Shaun Marsh's selection confirms it's Groundhog Day

By Glenn Mitchell / Expert

He’s back and the question being asked by many people is ‘why’?

Shaun Marsh has been thrown yet another lifeline by the national selection panel with the enigmatic left-hander recalled to replace the hamstrung Usman Khawaja.

Once again the selectors are hoping that Marsh will defy the set of numbers that are testament to his 15-year first-class career.

Once again the chorus of discontent over his selection in social media circles and on cricketing blogs is to the fore.

In fact, it is playing out as it so often has with Marsh playing the part of Bill Murray in Groundhog Day.

In making the case for Marsh’s selection, coach and selector Darren Lehmann said: “I still remember that great hundred he got against South Africa at Centurion.”

That was indeed a good knock. It was also 21 months ago.

Marsh played a further 14 innings after Centurion scoring 378 runs at 29.1, losing his spot on several occasions in that time.

Since his Test debut against Sri Lanka at Pallekele in September 2011 – where he made a classy 141 – he has 15 appearances for 861 runs at 33.1. In his 27 innings he has made two centuries, four fifties, seven ducks and another five scores under 12.

Those numbers are a microcosm of his entire first-class career.

In 15 years he has played 113 matches, making 6777 at 38.5 – a modest average for a specialist batsman, especially one of 32 years of age.

His West Australian state captain and once again Test teammate Adam Voges is 36 and boasts a first-class career average of 45.7 through 173 matches.

Voges’ nine Tests have produced two centuries, three fifties, 612 runs and an average of 61.2.

Both have played one-day cricket for Australia – Voges 31 times, scoring 870 runs at 45.8 with a strike rate of 87, and Marsh 46 matches in which he scored 1712 runs at 38.8 with a strike rate of 77.

Each has also represented Australia at Twenty20 level – Voges seven times for 139 runs at 46.3 and a strike rate of 122, and Marsh has played 13 matches, scored 223 runs at 18.6 on a strike rate of 105.

Whether it be in first-class ranks or in the three forms of international cricket Voges has been a superior player to Marsh in all four. Yet it is Marsh whom we keep hearing from the selectors who possesses special talents.

Voges, on the other hand, receives no such plaudits.

Marsh can be special, on his day, but his day materialises very infrequently. People talk of his solid technique, copybook cover driving and strengths square of the wicket.

He is spoken of as a free-flowing batsman yet his strike rate at Test level is a pedestrian 46. As mentioned he has scored 16 first-class centuries since his debut in 2001-02.

Some of the more recent ones have come against popgun, second-string attacks in overseas tour matches where key bowlers were rested – 114 against Kent and 101 versus Derbyshire on this year’s Ashes tour and 118 against a West Indies Cricket Board President’s XI at Antigua in May.

In 86 Sheffield Shield matches Marsh has scored 11 centuries which equates to around one per full season.

Some people still assign the word ‘potential’ to discussions about Marsh. At 32, potential is no longer on the agenda.

He currently sits 13th on the list of Shield run-scorers this season and his individual innings have again underlined his perennial inconsistency – 15, 1, 2, 92, 64, 33 for 207 runs at 34.5.

There was a feeling that 22-year-old Cameron Bancroft, a State teammate of Marsh, was in the frame to replace Khawaja. He was chosen for the cancelled Bangladesh tour and scored a century in the recent Western Australia versus South Australia day-night Shield match at the Adelaide Oval.

However, with Steve Smith and Adam Voges likely to bat at three and four as they did in their century-making second innings at Perth, Bancroft slipped out of contention being a specialist opener.

That opened the door for Marsh who received the nod ahead of another of his domestic teammates, Michael Klinger, who has scored 365 runs at 91.2 in Shield ranks this season – including an innings of 202*.

Last season he was second only to Voges for the most runs in the Shield competition with 1046 at 58.1 with four centuries and a top score of 190.

Yet he was overlooked for Marsh.

Yes, Klinger is 35 but whoever was chosen to stand in for Khawaja was going to make way once he was fit again.

The selectors have gone for Marsh.

He has to deliver this time and to do so he needs to show he has rectified the deficiency outside off-stump that he displayed in both innings at Trent Bridge a few months back where he made naught and two.

As for the other changes for Adelaide, Australia may defy a near decade-long selection strategy by playing two spinners in a home Test match. It last happened when Stuart MacGill and Shane Warne were chosen in tandem for the SCG Test against South Africa in January 2006.

Lehmann says Steve O’Keefe is a reasonable chance of playing his first home Test in partnership with incumbent spinner, offie Nathan Lyon.

The selection of O’Keefe in the 13-strong squad for the history-making Adelaide Test is very much a case of horses for courses. He has played three pink-ball Sheffield Shield matches in the past three seasons for New South Wales at Adelaide Oval where he has captured 18 wickets at 18.2.

O’Keefe was named as the second spinner for the recently postponed Bangladesh two-Test tour having made his one and only Test appearance to date against Pakistan at Dubai last October.

His first-class record is a solid 181 wickets at 25.0. He is also a handy batsman with eight first-class half-centuries and an average of 28.9.

With Mitchell Johnson having ridden into the international sunset there was a requirement to select another quick.

With Peter Siddle certain to be elevated to the XI the reserve quick is James Pattinson, who is on the road back from recurrent injuries.

Player of the Series in his first run at Test cricket, against the Black Caps in 2011-12, he has shown he has the goods at the highest level with his 51 wickets at 27.1 from just seven matches.

The word is he is still producing some sharp spells for Victoria this season.

With talk that Josh Hazlewood may be rested for Adelaide, Pattinson may be back beneath the baggy green for the first time since March last year.

Should that be the case it is hoped that a five-day match is not a bridge too far at this stage of his comeback.

The Crowd Says:

2015-11-21T08:13:19+00:00

Jeremy

Guest


haha

2015-11-20T07:22:27+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


But Spruce, I was just getting ready to nit pick. You spoil all the fun.

2015-11-20T06:40:52+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


If you read my posts, you get answers to those questions. If you don't like reading them, scroll past them. But if you ask me those questions, how will you get my response? You have a real dilemma here Mr Rabbit.

2015-11-20T06:35:28+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Gee, that was useful. As deep as Ryan's, "Hi Don."

2015-11-20T06:32:03+00:00

Rabbits

Guest


Don, you are an arrogant poster. Ryan's comments and responses to your babbling make sense. Your observations are irritating. Shaun Marsh doesn't deserve to be in the Australian test team. Period. He had his run and couldn't cement a spot. Why is he being given so many chances? He's got more lives then a 100 felines. Is Australian cricket so devoid of talent that Shaun Marsh has to be the man they turn to? Please. Give me (and everybody else on this thread) a break.

2015-11-20T01:16:21+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Is starting as a 19yo better or worse than starting as an 18 yo. The point is good though...if it's the point I think you are making.

2015-11-20T01:09:56+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


Jog along, Don. Better still - I will. I hope Shaun Marsh gets a hundred, because he's great to watch when scoring runs.

2015-11-20T01:04:40+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Care to finish that quote and deny that point? Those with an open mind will see that point. Those of you whose agendas just argue without looking do not have anything to say.

2015-11-20T00:46:41+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


I never said it wasn't impressive. However, sadly, it was an anomaly in Shaun Marsh's career when you look at it objectively and in totality. Two things you simply refuse to do.

2015-11-20T00:42:49+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


Tell me Don, does the 'Freo' in your name relate to being from Fremantle? It may provide an answer as to why you as so one-eyed and biased. As for asking if I'm dumb, blind or stupid, I'd be lying if I said I didn't find that highly ironic. Your rationale and logic on this topic has been nothing short of ridiculous. You've done nothing but embarrass yourself, and you simply can't be taken seriously on this matter. I've never come across a more selective use of stats in my life. Ever. "If Marsh score a ton next game . . ." - Ah yes, the refuge of every Shaun Marsh fan . . .

2015-11-20T00:12:14+00:00

Drew

Guest


Selectors no idea... Even though fellow Western Australia batsman Michael Klinger has made more runs in the current Shield season, over the past 12 months and in the previous two years and also boasts a higher first-class career average (39.71) than Marsh (38.50), the son of former Australia opener Geoff Marsh has received the selectors’ nod. "Shaun was unlucky to miss out on the squad for the first two Tests (against NZ) and since then has scored consistently in Sheffield Shield, so we believe he deserves this opportunity," Rod Marsh said, with the left-hander having produced scores of 15, 1, 2, 92, 64 and 33 over his past six Shield innings. Klinger, 35, has posted scores of 202no, 50no, 4, 16, 70 and 23 over the same period. Cannot justify the Marsh selection!!

2015-11-20T00:08:55+00:00

Drew

Guest


The position was clearly stated as a fill in role for when Usman comes back. Why not reward the guy most deserving - that being Klinger? For Lehman to say that Marsh's test experience got him over the line is an appalling argument. Its like going to an interview just out of school and being told you are not experienced enough and they reward someone who has had the experience but hasn't performed the job adequately. Klingers numbers have been excellent. He is a leader who has proven himself over a long period of time and made plenty of runs against the pink ball recently. The argument that he has in inferior average is unfair - remember he started as a 19 year old. His average over the last 1-5 years would place him at the top of the list. He creamed them in England earlier this year (should have been in the farcical Ashes team) I feel for Klinger - it would appear that his passport has been stamped - never to play for Australia. Quite unjust!

2015-11-20T00:04:06+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Well...no. You are including last season in an average. Care to explain how Marsh's season was not impressive last season?

2015-11-20T00:00:40+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


It is the most obvious indicator of form. This season is too short. Last season was the on they played previous to this season. That's how calenders work. Selectors don't care about anything prior to that. That is no longer relevant form. Rather than say "hilarious" and have a cheap laugh with fools on this site, why not explain what is useful about stats from 3 or 4 years ago in indicating form? Or, is form not a useful criterion in your thinking?

2015-11-19T23:55:08+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


I think "patgetic" sounds too much like a compliment but that strange Roar overload encrypting thing wouldn't let me change it to pathetic.

2015-11-19T23:46:07+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Are you blind deaf or stupid? I have said nothing about w"want (ing) to select him on last week alone. Aelect him on a sustained recent sample. Last season and this season. You want to go four seasons back or only the three weeks of this season. Surely you know this season is not old enough yet to draw a bead. Good grief man. If Marsh score a ton next game, his average goes above 50. Where are your arguments then? Two weeks ago, Klinger and Dean had averages of 300. One week later Dean's is halved and Klinger's is reduced by more than 200%. Anyone using a 4 or 5 innings average is doing so only for the sake of argument. You used not outs as an explanation for Marsh's average last season ( incorrectly). Yet you exclude that reference when referring to Klinger ir Handscomb this year. You have been patgetic in this line of argument.

2015-11-19T22:49:41+00:00

Offsideman

Roar Rookie


Sorry I meant it's a joint account both marsh brothers share to defend their honour

2015-11-19T22:48:47+00:00

Offsideman

Roar Rookie


Paul D don't worry mate I'm starting to get the feeling that don freo is in fact Mitch marsh himself

2015-11-19T22:36:20+00:00

Offsideman

Roar Rookie


Absolute rot don Mitch marsh gets the biggest wrap from everybody and I can't understand why his domestic average is under 32 he is not touching forty in any of his averages . And you laud his 50* which needs recognition but his six matches before that he hasn't a score over 45 although he was taking handy wickets I believe if we are still going to run with this need for an all rounder in our team as soon as he is fit James Faulkner needs to be in the team genuine match winner although his averages are about the same with marsh in first class (marshs bowling fair bit better). Faulkners one day averages leave marsh in the dust. Bye bye marsh brothers bring on some real cricketers!

2015-11-19T22:01:15+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


Newsflash Don: when I state his career average, I AM acknowledging last season.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar