A good chance for the Kiwis but Aussies will prevail

By Alec Swann / Expert

Having watched plenty of the Pakistan versus England series in the United Arab Emirates and been entertained – in a darkly comic fashion – by the old-school fare on display, I’m glad the Australian international summer is about to start.

Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy some good, old-fashioned attritional Test cricket as much as the next man who can’t quite bring himself to fully embrace the helter skelter of the Twenty20 merry-go-round, but I’ll be pleased to see some cricket that manages to get out of second gear.

And the Australians, a team with a nice big point to prove, and the New Zealanders, who if nothing else will attempt to play on the front foot, there are two teams to do just that.

Add to the melting pot a Gabba pitch that generally encourages a bit of speed with the ball and attacking intent with the bat and we could be in for a decent contest.

In a funny kind of way, it’s the reverse of last weekend’s rugby World Cup final. Australia will start as favourites given their record on home soil and in Brisbane in particular but their opponents, should they get their tactics right and follow them through, will more than fancy their chances of coming out on top.

With the modern-day approach to the longest format turning the draw into a collector’s item, two of the three Tests being staged on the quickest of the Australian surfaces – and the third an unpredictable lottery given the relevant factors – it is difficult to see how there will be anything but three results.

The Englishman in me will always revert to the caveat of poor weather possibly having an impact but there’s no need for pessimism so the prediction is 2-1 to the hosts – and here’s why.

In simple terms, Australia’s seam bowling is their trump card and the reason why they are priced at much shorter odds than the Blackcaps for both the first Test and the series.

Twelve months ago, with Michael Clarke, Chris Rogers and, dare one say it, Shane Watson in the top six, New Zealand would’ve been hard pushed to get any change out of the hosts. However, with the top order now taking on the appearance of a refitted shop there are chinks in the armour which can be exploited.

Joe Burns and Usman Khawaja, while good players, are very wet behind the ears, neither Mitchell Marsh or Peter Nevill are Test number sixes and Adam Voges is, late bloomer or not, entering the finishing straight.

Rebuilding happens to every side, that’s just the way it is, but even the most positive may have slight reservations about the Australians’ batting come Thursday morning, especially if the conditions favour swing which Trent Boult and Tim Southee are more than capable of exploiting.

But the defining match up will be between the two Mitchells, Johnson and Starc, and the Kiwi middle order of Kane Williamson, Ross Taylor and Brendon McCullum.

If the batting trio, all fine players in their contrasting styles, are allowed to dictate terms then the tourists will have an excellent chance to tip over the apple cart and the same goes for Johnson and Starc.

New Zealand’s success in the Test arena in recent times has been built around an ability to score heavily and do it in double quick time, a method that can only create opportunities to win if carried out successfully.

The Steve Waugh era Australians operated in a similar manner for the simple reason that they had the players capable of such a style and the Kiwis have been doing a fine job of emulation.

Should, however, numbers three to five struggle to get going then a bowling attack who have benefited from being able to search for wickets with little concern for how many they’re conceding will have to change tack.

And if they employ a four-man line-up, as they did in England not too long ago, a great deal of emphasis will fall on the shoulders of spinner Mark Craig.

If Australia can make full use of the bounce on offer in Brisbane and Perth then they can get on top of the game. Aggressive intent with the bat can work in such conditions if the bowling is awry but if the line is good it can go in the favour of the quicker bowlers and the difference in speeds between the opposing opening pairs is marked.

What is certain is this is a good test of where McCullum’s side are currently at. Few sides win in Australia and even though the side they will come up against are in a transitional phase, a defeat to their neighbours – on top of one to the oldest foe – would be hard to stomach.

The Crowd Says:

2015-11-04T23:25:54+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Foxxy. You've been in the chicken coup again. You're going to get egg on your face. Nevill is a gun. How can you declare a converted batsman as "vastly superior" when you haven't seen Nevill perform? Nevill is a top gloveman. His FC batting is already "vastly superior". Nevertheless, a keeper will never decide a series.

2015-11-04T17:35:48+00:00

Broken-hearted Toy

Guest


Lyon has taken some superb catches at leg-slip and gully, he's fine close in.

2015-11-04T16:45:02+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


Is that why they haven't lost a test series in two years which is more than can be said for Australia And by the way, for the record, play all over the world now in various formats on every conceivable wicket imaginable so I don't think home grounds are big hoop-lah advantage they once used to be In fact, it is fast becoming a bit of a myth - okay maybe not entirely but players adjust better and faster now than they used to And as for vastly superior team - yea right - every Australian cricket journo has admitted that NZ has the better and vastly more experienced batting line up - Watling is a vastly superior - to coin your words - wicket keeper batsmen than his Australian counterpart just for starters

2015-11-04T15:46:24+00:00

MJ

Guest


How the Kiwi bats go will decide the series. If Williamson, Taylor and McCullum can get 1000 between them for the series then they SHOULD win. A problem for NZ is scoring in Australia. The last time they managed a 400 run innings was the first innings of the 1st test in 1993/94. They'll need a 400+ innings somewhere in at least 2 of the test matches to get up. In the tests since, here are NZ's scores..... 2010/2011: 295, 150 (Gabba), 150, 226 (Bellerive, WON Match) 2008/2009: 156, 177 (Gabba), 270, 203 (Adel Oval) 2005/2006: 353, 76 (Gabba), 251. 250 (Adel Oval) 2001/2002: 8d/271, 6/274 (Gabba), 7/243 (Bellerive), 351, 7d/381 (WACA) [Rain affected 1st test, ruined 2nd test] 1997/98: 349, 132 (Gabba), 217, 174 (WACA), 251, 9/223 (Bellerive) 1993/94: 419, 4/166 (WACA), 161, 161 (Bellerive), 233, 278 (Gabba)

2015-11-04T12:47:37+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


Well at least we have the no1 ranking in one of them at test level !!!!!!!!

2015-11-04T12:43:21+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


Not sure it is illogical as the argument negates the claim that the Australian attack in a "different league" not who is the better attack and I think pretty well

2015-11-04T12:42:11+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


Lyon I agree but Starc is wayward with the red ball and bowls a lot of rubbish so I would not say he is light years ahead of Bracewell and especially not on Australian bouncy ( not that crap of wicket in Blacktown) wickets where he can be a handful - even more so than on Kiwi wickets but on flat track he can not do much but then neither was the Australian attack against Pakistan especially Johnston who was poor on that tour Lets see how many bad balls Starc bowls down leg and then tell us he is special with the Red Ball

2015-11-04T12:20:05+00:00

Nudge

Guest


Absolutely Burgygreen. Lyons not far off an outstanding fielder. Brilliant off his own bowling as well. Can only ever remember him missing one catch

2015-11-04T12:03:45+00:00

Tom from Perth

Roar Rookie


Cheers Sideline

2015-11-04T12:02:28+00:00

bryan

Guest


Not that I believe it, but I seem to remember thinking the same vs England....

2015-11-04T12:01:31+00:00

Tom from Perth

Roar Rookie


Cheers ;)

2015-11-04T11:55:41+00:00

bryan

Guest


Sorry, I was think more Lyon post Taylor. You are correct. Clarke could still move at that point, and wasn't there.

2015-11-04T11:50:39+00:00

bryan

Guest


I didn't say he was the best keeper, I said he was a great keeper. Is Ricky Ponting not a great batsman because he possibly wasn't the best of his generation?

2015-11-04T11:03:15+00:00

spruce moose

Guest


Boucher is regarded as the finest of his generation.

2015-11-04T11:02:33+00:00

spruce moose

Guest


Absolutely.

2015-11-04T11:02:07+00:00

spruce moose

Guest


Against people like Ponting, Martyn, Symonds and a younger Clarke? No mate, he wasn't.

2015-11-04T10:53:59+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Not clear to fans of world cricket. Still, it's clear he has one fan now.

2015-11-04T10:47:38+00:00

Sideline Comm.

Guest


A marvellous reply, that.

2015-11-04T10:05:32+00:00

Chinmusick

Roar Rookie


Haha that was a Hobart green top. Might as well have been in Dunedin. Lets focus on the GABBA - I dare say Kane Williamson hasn't played there much. Could vve quite a baptism...

2015-11-04T09:50:48+00:00

Chinmusick

Roar Rookie


This is exactly why (As risky as it is) BMac might consider sending us in. Only because our bowling is mostly proven but the entire team can be affected by a bad performance from one group so i'd be attacking our weakness. Bowl first and hopefully destroy our greenhorn top/middle order. Of course Warner and Smith could put on 700 over a day and a half but the flipside is that you're walking out on to the GABBA to open the batting on the first morning of test cricket of the Australian summer against the most feared home ground bowling attack in the world... Not really a hard decision for me.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar