Can we ever believe in the Tour in the way we once did?

By Stuart Thomas / Expert

Last week on my journey up the M7 cycle way in Sydney’s North West I had a flat tyre. A slow leak that became flat rubber right at the base of a steady incline that always tests me as I am returning back to my starting point.

I had recently bought a new pump and after removing my back tyre and starting the process of fitting the new tube I, for the life of me, couldn’t get the stupid thing to function properly.

I stood there like a simpleton trying to work out the mechanism on this thing, that I have subsequently discovered, was indeed faulty.

Most cyclists would be amazed that this could happen, they/you are probably reading thinking, ‘this guy can’t even use a pump.’ I can assure you that I can generally use a pump without too much trouble but this one had me stumped.

A lovely gentleman, 72 years old and suffering from the early stages of Parkinson’s disease, as I discovered later, pulled over and asked me if I needed a pump. He helped me out, we chatted about all things by the side of the noisy motorway and he even showed me an old technique of working the tyre onto the rim.

I told him he was a good Samaritan and thanked him profusely, as apart from saving me a good five-kilometre walk back to my car. I told him he had been an absolute treat to talk to. He had been riding for 60 odd years and was the most kind gentle soul I had come across in my cycling journeys.

As I relayed the story to my fellow enthusiasts their similar stories made me realise what generally good people cyclists are.

Always ready with a smile or a wave as paths cross, happy to pull over and help out others, I heard stories of all sorts of wonderful good deeds and exhibitions of human kindness.

I played golf years ago and one particular member of our group seemed intent on verbally disparaging the early morning waves of cyclists who used to snake their way around the local streets.

I never really got it. His language was foul, his sentiment mean and I never really understood the aggro. Perhaps he spent time driving in the heart of Sydney and had been witness to some of the loose driving of the many couriers in the CBD.

Personally, I felt that the fitness, fresh air and general health of cyclists probably morphed into their personalities.

It also made me think about the passion of the cycling fan, the sheer romance of one of the biggest sports in the world. The massive crowds that line mountain climbs with homemade signs, costumes and the general sense of goodwill they have for the competitors.

This led to another question. Would these people ever believe in the sport the way they once had after all that it has been through?

I hope the short answer is a simple yes, but I can’t be certain.

We all know the history and don’t need to relive it over and over again. The culture of cheating seemed to have grown to epidemic proportions through the eighties and nineties.

Perhaps it had always been a little hidden prior to that time but when the big money arrived, as is so often the case, the temptation to seek the advantage became far too much for some and at some stages, too much for just about all.

As the Tour de France struggled to cope with the seven tarnished years of Lance Armstrong, people began to speak about the sport they love in a different way.

Whoever did well was questioned. Gathering personal data and examining VO2 and hematocrit levels, examining wattage and output data became the norm and no recent winner of the greatest race has escaped scrutiny.

The discovery of an electric bike at a women’s Under 23 race last year has only fuelled the fire as has a number of positive test in 2015. Meldonium has also been in cycling news and not just connected to Maria Sharapova.

It does, however, appear clear that the sport is cleaner than ever. Blood passports, improved testing and more active doping authorities seem to have things in check. Yet, can we believe in the way we once did?

The UCI’s 2015 CIRC report seemed unclear in its finding suggesting that the ‘doped’ segment of the peloton could be as low as 20 per cent or as high as 90 per cent.

The issues that Team Astana have had in recent times and calls for testing controls between the hours of 11.00pm and 6.am to detect micro dosing EPO in order to be clear by morning seem to suggest that many people’s faith in cycling might yet to be fully restored.

The report also expressed concerns about substances not banned but still being used to seek advantage. Painkillers, caffeine tablets, Viagra, Cialis and “various nutritional supplements and homeopathic products” were all mentioned in the report.

There seems to be a stark difference to the scepticism levelled at Chris Froome’s recent performances and the blind faith and belief that much of the public placed in Armstrong.

That faith was built despite many people in the background being fully aware of what was going on.

Cadel Evans victory in 2011 as Australia’s first maillot jaune winner has remained ‘clean’ as have all the race winners since. Yet when names such as Alberto Contador, Andy Schleck and Alejandro Valverde loom into contention the drums start beating.

I will watch the race with countless warm drinks, snacks, my race guide at hand and very drowsy eyes in the morning, just like I always do. I believe in the sport, there is a majesty and a beauty about the entire endeavour.

The juxtaposition of man and the fearsome landscape, changing weather and the face to face combativeness of cycling enthrals me.

I will still be disappointed with the sprint finishes, longing more for a cold, wet and miserable day in the Alps to see who digs deeper within themselves than the rest of the GC contenders. To see the one who drags themselves up a mountain with snot flying from nostrils and sweat dripping their chin.

I hope it is a great race this year, and I hope there isn’t ever another Festina affair that brings the sport to its knees, yet it feels a little different to me. Most people I speak to are a little more than sceptical and maybe that’s OK.

Perhaps time will be the only thing that will see the new generations of fans develop the same trust in the sport and watch events without even a thought of ‘is he the full natty?’

The Crowd Says:

2016-07-01T03:57:55+00:00

delbeato

Roar Guru


I'm not so sure about the last bit - the IAAF has taken a real beating lately over its integrity. The ATP - likewise. One of the factors that has sullied cycling's reputation is that they actually started to look for cheating. And they found it - in spades. One reason for this may have been that the extreme doping that emerged in the early 90s presented a real danger to rider's health. There was a sense that doping had gone too far and for the first time - riders began to speak out. I'm cynical about other sports with a better reputation. I'm not saying they're necessarily as bad as cycling, but to me it's just as likely a symptom of their governing bodies just not looking for cheats.

2016-06-30T04:54:08+00:00

PB

Guest


Agree. Yes, it's true other sports have had, and continue to have drug cheats, but no other sport has had throughout its entire history a relentless, systemic culture of cheating, not just with drugs but by any means possible. Also, no other sport has such a toothless, impotent governing body like the UCI.

2016-06-30T03:13:52+00:00

delbeato

Roar Guru


Cycling deserves to the whipping boy in my view. It's earned that title. But unfortunately a lot of people are happy to think doping mostly starts and ends with pro cycling. The truth always gets out eventually. We haven't heard the last of doping controversies and they won't be restricted to cycling.

AUTHOR

2016-06-29T09:08:08+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Well said. When one of the two or three biggest teams is effectively booted out of the games, it says a lot about the culture in ALL professional sport. Cycling always the whipping boy for some reason. I have numerous friends who have dabbled in a little extra help for numerous activities in their lives. It's become a little bit like cheating on your tax.....which of course I would never do.

2016-06-29T04:14:07+00:00

delbeato

Roar Guru


Pro sports is riddled with cheats, on drugs or otherwise. Are you going to watch the Olympics? There are a lot of people who think cycling is full of cheats (and I don't really blame them) who will shed tears of joy at the performances of Olympians in a few weeks. I've got bad news..

AUTHOR

2016-06-27T04:42:05+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Well said PB. Hence the question I wanted to raise. It's hard to watch. Still a great competition yet hard to know where the playing field could possibly be level. Hamilton's book was great, an ever better read in my opinion, was Christophe Bassons' book 'A Clean Break'. He was Mr Clean in the Armstrong and co era. Fascinating reading that shows how a drug free athlete competed against the cheats.

2016-06-26T22:52:45+00:00

PB

Guest


I think it's exceptionally naive to think that cycling ever had any credibility. The most lauded cyclist in the sport, Eddy Merckx was a drug cheat. Since the 1890s, cyclists have been using any stimulant they can get their hands on to cheat. They just didn't see it as cheating and no-one told them differently. No sooner had the dust settled from Festina and Armstrong we had Van den Dreissche, and the next evolution in cheating, with the UCI being forced to play catch-up (yet again) to come to terms with detection. I love road racing and MTB racing, but any time I see a road cyclist turning in an extraordinary performance all I can think is 'he's on the juice'. When Nibali came back in the Giro, my first thought was that he was juiced. No, sadly cycling will never be clean - hasn't been for 120 years. Where is the incentive? Tyler Hamilton (drug cheat) will make more from his tell-all book than any clean cyclist ever will.

AUTHOR

2016-06-20T04:22:06+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


100% agree delbeato. Tennis has a black mark, rugby league and AFL both now have a link with the notion of things being systematic.The Olympics has always had the stigma and the National authorities reluctance to pursue their own was a disgrace. Cycling has always been number one target. Perhaps the benefits of doping were so appealing and magnified that it manipulated results more than other sports? Not sure. Thanks for reading I really enjoyed your ideas.

2016-06-20T03:08:23+00:00

delbeato

Roar Guru


Doping in pro cycling still happens. There is no reason to believe the peloton has suddenly grown a conscience. What has changed is that the degree of doping a rider can engage in has decreased. Improved monitoring techniques - notably the bio-passport - mean that riders can't juice themselves up as much as they once did. Lance is notionally seen as the poster boy for peak doping. Not even close. What was happening before the 50% hematocrit level in the 90s made Lance's doping look like child's play. The key benefit of all of this is that clean riders can now beat dopers. That was impossible in the days of Lance and before, when the degree of doping put dopers on a different level. Cadel's Tour win is seen by most as evidence that clean riders can beat dirty ones. But while cycling's doping past is perhaps the most extreme, why are similar sports not viewed with the same suspicion? The Olympics, I'm looking at you. The popular perception that cyclists are riding around with a needle hanging off their arms, while Olympians are paragons of virtue is what should be ridiculed. Why are there no articles about "Can we trust the Olympics results?" The answer is obvious to me: No, hell No. But watch the media coverage brush over it, as if the Russian track and field ban is but a curious anomaly.

AUTHOR

2016-06-19T21:55:49+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Thanks Scott, I feel the same way. The thing that concerns me the most is that national drug administrators seem far more aggressive in their pursuit of cheats than some of the governing bodies. UCI being one of those. Some of the nonsense that went on with Armstrong and the vested and financial interests really make me question how much we really know. I hope this is all conspiracy on my behalf. I really do. I don't want it to be true.

2016-06-19T13:56:25+00:00

Scott Pryde

Expert


Like you Stuart, I am a believer that cycling will see its day again - I love the sport and would be absolutely lost without it. The bottom line is, drugs are apart of it and as long as they, riders will try to use them. It seems the UCI have made leaps to improve what they are doing, but it is a long and slow process. As you say though, we haven't had a winner caught for drugs in some time and that has to be only positive.

Read more at The Roar