God is a quarterback

By Alex Moore / Roar Rookie

It’s a position on the field that conjures contrasting images of glorious triumph and abject failure. For every Tom Brady, Joe Montana, John Elway, or Dan Marino (yes, in that order), there is a Vince Young, Ryan Leaf or Tim Couch.

The NFL quarterback is the most vital position in all of professional sports.

Coverage of the NFL is always riddled with hyperbolic statements. Consider if you will how many pundits refer to it as simply “The Shield,” as if it were some form of official government arm or law enforcement agency. Many Australians balk at the over-exuberant fanfare.

But in this instance, and given the proximity of the NFL Draft, never has such a proposition been more relevant. The QB is god.

Consider the Hollywood heartthrobs who play them in film. James Van Der Beek and Paul Walker in Varsity Blues, Keanu Reeves’ Johnny Utah in Point Break (and again in The Replacements). So was Jerry O’Connell in Jerry Maguire. Dennis Quaid was Cap Rooney in Any Given Sunday (only to be replaced by Jamie Foxx’s Willie Beamen). Burt Reynolds was one too!

NFL wisdom dictates that “if a team doesn’t have a quarterback, it’s doomed.” Stress needs to be put on the determiner ‘a’ – if you have more than one QB, you don’t have one, and thus are doomed. Teams need a leader. Sports work better as a dictatorship, not a democracy.

Every Super Bowl winning team had a solid to spectacular quarterback. If you scour the results, there are really only two anomalies to this theory. Jeff Hostetler at Super Bowl XXV in 1991 (who was replacing the injured Phil Simms), and possibly Doug Williams in Super Bowl XXII in 1988 (if you consider his career statistics). Since 2000, the multiple winners include Peyton Manning, brother Eli, Ben Roethlisberger and the incomparable Tom Brady. Most of these players are certain Hall of Famers.

A good quarterback is more than just the guy who throws the ball. Their job list within the 40-second play clock is ridiculously long. While reading how the defense lines up, they consider the routes of the receivers, their matchup in coverage, what coverage the defensive backs are in, the blocks needed to run the play from both the linemen and backs, the snap count, the instructions from the 0ffensive coordinator in their ear, what the ‘mike’ linebacker might be calling to his defense, the noise in the crowd… it appears endless. But what the best quarterbacks do is ‘manage’ a game.

It’s not enough to simply score. The best quarterbacks are the ones who stay on the field the longest. They keep their defense rested and focused, because they don’t have to spend time on the field exhausting themselves. A quarterback who manages the clock and uses it up accordingly, is not only offensively strong, but defensively important. The term ‘jack-of-all-trades’ certainly applies.

When considering all this, we can understand why teams are sweating in their seats now, just hours out from the first round here in Chicago. Will the Rams secure their future in Los Angeles, taking Jared Goff with the first pick?

The Philadelphia Eagles traded a treasure chest of picks for (presumably) Carson Wentz, a stud from FCS powerhouse North Dakota State. Will his college experience work in the fast-paced NFL?

Certainly the Eagles will be hoping so, because a misstep with this pick can be catastrophic. Just ask the team down the road in Washington.

The Crowd Says:

2016-05-08T14:16:15+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Jim Kelly was a journeyman servicable quarter-back, and he took Buffalo to the super Bowl a few times, no wins but runner up a few time.

2016-05-01T09:15:36+00:00

pete bloor

Guest


Osweiller didn't exactly dominate. His numbers weren't that different to the guy he's replacing in Texas.

AUTHOR

2016-04-29T19:33:42+00:00

Alex Moore

Roar Rookie


"Serviceable", "solid" - "semantics"? I think if you go back and have a look at Super Bowl winning teams you'll see more great quarterbacks are at the heart of that team than great defenses. Defensive efficiency statistics often are directly correlated with "time on field". The less time on the field, the less chances the opposition gets to score. And one position is usually more responsible for that than any others.

2016-04-29T10:51:36+00:00

marc

Guest


Yep Vince won it for them

2016-04-29T10:51:16+00:00

marc

Guest


You can have a serviceable QB and still win. Running attack and defence still is more important. By the way Joe is the best quarterback ever. He even played back back when defences were tougher, rules were harder, you could smash recievers, and the top quarterback ratings were 1 or 2 guys per season at 91. Not like they are all plus 100 now. NFL became watered down by rule changes to make it easier to score just like NBA

AUTHOR

2016-04-29T03:07:11+00:00

Alex Moore

Roar Rookie


Fair call re. the Center's role. Forgot they often call the protection shifts etc.

2016-04-29T02:26:40+00:00

OJP

Guest


yes, its an interesting one Alex; the coaches clearly thought Manning's knowledge / experience etc was worth more to them on the field than Osweiler's obliviously (by that stage) significantly superior physical prowess throwing the ball... Re the QB role, yes, extremely complex and I havent come across any other role in sports that compares; my one quibble with your summary is that on the teams I played for (very low level stuff) it was generally the centre who made the line blocking calls at the line of scrimmage when they see how the defensive front would line up and you see this in the NFL also I believe cheers OJP

AUTHOR

2016-04-29T01:54:02+00:00

Alex Moore

Roar Rookie


Talking about the Texas v USC game? He was miraculous...

2016-04-29T01:33:41+00:00

no one in particular

Roar Guru


I’ll start by saying that Vince Young is still responsible for the greatest QB performance I have seen. There are two important people in an NFL organisation – the QB and the coach. Good QB’s can’t win with bad coaches, and bad QB’s can’t win with a good coach. See Indianapolis. A good QB and a good coach will bring success. I can’t stand Peter King, but his Carson Palmer article last season was a great insight into how intelligent a QB must be and how hard he must work http://mmqb.si.com/mmqb/2015/11/17/nfl-carson-palmer-arizona-cardinals-inside-game-plan

AUTHOR

2016-04-29T00:44:24+00:00

Alex Moore

Roar Rookie


He obviously was doing something right if he took the starting role back from Osweiler after recovering from his injury. In terms of a player-coach, there wasn't much better than Peyton.

2016-04-29T00:36:25+00:00

Marshall

Guest


He was one of the worst QB's in the league statistically last year.

2016-04-29T00:16:03+00:00

Mickyt

Guest


Denver last year. Defence Defence Defence with an ageing QB who had an average year compared to his lofty standards. I don't want to be blamed for shooting Bambi but Manning P in isolation last year. Hmmmm

AUTHOR

2016-04-28T23:59:27+00:00

Alex Moore

Roar Rookie


I'd say that Dilfer was "generally solid" as a QB, but you're right really. He was very average as a QB. They had a great running attack which carried a lot of the load for him. That defense was certainly the star component of the 2000 Ravens.

2016-04-28T23:21:30+00:00

Anthony Wingard

Roar Rookie


I disagree that every Super Bowl winning team had a solid or spectacular quarterback. Trent Dilfer threw 12 completions for 153 yards and 1 TD in SBXXXV which helped Baltimore clinch the title. That season he completed 58% of his passes and threw for 1500 yards with a 12:11 TD to INT ratio. Possibly the worst quarterback to ever start in a Super Bowl. There's no doubt having a decent QB under center is the quintessential key for a good team - maybe just not the Baltimore Ravens in 2000.

Read more at The Roar