Why I'm officially over Origin (until Game 3)

By Billy Stevenson / Roar Guru

As a Blues fan, I reserve the right to be whiny whenever we lose to Queensland at Suncorp.

Given our track record over the last decade, having a bit of a whine has actually become a defence mechanism. It’s something we do to distract ourselves from losing.

Over the last year or two, however, I’ve felt a different kind of frustration at the Maroons’ dominance.

In part, it’s a critical mass thing. After ten years – or almost ten years – of being pummelled, you get a bit sick of searching for the perfect strategy or the perfect combination.

At the same time, it really feels as if Queensland have graduated into true blue (unfortunate wording, I know) immortals.

In large part, that is because so many Maroons – Greg Inglis, Johnathan Thurston, Smith, Cooper Cronk, Billy Slater – are reaching the last phase in their careers, the period during which they’re going to be canonised and sedimented as immortals.

Sure, Slater may never play another Origin game in his life, but his absence has just made the other two members of Melbourne’s big three feel even more precious.

In one way or another, it feels as if all the key members of the Queensland squad are now facing a fixed Origin lifespan.

Dual retirement announcements from Corey Parker and Thurston in the buildup to last night’s game at Suncorp just intensified the feeling that we are witnessing a special turning point for this generation of Queenslanders.

It doesn’t help, too, that the hijinks at the Emerging Maroons camp earlier in the year means that descendants like Ben Hunt and Anthony Milford are still relegated to the wings.

All of that has created an even greater sense – if that were possible – that we are witnessing history in the making with this particular Queensland outfit.

With their achievements on the verge of passing into history, their current status and stature in the game has become even more intimidating to the Blues.

Realistically speaking, then, what is the likelihood that any team could beat the Maroons as they now stand?

If you look at this year’s Kangaroos squad, 13 out of the 18 players have worn the Maroons jersey, four have worn the Blues jersey and Semi Radradra wasn’t eligible for Origin in the first place (although you can bet he would have taken advantage of any loophole to have a shot at it).

On top of that, the most indispensable players in the team – Thurston, Cronk, Darius Boyd and (arguably) Inglis – are all Queenslanders (let’s leave the Macksville issue for another time), while Slater would obviously have been in contention as well if he hadn’t been out for the season.

Perhaps it’s time, then, to state the obvious: Queensland’s running streak simply stems from the fact that most of the very best players in the game at the moment happen to have been born north of the border.

After years of media speculation as to what the Blues are doing wrong, I just feel like calling it: Queensland are lucky.

If you were going to make a best-of NRL side, it would have to include at least two-thirds of the players currently wearing the Maroons jersey.

That’s not to say, of course, that Queensland haven’t capitalised on their strengths, nor that outlier players, such as Dane Gagai, haven’t taken advantage of Origin to build their game to the next level.

Nor is it to say that New South Wales couldn’t have made better selections or employed more vision or discipline.

It’s just to register a certain weariness about all the endless speculation as to why New South Wales can’t beat the best players in the game, as well as a certain weariness about Queenslanders acting like the best players in the game winning year after year is some kind of massive achievement.

In effect, the Blues have taken on the Kangaroos for the last half-decade. In that kind of stand-off, who would you expect to win?

In many ways, then, Origin has become something of a prophecy of how a fully deregulated NRL – an NRL run along the lines of the NFL – might operate.

For what makes Origin so unique is the total arbitrariness of whether a player is born in New South Wales or Queensland. In a code like the NRL that is – at least officially – so anxious to maintain salary caps and regulate parity among its teams in terms of player assets, Origin is a real wild card in terms of where the talent happens to fall.

While it has sometimes panned out that both teams have a roughly equal stable of players, it can also create the kinds of wild disparities we’re seeing at the moment.

In effect, the Maroons are fortunate to have the kind of dream team that would only ever occur at the wealthiest club in a completely deregulated code.

While that makes a bit of a break from regular footy, and gives the Blues a real underdog quality, it also makes for a bit of a boring experience.

Over the last year or two, I’ve noticed that there are more and more calls to ditch, revise or relocate Origin, often from the very people who most staunchly defended its singularity in the first place.

While a lot of these concerns are reasonable, I see them as part of a growing sense that Origin is not necessarily a fair or even enjoyable sport when one team simply happens to have most of the best players in the country.

While I’m not sure that opening up Origin to international representation would work – I sit on the fence about it and change my mind a lot – the best argument for it so far is that it would go some way to remedying the stalemate we’ve seen over the last few years.

If all that makes me sound like a bit of a whiny Blues supporter, then I fully accept the charge.

All I can say is that I love most of the players on the Maroons side as well. Nobody can grudge Thurston, Cronk or Inglis a great moment on the field when they’re in form.

At the same time, however, I’m getting a bit tired of the incredulity and excitement that ferments every year whenever the top players in the country simply manage to beat a less prestigious team, especially in years like 2016 when a whole lot of young Blues are being blooded.

To be honest, I’d feel the same way if the Blues had all the best players as well. Sport needs a relatively even playing field to be really exciting.

While some people see the Maroons as intensifying their achievement each year, then, I see it as a victory lap that’s starting to get a bit tiresome.

Here’s hoping that talent is distributed a bit more evenly over the next generation of New South Welshmen and Queenslanders, since that’s when Origin works best as a spectacle.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2016-06-26T23:30:31+00:00

Billy Stevenson

Roar Guru


I'm not really making excuses: Queensland deserve every win. They're an amazing team. It's just that when two-thirds of your players are also Australian representatives, the competition loses a bit of its dynamism - at least after ten years.

AUTHOR

2016-06-26T23:29:35+00:00

Billy Stevenson

Roar Guru


The difference, though, is that you'd expect Australia to field their very best players for a national tournament: what I'm arguing is that, due to the way the chips have fallen, the Maroons *effectively* are our national team (or the bulk of our national team), which makes it less and less surprising that they manage to take away the win. Selecting your best players for a national team (Cricket 2000-2007) and having a team that, by sheer chance, turns out to be much the same as the national team (Origin over the last decade, and the last five years in particular) is a very different thing.

2016-06-24T02:05:16+00:00

Liger

Guest


Stop blaming the QLD spine for NSW's ineptitude. NSW could've easily won at least another 2-3 series over the past decade but because of their terrible game plans and lack of attacking strategy in QLD territory they've constantly lost in games where they've been the better team. Honestly, QLD just go through the motions and guys like Thurston and Smith win the game for them through game management. They're not doing things on the field that other players can't do. So really you're just making excuses.

2016-06-24T01:30:21+00:00

Brett

Guest


One question: Did you feel the same way about Australia in cricket during their complete dominance during the 2000-2007 period? The whole of Australia loved their domination and I never heard one single Aussie complain about leveling the playing field. If you did, which I doubt, then we have very different views on what constitutes professional sport.

2016-06-23T03:13:29+00:00

steveng

Roar Rookie


I think that the dynamics and contest of SOO has been lost and its bordering on failure! I'm sure that there allot of fans (me included) that have given up on this contest and we as NSWelsh people have bore enough scars over the years with refereeing and certain outrageous decisions and events that have given Qld this dominance. For me, SOO is dead and I haven't been interested in this contest for many years and for the reasons that you have pointed out.Billy Stevenson.

AUTHOR

2016-06-23T02:24:12+00:00

Billy Stevenson

Roar Guru


Sure, I hear what you're saying, but that's not what I'm really arguing either. The New South Wales dominance in the early 2000s wasn't anything like the Queensland dominance over the last ten years. We only won for three years in a row - that's the kind of streak you'd expect in an event like Origin (and if you look back to the records since 1982, most sides have tended to win for 2-3 games in a row). The Queensland supremacy is a completely different scale - they've won ten out of the last eleven games, and probably would have won in 2014 as well if Cronk had been around for Game 2. If New South Wales had been the dominant team for eleven years straight, I'd probably concede that the event had lost a bit of its spark and dynamism as well. When you say "that's the nature of sport" - well, no, it's not. The fact that the NRL goes to such lengths to ensure salary cap standards and parity of assets amongst teams makes it clear that the nature of sport is the very opposite: to maintain a space where healthy competition can thrive. Similarly, the fact that the NFL only works as a deregulated code on the basis of its scale and wealth again suggests that the nature of sport actually works against a small-scale event like Origin maintaining a genuinely competitive spirit if there is no regulation of players. Don't get me wrong - I'm not saying that there should be regulation, or that Origin isn't a blast to watch, or that Queensland isn't fielding one of the best Rugby League team in Australian history. I'm just saying that, as a Blues supporter, it gets a bit wearisome to hear the Maroons congratulated year after year for fielding what is effectively the Australian national team in a domestic competition. While I love the gossip and drama surrounding NRL as much as anyone else, the constant sense of surprise - the constant incredulity - that Queensland manage to win year after year is starting to exhaust me a bit. At the end of the day, the Maroons have won in large part because they're fortunate enough to have gathered Thurston, Slater, Smith, Cronk, Inglis and a whole lot of other top-tier players on a single team. While that made Origin massively dynamic and exciting for a while - the thrill of seeing New South Wales try to take on these legends - I'm looking forward to to the next generation and a more genuinely competitive arena. I'm not saying Origin should be regulated - I love Origin - but just that I'm looking forward to the next phase, since this current dynasty has lost a bit of its dynamism for me.

2016-06-23T01:39:31+00:00

Brett

Guest


Mate, I guarantee 100% you and every other NSW fan who complains about a level-playing field weren't saying this back in 2003-2005, when the likes of Freddy and Joey were beating QLD. That's the nature of sport. If you have a contructed idea that origin should be manipulated to be even, then you don't understand what sport is about. I'm keen for Game 3 already!

Read more at The Roar