How will the dynamics of the scrum work in the England series?

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

England are on the rise again, and at the core of their renewal is the set-piece. It has always been an area of traditional strength for English teams of the past, and it became Eddie Jones’ sensible ‘first fix’ after the World Cup debacle.

There was not a lot wrong with England’s lineout in any case, but even that department has improved slightly on Steve Borthwick’s watch. In their last three games of the Six Nations against Ireland, Wales and France, England lost only one of their 32 lineout throws. Even more significantly, only two other throws of that 32 were seriously contested by the opposition.

Moreover, either George Kruis or Maro Itoje stole 10 of the 34 opposition deliveries to the lineout, a massive 30% takeaway ratio. Six of those steals occurred in their own red zone (or 22m area) with the England defence under pressure.

While the England lineout went from very good to better, it was the scrum that was in need of urgent repair. The psychological damage done by the performance of the Wallaby scrum at Twickenham on the third October 2015 was far-reaching and cannot be underestimated.

I believe that the propaganda campaign surrounding Joe Marler’s ‘angle’ affected not only his showing in that game, but also Eddie Jones’ decision to leave him at home this summer. There is little doubt that campaign would have been revived with some gusto had he toured, especially as the same referee at Twickenham is in place for the first Test at Brisbane – Frenchman Romain Poite.

Poite’s presence as chief arbiter ratchets up the importance of the scrum several notches. Of all the top international panel referees, Poite has demonstrated that he is the one most willing to escalate quickly from penalties to yellow cards at scrum-time for technical offences. Think Ben Alexander in the third Test of the Lions series in 2013, or Gethin Jenkins in the England-Wales Six Nations encounter the following year. When Romain refs a Test match, as a prop you have to be seen to be clean.

The improvement in England’s scrum performance from the World Cup has been led by veteran tight-head prop Dan Cole and the reintroduction of Dylan Hartley at hooker. With Marler trying to rebuild his reputation, it is Cole and Hartley who have had the most influence on England’s scrum in 2016.

The bare statistics look like this:

  Ireland Wales France

England own ball
(penalties & turnovers for/against)

2/0 3/1 1/0
Opposition ball
(penalties & turnovers for/against)
1/2 0/3 1/2
TOTAL 3/2 3/4 2/2

England won six penalties on their feed while conceding one, but conceded seven penalties on opposition ball while clawing back two. England completed 10 out of their 17 feeds (59%) successfully, but only 12 of 22 (54%) were completed on the opposition ball.

The stats suggest that England’s scrum:
• Is not a dominant force (roughly on a par with those of Wales, Ireland and France)
• Is better prepared than before to use the ball, rather than ‘long-scrum’ for penalties
• Vulnerable to sustained pressure on the opposition feed

So much for the stats. Now let’s take a look at how that’s reflected in live action sequences, starting with some examples of how England defend on the opposition put-in.

Of the seven England scrum pens conceded, six were called on Dan Cole the English tight-head prop. Cole is one of the taller tight-heads on the international scene at 6’3”. His height requires him to make some individual adjustments to the position, in terms of both his right-arm bind and his packing angle.

Cole’s left-arm bind. The positioning of both binds (left arm over his hooker and right on the opposing loosehead) is crucial for a tall tight-head. His left-arm bind is very low and vertical – either low down on his hooker’s shorts as in Ireland at 1:27, or even more exaggerated, on the point of Maro Itoje’s right shoulder at Ireland 4:55 and 32:06, and France at 33:08. The verticality of the bind allows Cole to turn in on the opposing hooker under pressure, whereas a more lateral bind would commit him to staying square. As a result, in all these examples he ends up ‘diving’ towards the centre of the scrum when the contest becomes white-hot.

Cole’s right-arm bind. Where his left-arm bind is designed to create flexibility, Cole’s right-arm bind is much more aggressive and dominant. From the side-on angle in Wales at 3:19, it is ‘cocked’ with the right elbow high and the arm driving straight down like a piston on the loosehead’s left shoulder. From the overhead camera shots, it is clear than the bind never extends beyond the loosehead’s armpit – he is actually pulling Jack McGrath’s jersey up his body in all three Irish examples, which demonstrates the force being exerted on McGrath’s left shoulder. Therefore, Dan Cole controls the opposing loosehead’s movement by the use of his strong right arm.

Cole’s packing angle. His universal angle when the pressure comes is inside and on to the hooker. The body positions of the two England locks (4 and 5) and the flanker on Cole’s side (typically 7 James Haskell) support this angle. The England 1, 2 and 4 drive across towards Cole, while 5 and 7 glue their shoulders together to rotate him around McGrath at Ireland 1:30 and 4:55; in France at 33:08 it is Kruis and Robshaw who ‘glue’ and kick Cole’s hips out, forcing a mistake at the back of the French scrum.

England’s collective, and Dan Cole’s individual technique is based on the same principles on their own put-in.

The general angle of attack is very similar. It is from left-to-right, with the loosehead and hooker angling out to their right and Kruis and Haskell tight to Cole’s backside. In Ireland at 22:23 and Wales at 15:37, both of 5 George Kruis’ feet are pointing out towards the far sideline as he endeavours to kick Cole’s hips out beyond his right shoulder. Once Cole’s right hip is outside his right shoulder, England have won their battle.

At 18:35 Wales try to counter this manoeuvre by crabbing to their left, which automatically forces Cole’s right hip inside his shoulder on that side. Once again England have a solution, driving up on their loose-head to rotate through 90 degrees and force the penalty out of Craig Joubert for defensive ‘walking around’.

**********

England’s scrum power will all be channelled through their right side, and that means it will be coming through Scott Sio, Australia’s outstanding young loose-head prop. It is fair to say that Sio is still on a learning curve despite his promising performances for the Wallabies.

A few months ago I wrote an article based around Scott Sio’s performance against the South African Scotsman W.P.Nel on Green and Gold Rugby.

One of the steepest slopes of Sio’s scrum education has been his repeated tendency to over-extend his body, as pointed out in the article. Dan Cole also found this weakness early in the World Cup game:

Against a prop like Cole, with his strong right arm and ability to drop the scrum height, this is a weakness that needs an urgent remedy.

Sio was also pinged for four penalties in the first half-hour of the Brumbies-Bulls game in Round 11 of this season’s Super rugby competition.


Sio had some problem to work out with the giant Bulls’ tight-head Marcel van der Merwe. In the clips he is pinged for first dropping the scrum at 2:08 (with van der Merwe’s right-arm bind at a very Cole-like angle), then finds himself over-extended at 7:42, with a long bind, feet well back and his chin trapped underneath his chest – a process repeated in the scrum at 27:25.

The scrum call against Sio at 9:40 appears highly suspect, but reinforces the danger of allowing early refereeing scrum perceptions to build. There is little doubt that referee Ben O’Keefe’s perception was shaped by his previous two decisions against Sio, and that tendency will be even greater with Romain Poite on the whistle at Brisbane!

**********

Summary: With M.Poite in charge, the importance of the scrum will be magnified in the first Test in Brisbane. Both front rows will have to be seen to be clean technically, and yet do all in their power to shape the referee’s perceptions early on in the game.

England’s scrummaging renewal after the World Cup debris, led by Dan Cole and Dylan Hartley, has been partially rather than totally convincing. They managed to achieve a stable status quo in their last three 6N matches without ever achieving dominance at the set-piece.

Dan Cole against Scott Sio will be a key litmus test in the front row. Cole will look to lever down on Sio with his right arm and attack Stephen Moore the Wallaby hooker on the inside on Aussie ball. On England feed, Cole will become the spearhead of a left-to-right movement designed to swing outside Scott Sio and force the set-piece to disintegrate, or give bullocking no.8 Billy Vunipola a free run at the first back defender.

A continuous run of penalties against either Cole or Sio will probably incur a yellow card, which may be a decisive shift in a match which is likely to be so closely contested!

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2016-06-13T14:12:08+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Thanks Fin - it will be a biggie for sure!

AUTHOR

2016-06-13T14:11:39+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Cheers!

2016-06-13T12:31:18+00:00

Fin

Guest


Agreed! Well done Nick. I enjoy listening to Rod Kafer's analysis, and I equally enjoy reading Nick Bishop's analytical work. It's of the highest calibre. Looking forward to your match review and preview of where you think the key battles are for this weekend.

2016-06-12T23:30:05+00:00

Craig

Guest


Nick Bishop - brilliant analysis - you are rugby's Nostradamus!

2016-06-10T09:49:14+00:00

Fin

Guest


Good news for the Reds today, the signing of George Smith as a replacement for Liam Gill. Now the organisation needs to get Quade back, convince Brad Thorn to come out of retirement, find a coach and it's onwards and upwards. Seriously though with Smith and Moore on the books for next year things are heading in the right direction. Throw in Slipper and Simmons and that's a lot of quality leaders in the pack.

AUTHOR

2016-06-09T12:04:16+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Not a lot Fin. I think Holmes is there because he's been playing consistently well in Super rugby and Kepu has a shoulder niggle. Not entirely convinced the 6-2 bench split is totally necessary, esp with Mumm being the 6th forward - presumably ahead of Hunt?

2016-06-09T09:27:58+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi again Nick. How much importance (in both scrum and lineout) do you thing Cheika placed on the starting tight five combinations with his selections? Holmes & Simmons (Reds) and Sio, Moore, and Arnold (Brumbies). Do you think those familiar Super Rugby combinations came into his thinking?

AUTHOR

2016-06-08T17:11:10+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Yeah... Nigel is an excellent ref, but does he love the limelight? Ofc he does!

2016-06-08T14:31:14+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


They do and you have the drama with it. Nige would let play go on for a minute and a half then call for the TMO. The TMO then goes back to that incident. Key time taken out of the game.

AUTHOR

2016-06-08T10:17:59+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I think both sides would benefit immensely if Stuart took up a position at the Reds. He'd have the right people in place and find the Reds' real identity again. He is one of the few coaches in the NH who would really bring something to the table in the SH and adjust successfully to the environment.

2016-06-08T09:35:51+00:00

Fin

Guest


It's being reported today that Stuart Lancaster is considering the REDS position. Do you think he would enjoy coaching in Australia? Jake White seemed to until he spat the dummy after being overlooked for the Wallaby job. Darryl Gibson also appears to be developing his head coaching credentials at the tahs.

AUTHOR

2016-06-08T09:09:33+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


He'd be a great influence around the team in any capacity wouldn't he?

2016-06-08T08:44:59+00:00

Fin

Guest


On a side note there was a photo of Brad Thorn and Michael Cheika in deep discussion having a takeaway coffee together at wallabies training today. I know he is an all black and is 41 years old but I reckon Cheika was wishing Brad was available for Saturday. He'd still be good enough to make this Wallaby team I reckon.

AUTHOR

2016-06-08T07:58:29+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Cheers mate!

AUTHOR

2016-06-08T07:56:51+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Exactly. In fact I don't really see what we're arguing about! Ofc Eddie thinks he can deal with whatever issues he has, or he wouldn't select him. Selecting these edgy types and getting the best out of them seems to be something of a speciality for him. Personally I wouldn't. I'd probably prefer Will Collier as Quins do. Or Henry Thomas from Bath. I reckon it's just as likely that Sinckler could come for the last 20 mins of the 3rd Test and make a massive hit in defence and turn the ball over, as deliver a high shot that earns him a yellow card. It's a double-edged sword, just like Eddie himself - as Phil Kearns pointed out in an interview today. The coach picks players in his image, and he'll live or die by those choices.

AUTHOR

2016-06-08T07:48:07+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Six of one and half a dozen of the other isn't it mate? There are always a number of technical offences a ref can choose to pick on in a scrum, but forward momentum usually decides which one he selects. Having said that, if you have access to the vid take a look at M.Poite's reffing of the scrum in the 2015 WC warm-up between Scotland and Italy, esp in the first 20 mins. It is most unusual. On one occasion Italy go forward about 3 metres on their own feed, Castro's side collapses and Scotland received the pen!

AUTHOR

2016-06-08T07:43:02+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Once you start moving bodies around TWAS - as many callers will do under pressure - the timing window for the throw can get very tight. The England lineout is not too dissimilar to Matfield's in some respects. They will try to get the ball to George Kruis in the middle with subtle variations of movement and timing, but basically the hooker knows 100% where he has to deliver the ball.

2016-06-08T03:50:23+00:00

Buk

Guest


Excellent analysis Nick, thanks for the time taken.

2016-06-08T02:02:37+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


I think the comment you make about the hooker heaving to "thread the needle" very apt. Too many people just blame a hooker (many here blame TPN unjustly) for a line out that is stolen but the fact is unless it's picked off by a jumper in front (thrown too low) or called not straight, or thrown too early, once it leaves the hooker's hands it's all up to the jumper.

2016-06-08T00:49:49+00:00

Who?

Guest


I agree that VDM could've been pinged for popping up, but I've never seen an advancing scrum penalized for that. Only retreating scrums. Think that even happened in the Lions series (Lions popped up first, but the Wallabies were retreating, and were penalized). And VDM popped, arguably, because he'd already managed to turn Sio inwards by moving forwards (and pulling him round). I'm not saying VDM's a great technician, more than he's strong. But that doesn't mean you can't get good results only if you're strong - technique can get you through, too.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar