Dockers' premiership window about to close

By Jamie Radford / Roar Pro

How long does a club’s premiership window stay open?

For Hawthorn it seems it will never close, but generally any given club’s period of contention is spoken about in terms of seasons – usually anywhere from between two to four.

Fremantle have been in contention now for three seasons, but although coming close are yet to taste premiership success.

After wasted opportunities cost them an inaugural flag in the 2013 decider, the Dockers finished fourth in 2014, and this season claimed their first minor premiership.

However over the last two years they have only managed to win one out of four post-season appearances. Bowing out in a semi-final against Port Adelaide in 2014, and defeated by eventual premiers Hawthorn in a preliminary final this season.

Both of those losses came at Domain Stadium, where the Dockers have proven to be almost unbeatable, having won 31 of 35 (or 88%), of games played there during the last three home-and-away seasons. In finals at the same ground that figure falls to 40 per cent.

Overall in the last three seasons the Dockers have played 73 games and won 52 of those at 71 per cent. In that same period they only won six of 16 games against teams that finished in the top four of each of those seasons, at 37 per cent.

The discrepancy is pronounced, and by far and away the most significant contributing factor is Fremantle’s inability to consistently outscore the best opposition of any given season.

They can keep their opponents’ totals down. Over the course of the last three home-and-away seasons the Dockers have been the number one defensive side in the AFL, having conceded 4638 points in that time. Sydney are the next best having let in 4730, and Hawthorn third with 5203.

Against all opposition during this period Fremantle have let in an average of 63 points per game, Sydney 71 and Hawthorn 78.

Their midfield is as good as any in the competition, with four time All Australian ruckman Aaron Sandilands feeding the likes of Brownlow Medallist Nat Fyfe, David Mundy, Stephen Hill, Michael Barlow and Lachie Neale.

In 2015 Fremantle were ranked first in the AFL for total hit outs, second in clearances and stoppages, third in disposal efficiency and fourth in contested possession and disposals. So they certainly get enough of the ball, and when they do use it better than most.

However despite their midfielders getting plenty of disposals, the Dockers ranked only seventh for total inside 50s this season, and a lowly 12th for marks inside 50.

For total points scored they were 11th in 2015, seventh last season and 12th in 2013. Conversely triple premiers Hawthorn were ranked first in each of those seasons, scoring 7433 points in total over the three compared to the Docker’s 5921 – or 23 points more per game.

Fremantle’s average score per game against all opposition in the regular season since 2013 is 89.7 points. Against teams that finished in the top four their average score per game falls to 77.6 points.

This season the Dockers kicked 293 goals to be ranked ninth in the AFL for goals scored. Last year they kicked 318 to be ranked fifth, as they were in 2013 after scoring 336 majors in the home and away season.

In total they kicked 947 goals from 66 games. Hawthorn, who were ranked first in each season for goals scored, kicked 1258 – a difference of 311, or 4.7 per game.

With the exception of the Dockers, every side who competed in a preliminary final in all three seasons were in the very top ranked teams in terms of goals kicked.

Put simply Fremantle do not get the ball inside their forward 50 enough, and when they do those entries are not turned into scoring opportunities nearly as often as they should be.

The addition of former Sun Harley Bennell will help. Bennell can play in the midfield or forward half and in either position should bring the ball inside 50 more frequently.

In an interrupted 2015 Bennell averaged 4.3 inside 50s, 0.9 goal assists and 0.7 goals per game, which stacks up very well in comparison to Brownlow Medallist Nat Fyfe, who averaged 4.3, 0.7 and 0.9 in the same statistical categories.

However while the former Western Australian may help with getting the ball inside the Docker’s forward 50, they still must convert those entries into opportunities.

At present, at least on the evidence of the season just passed, they simply do not have the personnel at the club to do so.

Skipper Matthew Pavlich has not yet made a decision on his future, but even if he does decide to go around in 2016 he cannot be expected to shoulder the burden of being the number one forward yet again.

Neither of the two preferred second ruckmen in Jonathon Griffin and Zac Clarke were able to cement themselves in the side this season. Clarke does though have five years on Griffin, who will be 30 by the time next season begins.

Clarke played 13 games and kicked six goals in 2015, while Griffin contributed seven in as many appearances. Although both did adequate jobs backing up Sandilands in the ruck, neither presented much of a threat to the opposition defence.

Of the four young talls the Dockers have in Jack Hannath (24), Mat Taberner (22), Michael Apeness (21), and Craig Moller (22), Taberner is the most accomplished with 28 games to his name. Seven more than the other three combined.

In only his third season of senior football, Taberner has shown steady improvement in each, playing 15 of his games this year. However he is not yet ready to be the number one tall forward in 2016 – even with another preseason under his belt.

Even should Pavlich decide to play next season Fremantle need a key forward. One that will command the best defender, at least the majority of the time.
The club has known this for a while now, and in previous years have tried to lure key position forwards including Collingwood’s Travis Cloke on big money deals. None have taken up the offers.

This year they have Greater Western Sydney’s Cam McCarthy on their radar, who has also expressed his desire to return home to WA.

However the Giants have categorically stated that under no circumstances will he be traded, and will be fulfilling the last two years of his contract.

Although of course that has been said before, and by the same football club.
It has been reported that as of Sunday evening Fremantle were still hopeful of the Giants softening their stance and have offered pick 22 in this year’s draft, and their 2016 first round selection.

The Dockers have stressed they will not be adding any players to the offer, despite rumours of a possible sweetener to the deal involving Michael Barlow or Lachie Weller. Meanwhile, the Giants are still maintaining their position on McCarthy.

Should that remain the case, Fremantle have also reportedly said if they cannot get McCarthy they will take their remaining selections to the national draft, and will not be targeting any other established players.

That would be a mistake. Even with limited draft picks to trade and an even scarcer supply of quality key forwards on offer, the likes of Levi Casboult and Aaron Black could possibly be available at a price the Dockers could afford.

Casboult in particular despite his suspect kicking for goal could be a good fit. Fremantle’s medium and small forwards need a big bodied forward to crash packs and at least bring the ball to ground.

It is unrealistic to expect Pavlich to be that type of player at his age, even if he does goes on, and Taberner is not mature enough yet to do the job. Casboult at 25 is still relatively young and could be that big bodied forward – and maybe more.

If Fremantle fail in their bid for McCarthy, and do as they have said and go to the draft with their remaining selections, an inaugural premiership in 2016 is even more unrealistic.

Generally any given club’s premiership window is spoken about in terms of seasons – usually anywhere from two to four.

For the Fremantle Dockers it could close in as little as four days.

The Crowd Says:

2016-04-29T06:08:49+00:00

Tim Birrell

Guest


Window shut now boys!! DeanM called it a treat

2015-10-23T22:55:33+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


It's obvious you " don't think" that. Indeed, it's obvious you don't think at all.

2015-10-23T21:18:46+00:00

DeanM

Guest


I don't think he is capable of learning new tricks, he's been running that same stagnant (fail in finals) grubby defensive style for years. With such an excellent midfield they really should have won a premiership by now. After failing to lure a specialist forward again in my opinion they should try do what Geelong did in with Podsiadly and get the best available forward or forwards in the pre season draft even if they are 28 etc. It would be a gamble but atleast a very cheap gamble. Time I think is running out for Freo as I expect other teams to rise above the current top 4 in the next couple seasons.

2015-10-23T10:20:03+00:00

Frank R

Roar Rookie


Premiership window has just opened again. With 2 ex Hawthorn players appointed as assistant coaches, they are probably tasked with teaching Lyon how to coach a team to kick a winning score. If you can't beat them, learn their strategies.

2015-10-23T06:56:25+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


"Love child"? Do those comments just come to you or do you research them? I think that is now the 3,478,226th time someone has made that ORIGINAL comment. What is Zac Dawson? One of the tightest, most successful full backs of recent times. While Rance, Gibson, Lake, Frawley concede goals regularly, Zac turns in miserly performances week in week out. Not watching Freo games? You are not an orphan there.

2015-10-23T06:43:21+00:00

gameofmarks

Roar Guru


Any team that picks Zac Dawson in its side doesn't deserve to be in a premiership window. What is he anyway, Ross' love child?

2015-10-23T03:30:59+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


They don't change the rules because a bloke doesn't run straight. They run off their marks to swing around to get extra distance. Nothing wrong with the technique...judt play on. Perhaps you're a Kiwi? There must be a reason you don't know that.

2015-10-23T02:33:17+00:00

Balthazar

Guest


Shouldn't you be at school?

2015-10-23T02:21:26+00:00

DeanM

Guest


I know more than enough about the game and it quite easy to enjoy watching the Hawks win premierships and embarras Freo time and again. I'm also very familiar with the ruling on players running off their line for set shots at goal as it all come about when Franklin was playing for the Hawks, there was confusion about the ruling and the umpires boss cleared it up, end of discussion. Just because the commentators say something doesn't make it true. If you know Suckling as a player he to swings around to his left on his run up. But you just keep avoiding the points others make and enjoy your delusional alternate reality where Freo don't actually have a history of sucking. I will remain in the real world where the Hawks again ended Freo's season simply because they are a better team. #ThanksFreo2013,2015 #3peat #HawksGOAT Hawks owning Freo since 1995

2015-10-23T01:26:00+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


You don't know a lot about the game, Deano. It's hard to see how you can enjoy it when you don't get it. I suppose, however, that allows you to beilieve what you've been told instead of what actually happened. There are DVDs and on line links that can explain the game to you.

2015-10-23T00:11:58+00:00

DeanM

Guest


Hawks owning Freo since 1995

2015-10-23T00:05:32+00:00

DeanM

Guest


That's where your wrong delusional Don, your crazy theories have been challenged numerous times, you just have selective memory and warped logic. Suckling is 1 example. I gave you an example a link that clearly states the AFL umpires boss allows a players natural running arc for a set shot at goal. Every player has some minor arc some more than others like Franklin. Sometimes this opens up the goals, other times it does the opposite. Clearly stated as been allowed within the rules. A few calls went against the Hawks that resulted in lost opportunities, goals. The stats also are slightly in the Hawks favour so Hawks certainly were not outplayed as your warped mind allows you to believe. Free kicks also basically even. The Ballantyne free was there as he obstructed a players movement well off the ball. Hawks comfortable win due to been the better team and with better conversion in Freo's backyard also. Would have been 50 odd points at the MCG or 90 in tassie. "Hawks owning Freo since 1995"

2015-10-22T22:51:21+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


You say it every time you post, Dave. It's obvious you actually are NOT a Docker fan. There, I said it.

2015-10-22T21:42:41+00:00

dave

Guest


I have to add collingwood would never win a flag with buckley in their side

2015-10-22T21:40:27+00:00

dave

Guest


Thanks for that,I have only just recently read pavs words about harvey. You have to wonder is Pav the problem?The premiorship we all wish him was in his hands in 2013. I hate to dis the guy but theres great players e.g. Harvey and Buckley that gained much accolades same as Pav while their team didn't win a flag. We need guys that can kick it when it counts.When Pav kicks these goals you can see the whole team lift but when he misses you can see what happens.(thats ok if he does the teamliftng goals in the finals when it counts) Its just that true champions kick them when needed thats why they get flags. Sorry to all you docker fans but we will never win a flag with Pav in our team.yes I said it

2015-10-21T22:51:06+00:00

paulywalnuts

Guest


Mitchell was also spotted (with someone who looked eerily like Stevic) on the grassy knoll. Pass it on!

2015-10-21T14:48:17+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


That makes no sense. Try saying it again.

2015-10-21T14:19:36+00:00

Me Too

Guest


played off in a grand final one year, finished minor premiers another - if that ain't a window for you then you're alone in your view.

2015-10-21T01:57:23+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Yes...but, despite frustrations, what a great thing footy is. The world of AFL has become even better since it added a purple tinge.

2015-10-21T01:08:15+00:00

EddyJ

Guest


Yes, was very surprised that Stevic was named as grand final umpire. It really was a poor performance. Whether there was a conspiracy or not, his umpiring was woeful, and should not have been rewarded with a grand final appearance. But, who knows – will have to analyse any AFL conspiracies, but they really are a law unto themselves. The Swans ban (then changed to a restriction) on trading seemed quite bizarre, especially since no wrong doing had occurred (well, not anything that was publicly announced) – I agree COLA should go, but a club was punished for abiding by the rules. Maybe Gillon is a weak leader. Andrew wouldn't have condoned this.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar