A Broken Record: What Test cricket can learn from the vinyl revival

By Alaister Moughan / Roar Rookie

It’s a broken record. The latest spin comes from Michael Holding asserting that “there’s too much lip service about the sanctity of Test cricket”.

There’s even a committed group of loyal fans bringing out a movie to support the cause. But what’s really going to save Test cricket?

Well, perhaps the record isn’t broken. Perhaps it’s the solution.

As a student of both the music industry and Test cricket, I’ve noticed that the rhetoric around the long-form game is similar to debates in the music business. The argument is often made in similar terms regarding quality and duration in cricket, or in music, the craft and the album.

What Twenty20 is to Test cricket, digital music services such as Spotify and Radio are to the physical albums. These services offer the same entertainment much quicker and with greater convenience.

For music consumers digital streaming services offer a universal library of music, typically listened to as single songs, rather than ‘long play’ album format.

Twenty20 also caters to greater expectations and lower attention spans. It is cricket as highlights, amazing catches, massive sixes (excuse me, DFL maximums) and flashing bails. Critically it lacks the subtlety, variety and the unique spirit of Test cricket. Tension doesn’t build, it rockets.

Test cricket and vinyl offer something different. They allow you to sit back and relax, watch or listen as the suspense unravels. As David Mitchell puts it:

“Sport is, in essence, the earliest and best form of reality TV (obviously it predates TV – before that, it was just “reality stuff you watch”). It’s compelling because it’s really happening and no one knows what the outcome will be, and whether it will be exciting and satisfying, a dull anti-climax, or maddeningly unjust.”

Vinyl is the same. It is intended to be consumed as a whole album, an entire experience, rather than the ‘highlights’ of the single song driven digital world. It’s also an investment, you pay for a physical artifact. Digital music is typically cheaper if not free.

The investment in Test cricket is time, five days or 40 hours. Twenty20 games can be all but a foregone conclusion in the first five overs, yet a Test match unravels with twists and turns each day.

There’s also the quality argument, as Mitchell waxes lyrically:

“Test cricket is just better: the batsmen have to make fewer mistakes, the bowlers are allowed their proper role as match-winners or losers, rather than run-savers, and, because a match lasts five days, it’s more exciting.”

To some, vinyl just sounds better, a “beautiful warm sound” to quote Lou Reed.

Many thought the post-Napster, or even post-CD vinyl music market, just like Test cricket, was doomed. And for a while it seemed so. But then something happened. A mind-numbingly simple idea – Record Store Day.

Launched in 2008 by a collection of independent record store owners, Record Store Day is one of the key reasons behind the vinyl revival. The most recent figures seem astounding; the US market increasing by 52 per cent between 2014 and 2013, the Australian market rising by over a 100 per cent.

However, it’s not as rosy as it appears.

Vinyl sales have only risen by such huge amounts because these sales had dipped so low. Vinyl sales represent two per cent of total recorded music sales. Additionally, the interests of major labels looking to monetise this revival threatens the passionate indie community that drove the revival.

Do we really need a vinyl reissue of A-Ha, or even worse, this Jay-Z-Linkin Park disaster? Should the money of ‘super fans’ actually willing to part with their cash go to the most powerful and popular releases? More importantly, in the long term, is this sustainable?

I don’t think so.

Record Store day is also built around the community, the music nerds. Those who regularly rack through record stacks and read liner notes – the ‘music enthusiasts’ that inhabit the pages of High Fidelity.

Test cricket needs to cater to cricket’s equivalent – the ‘cricket tragics’. (For example the long-suffering New Zealand Test cricket fans like myself.)

The only way to maintain the passion of these avid fans is to provide variety, not exhausting the big hits with endless Ashes series or series between the big boys, Australia, India and England. The quality of Test cricket is highest when more nations are competitive – the most recent New Zealand and England series are paramount examples.

It might even need the flair of new releases – new nations to play the real game, or a new sleeve, such as the day-night Test.

Twenty20 may be the future of the mass consumption of cricket, but what the vinyl revival shows is that passionate enthusiasts will still crave depth and this passion can be handed down the generations – 26 per cent of vinyl buyers are aged between 26 and 35.

It’s time for those in power to respect this passion and craft and take the more difficult yet sustainable road forward for Test cricket, rather than being petted like a dying cash cow, which needs to be milked rather than nourished.

That would be music to my ears.

The Crowd Says:

2015-12-06T07:12:56+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Players will always play 4 or 5 day cricket. An audience of non-players or part time players will never determine the demise of the ultimate cricket. It might determine its commercial future...but that's all it will affect. They'll never stop playing it.

2015-12-06T07:05:45+00:00

Brendon

Guest


I remember one test against NZ at the 'Gabba in the 1980's only attracted something like 16000 people ... over the 5 days. I was at the first day of the 1991 Ashes test at the SCG and the crowd was 27,000. Not even a sell out. The following year I attended the first day of the Australia vs India test and there was only 13,000 people. The year after that I bough a 5 day ticket for the West Indies. This was when the West Indies were still number 1 and Australia was number 2. There was 28,000 for the first day of the 1993 West Indies test and about 26,000 for day 2 then numbers dropped away drastically. I looked it up and a total of 83,000 attended that test. Even though I had a 5 day ticket I didnt even bother attending the 5th day. No one did. The big test crowds of the late 1990's and early 2000's coming to watch the great Australian teams was more of an anomaly than the norm. So many people want to get tickets to the Lords Ashes test that the ECB hold a raffle. As for the vinyl revival a lot of that is because of the crappy audio quality of streaming services. People are sick of compressed audio quality of mp3's and streaming services and want to listen to the real thing. A well pressed vinyl record in good condition on a good quality turntable will produce excellent sound quality. I don't think the backlash against T20 is going to increase test crowds though. Couple of things to remember. While test crowds are down BBL crowds are up. 15 years ago people only attended tests and ODI's. Now we have international T20's and the Big Bash League to attend as well. Total cricket attendance is higher than ever. The 'Gabba and WACA tests are held before the holidays when people are still working. The MCG and SCG tests are held during the holidays when people are not working. Ultimately TV ratings are more important than crowd attendances. Once the new Perth stadium is built will it hold day/night tests? No even though crowds would be bigger. The reason? A day/night test will finish too late in NSW/VIC/QLD. With the time difference the WACA test goes into prime time and is usually the highest rated test of the season even when crowds are poor so theres no need to have a day/night test. Test cricket will ultimately live or die on TV ratings. Not crowd attendance.

2015-12-05T22:42:06+00:00

onside

Guest


T20 = a 78 record played at 33

2015-12-05T14:50:39+00:00

Sameer Murthy

Roar Rookie


I don't understand people that deny Test cricket is in trouble. Crowds are terrible in India, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, UAE and West Indies. New Zealand had to shift to grounds like Seddon Park and University Oval in Dunedin just to create some atmosphere. If u look at footage from the 80's and 90's, crowds in the West Indies, India and South Africa were extremely high. The Hobart test is expected to have a paltry crowd and people can't just blame the weak opposition, because surely seeing the national team is a ust in a small city. Yes u maybe right about the 89 Ashes but in a series where there is 6 tests, there are bound to be a few days which have less crowds. There is also plenty of footage in the 89 Ashes in which there are sellout crowds

2015-12-05T07:06:31+00:00

Mark

Guest


Great comparison, interesting read.

2015-12-05T00:11:10+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Test cricket is as resilient as my support for Aussie players. Everything's good.

2015-12-04T22:14:38+00:00

Steve

Guest


I just don't understand all the carry on regarding test cricket at the moment. Apparently tv viewership, radio ratings and Internet visits are the highest they've ever been. I've been following cricket since the early 80's. I cAbt remember anybody turning up anywhere in the world, save for periodic series in India where they had much larger crowds than the present. Look at some of the crowds in the 89 Ashes, go and watch highlights of Brian Lara's 277 in Sydney. -- Comment from The Roar's iPhone app.

2015-12-04T17:14:54+00:00

peeeko

Roar Guru


its still popular here, compare test crowds with 20 years ago

Read more at The Roar