The power is in the players, but who is offside?

By Myles Houlbrook-Walk / Roar Pro

In the footballing world it is remarkable how much the game has changed in recent years.

While many of us have enjoyed the lofty heights leagues across Europe have reached since the turn of the century, there is one stakeholder who has enjoyed it less- the manager.

With the likes of Jose Mourinho and Brendan Rodgers already being sacked this season and quite possibly Louis Van Gaal to follow, it’s apparent that the players wield an incredible power over the destiny of managers.

While Rodgers’ sacking was due largely to backroom issues, all too often it seems to be key players who are deciding the fate of managers. Case in point – Jose Mourinho.

Mourinho is arguably one of the greatest managers of his generation. Yet, when looking at the final days of his tenure at clubs such as Real Madrid and Chelsea, they are fraught with spats with big name players. At Madrid this included Cristiano Ronaldo, Sergio Ramos and Iker Casillas and at Chelsea Eden Hazard and Diego Costa.

This isn’t just a common theme for Mourinho though. Van Gaal, who seems to be waiting for the unavoidable axe to end what has been a forgettable stint, also seems to be suffering from dissent among the ranks.

Chelsea’s performance against Leicester (Mourinho’s last game in charge) and United’s performance against Stoke on Boxing Day are a testament to this. Both uninspiring, both typical of their recent performances and both came at times when the players were called upon to fight for their manager.

Despite this the players looked lethargic; there were even accusations that Hazard faked injury to stop playing. Conjecture perhaps, but what is plain is we all witnessed world-class players put in extraordinarily ordinary performances.

So why is it a problem? If the manager and players don’t get along perhaps it is best for the gaffer to step aside. A valid point, however, the buck must stop at some point. If managers are dealing with players whose egos could fill the Santiago Bernabeu and Stamford Bridge ten times over they can hardly be at fault.

Eden Hazard was in scintillating form last season, this year his effort is akin to that of someone at my local park.

It’s the classic issue of individuals who are highly skilled at something believing they can’t be taught anything new or even worse believe they’re above teaching. How many times have we seen great players make terrible managers?

The best managers of the 20th and 21st century were often average professional players, not the Peles or Maradonas.

Sir Alex Ferguson played only a handful of games for Scotland and Arsene Wenger failed to notch 100 professional games across a 12-year career. Even in schools we don’t allow students to run classrooms and when they do there isn’t much learning going on.

That is the story from Europe, what about what happens at home?

Last season we saw the Jets’ Phil Stubbins very clearly lose the dressing room with a player revolt which eventuated in a messy departure when the FFA assumed control of the club.

One season on and despite the promising start, Newcastle again is in a poor position are destined for another season without finals football. At the Mariners, Phil Moss also lost his job after not playing John Hutchinson in the F3 derby.

Moss was sacked and now ‘Hutch’ is the assistant coach. The Mariners yet again are in dire straits having failed to win since Round 1 this year.

Conversely there were rumours of discontent among many players at Wanderland last season, yet the board backed Popovic to conduct a full-scale cleanout. Wanderers are at back the top of the table and haven’t lost in their past nine – not too shabby Tony.

Considering this, one can’t help but think back to the days when managers were given freedom to dictate the terms on which a club played and they were scrutinised only by the people who appointed them.

If there were dressing room issues at Manchester United it was the player(s) who ended up making way. Thirteen Premier League titles later I think we can agree it paid off.

The era of managers staying with clubs for a decade is a dying tradition that shows no sign of revival.

It’s not as simple as saying the players should have no say in the team’s affairs, but rather understanding that there is a fine line that shouldn’t be crossed.

At the moment players are crossing the line with impunity, while boards of directors cry foul on managers. The reality is sometimes managers do need to pack it in when they’re not getting results, but it should not be up to the players to decide when that is.

The Crowd Says:

2016-01-01T00:21:00+00:00

jbinnie

Guest


Myles - you have chosen a very "difficult" theme with which to make your "Roar "debut. You have attempted to draw some kind of similarity into how "managers" retain or lose their positions and as the early comments are showing some of your "statements" are already being questioned. Let's go back to the origins of "great " managers.Most have started with "smaller' clubs and have progressed up the "managerial "ladder by successes at these "lesser" identities and in doing so over the last 20 or so years have also placed themselves in a potential "firing line", for with player remunerations rocketing skywards,then we have to assume these managers will be on similar, or even higher "pay levels.". If this is accepted as being near fact, then one cannot really sympathise with the lot of managers who are not getting the goods out of their charges,after all ,one has to assume they,the managers,have considerable input into the procurement of players when they are signed to the club. Take Van Gaal. In 18 months he has spent a king's ransom on players so he cannot say he was left with players from the Moyes/Ferguson eras as an excuse for United's recent performances. Moyes could have used that as an excuse but is it not strange that the players Moyes signed,Felliani and Mata,still appear to be being used regularly by Van Gall,who, in doing so appears to agree with Moyes' "assessment" of these player's talents.while at the same time overseeing the departure of many of Ferguson's last championship winning side. Hence the real men in charge,the money men, could be excused for thinking,this man, who is being paid extremely well and has had his every wish acted upon when buying players, is not getting results,so with a hard core of other "super coaches" around, ,Guardioli.Mourhino,Hiddink,Ancelloti, etc etc, some looking for "new pastures", the decision becomes quite easy,"Let's try someone else"!!!!!!!!. That is the position manager/coaches find themselves in today,they negotiate,or their agents negotiate,large contracts, and in doing so lift themselves into the "firing line" I mentioned. The job now rises or falls on results, for in the higher echelons of the game success brings greater financial reward and if the "new super coach" can't deliver for any reason whatsoever, he moves himself towards the "blank wall ",ready for execution. As I leave you,think of Nigel Pearson. After winning promotion from the lower league into the EPL last year and a season long battle against relegation, which in later weeks in the season,his team,playing some quite good football pulled themselves well out of the "zone",one could have said a remarkable achievement for team and manager in just 2 seasons. Result ---- Pearson was sacked by a board that found him "incompatible" with them,-the board,- not the players,????????and was replaced by one of the "super coaches" I mentioned, Ranieri , and, lo and behold Leicester are among the high fliers in the EPL this season,using mainly the players who performed so well under Pearson. Myles, that is only scratching the surface of the "goings on" in football between boards,managers,players,&fans, today,probably beter described as "chaos". Cheers jb. ps.Just remember if you are "sacked" and have a $2miillon a year contract you could go"bush" and ponder how to spend your "payout" while your agent frantically searches for another position your reputation almost guarantees at least an interview. Not a bad life is it?????jb

AUTHOR

2015-12-30T08:24:24+00:00

Myles Houlbrook-Walk

Roar Pro


Well I think many from terraces of Stamford Bridge would have preferred Mourinho to stay and some of the egos departed...

AUTHOR

2015-12-30T08:23:01+00:00

Myles Houlbrook-Walk

Roar Pro


Well I'm working on a piece about what every A-league club needs this January, hope that's close enough :P

AUTHOR

2015-12-30T08:22:08+00:00

Myles Houlbrook-Walk

Roar Pro


A fair comment about Moss, though it seemed to be that not playing Hutchinson was the last nail in the coffin and a critical error at the time.

2015-12-29T20:52:07+00:00

CG2430

Guest


Phil Moss was not sacked for not playing John Hutchinson in one match (much as it frustrated many of us fans) - he was sacked because we were playing dour football and not getting results.

2015-12-29T04:38:43+00:00

Christiana O'Regan

Guest


I agree but surely in the case of phil stubbins, it was the coaches fault really...

2015-12-29T03:05:46+00:00

Rodger King

Guest


Maybe the time is coming when managers like Tony P are the rule, and dressing rooms are cleared out rather than good managers are dismissed. Imagine that happening at Chelsea (as an example) and the new man building from scratch.

2015-12-29T02:08:07+00:00

Jono Law

Guest


Interesting piece, have to say I find myself agreeing with most of what you've said. Maybe there's something worth saying about how players act in the transfer window too.

2015-12-28T20:01:03+00:00

Swampy

Guest


In the end it is the lot of the manager to control the egos of the players. If that ability is lost then there is no future for the manager. This hasn't changed in 100 years. Chelsea though have far deeper issues than the Manager. Watching them this morning vs United all their problems were laid bare. They have no finisher. Hard to win if you can't score.

Read more at The Roar