Weekend Wallabies prove rugby teams need a second playmaker

By The Crowd / Roar Guru

Well, plenty of Roarers, including me, bought into this one playmaker so that they can have two centres experiment that Wallabies coach Michael Cheika has tried out in the first two games of the Cook Cup.

However, the second game suggests that the Wallabies just ain’t ready for that. That is not to criticise the efforts of Samu Kerevi, who played his part as a big ball running 12 with ball skills better than most of their teammates did their job. However, the sad fact of the matter is that he was only playing his second Test and does not have a set of experienced eyes accompanied by a big mouth that we need in the backline, such as Matt Giteau, Matt Toomua or Kurtley Beale.

Hopefully Kerevi will develop in this manner with experience, as Ma’a Nonu did, but at the moment the lack of another playmaker has just put too much decision-making responsibility on Bernard Foley’s overburdened shoulders.

I rate Foley, while not having the same outrageous skills of the likes of Beale or Quade Cooper, he came to the Wallabies with blistering pace, solid basics and excellent goal kicking and has incrementally built on those skills with a better long passing game. I like his desire to be a central part of the win, epitomised by stepping up for the big match winning goal kicks, and his evident commitment to continual improvement.

However, he does appear to me to get overloaded, and make poor decisions and mistakes when he doesn’t have some experienced backup nearby. This was epitomised on Saturday by his repetitive but not particularly effective running at the English line and failure to look for tactical kicking options, as well him blowing the first penalty kick for touch of the game in spectacular fashion.

There is no shame in this, I doubt Dan Carter would have consistently looked so good if he wasn’t surrounded by wildly talented and experienced backline teammates like Conrad Smith and Ma’a Nonu to feed him advice, so it is unreasonable to expect Foley to do all the thinking by himself.

He functions much better when he has the likes of Giteau or Beale yelling him advice, so getting somebody who can do that job into place has to be a priority.

So where does this leave us in terms of getting some second playmaker support for Foley onto the park in time for the third Test? Disappointingly Christian Leliifano didn’t do anything worthwhile with his own game when he was subbed on over the last fortnight. He would need to assure the coaches of a better performance if he was to replace Kerevi at 12.

I’ve been impressed with Lealiifano’s previous athletic performances at 12 in the past, but I am not so sure that he provides much in terms of direction to the 10 from that position. At least he might be able to take some of the kicking off Foley though, which would allow Foley to concentrate on picking the best playmaking options.

Aside from Lealiifano there is Toomua, though he is only available for one Test before he goes off overseas, so it isn’t exactly investing in long term development to use him. In any case he has played no footy for about seven weeks so might be rusty. Then there is the untested option of Karmichael Hunt at 12 or 15.

Cheika has said previously that he rates this player and he certainly doesn’t mind making himself heard from fullback in Reds games. However, like a few that get mentioned but never picked, such as Liam Gill, I wouldn’t be surprised if Cheika isn’t just using Hunt as a stalking horse to keep the other players motivated.

Irrespective of the three less than ideal options available, choosing a second playmaker at 12 or at 15 would necessitate dropping one of three players, Folau, Kuridrani or Kerevi to the bench. Cheika isn’t going to drop Folau so it would be one of the other two, they can both play 13 if a playmaking 12 is needed though Kerevi would be the frontrunner to start at 12 if the playmaker was positioned at 15 with Folau moving to 13.

Beyond this Test series and its bitter lessons, I think we will be seeing Monsieur Giteau back in the gold 12 jersey for the remainder of the year.

He is the most experienced inside centre who qualifies for the Wallabies and the backline functioned much, much better with him in it last year. Hopefully he can bring the same stability to make the Rugby Championship more fun for Wallabies fans than the Cook Cup has been.

The Crowd Says:

2016-06-21T16:41:32+00:00

Brian USA

Guest


10. CLL 11. Morahan 12. Hunt 13. Kerevi 14. DHP 15. Folau Someone needs to get some genuine pace in the backline, and right now it looks like Morahan is the only burner. But CLL would be defensively sound in the 10 channel, Hunt fine in the 12, so no need really to shift the back line around to accomodate defensive weaknesses.

2016-06-21T16:02:28+00:00

Not Bothered

Guest


How does that make sense?

2016-06-21T13:52:35+00:00

Shane D

Roar Rookie


Because the other options aren't any better in the coaches eyes I suspect.

2016-06-21T13:50:26+00:00

Shane D

Roar Rookie


Think it might be to do with Foleys ability to place the kick accurately consistently.

2016-06-21T13:49:22+00:00

Shane D

Roar Rookie


Works well for the AB's though. Dagg or Smith play that role & before them Muliaina did as well.

2016-06-21T08:31:28+00:00

Jibba Jabba

Guest


True - but is it a coaching issue i.e. a lack of ... or more the form of the opposition at the time. My recollection is he managed the game really well. Perhaps he had more time but I do recall he was doing things at pace.

2016-06-21T08:18:42+00:00

Jibba Jabba

Guest


Maybe the coach could do that ?? especially the Best Coach in The World:)

2016-06-21T08:17:38+00:00

Ruckin' Oaf

Guest


Yep Foley had a great test against England last year. However that could be due to the form of England last year as much as the ability of Foley. His games before and since haven't reached the same heights.

2016-06-21T07:43:10+00:00

Mushu

Roar Pro


We were debating whether Barrett should start at 15 since I assume Cruden will start at 10 when fit. Barrett vs anyone else besides as Cruden's understudy is another debate altogether and perhaps one that is much easier to settle in Barrett's favour as pointed out....

2016-06-21T07:00:06+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


O'Connor was back last year and was starting to get into old habits with his behaviour. Playing in Australia isn't for him. He is a completely different person in Europe

2016-06-21T06:56:45+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


Mauger was capped in 2001. He was originally a mid range flyhalf

2016-06-21T05:50:41+00:00

Brady

Guest


Sorry for hurting your sensibilities Mrs Foley. Personally i would be happy if your boy had developed into a decent fly half at test level. He hasn't despite all the chances. Move on. "Yay Quade". How's that?

2016-06-21T03:42:39+00:00

Boz the Younger

Guest


There is no such thing as "wasted on the wing", if you put the best players there they will find a way to influence the game with the tremendous amount of freedom they have to rove. DHP has the goods to make it work.

2016-06-21T03:41:30+00:00

Boz the Younger

Guest


Maybe, but I still wouldn't mind trying it out with Kerevi at 13, to see if CLL can get into the groove with a start. Kuridrani usually makes his biggest impact towards the end of the game anyway, so I don't think it would do him any harm to have a game off the bench.

2016-06-21T03:32:28+00:00

AlexG

Guest


"If his initials were QC you know everything would be blamed on him." The classic sign of one of the QC tragics. They have a far bigger chip on their shoulders than QC himself ever did. Personally I would be very happy to see him back, but not his fanatical fan club. Thats it for me in this debate.

2016-06-21T03:28:14+00:00

AlexG

Guest


True but I wonder, if the need was identified, could more be done to entice the right peolpe back home? The "amigos" debate has been done to death on both sides (and with some very valid points made on both sides too). Eveyone is older and wiser. Perhaps the ARU needs to approach Cooper and O'Connor, say 'look we want you back, can't guarantee a test slot but we want your sort of player, and we have spoken to xyz Super side that wants you and will support you', or something like that. At the moment you couldn't say it, because Wallabies aren't looking for the 2 or 3 playmakers in the backline a la Deans.

2016-06-21T03:05:06+00:00

Brady

Guest


What you read into plain English is up to you but the truth is he hasn't been mostly playing well. He has been mostly pedestrian with limited vision and limited talent. I don't think all the problems can be blamed on the fly half but he needs to be accountable for the poor attack to some degree. If his initials were QC you know everything would be blamed on him. I agree that you need to sit back and take a longer view. Foley has had his chances and while he may be the best available right now, he isn't the answer.

2016-06-21T02:27:54+00:00

kiwineil

Guest


completely agree great summary

2016-06-21T01:13:05+00:00

Boz the Younger

Guest


I agree.

2016-06-20T23:29:59+00:00

AlexG

Guest


At test level, Cooper's best games were with one or two other playmakers in the team. That's not a criticism.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar