Five talking points: Wallabies vs England first Test

By Digby / Roar Guru

Australia versus England is always must-see viewing in most sports. There is a tremendous rivalry between the two nations.

The sides played out a pulsating and hard-fought match in Brisbane, with England victorious over Australia by 39-28 to take a 1-0 lead in this three Test series for the Cook Cup.

More of the wash-up from Wallabies vs England
» Eddie Jones – genius or madman?
» Pocock ruled out of series
» Match report: Eddie’s England too good
» DIY player ratings
» Roar Forum – what changes should the Wallabies make?
» Watch the full highlights

A superb opening to the Test season, this match was played at a high pace and skill level and provided plenty to discuss in the aftermath.

Here is what I believe are the five major talking points to come from this first Test.

1. Unforced errors are killers
Seems an obvious statement to make but incredibly pertinent to last night’s match. A couple of unforced errors proved pivotal turning points in the match.

After twenty minutes of play, the Wallabies were well on top of England, playing with speed and continuity that England were struggling to contend with and had already scored two tries to lead 10-0.

After winning a penalty, Bernard Foley failed to find touch then shortly after Israel Folau kicked out on the full, gifting England easy possession and field position.

This allowed England to regroup and start ticking the scoreboard over and robbed the Wallabies of the momentum they had started so brilliantly with. Another errant pass and fumble saw England score their only try of the first half and secure a lead of 19-13 at halftime, a lead which they didn’t relinquish for the rest of the game.

It is not my intention to isolate those two players in particular, they were both instrumental in getting the Wallabies off to a fast start in those first twenty minutes, but the unforced errors killed the Wallabies momentum and allowed England back into the contest.

2. Lineout
At the end of the match, the lineout stats read; Australia 9/10 and England 13/15 according to ESPN UK. They seem like reasonable reading, however they fail to tell the full story.

The Wallaby lineout started out fine, Mike Hooper even being used on one occasion. However, throughout the match they were constantly put under pressure.

Many of their wins were under pressure or slapped away from Nick Phipps at halfback. The Wallabies were constantly put on the back foot, conceding penalties on a couple of occasions.

In contrast, the English lineout was rarely under pressure, securing their own ball comfortably and able to launch with ease, their losses coming from their own poor execution.

It should be noted here that the Wallabies did lose their main lineout forward Rob Simmons to injury during the first half but regardless, it appeals as a major area of concern for Michael Cheika to address.

3. Has ‘Pooper’ been figured out?
The Wallaby pack was outmuscled last night in the collision area and the lack of effective ball carriers proved telling in the face of a vigorous English defence.

The English carried with aggression and for the majority they cleaned the rucks with ruthless efficiency. They were rarely isolated which raises the question – are the two open sides in Michael Hooper and David Pocock the best way forward for the Wallabies considering the remainder of this series and the opposition to come?

It certainly seemed the right choice while the Wallabies played with such pace and width in the opening stanza but as the match wore on and the grind was in full swing the Australian loose forwards were rendered ineffective for large periods.

These players certainly did not lack for effort, far from it and there will be questions too of the tight five who are also responsible for the collision areas but it seems the balance within the Australian pack is off and the English have plans in place to nullify the threat posed by two of Australia’s best.

Of course, there is the small issue of who exactly to bring in instead, if Cheika sees this as an issue to contemplate and overcome.

4. Maro Itoje
Had heard a lot about this young man through the grapevine, with Roarer RobC even remarking to me he is the ‘Air Jordan’ of rugby.

I was greatly looking forward to seeing this fellow in action and to understand the hype. Fair to say he did not disappoint.

His work rate is very impressive, he shifts bodies and is a constant, chirping menace in the lineout, his ball skills and handling are quite remarkable.

In the first twenty minute period when Australia were rampant, he seemed like a lone figure at times standing against the tide, several crucial turnovers saving his team from perhaps falling further behind during that whirlwind opening.

Staggering to think he is still only 21 years old. Hyperbole alert but I think this kid could be one of the greats and one to keep an eye on, both for the remainder of this series and the future.

5. Englands colonials
It was telling to me to see Eddie Jones and Glen Ella celebrating together in the English coaching box, Ella in a white English Jacket.

After the World Cup disappointment, it has been a remarkable turnaround for this English side with Jones as its catalyst.

The English side looked fit, well prepared and mentally very strong, overcoming the early onslaught to remain composed and work their way back into the match. If there was any concern or worry over the England’s side’s lack of success in Australia and never having won in Brisbane, it wasn’t showing.

It is hard not to imagine the Australian contingent played a significant part in this. Eddie Jones looks to have been a rather astute acquisition for the English rugby union.

Well, there are my five main talking points from this opening match and of course there are plenty more to discuss. Over to you Roarers, what were your major discussion points from this match?

The Crowd Says:

2016-06-17T12:16:17+00:00

Timbo (L)

Guest


My 2 cents: 3 point penalties for "Cheats" short arm or scrum (dealers choice) for the accidentals.

2016-06-15T04:56:57+00:00

Timbo (L)

Guest


CS - aren't Stat's Great, you can make them support anything you want.. Look at the lead up to England's first try: Haskell slides around the side of the mall, making a large gain and breaking up the Australian Defense priming it for a secondary attack.. Hooper chases him down and adds a try saving tackle to his stats. YEY Hooper, you are a GOD! Look closer, who's left the side gate open? - the out breath, out of position Hooper! Where are the stats for that? A good #7 would have picked him off before he cleared the Mall. A great #7 would have roughed him up and nabbed his stash. The Pooper combo is often reported as 2x #7's, where in fact it is 2x #11's. This leaves the team with an OK #8 moonlighting as a Great #7 Hooper's great game stats were earned in the vacant #11 position. I have said it before and I'll say it again if you want Hooper on the field give him #11. Gill, Pocock and McMahon all do a better all-around job at #7, There are others. Gill can Jump which to my mind makes him the best choice.

2016-06-13T10:46:30+00:00

Pieceofmerce

Guest


I thought the scrums were a joke. The first few werent completed. If thats about gamesmanship then so be it. But as i was taught as a youngster in nz, play until the whistle blows. And in England's case it was favorable. Good luck to England getting the same calls next week. As for the game it was a ripper. Good for world rugby.

2016-06-13T09:48:18+00:00

SAVAGE

Guest


Scott Sio got the raw end of the deal, and he's too nice. It was obvious Cole was angling in every time Poite was on the other of the scrum. Ledesma needs to light a fire a Sio's arse this week, no, make that the whole forward pack, mildly amusing watching the English pack being manly and gobbing off when things were going their way on Saturday, obviously the Aussie pack let them. What was surprising was that there was no collective response from the Aussies. Let's hope that gets fixed this weekend.

AUTHOR

2016-06-13T09:29:06+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


An interesting thought that Rob. Timani is often criticised for his workrate I believe? With what appears to me as a lack of succession planning, it will be interesting to see who Cheika brings into his camps and takes away on the Northen tour. Loose forward mix is certainly an area to address as I feel that 6/8 are problem areas for the Wallabies, certainly depth wise.

AUTHOR

2016-06-13T09:21:54+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


Hi Gatesy, From my limited experience and misfortune when shifted to cover TH I found the lower bind useful if the LH attacked me, allowing me more flexibility if I was turned and staying stable with my hooker and coordinated. It certainly makes it easier for Coles that once he rolled his shoulder of pulled on Sio to go with the angle created. The counter to me is in Sio footwork/placement. If he was losing his balance. A small step forward would make all the difference, with his flanker in behind, perhaps even angled down to help Sio push up.

2016-06-13T07:33:45+00:00

Rob9

Guest


Good call on Holloway. I think you're right regarding looking further down the track. But then I just can't fathom how Palu who is a shadow of his former self has got a call up to the squad. Especially while the 25yo Timani who been a real danger for the Rebels over the past 2 years sits on the sidelines. I'm interested to see Houston, but while McCalman is an option, I wouldn't be game to throw him in at this level until I've seen him at the Reds. Obviously the decision makers would have kept an eye on him while he was at Bath. The more I think about it; while Pooper isn't an option I'd really like to see how Timani/Hooper/McCalman would go with Fardy at lock. Especially while Simmons appears to be out also. With Arnold the other lock, that to me represents a backrow and lock combination with a bit of presence and grunt about it- something we're going to need to counter England, especially while Pocock isn't available.

2016-06-13T03:41:48+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


No news re Simmo yet mate. I guess if we dont hear by tonight, its not likely gatesy, I think the reason Fris got some seconds, was to cap him. So big congrats to him! :D

2016-06-13T03:38:18+00:00

gatesy

Roar Guru


A shame we didnt see a bit more of Frisby, as he is a good box kicker and we needed to have England on the back foot a bit more. Hopefully, he gets more than 1 1/2 minutes in future.

2016-06-13T03:36:01+00:00

gatesy

Roar Guru


I'm no scrummaging expert, but it seemed to me that the reason that Cole was able to get such dominance over Sio, was the way he bound. you noticed that his left arm was down very low on the bind, just above the hooker's bum, whereas the loosie bound much higher up. This has the effect of pulling the hooker towards him and both he and the hooker screwing in, so that the Wallaby loosie was never able to get out from under and on one or two occasions that i saw made it easier for him to force Sio downwards, almost with just a simple twist of his arm. I would never have seen that if it weren't for the overhead cameras and the analysis done by one of the Roarers last week, and maybe that is something that we have to work on. I presume that that is legal and therefore clever, but surely there must be an easy counter for it

AUTHOR

2016-06-13T02:50:07+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


Hadn't considered that thanks magg. Cant fault his output. Given the Wallabies were being beaten at the collision, would of thought most halfbacks would struggle anyway?

2016-06-13T02:16:02+00:00

Smiggle Jiggle

Roar Guru


One talking point is how easy it is to rattle Phipps. After a great first 20, the English started targeting him, with small, off the ball stuff and that got him rattle, and his game dropped of dramatically.

AUTHOR

2016-06-12T21:37:22+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


Great point WB but sometimes that can happen I suppose. No doubt the coaching staff will be addressing this issue this week. A repeat would be costly. Believe it was 15 to 8 in Englands favour.

AUTHOR

2016-06-12T21:36:07+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


Thank you Mr Jones.

AUTHOR

2016-06-12T21:35:46+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


Thanks Thugby, appreciated. Perhaps a touch of rust as well, but the Wallabies certainly did not adapt well during the match.

AUTHOR

2016-06-12T21:33:36+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


Thanks In brief and perhaps a good discussion to have, though I do think 3 points is fine.

AUTHOR

2016-06-12T21:32:02+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


Not sure about that Savage but those unforced errors certainly allowed England to regather.

AUTHOR

2016-06-12T21:31:00+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


Cheers Adsa.They were excellent.

AUTHOR

2016-06-12T21:30:25+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


Hey Rob, Commiserations mate, tough loss. Interesting week ahead, Pocock out, have we heard how Simmons is doing?

AUTHOR

2016-06-12T21:25:08+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


Thanks Bob. Lineout is more of an issue in my view and yes, perhaps England were in the box seat after all heading into the match. The extra week off has proved beneficial I think and what we SH teams need to do is perhaps rethink how we approach these series in future in terms of preparedness. Perhaps an opportunity for a warm up match against our Pacific neighbours as an example?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar