Oakmont will give the elite US Open field nightmares

By David Lord / Expert

“It’s the hardest course we have ever played,” was how Phil Mickelson described Oakmont Country Club in Pennsylvania, the oldest top-ranked course in the USA, built in 1903 by designer Henry Foundes with a crew of 150 and two dozen mule teams.

The leftie, who will celebrate his 46th birthday on the opening day this week, has played in 94 majors winning five – the Masters in 2004, 2006, and 2010, The Open in 2013, and the PGA in 2005.

But Mickelson has never won a US Open having the frustration to finish second six times – in 1999 to Payne Stewart, 2002 to Tiger Woods, 2008 to Retief Goosen, 2006 to Geoff Ogilvy, 2009 to Lucas Glover, and in 2013 to Justin Rose.

“A lot of golf courses that challenge you tee to green the way Oakmont does usually give a little bit on the greens.

“Not Oakmont, the greens are some of the most undulating and fast to make it very difficult to putt,” Mickelson added.

This will be the seventh US Open Oakmont has hosted.

In 1927, Tommy Armour won with 13-over.

In 1935, Sam Park Jnr was successful at 11-over.

In 1951, Ben Hogan won with 5-under.

In 1962, Jack Nicklaus won with 1-under.

In 1973, Johnny Miller was successful with 5-under.

In 1983, it was Larry Nelson with 4-under.

In 1994, Ernie Els with 5-under.

Before the 2007 US Open, Oakmont underwent a major reconstruction, cutting own more than 4000 trees that were planted in the 1960s, lengthened the course to 7230 yards (6611 metres), and reduced the par to 70 in the new style links course.

Angel Cabrera won in 2007 with 5-over by a shot from Tiger Woods and Jim Furyk.

Mickelson and Cabrera are among the senior starters this week – Mickelson drawn with former US Open champion Justin Rose and Henrik Stenson for the first two rounds – Cabrera with two former US Open champions in Ernie Els, and Jim Furyk.

World number one and tournament favourite Jason Day warmed up for the second major of the year by pitching the first ball at the Pittsburgh Pirates and the St Louis Cardinals baseball clash.

“I was very nervous,”admitted Day.

He shouldn’t have been nervous, his pitch was in the strike zone, his action and delivery impressive, just like sinking one of his many 30-foot putts.

Day’s drawn in one of the strongest marquee groups with compatriot Adam Scott, and Louis Oosthuizen.

World number two and defending champion Jordan Spieth’s been drawn with Zach Johnson and Bryson DeChambeau.

World number three Rory McIlroy’s drawn with Masters champion Danny Willett, and world five Rickie Fowler.

World four Bubba Watson has Matt Kuchar and Patrick Reed for company.

World six Dustin Johnson has Sergio Garcia and Hideki Matsuyama.

Other groups in contention include Lee Westwood with Luke Donald, and Martin Kaymer. Then there’s Brandt Snedeker with Bill Haas and Billy Horschel. And finally Kevin Kisner with Charl Schwartzel and Branden Grace.

The other Australians include Geoff Ogilvy with Graeme McDowell and Webb Simpson – three former US Open champions.

Marc Leishman with Jimmy Walker and Paul Casey.

Cameron Smith with compatriot Steve Bowditch and Derek Bard.

Aaron Price with Dennis McCarthy and Mikael Lundberg.

Prediction – Jason Day’s patience to tell with the winning score likely to be over par. The bolter will be Daniel Berger.

The Crowd Says:

2016-06-20T18:06:04+00:00

Jeff Morris

Guest


I was shocked and revolted to see the "oakless" Oakmont course. Apparently they cut down 15,000 trees since the last time the US Open was held there. It looked like an ugly livestock pasture not a picturesque golf course. This in an area where trees grow naturally and woodlands are the default landscape. What a shame if this is the "new trend" in golf courses as many are saying.

2016-06-14T21:07:21+00:00

Lancey5times

Guest


I agree. They won't go too low but 6 deep or so will probably get the job done

2016-06-14T12:33:33+00:00

dylgolf

Roar Guru


Actually won't be that difficult for the players. The removal of the trees means players will players will be able to thrash at the ball off the tee, thus giving them shorter clubs into greens.. Although the greens are extremely fast, any world class player knows to keep the ball below the hole. Chambers Bay seems a far more difficult test for players.

AUTHOR

2016-06-14T10:58:21+00:00

David Lord

Expert


I have far more important things to do than wait around 24/7 for your posts Lancey5times. The description of seven US Opens at Oakmont is totally my mistake, but the homework was done, the winners of the eight US Opens at Oakmont are there but obviously you couldn't or didn't bother to count them L5t.

2016-06-14T01:31:58+00:00

Lancey5times

Guest


and....................... silence from Mr Lord

2016-06-14T00:45:08+00:00

Lancey5times

Guest


Agreed

2016-06-14T00:05:52+00:00

Brendo

Guest


Good article, it was a shame it got buried by all the other stories that came out that day. By mid morning it had disappeared to the bottom of the page.

2016-06-13T23:30:33+00:00

Lancey5times

Guest


"This will be the seventh US Open Oakmont has hosted" Oakmont has hosted the US Open 8 times. This will be the 9th occasion. Please do your homework

2016-06-13T23:24:17+00:00

Lancey5times

Guest


Read the US Open article from 4 days ago by Ryan Day (ROAR Rookie) and tell me it is the sort of article that should take up space on a sports opinion forum based website. Then read yours again and consider the same thing.

2016-06-13T23:17:33+00:00

Lancey5times

Guest


This is an opinion based website David and you are apparently an expert on putting forward said opinion. What 'opinion' have you put forward here? There is nothing here I can't get from Wiki and/or PGA.com. I always read your articles (as I do with the other 'Experts' on this site) not so I can criticise, but so that I can learn from those that the Roar have deemed the most knowledgeable. It is only when I reach the end of articles such as this that I am disappointed. I'm not questioning the relevance or the validity of your stats here David so it is an odd statement to make regarding my interest in the history and tradition of the game. You seem to have A) missed the point of my first comment, B) missed the point of this site and C) underestimated your fellow Roarers if you believe that reading a list of champs and tee-times qualifies in their minds as 'what makes their sport tick' If you review my comments on other articles you will see that I do put forth opinion when replying. I don't simply list stats. If you are simply aspiring to know more than me you are not worthy of the 'Expert' tag because at no stage have I claimed to be worthy of it

AUTHOR

2016-06-13T22:50:48+00:00

David Lord

Expert


You are obviously very low on history and tradition Lancey5times. Genuine sports lovers are tuned in to what makes their sport tick, especially a tournament as high quality as a US Open on a very difficult course. You have consistently proved you are a nark, I'm waiting for the day when you state the sun sets in the east, just so you can have another crack at being a keyboard warrior.

2016-06-13T22:35:30+00:00

Lancey5times

Guest


Is it possible to post a comment above the story? I'd like to tell potential readers to save their time as this is once again just a list of stats and the variety comes from an accompanying list of the groupings. As it stands you need to make your way through the article before you realise it's a hollow shell which is unfair on sports fans. C'mon David try a bit harder and earn the expert tag

Read more at The Roar