Socceroos dominate after uninspiring opening

By Janek Speight / Expert

At the end of 90 minutes in Canberra Stadium the Socceroos could have perhaps been 5-0 up against Kyrgyzstan. Ange Postecoglou suggested it should have been 10-0.

Instead a 3-0 scoreline was enough proof of Australia’s dominance, which will give the squad a much needed boost after the 2-0 slip against Jordan last month.

There were impressive signs, with the Socceroos growing into the game and eventually overpowering a Kyrgyzstan side that struggled to match its performance from the previous encounter in Bishkek.

Goals to Mile Jedinak and Tim Cahill either side of half-time effectively sealed the game, while an unfortunate Ildar Amirov own goal completed the scoreline in the 69th minute.

From there Cahill should have completed his hat-trick, though some uncharacteristically wasteful finishing prevented a blowout win.

Yet despite the Socceroos exerting their dominance over the 90 minutes, the first 20 showed few promising signs of a new-look formation clicking into gear.

Postecoglou, facing perhaps one his hardest selection decisions as Socceroos boss, plumbed for a 4-4-2 or 4-2-2-2, whichever way you wish to interpret it. It was a new system for Australia, with Tomi Juric paired up front with Cahill and the team effectively playing without natural wingers.

The return of captain Jedinak had posed Postecoglou a dilemma, with none of Mark Milligan, Aaron Mooy, Massimo Luongo or Tommy Rogic deserving a spot in bench, having performed well in their leader’s absence.

Rogic’s heavy schedule with Celtic in the Scottish Premier League provided Postecoglou with one easy omission, yet the second casualty was harder to discern.

Would Postecoglou drop one of the remaining performing stars to the bench, or would he take the brave option and keep Jedinak out of the team, proving that no man’s position is safe in this squad?

He chose neither option, instead attempting to fit Milligan, Mooy, Jedinak and Luongo into the same starting XI.

Luongo, once again, was forced out of his most dominant position, and his performance once again suffered. For the Asian Cup’s player of the tournament, you would expect all would be done to provide a platform for Luongo to continue shining, yet that has not been the case in recent months.

Mooy and Luongo played ahead of twin holding midfielders Jedinak and Milligan, a central partnership that has always looked defensively sound but has never inspired going forward.

As mentioned, former Western Sydney Wanderers and current Roda JC striker Juric partnered Cahill up front for the first time. It was also the first time Postecoglou had picked two strikers as Socceroos coach.

The entire team looked devoid of pace, and the positioning of Luongo and Mooy gave the team a lack of width, which can be crucial to unlocking Cahill’s aerial game. Debutant James Meredith, who was excellent, and Ryan McGowan were instead expected to push forward from fullback instead.

The Socceroos’ start to the game did not thrill. Juric and Cahill struggled to find a way to gel in the front third of the pitch, and Luongo again looked uncomfortable out of position. The whole team struggled to find their first touch and rhythm in a scrappy opening.

That said, Cahill did hit the bar and Kyrgyz goalkeeper Pavel Matiash was forced into three good saves, but it was not a display to put fear into the solidity of the Jordan defence, for example.

Postecoglou may or may not have agreed there was a need for change – especially if the scoreline had stayed goalless at half-time – but was saved the need to make the decision when Juric went down with injury. On came Nathan Burns, and from the 30th minute onwards the side looked a whole lot more balanced.

Both Mooy and Luongo started to grow on the ball, the latter dropping down further alongside Milligan and Jedinak. Burns added the pace and directness that had been lacking up until that moment, and it was he who won the fortuitous penalty which allowed the Socceroos to take a 1-0 lead into the break.

The second half performance was further proof of a more balanced setup, with the Socceroos pushing on immediately from kick-off. Mooy slipped Cahill through with a beautiful ball in the 50th minute, Australia’s top goalscorer firstly making the inch-perfect run and then matching it with an emphatic finish.

Mooy grabbed another assist about 20 minutes later from a corner kick, Amerov heading into his own net, and from there it was just about how many the Socceroos would put past a dishevelled Kyrgyzstan team.

Rogic, despite failing to find the net or provide an assist, continued to build on his ever-growing reputation, toying with the Kyrgyz midfield and displaying uncanny vision, ball control and physicality. He really is the future of this football nation.

The near 20,000 strong crowd were entertained, in the end. Luckily their predilection for the cringeworthy “Aussie, Aussie, Aussie” chant did not take away from the overall on-field performance.

It was a dominant display, no doubts there. But it was not incredibly inspiring, especially considering the Socceroos will be facing much stronger opposition in the next phase of qualifying, which is still not a foregone conclusion.

With Kyrgyzstan forced into five changes from the last outing, including their best performers – Daniel Tagoe, Anton Zemlianukhin and Mirlan Murzaev – from that match, it was a much less potent foe. Without the threat of a blistering counter-attack, which caught Australia out too often last time, and against Jordan, the back four were never truly tested.

Yet you can only play what is in front of you, as they say, and the Socceroos completed the job at least convincingly.

If anything the game showed us that the Juric-Cahill partnership – granted only 30 minutes worth – still needs a lot more work on the training pitch before it can be transferred into stadium games.

It also proved how important Mooy continues to be for this team, as he carried the midfield in the creative stakes at times. You do have to feel for Luongo, however, as he has been sacrificed for the greater good. It would almost be better to drop him and play a natural winger if omitting Jedinak and Milligan are somehow impossibilities.

Meredith’s stellar performance also gives Postecoglou the first viable alternative to Jason Davidson the Socceroos boss has arguably ever had. It will be a fascinating battle between the two and will push them to higher levels.

And lastly, it was impressive to see just how fit Cahill still is. The Shanghai Shenhua marksman put in a strong shift in a more roving role then he is accustomed to with the Socceroos, and often found himself on the right wing.

Having just witnessed Kazuyoshi Miura celebrate his 48th birthday with a new professional contract, Cahill’s quest to make the 2018 World Cup becomes more and more plausible with each game he plays. You cannot make a case to drop him, not when he is still banging in goals. Just keep the book promotions off the field please, Timmy.

Three goals, three points, little worries and Bangladesh coming up – whom Tajikistan defeated 5-0 – will ensure Postecoglou and his team will be feeling rightly confident. Yet the big game is Jordan next March, and more will be needed to get past them.

The Crowd Says:

2015-11-13T22:35:11+00:00

Fadida

Guest


If you read the second paragraph jb I said "Jordan got it spot on " tactically,, meaning as you say it was their game plan that limited our poterncy. I think we agree

2015-11-13T13:26:07+00:00

jbinnie

Guest


Fadida- If I may add a word or two to your opening comment I will agree with your point "We just weren't allowed to create against Jordan" You could have added "not by our lack of effort but by their application of their game plan".That would have been true. Last night's opponents were neither equipped personally or tactically to be compared with that Jordan team, in fact apart from the goalkeeper their players were in a "different league" to ours. Cheers jb.

2015-11-13T13:22:10+00:00

Midfielder

Guest


agree .... in the wings Musty for Jedi ...

2015-11-13T13:08:10+00:00

jbinnie

Guest


Fuss - You may be right I was probably in Russia when that game was played but I did see the Jordan game and last nights match and as I have said to you before I base my comments on what I see not on what happened say 10 or so weeks ago. Now later in your comment you appear to try and think for me for in the penalty that was awarded to Jordan there was what is termed a real goal scoring chance nullified by a foul. Last night's penalty was awarded,rightly so, but the tackle on Burns actually took place when he,Burns, was actually heading away from the goal, so no certain score was interrupted Agree?? In addition I don't class a penalty as necessarily what one would call a goal scored from open play.So to clarify your thinking I think a goal is a goal no matter what but is not necessarily the outcome from good outfield play. Lastly, my comment re. what Ange said was based on a report in this site by someone who claimed he had said that . If he didn't then so be it but IMO it could have been 6 or 7 nothing had our lads converted even half the chances they created. You see Fuss,that's where you and I differ,I see the continued creation of chances and the missing of the same as a flaw in a team's game for if you don't score goals you don't win games no matter how prettily you may pass the ball around. Cheers jb Ps You are aware of the fact that 3 of the players who played over there did not play last night and I am led to believe they were 3 strikers". jb

AUTHOR

2015-11-13T08:32:56+00:00

Janek Speight

Expert


Hmm, this is where I split away from general opinion on Milligan. Great 6, okay 8. He is not in the mould of box-to-box players like Cazorla or Rakitic, or Marchisio or Gundogan. Simply because he doesn't have the forward penetration needed for a great 8. You rarely see Milligan play delicate through balls like Mooy and Luongo. Not a criticism of Milligan, he is just not that type of player.

2015-11-13T06:32:17+00:00

Wainscoting

Guest


I agree with striker too. Some people really do have an agenda against Jedinak in wilful ignorance of the quality of his performances. Often they are MV fans doting over Milligan, who-I'm sorry-isn't nearly as special as they think. I thought once Jedinak went off they actually started coming into the game a little bit offensively with their bald attacking midfielder? (who was their only decent outfield player) immediately taking advantage of Milligans poor positioning to get some time on the ball. Milligan did made lots of reliable square passes and quite a good tackle to account for another positional error, but I think I'll take a crucial interception/straight ball leading to a goal over that any day. Can never lose a midfield with Jedinak playing. You can play around him but teams will never be able to play through him. Glad he's there to crush the opposition spirit and lift our own.

2015-11-13T06:13:27+00:00

Punter

Guest


Hey, that's an option, but what I like is we now have options, all 3 Mooy, Rogic & Luongo are all players that are fairly creative & has vision. I would love it, if in 2 years time you can say, I'd like to see Mooy & Rogic there as De Silva, Luongo, Amini, Antonis & Ikonimidis not doing enough.

2015-11-13T05:33:43+00:00

Timmy S

Guest


I think the pitch was a bit dodgy due to all the rain in the last week. Didn't help the teams training on there as well. If you can remember the Asian Cup we had the best surface in the comp.

2015-11-13T04:28:08+00:00

Fadida

Guest


Here's Roger again. Trolling. Ignore him

2015-11-13T04:27:54+00:00

SVB

Guest


I think that's what Roger wants. But he should realise that the reason the FIFA World Cup and the Olympic Games are the two biggest sporting events in the world is because they are a party with lots of different nations invited from all over the world. Even the Superbowl which spreads its love around to many different cities (and has a global audience) has become a large event. You take this inclusiveness out of these events and they will shrink in relevance. Secondly his argument that the second tier Euro and South American nations deserve spots ahead of Asian nations is flawed, when history shows us in previous World Cups that Asian nations have been able to compete with and even beat these second tier Euro and South American nations. Therefore there is not a massive gulf in class that he is making it out to be. The last World Cup saw a rebuilding phase for the major Asian nations, therefore performances weren't as good as the previous World Cups.

2015-11-13T04:24:55+00:00

Fadida

Guest


I just thought Jordan got their tactics spot on. Having said that had we scored first we'd have won easily because they won't be able to force the pace

2015-11-13T04:20:59+00:00

Kaks

Roar Guru


Agree Fadida. Look at most of the top european teams and how they set their midfield up. Barcelona have two holding mid's in Busquets and either Iniesta or Rakitic. Busquets is defensive while the other is box to box Arsenal have two holding mids. Coquelin is defensive and Cazorla is box to box. Same can be said about Juventus, Chelsea, United etc. A ball playing mid next to the hard tackling ball winner is the way to go.

2015-11-13T04:18:03+00:00

Kaks

Roar Guru


Dont think we will make the same mistake against Jordan. A bit of complacency seemed to have creeped in and that result may have been what was needed.

2015-11-13T04:11:41+00:00

striker

Guest


SVB great response from these haters of our code, why don't they just come out and say they fear our code what else keeps them on our TAB.

2015-11-13T04:10:56+00:00

Sydneysider

Guest


"Perhaps it is you who should look at the statistics – how many Asian teams got out of the Group stage at the last WC?" Roger, not sure if you are a soccer/football fan but imagine if we applied your thinking to other sports world cups eg. rugby union, rugby league, cricket, netball etc....etc... you'd have world cups with only 8 teams, 3 teams, 6 teams & 2 teams respectively. a world cup is a celebration of the sport/game, not only for the best teams. Besides, at least Australia has to qualify for the tournament rather than automatically given a spot like other world cups, and that's not demeaning to the other sports. If Australia qualifies for the FIFA world cup, they have earned their spot by winning games.

2015-11-13T04:08:14+00:00

Bondy

Guest


I prefer Milligan over Jedi if push came to shove ..

2015-11-13T03:54:46+00:00

Roger Cronin

Guest


What has that got to do with anything? Last time I checked Britain was not a confederation.

2015-11-13T03:53:16+00:00

nickoldschool

Guest


Yes same here, pleased with what I saw. This was a crucial match and winning any crucial game 3-0 is a great performance. Italy, France, Argentina and many supposedly 'top teams' have been winning games 1-0 against (back then) lesser opposition like Albania, Island, Israel, Peru etc for decades to qualify to WC or euros/ Copa America. In some cases they couldn't even win and stayed at home. Look at the Netherlands right now. I think its ok to demand a lot from your NT but 3-0 with a few unmissable chances missed is imo more than ok. Especially as it was a must win match.

2015-11-13T03:48:25+00:00

SVB

Guest


Why don't you look at the last four World Cups and see results and positions on the table. Compare this with European teams in the same groups. A far better sample to judge on the performance of Asian teams.

2015-11-13T03:47:35+00:00

Punter

Guest


How many British countries got out of the group stage?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar