Reynolds is impeding Mbye’s development - and the Bulldogs’ premiership hopes

By Ryan O'Connell / Expert

Josh Reynolds has always been a polarising player. It comes with the territory of being a self-confessed ‘niggler’, and someone who exhibits no shame with their nickname of ‘Grub’.

When you get under your opponents’ skin with the regularity that Reynolds does, it ensures said opponents and their fans begin to hate you, and therefore struggle to objectively assess your actual skills, as emotion starts to influence their perceptions.

Canterbury fans love their five-eighth’s tenacity and intensity, and believe he’s an underrated ball-player who is a dangerous, if not erratic, part of the Bulldogs attack.

Other team’s fans think Reynolds is a dirty player with limited skill, whose impact on a game comes from underhanded tactics and little else.

As is so often the case, the truth lies somewhere in the middle of those diametrically opposed opinions.

Reynolds is what I like to call a ‘busy’ player. He’s active, enthusiastic, and always trying to make something happen. They’re great qualities to have, as passiveness is a trait rarely seen in elite rugby league players.

However, Reynolds’ strength is also his greatest weakness. It’s one thing to always have a desire to make things happen on the football field, but it’s another thing altogether to have the necessary skills to do so.

Andrew Johns, Darren Lockyer and Brad Fittler – to name just a few all-time greats – were always willing to have a large impact on the game. Crucially, they also had the skills and football IQ to match their willingness.

To be blunt, Reynolds seems completely oblivious to the fact he’s not Johnathan Thurston. He’s not in the upper echelon of NRL players when it comes to either passing or kicking, and lacks the self-awareness to understand when he should and shouldn’t get involved in the game.

In fairness, when he’s playing well, his desire to get involved is exactly what makes him a good player. Therefore, if you’re coaching or selecting him, you shouldn’t be requesting that he change his mentality or approach to the game.

However, you should be cognisant on what the optimal use of him is. You should be aware of how many decisions you want Reynolds making, and just how much is the right level of influence for him to have upon a game. His role needs to be clearly defined.

Reynolds is better utilised in short, sharp bursts with the ball in his hand. Otherwise he begins to have diminishing returns, and actually hurts his team.

In a related point, the Bulldogs have spluttered in attack so far this season.

It’s not all Josh Reynolds’ fault, of course.

The Dogs current number 9, Craig Garvey, appears to be a poor passer, which – in an understatement for the ages – is a slight issue for a hooker. Though he would seem to be a good defender, and not lacking in confidence, his service from dummy-half has been absolutely horrible.

He has consistently delivered the ball anywhere but his teammates’ waiting hands, hurting the Bulldogs’ attacking momentum, as the receiver has had to reach way out in front of him, or stop running and catch the ball behind them.

Either way, it’s provided the defence plenty of time to nullify the Dogs’ attacking raids.

The importance of a good hooker has been reinforced to the Bulldogs over the last two weeks, and Canterbury desperately miss Michael Lichaa, currently out injured, along with the man he replaced, Michael Ennis.

The Dogs have also been poor with their fifth tackle decision-making.

Sadly, that’s not exactly a fresh sentiment. It feels like I’ve been saying that for a number of years now.

The Dogs have been one of the worst teams in the NRL over the last two or three seasons when it comes fifth-tackle execution. Time and time again, the forward pack has got the team into good field position, only for the option taken at the end of the set to completely offset any advantage gained.

Tackled with the ball. Kicked dead. Kicked out. Kicked straight to a defender. Whichever bad option you want to nominate, the Dogs have regularly taken it.

At some point, coach Des Hasler has to take responsibility for his team’s consistently poor option-taking. When a player makes a mistake, it’s his fault. When the team consistently makes the same type of mistake, it’s on the coach.

It was hoped that this season, with halfback Moses Mbye signing a big contract to stay at the club, and Trent Hodkinson moving on, the Bulldogs would have clarity and direction in attack. No longer would there be questions over who the first-choice halves would be.

Mbye represented not just the future, but also the present.

However, the young number 7 is yet to take the team by the scruff of the neck in attack.

Reynolds is a strong personality and a vocal leader on the park. You can often see him calling for the ball on the fifth tackle, because he’s a confident character who wants to manufacture something for his team.

A seasoned or heady hooker would have the nous to overrule Reynolds, wave him away, or pass elsewhere. The Dogs presently have a rookie rake. It means Reynolds is getting too much ball, as his dominant personality can be hard to resist for an inexperienced dummy-half.

This is where Hasler must step in, and Mbye must step up.

The coach should instruct the team that Mbye is the halfback, the main decision-maker, and should be taking control of the vast majority of fifth-tackle options.

Meanwhile, Mbye has to have more presence, be more demanding, and scream for the ball.

Essentially, take control of the team.

Once Mbye has the ball, he also needs to ensure he does the right thing with it. He could do worse than watch hours and hours of Cooper Cronk, and learn that the best play is often not the flashiest play.

Physical skills are but a small part of being a quality halfback. Leadership, decision-making and providing direction are all equally important, and these are all currently somewhat lacking in the Bulldogs number 7.

Developing these traits will come through experience; yet that is something that is being hindered at present.

All in all, it would be in the best interests of both individuals involved – but most importantly, the team – for Reynolds to take a backseat, and Mbye to be more dominant.

It’s on Hasler to make that happen.

The Crowd Says:

2016-03-25T10:24:45+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


That's three games in 2016 for the Reynolds / Mbye halves partnership. They have been good to very good in three of them and poor in one game where their forwards were outplayed by the Parramatta pack.

2016-03-23T03:16:30+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


I've disagreed with the article on much more than the Thurston comparison. It was the least of my problems with the article. Have a good long weekend...

2016-03-23T02:45:12+00:00

pete bloor

Guest


Agree to disagree as I said I got the intended point first read of it. If all Ryan had written was the Thurston comment then sure, but there were quite a few more sentences to the article that gave sufficient context. Anyway on to next week as my boys look to set the golfing world alight shooting 115 under

2016-03-22T23:46:17+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Sorry mate - didn't mean to sound like I was jumping down your throat. I disagree with the premise of the article because Reynolds and Mbye have played two good games as individuals and a unit and one poor game (where their forwards were soundly beaten). Mbye has 2 tries, 3 try assists, 3 line breaks and a line break assist from 3 games (and in the last game he didn't register any of these attacking stats). He's top 5 or so for all of these stats even allowing for a poor game last week. Reynolds has 2 try assists, 1 line break, 1 line break assist. How dominant does a 22 year old halfback in his first year as a regular starter have to be? How does that point to Reynolds not giving Mbye enough responsibility? Mbye is clearly running the side with support from Reynolds. I don't really mind criticism of the Bulldogs, but I did get caught up in the emotional side of defending Reynolds. He cops more unsubstantiated flak than any player in the comp. Saying that he goes out thinking he's as good as Jonathan Thurston doesn't really mean the same thing as saying he shouldn't be overplaying his hand.

2016-03-22T22:04:03+00:00

pete bloor

Guest


To be honest I thought he did say it, it was the first impression I got from reading the article with references to self awareness etc. Can you see that if your jumping down my throat because I actually got the point of the article, that perhaps you've allowed your "bulldogs criticism is more offensive than a short joke to napoleon" stance to cloud your comprehension on this one?

2016-03-22T21:04:06+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Other than a drubbing of the rabbitohs (with Reynolds and Mbye starring, of course). Enjoy the game and your long weekend...

AUTHOR

2016-03-22T20:35:45+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


Unlike a certain previous Good Friday, I hope the Dogs give me nothing to write about!

2016-03-22T20:25:29+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Cool - I can live with that Ryan. I look forward to your next article. Believe it or not it's yours and Tim Gores articles I look forward to the most each week. May I respectfully suggest a top 5 with no mention of the Bulldogs! ?

2016-03-22T20:08:04+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


It's painful reading your gobbledygook once, I'm certainly not reading it a second time.

AUTHOR

2016-03-22T19:46:05+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


Baz, park the Thurston stuff for a second if it's too confusing or upsetting for you. We'll leave it out for now. It's pretty clear that I'm saying Reynolds should play more within himself, and have less influence on a game than he is currently having. It's equally clear that a by-product or benefit of him doing that, would be Mbye having to do more, and having a larger impact on the game than he is currently having. That's even allowing for how well Mbye has played thus far; I believe he can play even better. I believe the Bulldogs would benefit from all that, as would both individuals. That's my point. It can't be any clearer. If you disagree, that's great. It's an opinion site, after all, and all are welcome.

2016-03-22T12:26:56+00:00

Jarryd

Guest


Well Mat D i think you and your mate who works for BWS should be in charged at the warriors because you seem very knowledgable about footy and no one can be as bad as McFadden. i think that the warriors have a lot of Lazy players in the team and i think the eight interchange are affect the warriors because the team is big not mobile and you need a team of mobile player look at parra for one side with a mobile side

2016-03-22T11:17:46+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Maybe it's not as easy to follow as you think. There are a number of people confused as to why you're comparing Reynolds to Thurston, Cronk, etc. You still haven't come up with anything solid as to why Reynolds is supposedly impersonating Thurston other than "I said he is" It's just as confusing that Mbye has played two of his better first grade games this year but you're claiming his development is being impeded.

AUTHOR

2016-03-22T11:10:35+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


You're a smart guy. You've proven it on many occasions. I struggle to believe you couldn't see the mention of Thurston was used as a way to say Reynolds should play within himself.

AUTHOR

2016-03-22T11:01:30+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


I said he is. It's really not that hard to follow.

2016-03-22T11:01:01+00:00

Big J

Guest


Read it again Barry I said a good player he may be ( not that he is). Saying that someone may be a good player does not necessary imply that they there. Reynolds is nothing flash nor that he ever will be. After all he plays for the dogs so he can't be that good.

2016-03-22T11:00:14+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


Bizarre it was. It was meant for Chop. Apologies!

2016-03-22T10:47:17+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


If that's what he means maybe he should just say it. There's a big difference between playing within yourself versus pretending youre Jonathan Thurston.

2016-03-22T10:45:42+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Who. Says. He. Is. I've never seen or heard any indication that Reynolds thinks he is or wants to be Cronk or Thurston or Johns or Lockyer. Thats completely your invention. I think he goes out week in week out and plays like Josh Reynolds. Whether or like him or not or rate him or not there are very few footballers as true to their own style as Reynolds.

2016-03-22T10:44:04+00:00

Dean - Surry Hills

Roar Pro


Lucky its the dogs and they're using sticks - in Kogarah they use pineapples.

2016-03-22T10:38:35+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


But no one here is claiming that Reynolds is a legend. Just that he's a good player. You were actually the person that introduced the term legend to this conversation. "Reynolds is a good player" "No, he's got a long way to go to be a legend, he's just a good player" Brilliant!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar