The Sydney Swans' evolution is complete, now comes a flag

By Ryan Buckland / Expert

A Sydney Swans premiership in 2016 would vindicate their decision to embrace their destiny as a marquee AFL club. Everything is coming together, and the Bloods will be a tricky proposition no matter who they face come September.

The AFL coaches are as close to unequivocal as you can get.

Nine of the 17 that responded to a question as to who would be the 2016 premier in this year’s AFL Coaches Association Survey said the Swans were the team to beat. The next highest scoring side was Hawthorn, on four.

Unless head coach John Longmire voted for his charges (not unlikely), that’s nine of 16 possible votes.

Sydney moved to second on the ladder on the weekend, with a first quarter obliteration of Port Adelaide helping them build to the league’s best percentage. With games against St Kilda, North Melbourne and Richmond to come, there’s a strong chance the Swans finish the year on a five-game winning streak, sitting in pole position.

That world came into view after Hawthorn’s loss to Melbourne on Saturday afternoon. It is no understatement to say that the Dees drove a stake into the heart of the Hawks’ top-two desires. Hawthorn are a clear 27 percentage points behind Geelong in fifth spot, who now sit just one win behind them. Next Friday night’s grand final rematch has become the pivot on which the Hawks’ double chance – and, probably, a realistic chance at their fourth straight flag – sits.

Simultaneously, the top four is now in a total state of flux. Where one of Adelaide, Geelong, Greater Western Sydney or Sydney looked like missing out, there’s now a clear path to them all making it.

Thought this home-and-away season was petering out to nothing? You can thank Paul Roos and his surging Demons later.

One of the beneficiaries of the surprise result on Saturday is the Swans, who are now in the box seat for a top-two spot. Indeed, they may share top billing with their cross-town rivals when the Round 23 dust settles, in what would have been a 10,000-to-1 chance to salute in early March.

That would help Sydney, sure, but it may not be required. Sydney are firmly in the frame to win this year’s premiership, and to cement their status as the AFL’s marquee club.

The evolution is complete
We’ve talked about Sydney quite a bit in recent times. It started when the vultures were circling Kurt Tippett, became a discussion about their evolution from stodgy to silky, and more recently was about how that evolution may stall in the face of a lack of pace on the list.

We talked about them in the context of the league’s new Big Three, too.

Sydney’s year has been as stellar as we’re used to seeing, although in many ways 2016 might be the most surprising season they’ve pulled together under Longmire to date.

The recruitment of Lance Franklin and Tippett, and retention of a stellar group of A-grade midfielders, left the Swans with a talent gap through the middle part of their list. They were to be the stars and scrubs (young players are scrubs for the purposes of this narrative) of 2016; a side grappling with the tricky inflection point they thrust upon themselves with their high-price acquisitions.

We just weren’t aware that many of the scrubs were already set to play like stars.

Through Round 20, five of Sydney’s players under 24 years of age have played at least 16 games this season: Tom Mitchell, Jake Lloyd, Callum Mills, George Hewett, and Isaac Heeney. All have played significant roles, in keeping with players in their prime years.

Heeney and Mills deserve particular praise, having come into the Sydney side at the first available opportunity, and holding their place thereafter. Heeney will likely end up as the best player of his Rising Star class, while it would be brave to write off Mills’ chances of taking the award this season.

They’ve been joined by Harry Cunningham (15), Zak Jones (14) and Tom Papley (12), who have also carved their own niches in this team. All told, 17 of Sydney’s 34 players used this year have been under 24, which is remarkable for a side that was the oldest in the competition in their 2012 flag year.

Speaking of 2012, Sydney’s evolution since then has been incredible, and extremely quick. Just 14 players that were on the list in their flag year remain in 2016. Carlton still have 12 players on their list from their 2012 season, while Hawthorn have 21. Fellow double-chance holders the Giants and Crows still have 19 and 21 of their 2012 players.

It is arguably the sneakiest rebuild in AFL history, and what’s more, the Swans have finished in the top four each and every year.

The more things change and all that.

Augmented identity
The Swans used to be a defence-first team, and in many ways, their current side still leans heavily on stopping the opposition. But rather than their story ending with congestion and ball ups – many, many ball ups – their midfield lets the Swans be much more potent.

Still, as the season has progressed Sydney’s defence has emerged as their cornerstone, as the unit defies expectations that it would be too slow to keep up with the pacey sets of the best sides. They’re conceding a league-leading 66.6 (let him who have understanding…) points per game, which happens to be just three points more than Essendon have scored per game. Regardless of the lens you want to view those two numbers through, they’re immense in their diminutiveness.

We shouldn’t be surprised; system trumps personnel, particularly behind the ball where only demi-gods like Alex Rance can reliably kill plays. We get fooled every year into thinking the loss of an individual is going to cruel a football team, or the injection of an individual will create a path to glory. Sydney have been one of the best defences for time immemorial, and it’s difficult to see that changing.

We’ve talked about the Swans’ system in the past. They are incredibly effective at creating dead space inside their opponents’ forward 50, by forcing teams to kick long and high or short and wide. They don’t go to a spare defender as their main strategy, but it often doesn’t matter such is the nous of their group.

Unfashionably, Sydney employ a number of players in their back half who are defenders first. Dane Rampe is the only defensive half player to rank inside the top ten for metres gained for the side, in contrast to many other teams who have three or four players in the back half.

It extends beyond the ilk of Heath Grundy, Nick Smith, Rampe and the emergent Aliir Aliir (who has kept Ted Richards out of their side since the midway point of the season). Their group of half backs are young, and have been trusted with the responsibility of running this line despite it emerging as the key battleground in 2016. Mills looks like a natural, Jones is growing, and Lloyd has continued to build on the impressive start to his career.

Sydney’s midfield work rate is second to none, too. The back half of the ground is often a numbers game, and Sydney’s midfielders run hard to ensure their back six have support. It speaks to a team that understands the importance of team when it comes to stopping the opposition from scoring.

How effective are they? Well, 66.6 points per game against is incredibly low, but some numbers that lie beneath the surface are even more indicative.

The 2016 Swans are content to turn the pace of their games up to 11. They are second in the league for inside 50 entries, at 57.1, but unlike recent years, they also concede 50-plus entries per game (51.6 in the year to date). Most other sides around the top of the ladder are much more miserly when it comes to territory: Geelong, Hawthorn, West Coast and the Western Bulldogs all let their opponents in less than 50 times a game.

It’s Sydney’s elite performance inside defensive 50 that is holding their opponents to such low scores. The Swans concede a score on just 38 per cent of opposition entries, clearly the lowest mark in the league, and a full 20 per cent below the average.

Beyond the arc, the Swans are just as crushingly effective; their opponents have scored just 72 points per 50 minutes of possession, almost three goals less than the AFL average (89 per 50 minutes) and a kind of comical 46 points less than the hapless Brisbane Lions.

In short, beating them relies on beating their defence first. And they have been beaten this way in 2016: the Swans have lost every time they’ve conceded 100 points or more, which is not uncommon (there have only been four games in which a top eight side has conceded 100 points and won, from 20 instances). But it does illustrate how important stopping power is to their prospects in September.

Untapped potential
Stopping is important, but having the capability to score with ease is arguably the more pertinent factor in winning individual games – that’s what becomes critical in knock-out finals. Fortunately for the Swans, they have this base covered.

Sydney are the league’s seventh-best scoring side in 2016 on my Offensive Efficiency Rating scheme, but once the top two are taken out (Adelaide and GWS, who have ratings of Holy Crap and God Damn, respectively), the gap between third and the Swans is half a goal. At +7.4, they have an above-average scoring aptitude, which is amplified by their miserly defence.

That’s despite their offensive abilities being hindered, in a record-keeping sense at least, by their unfortunate timing. The Swans have played five games that have been affected by rain this year – three of them significantly so – which are likely to understate their true potential. Indeed, if those five games are excluded from Sydney’s report card, they shoot up to third in the league, with an OER that gets them ever so close to the magic 100 points per game mark (99.8).

It makes sense: they have the most potent single offensive force in the game patrolling their forward half, and have a midfield which is known for its ability to share the load. A cursory look at their goal kicking spread paints this picture perfectly. Franklin sits on 61, while seven players that have played in at least 11 games have booted 0.9 goals a game or more (five of them having kicked more than one).

Franklin is the focal point, and rightly so. He is an instant candidate for a double team, and I’ve shown on a few occasions how his mere presence can bend the opposition’s defensive preferences. Buddy’s ability to hit the square from 60 metres out is the definition of a comparative advantage for the Swans, and one that becomes lethal on their home deck.

His running mate, Tippett, remains on Sydney’s long-term injury list, slated to return in Round 23. Despite playing as the team’s primary ruckman this season, Tippett was on track for a 30-goal season, and will likely end the year with close to ten contested possession wins per game. He would have been an intriguing choice as a forward pocket in the All Australian team.

Youngster Heeney is also an important cog, and forms a uniquely challenging three-headed hydra in Sydney’s forward 50. Heeney, the smaller of the three, might be the best mark, Franklin plays like a small forward, and Tippett is freaking huge. Deal with them, and the likes of Tom Papley, Ben McGlyn and Gary Rohan get off the chain. If all three heads are fit and firing, which seems likely, the Swans will be a constant 100-point threat.

Flag favourites
The glory of this season is that there hasn’t been a genuine flag favourite all year. Sure, the Hawks started the season at the shortest price, but that is out pre-season respect and a fear that until their brains are splattered all over the ‘G, they’re not really dead.

This week, the current top four have moved to equal favouritism. Of this group, I’d argue the Swans and Giants are the best placed, given their respective home-ground advantages and potential to win the day across the ground. The less said about GWS now the better, because I feel they’re going to be the AFL’s biggest finals story – I said my piece in May, and there’ll be more to say in the weeks ahead.

Big brother might be the pick of the litter this year, though. The Swans have embraced their status as a marquee club in recent years, foisting upon themselves a substantial overhaul of their playing group which has arguably put them in a better position than they were in 2012.

Every year, there’s a club where everything seems to fall into place in the run to September. Last year it was West Coast, and this year, it looks like it’s the Sydney Swans.

A third flag in just over a decade, after a period in the football abyss, would cement their newfound status as a league heavyweight; the marquee club of the competition.

The Crowd Says:

2016-08-12T00:37:17+00:00

Mark

Guest


Dean Rampe must be Dane's dad?

2016-08-11T02:47:05+00:00

kick to kick

Guest


I think that's a reasonable reservation about the Swans. They still rely on total exertion in the midfield and when a team like the Bulldogs can spread quickly and wide with uncontested possessions the Swans struggle to regain the initiative. Mind you, that is the modern game and suffering a run of opposition goals is common for most teams including the Hawks. However the Swans look vulnerable when a team is able to play keepings-off or at least keeping-the-ball-in-space where try as they might Swans players can't get close enough to exert trademark pressure. I felt that despite Hawthorn's toughness and tackle count in the 2014 GF, it was Clarkson's brilliant game plan that made the difference, the Swans running themselves ragged in bewilderment, the ball always one step away in a chain of uncontested possessions. Richmond plays Sydney in a similar way as did GWS at Spotless this year.

2016-08-10T12:50:53+00:00

TomC

Roar Guru


I reckon there might be one or two teams break away from the pack next year. GWS and the Bulldogs are the early favourites for mine.

2016-08-10T11:43:40+00:00

Mike Huber

Roar Pro


Jim Thanks for the info on the SCG . I wasn't aware that it is was lengthened . A few hypotheticals to play out yet - a few injuires to key players before the finals could determine who wins the flag . Hawthorn on their day are hard to beat, but all the other teams can perform sensationally on their respective days .

2016-08-10T11:34:01+00:00

andyl12

Guest


If Sydney do so much as reach a prelim this year then to some extent they've bucked the trend.

2016-08-10T11:32:11+00:00

andyl12

Guest


The scars last at least six years or in some cases they have lasted to this very day. In all cases a full rebuild was necessary before they were a September challenger again.

AUTHOR

2016-08-10T07:01:05+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


Without a doubt, and indeed I made that argument a few week's ago! People (not you, I mean in the third person) moan about Sydney, Hawthorn and Geelong being at or near the top consistently - there's a reason why that's the case.

AUTHOR

2016-08-10T07:00:11+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


Yep, I agree with you 100%. The season is so even because each side has its flaws. I prefer that model to the one or two superteam model, because it makes things so much more interesting from a tactics and match up perspective. Next year is going to be even more excellent in that respect. If we're talking the most solid teams, it would have to be a tie between Sydney and Geelong for mine, and I'd give Sydney the edge because of their depth. As above I reckon five sides are in with roughly equal chances; these two, plus Adelaide, GWS and Hawthorn. I am probably too down on the Eagles, but that was my mode last year too...

2016-08-10T06:48:09+00:00

Michael Huston

Guest


That stat is hard to go past, and it's certainly given me cause for caution no matter how well we are playing. But the interesting thing about this particular Sydney team is that it's different to that of 2012 and 2014. Isaac Heeney, Xavier Richards, Tom Papley, Dean Towers, Tom Mitchell, Aliir Aliir, George Hewett, Callum Mills, Sam Naismith, Toby Nankervis, Callum Sinclair and Zak Jones weren't part of that side. Only Grundy, Smith, Rampe, Cunningham, Lloyd, Jack, Hannebery, Parker, McVeigh, Kennedy, Tippett, Buddy and Rohan remain from that 2014 side. That's a big chunk of that team to be missing. 2015 I think you could clearly see the weight of that grand final loss on the boys. They kind of went into a lot of games already defeated, similar to West Coast this year. But this particular Swans team have come out rejuvenated in 2016, and they've maintained it across the whole season. That's a huge testament to this teams mentality. Not to mention the fact some of the blokes from that 2014 side are currently in better form this year than they were that year, including Grundy, Rampe, Lloyd, Hannebery, Parker, Tippett and Rohan. Not saying that day won't haunt us, and that our boys are imperial beings who never crumble. But I think John Longmire and his coaching staff have done a good enough job to warrant separation from that team, which was very different both in structure and in personnel.

AUTHOR

2016-08-10T06:30:24+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


Excellent comment Jim. I have nothing meaningful to add. You've captured it really well.

AUTHOR

2016-08-10T06:29:56+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


I never said the Hawks were done - I trust that's a comment directed at other websites and their writers? As above, for what its worth my favourite is the Giants, and I'll get to the reasons why in the weeks ahead.

2016-08-10T06:29:47+00:00

Michael Huston

Guest


Your statement about system trumping personnel is one of the sharpest points I've seen regarding the Swans. However, the irony of it all is that because of how strong our defensive system is, it's produced some genuine star-power. Dane Rampe is a lock for All Australian, Heath Grundy should be selected too, and Aliir Aliir has all the makings of a genuine star defender. Just on Grundy, it's a bold statement, but I would take him over Alex Rance any day of the week. We all like to watch Rance; he does the fancy, the tough, and the freakish, and his reading of the play is excellent, as is his ability to take the game on and intercept opposition plays. But we have Rampe for that. He's basically proven to be capable of doing all the things Rance does (God forbid Rampe gets a mention in the media though). Which leaves Grundy. Huge statement, but he's got to have been the best key defender this year in terms of one-on-one. I can only recall one game where he was beaten, and that was by Ben Griffiths. Grundy's had Jack Gunston, Josh Kennedy, Jesse Hogan, Jeremy Cameron, all of the North talls, Josh Jenkins, Charlie Dixon, Tom Lynch and Tom Hawkins all bent over a barrel this year. They are the cream of the crop as far as tall forwards go, and yes, some of those games were in wet conditions which favoured Grundy, but it's an individual win-loss ratio that simply can't be ignored. He is the lynch-pin of the competition's best defence. Can't see how he doesn't get All Australian.

AUTHOR

2016-08-10T06:28:26+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


I see that stat get bandied about often, and like West Coast's scars, until something else can explain why it continuously happens rationally, then I can't really dispute its use. Out of curiosity, how long do "the scars" last? Eventually every team is going to get their butts kicked in a Grand Final - so it can't last forever.

2016-08-10T06:21:25+00:00

Michael Huston

Guest


I think there's something a little fair-weather about GWS. They're bloody scary when they get their run on, but in a final, that won't happen much of the time. And their run is basically the only thing that elevates them from 'good' to 'great.' So, come September, I have a feeling they will look a little more ordinary than what we're used to seeing from them. I'm not saying they aren't tough. They've won some hard, tight contests (Port, Geelong, Bulldogs..) but their tough wins aren't as convincing as say, a Sydney, or even a Geelong. They're not as good in the tough wins, and most finals games you have to win tough. I suspect they'll be flimsy this year, but next year, I have a feeling Leon Cameron will have them looking a much more imposing defensive unit ala Sydney and Bulldogs this year.

AUTHOR

2016-08-10T06:04:04+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


Yep, they are living proof that system trumps personnel. For the longest time they were the League's afterthought, and I now think it's pretty clear that they are the marquee club of the competition; the Hawks are be the best and best run (although Sydney are far behind in an administrative sense), but when I think about the Sydney Swans I think about prestige and might.

AUTHOR

2016-08-10T06:02:39+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


Yeah, that's fair. I meant more in a qualitative sense; a team where everything breaks right, and they're good enough to capitalise on that. Now, the Eagles lost their two primary key defenders which was very unfortunate, but they were good enough to capitalise on it by going small down back and building their zone system. I reckon the Crows, Giants, Swans, Hawks and Cats are all somewhat equal propositions right now. It is so hard to split them.

AUTHOR

2016-08-10T06:01:03+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


Yeah the youth at Sydney is quite impressive, and right across the ground. I said a few weeks ago that Aliir Aliir might be as good a prospect as Jacob Weitering - although not knowing that Aliir was a few years older at the time - and I stick by it. He's been excellent, and looks like holding down centre half back for the Swans for some time yet. I'm still waiting for Hawthorn to lose a preliminary final at the MCG before writing off their chances, but I think it is more likely than not that they don't win in this year. My favourite is still GWS, for what it's worth.

AUTHOR

2016-08-10T05:54:05+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


People have been saying that about West Coast this year, and you know what, in lieu of a better explanation this is always going to stick. Still, the Swans beat the Hawks at the 'G this year, whereas the Eagles might as well have been in Western Australia when they played the Hawks in Round Two or Three. The difference between the 'G and 'G (...) is real, but I sometimes think these things are over-stated. Indeed, the Swans have kicked 100 points per game (and change) away from the SCG this year. Open grounds are probably better suited to their current preferred method of play through the middle of the ground. Their defence has been better at the SCG though, so it is certainly something to consider. I read this morning that Tippett will be back next week (he comes of the LTI list early next week), and you'd think he'll come straight back in. A forward line with he, Franklin and Heeney is very nice indeed.

AUTHOR

2016-08-10T05:50:35+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


Under the way I define close games (final margins of 12 points or less), the Swans have played in six close games and lost four of them, which is only one less than you would expect. (noting that over the long run, teams struggle to win many more than half of their games that are decided by 12 points or less) It has played out a couple of times most certainly, particularly, and unfortunately, with Dean Towers. Still, in that Richmond game, Alex Rance essentially won that game for them (head here for a break down of his plays in the last couple of minutes: https://twitter.com/RyanBuckland7/status/731661561857593344)

2016-08-10T05:29:48+00:00

Mike Huber

Roar Pro


For Geelong to progress in the finals , Menzel will have to play out of his skin . The cats can't rely on Hawkins , he is simply to inconsistent and underwhelming as a match winner . Considering Hawkins size he should be throwing himself around like Tony Lockett , he doesn't and that disadvantages Geelong more than they would like . It will be interesting to see if the cats veterans have the legs in September - as they have been shaky throughout the year. I like a Hawthorn vs GWS Grand Final.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar