AFL premiership rankings: Giant leap shapes the finals race

By Michael DiFabrizio / Expert

Who’s closest to the flag after the first week of finals? There’s a big, big sound telling us it’s the GWS Giants.

Yes, that’s right. A club that hadn’t played a single finals match a few days ago is now best placed to go all the way.

An absurd proposition? Hardly.

We thought the pressure might show up the 16 players without finals experience against the September-hardened Sydney Swans. Instead, the Giants played the most September-worthy footy of any side at the weekend. They laid 17 more tackles than the next best side across the board and 32 more than their opponents on the day.

If there were nerves, they pushed past them. The Giants had the strongest disposal efficiency differential across the board, using the ball at a 5 per cent better rate than the minor premiers.

The players who’d been there and done that stood up (see Heath Shaw) and those who hadn’t were ready (Toby Greene, Tom Scully), really ready (Lachie Whitfield, Stephen Coniglio) or so very, very ready (hey Jeremy Cameron).

Now, it’s another week off and then a home preliminary final. Only one other team is in the same position and the Giants might just have their noses in front.

With one week of finals down, here’s our ranking of those closest to farthest away from lifting the cup:

Through to preliminary final vs Hawthorn/Western Bulldogs
The risk with placing the Giants on top is what could happen at the match review panel. Worst case scenario – losing Steve Johnson and Shane Mumford for the preliminary final – would move the calculations around. But after such a strong win over the team that previously looked most likely, they’ve earned top billing.

Through to preliminary final vs Sydney/Adelaide
Had Isaac Smith kicked as truly as his previous 11 shots at goal in finals, the conversation around the Cats would be very different today. It missed though, meaning Geelong can boast a home preliminary final and a gritty win over a team considered expert at closing out games.

A fair position to be in, to be sure. What’s scary looking ahead is that wile his numbers were impressive, Patrick Dangerfield is capable of better footy than his game against the Hawks.

As these rankings are forward-looking, we’ve also taken into account possible opposition in a fortnight’s time. On that front, the Cats can expect a big challenge regardless of who wins out of Sydney and Adelaide. For mine, they’re definitely on the tougher side of the draw.

Semi final vs Sydney (SCG, Saturday 7.25pm)
If you take the body of work that Sydney and Adelaide have put together this season, you’d have to say the winner of this weekend’s match is a very good chance to go all the way. Playing four consecutive weeks is the barrier, but Hawthorn showed what was possible last year and the week off this year could help push things along.

For the Crows, they were expected to beat North Melbourne and to do so with a decent margin, so we can’t read too much into the result alone. The key was that round 23 was made to look like an aberration and not the norm.

With Eddie Betts, Tom Lynch and Taylor Walker all prominent, there’s clearly no shortage of firepower up forward with this side. One man the Swans will have to study this week is Brodie Smith, who gained 927m and delivered his 29 disposals at 86 per cent efficiency against the Roos.

Semi final vs Adelaide (SCG, Saturday 7.25pm)
Could the Swans be headed for a straight sets exit? It’s entirely possible. Could they bounce back and go on to do a Hawthorn? It’s entirely possible.

Awkwardly, the ledger now shows the Swans have lost their past four finals. Still, we know the Swans can apply more pressure than they did against the Giants. We have to expect it this week against the Crows.

What bumps them to fourth here is the injury toll to come out of the weekend. With Callum Mills sidelined by his hamstring and Kurt Tippett ruled out this week, things get more difficult.

Semi final vs Western Bulldogs (MCG, Friday 7.50pm)
Let’s talk about the kick first. Isaac Smith’s shot didn’t look particularly comfortable. Compare this picture of Smith kicking pressure-free at training during the week to this one from Friday night.

Maybe the timing of these two images is a bit off, but there are a few differences in posture that can be studied. His body is more upright and his right foot happens to be pointed further outwards. Looking at that image alone, it isn’t surprising a high arching ball to the right was the outcome.

Over-analysis aside, the Hawks were a kick away from a preliminary final so perhaps the fifth-spot ranking is harsh. But here’s their record against the teams that are left this season: three wins by under a goal and four losses (with margins stretching as far as 75 points).

Semi final vs Hawthorn (MCG, Friday 7.50pm)
Not many gave the Dogs too much of a chance on the road against West Coast. Somehow, this team keeps winning – despite all the setbacks, and there was another when Lin Jong did his collarbone.

Who’s to say the winning has to stop here? It was a strong victory over the Eagles, powered by seven unanswered goals in the first half.

Luke Dahlhaus, Liam Picken and Tom Liberatore all showed good form, while Marcus Bontempelli has room for improvement, which can only be a good thing. Another star of the Eagles win, Caleb Daniel, played a big role on Sam Mitchell when the sides met in round 3 (a three-point Hawks win).


Three questions for the week ahead:

1. Will the week off prove to be the great leveller?
There’s a theory that the post-round 23 bye has given a leg up to teams that didn’t earn the traditional perks of finishing higher up the ladder.

Would the injury-plagued Western Bulldogs have had the same performance last Thursday without being able to bring back five players? Perhaps not. Did the extra break reduce the impact travelling across the continent? Perhaps it did. Could the week off help facilitate a run by a team outside the top four? Perhaps it can.

2. What will the match review panel verdict be on Steve Johnson?
There will be nerves in the Giants camp right now. Johnson’s collision with Josh Kennedy will no doubt be heavily scrutinised and as it stands there’s a big chance he won’t play in the preliminary final.

The argument that the vision isn’t conclusive enough will probably fall short. That hint of a raised arm in the footage could be what sways things towards a ban. Kennedy’s medical report, given he returned to the field, might offer a lifeline.

Then there’s Shane Mumford, too. The tackle on Kurt Tippett will have to be looked at, though you suspect the risk of suspension is lower than with Johnson.

3. Will Boomer play on?
North Melbourne’s loss brought the curtain down on at least two careers. Michael Firrito and Drew Petrie aren’t expected to play on, though the question is being asked of Brent Harvey and Nick Dal Santo.

The answers aren’t yet apparent and in Boomer’s case, he was politely dismissing the question in the aftermath of a finals loss (which is fair enough). In coming days we might get a clearer sense of his intention.

The loss to Adelaide was far from his best performance, but look back to his last game before everything went down a few weeks ago (32 disposals, three goals against Sydney) and it’s not so clear-cut.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2016-09-13T08:06:33+00:00

Michael DiFabrizio

Expert


Okay, so we've narrowed down not giving GWS respect all year to not giving GWS respect after round 21. Cool. Let's explore that idea. The power rankings are an analysis of form. GWS at that point were coming off a loss to West Coast and a narrow win over an ordinary team in Gold Coast. Melbourne were coming off a 29-point win over Hawthorn (!) and a 40-point win over Port Adelaide (ie, a much better team than Gold Coast). Is it all that controversial that Melbourne moved a whopping one spot ahead in a ranking based on form??? As for Adelaide, I've taken into account their road ahead. I get that Geelong might be ahead of them (as reflected by the fact I've put Geelong ahead of them) and the fact I have Sydney one spot behind acknowledges that not even this week is a given. But looking ahead, and taking all that into account, I genuinely think they are the third closest team to the flag right now.

2016-09-13T04:12:22+00:00

Birdman

Guest


oops . The Cats weren't given a commitment.....

2016-09-13T03:39:45+00:00

Birdman

Guest


commercial interests will always carry the day, Cat so home advantage in the form of a boutique stadium will never be the priority if the potential audience demands it move to a bigger venue. The Cats we're given a commitment from the AFL on home finals when it invested in renovating Kardinia so there should be no surprises now.

2016-09-13T02:27:42+00:00

sammy

Guest


but they beat sydney in the only game the 2 teams played each other - so are a reasonable chance to make the prelim and who knows. And remember Adelaide very comfortably beat GWS in the only meeting this year between the 2 teams

2016-09-13T00:35:01+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


As a Cats fan I'd very much love to play a finals where all the Hawthorn fans got locked out (I don't care about neutrals and non-members either, support your team or miss out). I'd love to have basically the same home advantage that any interstate side has, a very pro-home team crowd. If Hawthorn was good enough to earn a home final (and this year they were not) they would play at their home ground, the MCG. Why shouldn't the Cats get the same exact consideration, earn a home final, play it on your home ground. The MCG is not the Cats home ground, we don't ask to play there, we are given no choice. We have said if we must absolutely play some home games in Melbourne they must be at the MCG and not Etihad. It costs too much money for a disadvantage.

2016-09-13T00:30:24+00:00

Birdman

Guest


thanks Michael for providing your reasoning for your analysis. Makes sense I can't fault Isaac who played his socks off but he did seem to 'rush' it a bit although that may have felt more natural rather than to dwell on it a bit longer.

2016-09-13T00:23:38+00:00

Birdman

Guest


I agree Cat, it's not a similar issue, it's actually the SAME issue - that is, to have an advantage over the opponent. Of course Hawthorn, or North for that matter, won't ever ask for Tassie finals but it beggars belief that Geelong could insist on games at Kardinia (particularly against Hawthorn) that would lock out tens of thousands of punters because they were missing out on an advantage which was the nonsense floated by many Cat fans last week.

2016-09-12T23:32:01+00:00

anon

Guest


And with a close win away against the Gold Coast you had them down all the way to 8th, which absolutely absurd. You had Melbourne ahead of them in 7th. Even after their crushing win against Richmond (kept a team to 23 points in 120 minutes of football) you couldn't put them above 5th. Meanwhile, you had Adelaide on top, after both those rounds. It really hasn't come to fruition for Adelaide. Blew their must win game against West Coast by a big margin, yet still finding a way to put them 3rd. They still have to get through Sydney at the SCG, and Geelong at the MCG. Correct me if I'm wrong but Adelaide wasn't competitive both times they played Geelong this season.

2016-09-12T22:15:00+00:00

Tim Holt

Roar Guru


Jim, the irony of your comment about Hawk fans is even I cringe at their recent antics and when I venture to the footy have more disputes with them than with opposition fans. The traditional fans are fine but with success as we have experienced it attracts the bandwaggon jumpers, and they are feral. For they have no knowledge and respect for the Family Natlure of the club and are governed by their blind zealotry which is always hysterical.

2016-09-12T12:25:39+00:00

Paul

Guest


Geelong should be allowed to play home finals at Kardinia. There's only one reason why GWS get their home final at Skoda. The potential for empty seats.

2016-09-12T11:53:45+00:00

Jim

Guest


The important one did come from the most blatant hands in the back one would ever see however :P Hopefully a similar circumstance this Saturday night might see the free kick that should have been paid actually paid. There are not many small forwards that have had a lot of great nights against Nick Smith over his career - should be a highlight of the match in my opinion.

AUTHOR

2016-09-12T10:21:06+00:00

Michael DiFabrizio

Expert


Sorry another thing I should add here is that in my view (and I suspect this is how the players would approach it) .... the goal in that situation is to revert as much as possible back to your natural, relaxed kicking style. Hence the comparison has value.

AUTHOR

2016-09-12T10:18:05+00:00

Michael DiFabrizio

Expert


Cheers Tom. I'm obviously going all-in on the Swans/Crows side of the draw here but we'll see. As I say in the article it's a real concern Hawthorn hasn't beaten any of the teams that are left by more than a goal.

AUTHOR

2016-09-12T10:15:30+00:00

Michael DiFabrizio

Expert


Pete, it's an interesting argument, re: the Giants in Melbourne. I don't think it should be as big a factor as it's made out to be in finals (anywhere, anytime and all that) but then again clubs do place a lot of importance on training at grounds with MCG dimensions ahead of MCG games, so it's clearly something they value. Against a Geelong it could be an issue. A neutral opponent (Sydney / Adelaide) might take that out of it.

AUTHOR

2016-09-12T10:12:34+00:00

Michael DiFabrizio

Expert


Tim, it's interesting how some of the comments have panned out. You've got some placing Hawthorn and Western Bulldogs together above Sydney and Adelaide and others (okay, me) going all in on Sydney and Adelaide. And you know what, I can understand both arguments completely.

AUTHOR

2016-09-12T10:07:50+00:00

Michael DiFabrizio

Expert


Birdman, obviously they are completely different scenarios. I thought it worthy to illustrate what his ideal motion looks like and use it as a comparison, because between the images there are a number of contrasts. First and foremost it's interesting. Here's what it looks like at training, here's what it looks like after four quarters of finals football. Here's the reference point, here it is when the intensity is turned up a gazillion notches. So I'm with you, although I would add that sometimes players are capable of blocking all that out and just executing in similar moments. This wasn't one of those times, so I don't see why it shouldn't be picked apart. I'd wager that the Hawthorn coaching staff and Isaac Smith have done the same already.

2016-09-12T10:06:47+00:00

Ian Whitchurch

Guest


Meh. Western Sydney. Chip on shoulder. Meh.

AUTHOR

2016-09-12T09:57:06+00:00

Michael DiFabrizio

Expert


anon, just had a look back at the power rankings throughout the season. Had GWS in the top four for 13 consecutive weeks. They were in the top two for seven consecutive weeks at one point.They spent two weeks at number one, a ranking only five clubs achieved. May want to reconsider the statement: "You haven’t given GWS any respect all year"

2016-09-12T09:42:12+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


MCG is Hawthorn's home ground. Not even close to a similar situation.

2016-09-12T09:22:18+00:00

Birdman

Guest


yeah and Hawthorn might insist on playing next year's home finals at Aurora down in Tassie because that's a real advantage. Sheesh!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar