Coles, Creevy and Strauss: Defining the modern day Test hooker

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

Hookers. You can’t live with them, you can’t live without them. The contemporary version is a gregarious multi-tasker, even more so than he was back in the amateur day.

His role is expanding all the time and he is fast becoming the jack-of-all-trades on a rugby field.

It is not an exaggeration to say that the selection of the No.2 across the globe gives a rough-and-ready short-hand of how their teams are going to play. (Click to Tweet)

In the northern hemisphere, selection is still conservative. The best among the home nations is probably the England captain Dylan Hartley, an expert set-piece technician. Giulhem Guirado, the French all-rounder is perhaps the best-equipped European to switch to the faster pace required by Super Rugby.

Hookers in the southern hemisphere mirror the style and ambition of the teams in which they operate. The Puma rake Agustin Creevy has embraced the new attacking philosophy of Argentina, while retaining the core attributes the nation expects of their hookers.

The transition between Adriaan Strauss (and Bismarck du Plessis at the World Cup) and Malcolm Marx exemplifies the halting, uneasy interval between the old, power-based South African game and the new way forward, shown by the Lions in Super Rugby.

Meanwhile, New Zealand are galloping away with their interpretation of the position, with Dane Coles demonstrating a wide array of skills no other hooker in the world can match.

Pumas
Historically, Argentina has always required scrummaging strength from its hooker. Frequently they have been converted from props – think Federico Mendez and more recently, Eusebio Guinazu. Those three props in the front row, and the back-breaking bajada technique gave the Puma scrum a fearsome front foot.

At least when Marco Ayerza is available (and selected) at loose-head, the Pumas can still boast a scrum worthy of its ancestors, and Creevy is very much a part of that. But with Daniel Hourcade looking to expand the Pumas’ attacking game, much, much more is demanded of the 2 than in the day of Mendez, or even Guinazu.

The clips come from Argentina’s sensational World Cup quarter-final victory over Ireland, and the gallant haymaker they threw at the All Blacks a couple of weeks ago. In them, Creevy demonstrates the historic Puma power at scrum and breakdown, along with the new commitment to playing across the full width of the field.

The scrum power was certainly there at the World Cup with Ayerza still in harness, as the final clip illustrates. The shoulders of both Creevy and his tight-head Ramiro Herrera have advanced well beyond the Ireland #3 Mike Ross as Argentina win the ball against the feed.

With Argentina throwing the vast majority of their ball to the front or middle of the lineout, less is required of Creevy in this respect than Strauss or Coles.

Along with Strauss and Bismarck, and Rory Best from Ireland, Creevy is one of top defensive breakdown thieves as a hooker in international rugby. He is averaging more than one turnover per game in the current Rugby Championship and won two turnovers against Ireland in the quarter-final.

At 25:33 against New Zealand, the combined efforts of the two Sams – Cane and Whitelock – are not enough to remove him; at 1:45 against Ireland he is able to resist the cleanout attentions of no less than three Irish players.

The power to stand up over the ball in the tackle area translates into the power to stand up in contact with ball in hand. Working as an analyst for Wales back in 2004-05, I devised a new category (derived from American football) to measure the effectiveness of ball-carriers. It was called YAC (yards after contact) and was designed to quantify the yardage achieved by a ball-carrier after the first collision had occurred.

Against New Zealand, Creevy was used as a work-horse close to the breakdown, and he achieved hugely impressive YAC in this role. In the New Zealand clips at 33:59, 39:36 and 42:13 he earns 23 of the hardest metres available, while occupying seven All Black tacklers near the ruck.

But the role against New Zealand was game-specific. Under Hourcade, Creevy has been encouraged to provide tight forward width in the two 15 metre zones:



He can appear on the right, but more frequently attacks down the left side, where he can use his back-handed offload out of the left hand more effectively (New Zealand at 32:33, Ireland at 5:11 and 50:55).

So Creevy’s individual role with Argentina is a fair reflection of where the Pumas are going collectively – they want to keep their traditional identity at scrum and breakdown, but add width and offloading to their attacking philosophy.

Springboks
Steve Hansen recently described the situation of South African rugby very succinctly: “Maybe that has been part of their problem so far, they are not sure how to play… Most of the side is from the Lions and there is a certain style South Africa play and it is bruising, physical and reasonably direct. The Lions don’t play like that. I am not sure which one of those styles Allister [Coetzee] wants to play.”

The situation at hooker is a capsule of what is happening in South Africa on a larger scale. The incumbent, Adriaan Strauss, is the team captain but has handed in his notice for the end of the year. His obvious replacement, massive Malcolm Marx from the Lions, is one of best talents at the position to emerge for many years, but is being kept out of the match-day 23 by Bongi Mbonambi.

Marx is both a symbol of South Africa’s political difficulty with sporting quotas, and their stylistic difficulty in transitioning towards the playing pattern adopted by their most successful Super rugby franchise. This is what that transition looked like against the All Blacks in Christchurch:

Like Creevy, Strauss is one of the strongest on-ball hookers in international rugby at the tackle area, and he turns over two New Zealand breakdowns for penalty at 11:44 and 16:17.

He also exemplifies South African lineout expertise with his accurate throwing to the tail of the line at 3:42 and 13:10. In neither case is the ball in the air for longer than one second, and the All Blacks are unable to get a counter-jump up in time to contest. There is very little loop on the delivery and the line on both occasions. This represents superior technique against the best defensive lineout in Test rugby.

Strauss’ two intercepts against the Wallabies last week also showcased his ability to shoulder the responsibility of a key defensive role, inherited from the previous Springbok skipper, Jean de Villiers. Like de Villiers, Strauss shoots out of the line, squares his shoulders inwards to the side-line and ‘fish-hooks’ for the intercept – then offloads neatly to Elton Jantjies to convert opportunity into score.

Strauss (along with Bryan Habana) represents the best remnant of an era of success for South African rugby under Heyneke Meyer. But if the torch has to be passed anywhere, it must be passed to Marx and the Lions.

Despite his great size, at 120 kilograms, Marx can run and is a footballer down to his bootlaces. At 58:28 he is defending at the end half-back position in the lineout. He anticipates the chip from Beauden Barrett, stays with him all the way on the turn and recovers the ball, before tossing Malakai Fekitoa away like toothpick as he turns back upfield.

At 60:18, with ball in hand, he steps Wyatt Crockett before brushing off the tackle of Sam Whitelock and offloading deftly to his front-row colleague Vincent Koch.

Marx is a complete footballing package, but will South African rugby politics and coaching expertise allow him to be recognized as such?

All Blacks
If Creevy represents the sunny Puma smile, and Strauss and Marx the befuddled frown on the face of Springbok rugby, then Dane Coles – well, he must be laughing all the way to the bank!

The All Blacks are getting the absolute playing maximum out of the No.2 position. Coles represents the place where Argentine rugby aspires to be, and where South Africa is tentatively groping towards in its own separate darkness.

Coles was required to put on upper body mass in his early days, developing from 100 to 108.5 kilos in order to cope with the isometric loads of the modern scrum. As Mike Cron says, “under the new (scrum) laws the hooker has to scrummage every bit as well as a tight-head prop.”

His throwing to the tail of the lineout has become top-quality, as good as that of Strauss, as the two clips at 11:33 and 63:30 illustrate.

In the second example, Coles keys the ‘teabag’ move, which earned Tony Woodcock the All Blacks’ only try in the 2011 World Cup final. At 2:05, Coles is doing what a goal-kicker does – shifting from the inner stillness needed to complete the throw to all-action as the phase-play begins:


After throwing successfully to the tail at 2:05, by fifth phase at 2:37 Coles is over on the far side of the field, mounting a kick chase on the South African fullback!

It is Coles’ mobility and attacking skills which set him apart. In the All Blacks attacking system, he is consistently required to play in the wide short-side channel, along with #6 Jerome Kaino.

In the Christchurch Test, New Zealand had a clear plan of attack to hit in midfield at first phase scrums and then move the ball quickly back to the short-side.

Many teams will tip off this pattern of attack by shifting a back into the short-side first receiver role. New Zealand don’t need to, because they can rely on Coles’ ability to fill that role as a distributor – whether it is through ‘quick hands’ at 21:45, or by attacking the end defender and hooking an offload round the corner to Julian Savea at 27:36.

Coles has excellent passing technique, and that is what allows him to attack the line with the confidence of a distributing back. At 64:00 he takes three steps towards Damian de Allende before flicking a 15-metre scoring pass away to Whitelock (playing the Kaino role, with Kaino off the field) with no more than the power in his wrists and forearms.

It is the same at 32:19, with Coles making the long pass solely with the power from elbow to wrist. At 32:30, he is able to stop the defender (Vincent Koch) by running forward before he flicks the pass away across his chest, thereby preserving the overlap for Israel Dagg near the sideline.

Coles’ sheer running power has never been in doubt, as the reprise from last year’s return Bledisloe fixture amply demonstrates, with Coles running away from Wallaby wing Adam Ashley-Cooper to score.

Summary
The position of hooker is a dynamic and developing one. Changes of attitude and intent can be observed in the types of player selected.

Agustin Creevy represents Argentina’s desire to play expansively with ball in hand while keeping in touch with their traditional strengths at breakdown and scrum. Like Coles, he will typically be an attacker in the two 15m channels with his offloading ability out of the left hand.

The confused (and confusing) situation with Adriaan Strauss and Malcolm Marx underlines the lack of direction in Springbok rugby. South Africa’s coaches and rugby politicians need to commit to Marx to show supporters they know where they are going.

Dane Coles represents the All Blacks rocket-fuelled post-World Cup relaunch. His core skills at lineout and scrum are solid, and he has the ability to mask and enhance his team’s short-side attacks with his distributing skills.

To catch the All Blacks, their rivals across the globe will first have to unearth a talent to match Dane Coles!

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2016-09-27T10:38:26+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


The pyramid is built both on the inside... and the outside. It's a great way of seeing things, and you get supporters, players, coaches all feeling that they a part of the same adventure. Great stuff!

2016-09-27T00:49:13+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, When Michael Cheika first took over the Waratahs the organisation and team was in a poor state having never won the Super Rugby competition and finished 11th on the table in the prior season with 4 wins and 12 losses. He had a lot of work to do. One of the tasks he committed to doing was making contact with disgruntled supporters who had previously made the effort to voice their concerns with NSW Rugby. He would obtain their contact details and phone them on his long drives to and from team training sessions during the pre-season. He would firstly hear what they had to say by listening to their concerns/gripes and then outline what the Waratahs will be about under his coaching; 1. They were working on building their identity; 2. The players will live and play by that identity; 3. Supporters of the team and those that want to come and watch the Waratahs play will know what they can expect and the style they can expect each week because the identity of the team will be obvious and well known to all. When the Waratahs won the final of the tournament against the Crusaders two seasons later in a nail biting finish this is what Michael Cheika said after the game: “Look, they powered up in the second half, they used all their finals experience, and we wobbled a little bit, I think. But we were able to stay true to our identity and I think one of the big things beforehand we said is - if we're going to do this, we want to do it in our manner. We want our supporters to see us play our way. And I was really happy with the team that they stayed that way. We played - we kept passing the ball, we kept coming at the opposition in our attacking style and eventually it got us into field position there at the end and we were fortunate enough to get the penalty and then the man stepped up and kicked it. And I could see when they got the penalty, they did as well, because there was no hesitation in the decision-making and that comes from having belief in your teammates and knowing how we want to play.” Later on Cheika said some of the information gained from those phone conversations in the early days with disillusioned supporters was used to establish the team identity. In other words he was not just reaching out to the team’s supporter base – he was also conducting hands on market research to get an idea of what they were thinking and wanted to see in their team. The other stakeholders that were used to develop and formulate the team identity were the players as well as the executive members of the organisation and their goals. There was a lot of buy-in and ownership.

AUTHOR

2016-09-24T06:46:32+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


It's just a matter of personality isn't it? I don't see any problem in it, aren't people in the media always complaining there's not enough colour? When they get it, it's wrong kind (apparently)! By all accounts, MC is a paasionate coach, that is the way he is. Life is too short for him, or anyone else to be pandering to the whims of others.

2016-09-24T00:00:31+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, Much talk from the 'outside' about Michael Cheika's coaching methods, particularly criticism he gets from people who see him in the coaches box during games and don't approve of his approach. I found this response to a question he received from a reporter quite revealing. 'Well you know us Mediterraneans; can't keep a lid on it, can we? No, I think one thing that's very important for me is that I know that, you know, in life you've got a small period of time to enjoy yourself and be passionate about what you do and I don't think that any of us can seriously consider that being a rugby coach or a rugby player is a job. It's not work, it's a passion, it's something that you want to do, it's sport at the end of the day. There's a lot of people working a lot harder than us in jobs all around the country, you know what I mean? And I think that it's important for us to understand that. And for me, I certainly don't take it as a job, I take it as a passion and we're very lucky to be able to do it in the time we've done it'.

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T15:05:56+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Fair comment Fin...

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T15:05:26+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


That was an eke from Squeak then...:)

2016-09-22T12:06:10+00:00

Fin

Guest


So under the Wallaby system Moore has to try and make more of the 'violent metres' or the YAC.

2016-09-22T09:12:47+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


cheers Nick. Under EM, Squeak eked out a few passes and offloads in the midfield, to wingers (or flanker)

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T08:02:32+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Coles is reasonable scrummager now. TPN is one of the very top scrummagers in the world - but it's seldom about hooker v hooker in the scrum, it largely depends on the style of the T/H and front row as a whole.

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T08:00:35+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Owen Farrell is one of the guys who started off looking quite mechanical (albeit at a high level of performance) with England. But he has learned how to play in situations where the structures are more broken and there is no automatic answer. George Ford on the other hand is a natural inproviser and would fit into any of the NZ SR teams very easily.

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T07:57:44+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Even Graham went through quite a long phase where he questioned whether power was the way forward T-man. It may not have showed too much in his coaching but it was a serious period of reassessment. I think it was also the reason they decided to move Nonu into 12 and push him as far as they could as a passer and kicker. They didn't want simply a 10's body at 12, as they had with guys like Aaron Mauger. Same issue for Aussie now.

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T07:54:01+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Not too dissimilar is it Fin? An even older w/keeper for England, guy called Alan Knott, did the same... rescued countless Test matches for England with very unorthodox stroke-play. Had an unorthodox personality too...

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T07:51:22+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


No worries Digger - stimulating exchanges!

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T07:47:36+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Morning Rob. Sonny-Bill Creevy, like ti. Sounds like a hired gunslinger from an old Western. I think SM has decent handling skills, but in the Wallabies' attack structure (at least up until now) they are not as valuable as Coles' are to the AB's. His pod is usually playing in between the two 15m lines and often he doesn't have a backs receiver behind him - so the chances of a straight hit-up are much higher. It would be interesting to see how he went in the NZ system, esp at his peak a few years back. Ready and Scoble both look like they can develop, let's see how they go next year...

2016-09-22T07:35:42+00:00

Fin

Guest


Nick, I don't know whether we have seen much of TPN up against Coles at scrum. That would be interesting. I expect Latu could give Coles a hell of a time in the scrum, and it's good to see he has been included in the Wallabies squad today.

2016-09-22T04:25:10+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


Thats very true Nick it has that regimental look to it. Same with guys like Farrell. Hes a good example of knowing what to do and plays as if theres an expectation that his opposites will do the same. I think thats why they struggle. NZ is so unorthodox in an individual sense yet theyre best described as doing the basics so well! If that isnt an oxymoron!

2016-09-22T01:05:34+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


Wish I was fin, gave the game away with some not to good injuries and now a watcher. Nice compliment though. I'm just spouting what I've heard and learned from others these days, Henry has always been the master of the game for me. One of his most memorable comments for me was when the Boks were dominating the ABs in 09 with the big behemoth forwards, skyscraper lineout men and kicking to corners to force a mistake on either the defender or subsequent lineout he was asked if he was going to have to match the Boks in size and strength to be able to compete. I remember at the time thinking oh no we are we going to get players like that, and is that how we have to play now. Henry's response was a flat out No, that's not the way kiwis will want to play or watch rugby and instead embarked on the bomb disposal unit of Jane, Mils etc to run the ball back, counter and make the big boys scatter and run and tackle, the absolute opposite of what the Boks were trying to achieve...close it down, strangle the opposition, look for contact rather than space, in general...'keep your enemies close'. Sure it worked but the bigger picture was Henry spoke for all of NZ rugby, not just the one team. He knew that if you get wholesale buy in from everyone it'll excite them, and follow. Overseas coaches deal with what they get with their test sides when they get them and decide what game to play from there depending on the skilset available. They know there's clubs playing all sorts of stuff around the country, good and bad. They need to sift through it all and decide what they want. The ABs already know what they're going to do, the players have known for years what's expected of them. They know they need to do the core job, but what else can they bring? That's why you have players excelling outside their roles. It's not enough to be able to take lineout ball, scrum, hook...what else can you bring to the table. That's what makes it exciting, because individual flair gets to shine at the top level when you get players coming through willing to try anything and everything.

2016-09-22T01:02:49+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Here he was 5 years ago, Mr Chook :) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dw-86RYNeSY

2016-09-22T00:52:29+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, Thinking about your comment of wicket-keepers and natural improvisers and the similarities to hookers in rugby. Adam Gilchrist didn't just turn wicket-keeping into the all rounder category. He took it to the point where he could change a game in a session with his batting. He redefined the role of a test match keeper. Is what Dane Coles is currently doing in the hooker's position equivalent to Gilly and the way he redefined the keeper's role?

2016-09-21T22:49:43+00:00

Machooka

Roar Guru


Nice work again MrRobC... "Sonny Bill" Creevy :)

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar