You and whose army? The failure of Green Bay's one-man team

By Jay Croucher / Expert

Death, taxes and Aaron Rodgers breathing dragon flames on Sunday – those have been America’s three certainties for the better part of a decade.

Forget the stats and the accolades (although they help), Rodgers might be the most purely gifted, rounded quarterback we’ve ever seen. He is the perfect man behind centre.

His arm is a leather whip, slinging passes with unnatural power and precision. He’s fleet-footed and elusive, treating defensive linemen like aimless bulls running towards his green and yellow cape. He carves you up inside the pocket with poise and timing, and he kills you outside of it with athleticism and creativity.

The quarterback position is more important to American football than virtually any position is to any other sport. If you don’t have a quarterback, you don’t have a team, which anyone in Cleveland or Buffalo can tell you all too well.

Occasionally a Trent Dilfer, Brad Johnson or Rex Grossman will make the Super Bowl, but those players were all propped up by greatness around them. Unless you have transcendent talent everywhere else, you can’t win if you’re getting mediocrity from the quarterback position.

The more interesting question is, can you win with a transcendent quarterback and very little around him? The Green Bay Packers have spent their season trying to answer this question.

Outside of Rodgers, the Packers aren’t a terrible team. The defence ranges from very good to excellent, having entered Week 17 as the ninth-ranked unit in DVOA. Led by Julius Peppers, Green Bay have a strong defensive line that generates pressure. They’re third in the league in terms of stuffing the run at the line of scrimmage, although they struggle once running backs break to the second level and the open field. But the defence is fine.

The problem, for the first time since Rodgers became a starter in 2008, has been the offence.

Losing Jordy Nelson, one of the game’s handful of best wide receivers, in the preseason to a torn ACL crippled the Packers’ attack. In Nelson’s wake, Randall Cobb, Davante Adams and Richard Rodgers were all expected to step up and fill the void, but all three have disappointed. James Jones has been a nice pick-up, but he’s no Nelson.

The highly touted Eddie Lacy continues to underwhelm, finishing the season with just three touchdowns and only eclipsing 100 yards rushing in two games. Add in an injury-ravaged offensive line and the Packers, despite having the game’s pre-eminent signal caller, finished the season with the league’s 23rd ranked offence.

The per play numbers are less damning, as Green Bay entered Week 17 with the 11th ranked offence in DVOA. But those numbers are skewed by a now distant 6-0 start, and the Packers’ offensive ranking collapses to 21st in weighted DVOA.

Rodgers isn’t without culpability himself. He finished the season with career lows in completion percentage (60.7%), passer rating (92.7) and yards per attempt (6.88). For the year, his statistical profile looks remarkably like that of Ryan Fitzpatrick and Derek Carr, comparisons which aren’t becoming of the game’s best quarterback of the past decade.

His career passer rating is 104.4, but he hasn’t touched 100 in the past ten games. He’s looked unusually out of sorts this year, at times flummoxed by the awful defences of San Diego and Chicago.

But this season isn’t an indictment on Rodgers. His offensive line (23rd in DVOA for pass protection) can’t keep him upright, watching him get sacked nine times by Arizona a week ago. His receivers can’t create separation, allowing defences to sit back in man coverage. His alleged star running back can’t carry the weight of the offence, possibly because of the unhealthy amount of bodyweight he seems to be carrying himself.

We’ve known for a while that a great quarterback isn’t enough to make a great team. Drew Brees has spent many years in the NFL wilderness of 7-9 because of atrocious defences. But this Packers season has confirmed that a great quarterback isn’t even enough for a good offence.

There is some historical evidence that goes against this, such as the 2006 Patriots who went 12-4 and were one throw from the Super Bowl with Reche Caldwell as their number one receiver. But there is also historical evidence that Bill Belichick is a warlock, and everything that he does should be considered an outlier.

The Packers are still a feared team entering the playoffs. The spectre of Aaron Rodgers, Super Bowl MVP and quarterback God, will always loom large. But this year his spectre is just an empty shadow, with nothing to make it corporeal.

The reality is that the Packers have played three elite teams in the past ten weeks – Denver, Carolina and Arizona – and lost all three games by a combined score of 104-47. They’ve lost to the woeful Lions and Bears at home, and couldn’t scrape out a win at Lambeau against a Vikings team that had Teddy Bridgewater throw for under 100 yards and Adrian Peterson average just 3.5 yards per rushing attempt.

For all their flaws and the general lifelessness that has enveloped this team for the past three months, there is something deeply reassuring about the 2015 Packers. They’re positive reinforcement for the idea that football truly is a team sport that requires widespread contributors, not just one man’s genius.

After all, there is something magical about the game’s best quarterback in his prime being an underdog in the playoffs against a team with the league’s 20th ranked defence and Kirk Cousins at quarterback.

The Crowd Says:

2016-01-08T03:49:31+00:00

Chop

Roar Guru


The Packers have a great record of preparing players and succession planning. Recently I think they've relied to much on draft and develop rather than free agency. I hope the OL can hold their own against Washington because if they do my packers should win the game. Brett Hunley from UCLA (I think) was drafted last year and looked great in the pre-season, but he might not be keen to wait around another 3-4 years for Rogers to finish.

2016-01-06T05:36:28+00:00

no one in particular

Roar Guru


Poor OL coupled with poor coaching/play calling

2016-01-06T05:23:11+00:00

Kingcowboy

Guest


Jay I wouldn't say they are screwed. There was a time when Packers would have been worried about who was going to take over from their previous quarterback and Rodgers turned out ok.

2016-01-06T04:02:37+00:00

Will Sinclair

Roar Guru


Ha! Gold. Thanks for the response mate.

AUTHOR

2016-01-05T23:41:46+00:00

Jay Croucher

Expert


Cheers Will. I think Rodgers still has a while left. He's a bit more dependent on his athleticism than most great quarterbacks but he's still only 32. In a league where Brady is an MVP candidate at 38, Drew Brees is leading the league in passing at 37 and Eli Manning and Carson Palmer are coming off career years at 35 and 36, I think Rodgers has 4-5 elite years left in him. And then the Packers are screwed.

2016-01-05T22:46:57+00:00

Will Sinclair

Roar Guru


Enjoyed this - thanks. Any idea what the Packer's plan is for life post-Aaron Rodgers. He's not a spent force yet, but he is a lot closer to the end of his career than the beginning...

2016-01-05T22:40:21+00:00

Chop

Guest


I think the Packers offence is a victim of trying to draft and develop rather than recruit free agents. The offensive line is horrible and Adams/Jones are Cleveland-esque and teams are doubling up on Cobb. Montgomery is injured which means their playing guys like Janis and Abbredaris at WR. Richard Rogers at TE has been the only real contributor in the last 8 weeks. Lacy is being outperformed by Starks who aren't fooling anyone. It's all on Rogers and I can't see him beating Washington without a dramatic improvement and I DON'T LIKE THAT

Read more at The Roar