored their opponents by a measly 20 points.

In those 11 games, the purple haze are 6-0 against teams outside the eight and 1-4 against those inside it. They’ve been outscored by 130 points in those five games against the big boys and they were one ill-fated Bachar Houli brain-fade from being 0-5.

The Dockers haven’t been the same team since they demolished Sydney with their ferocious, unrelenting pressure in the 2013 preliminary final. Ross Lyon sides have always prided themselves on defence, but there was something special and brilliantly unusual about how manic and seemingly omnipresent Fremantle’s pressure was in the 2013 finals series.

Teams built on defence have always been more sympathetic to me than those built on attack. The Hawks of recent vintage have been a joy to watch, but they’re so talented and so alien in their physical gifts that they’re more breathtaking than endearing.

The 2013 Dockers weren’t short on talent either, but they seemed to succeed primarily because of work ethic, selflessness and cohesion – concepts eminently more relatable to the everyman than the extra-terrestrial athleticism of a Lance Franklin. Their working class style of play combined with a history of unthreatening ineptitude made the Dockers one of the easiest teams for neutrals to support in a long time.

The vigour and mania that defined Fremantle’s defensive pressure in that 2013 finals run seems to have faded away in the past two years. The Dockers of 2014 and 2015 have grinded their opponents into submission, whereas the 2013 brand bludgeoned them into oblivion.

The team’s game style seems to have matured, relying more on structure and order to succeed, as opposed to embracing chaos. This is likely by design, an ageing team needs to pace itself. But in the maturity process the Dockers have lost what made them so special – sometimes there is nothing as intimidating and thrilling as the energy of immaturity.

The knock on Fremantle under Ross Lyon has always been that they don’t score enough. Since Lyon took over in 2012, the Dockers have ranked 12th, 12th, seventh and (this year) 10th for points scored. On the surface these rankings are damning, but they’re also misleading. You don’t need to score a lot of points to win, you just need to score more than your opponent, and under Lyon the Dockers have ranked second, first, second and first for points against.

A mediocre offence is not a death knell for premiership aspirations. Only two teams in the league scored fewer points than the 2005 Swans but that didn’t stop them from winning the flag. Collingwood in 2002 and Lyon’s St Kilda in 2010 were both minutes away from premierships despite ranking a middling eighth and ninth for points scored during the season. Hell, the 2013 Dockers ranked 12th for points scored and probably would have won the grand final if not for Nat Fyfe’s wayward goal-kicking and Hayden Ballantyne’s nervous breakdown.

The Dockers can win with defence – the problem this year is that their defence hasn’t been good enough in big games. On average the 2015 Dockers concede just 69 points per game, but in four of their last five games against top eight sides they’ve given up 94 points or more, with the one exception the game where Richmond kicked a woeful 10.18.

In each of those five games Fremantle has allowed their opponents to score at least every 1.86 inside 50 entries, a shockingly high frequency. By comparison, for the season the Hawks have scored every 2.02 inside 50 entries. In essence, over the past three months against top eight sides Fremantle’s defence has allowed their opponents to be a better, more efficient version of Hawthorn going forward.

If their defence isn’t at 1989 Bad Boy Detroit Pistons levels, the Dockers don’t have the offence to compensate. Ross Lyon has preached the importance of scoring more freely the past two years, but smooth offence and the Dockers have been a volatile, unfulfilling relationship. Occasionally there are highs – notably last year’s round one demolition of Collingwood and kicking 17 goals in a win against Hawthorn – but offensive fluency is generally nothing more than a passing fancy for Freo.

Last week’s loss to North Melbourne was a perfect microcosm of Fremantle’s offence. A brilliant, fluid first quarter of incisive kicking and lightning ball movement that produced seven goals was followed by three quarters of stagnancy that resulted in a combined total of five goals.

In the third quarter against North both Garrick Ibbotson and Michael Walters played on immediately from marks with quick handballs into the corridor only to mistime their deliveries and miss their targets, resulting in turnovers. The symbolism was clear – the Dockers are trying to be more offensively-minded, it just doesn’t come naturally to them.

Personnel availability is also an issue entering finals. Nat Fyfe will play the first week of finals, but whether or not he’s going to be ‘Nat Fyfe’ is as ambiguous as the term ‘periostitis’ is for the medically non-educated. Matthew Pavlich’s Achilles tendon is an ongoing concern, as is the match readiness of Ballantyne, if he does in fact return.

Alex Silvagni and Ryan Crowley (remember him?) are also question marks for finals given their brain-fades of various offensiveness (Silvagni’s being much worse for mine, but adjudged to be 11 months less offensive by the authorities).

And yet, despite the health concerns, the perpetual offensive woes and recent defensive struggles, there the Dockers sit, on top of the ladder with a fortnight to play, virtually guaranteed to be one home game from being one home game away from a grand final.

Who’s to say they can’t turn it on in September? Who’s to say that the ability to inflict otherworldly defensive chaos won’t return to a veteran side that knows it only needs three big performances, two on their home turf, to win the club’s maiden premiership?

We have four years of evidence to suggest that the Dockers are never going to be an elite offensive side, but we also have just as much evidence to suggest that they are much better defensively than they’ve shown over the past three months.

The Eagles are banged up and the Hawks are going to have to win a final interstate for the first time since 2001. If the defence returns, Pavlich is healthy and Aaron Sandilands is giving first use to David Mundy, Stephen Hill and a fit Fyfe, the Dockers have a clear path to a grand final where anything can happen, as they unfortunately can attest to.

As uninspiring as Fremantle’s form has been over the past three months, ultimately the home-and-away season is just about setting up the starting positions for the finals. On that front, the Dockers’ form is better than anyone’s.

Fremantle’s current percentage of 122 would be the worst percentage for a minor premier since 2006. Who finished top of the ladder that year? The West Coast Eagles, who went on to win Western Australia’s most recent premiership.

The Crowd Says:

2015-09-08T14:23:06+00:00

justinr

Guest


Both Brisbane (2003) and Geelong (2009) lost momentum in the second half of the season after strong starts, but managed to take home the Flag. The Swans lost 3 of their last 4 H&A games in 2012 and did the same. Freo are still a huge chance.

2015-09-04T00:14:36+00:00

theGav56

Guest


Enjoyed the article. For me it has the glaring omission of any discussion about Freo's absolutely dominant first quarter/halves. They have been quite exhilarating. On numerous occasions this season the game has been over very early in the match, and it seems that the game and players have been managed from then on.To me they suggest that this team does indeed have another gear to go to during finals. Of course changing how a team plays for finals may not come off, but the potential is certainly there, and the coach does have the luxury of time to prepare the side for that to occur.

2015-09-01T04:18:12+00:00

Axel

Guest


Freo have another gear or two which we will see in a few weeks. We all know what Hawthorn are capable of and they will be at their best. Sydney will get serious as they've been around the block a few times. West Coast are an unknown, they may choke, feel the heat etc. with a young coach, inexperienced finals team. Same goes for the WB - they will struggle if they have to travel. Other threats are too inconsistent - Richmond, North, Crows.

2015-08-29T03:20:45+00:00

Jesse

Guest


That little list should be titled, "players more important to team success", and then I would be inclined to agree with you.

2015-08-29T00:04:03+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


I'm proud of that.

2015-08-29T00:02:40+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


FreoGulls. That gets the hierarchy into the correct perspective.

2015-08-28T23:58:03+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Yes, Johno. Ten wet or dewy games is why no one needs worry about a lower score by Freo. Lots of wet games. That involves not quite clunking marks 25 metres out that might be held in the dry or dew free games. It's not just about kicking a wet ball. Stats about Freo's scoring prove nothing other than non-Freo folk are looking for some substance for their hope that Freo will fall over.

2015-08-28T13:40:24+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Wouldn't have thought, Me Too. Hawthorn is most out of form heading into finals. Fancy losing to a bottom 9 side at this time of the year...when they NEEDED to win.

2015-08-28T13:31:06+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Hawks are the team most teams would want. Lost 2 of the last 3...ageing defenders they are trying to hide...ageing midfielders who everyone is ashamed of....they are the opposition of choice.

2015-08-28T13:22:44+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Leaking less points doesn't strike me as a problem, Jamie, but feel free to worry if you like. Won't change much. They'll probably continue to leak less points...even in finals.

2015-08-28T13:13:09+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Buddy can't possibly have a day out. Freo has McPharlin. Buddy doesn't know what to do on him. Last time he went to the wing so he could play on Duffield.

2015-08-28T12:05:50+00:00

Frank R

Roar Rookie


Not sure anyone really can understand them.

2015-08-28T08:57:04+00:00

Mark

Guest


Freo are burnt to a crisp, Sydney are only medium, maybe even rare with Bud, Mitchell and Gaz back

2015-08-28T08:43:49+00:00

Mark

Guest


Hodge, Mitchell, Lake > Pav, Sandi, McPharlin And I hate Hawthorn with a passion

2015-08-28T07:50:18+00:00

Stewart

Guest


I can hear your mates guffawing at the pub when you drop one of those gems. I bet you're the funniest aren't you? Might be time to back away Moose.

2015-08-28T07:17:09+00:00

Dalgety Carrington

Roar Guru


Good work Dean. Neither of us need any patronising.

2015-08-28T07:16:25+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Yes it just makes the point that a stat about average scores etc isn't always an indicator. Entries into forward 50 might better inducate an attacking plan. Freo's issue is execution and, more to the point, taking responsibilty to take a shot rather than dishing it off.

2015-08-28T07:09:18+00:00

Dean N

Guest


I know at least 5 WCE supporters that won't be barracking for Freo.

2015-08-28T07:05:49+00:00

spruce moose

Guest


Rush me to the burns unit Stewart.

2015-08-28T07:05:42+00:00

kick to kick

Guest


Swans will be hanging out for a qualifying final against Freo as opposed to playing the Eagles. So both sets of fans will favour that match up. The Swans aren't anyone's flag pick at the moment but could take out an unconvincing Fremantle. And the winner gets a home prelim with all the advantage that historically bestows.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar