The Neutral Weekly Report From Sweden: referees, Michael Cheika, and rugby's best player

By The Neutral View From Sweden / Roar Guru

Alrighty mates, take a deep breath or two before starting to read this, because on the menu today is refereeing, Michael Mourinho – sorry – Cheika, Aussie mentality, World Rugby awards and some other stuff.

Not since the quarterfinal between Wallabies and Scotland last year has a refereeing decision been more discussed than the no try call at Eden Park. And before I move on I’m going to give my personal take on it: I have no idea.

It is a hard 50/50 call that could have gone either way. Everyone who has studied a little bit of the laws of the game knows that it is not an exact science. Interpretations are part of the game.

I have studied the no try call much more than any other call in rugby. From every single angle, in full speed, in slo-mo, in still pictures. I have taken in every single opinion people have presented at my local bar, in newspapers and here on The Roar.

There is no way I can say – with a straight face and pure heart – it was the right call or the wrong call.

The only thing I can say for sure is I feel for Nigel Owens, the TMO and for everyone who is refereeing rugby or any other sport. It is the toughest gig going around. Most referees know that and like the challenge of being in the eye of the storm. They push themselves as hard as humanly possible can and still be unbiased. They don’t let emotions get in the way when the going gets tough.

Personally, I have a background as a football pundit and columnist in Sweden. I have blamed referees for my bad mood, insomnia and loss of appetite. I have hammered referees in TV studios and in nationwide tabloids. Not as bad as Rob Kafer and the Fox boys, but not far from.

But everything changed a few years ago.

Me and a couple of other pundits were invited to a refereeing skill development session. The highlight was an opportunity to be an assistant referee for 45 minutes in a friendly. Every move would be recorded with several video cameras, to be analysed and discussed after the session.

I did my 45 minutes and went to the studio fairly confident that I got most decisions right. Maybe I had got the odd one wrong, but overall I thought I was living proof that an armchair referee is just as good as the real one.

When we were done watching the video in the studio I was a broken man and very very very humble. I had called offside eleven times during my 45 minutes. Nine of them were wrong. Nine!

The professional referees who sat with me in studio said that I had nothing to be ashamed of. When they started out as referees they had got – almost – just as many calls wrong as well. They explained that getting every call right is a utopian dream, to get to an 80 per cent correct rate takes ten or more years of practice, to get to a 95 per cent correct call rate is pure luck.

I did feel a little bit better knowing that, but I was still a broken man. Because in the back of my mind, all the rants I have had towards referees – for so many years – kept popping up. To say I had a severe case of guilt tripping is a huge understatement.

I told them how terribly sorry I was for my stupidity and asked them to spread the word among their colleagues that I was truly sorry for my previous behaviour. To my surprise, they were having none of it.

No apologies were accepted because no apology was needed. They had long accepted the way things worked and that players, managers, fans, journalists, their wifes and their teenage kids will use them as an excuse if things don’t go the way they want.

They were totally aware they had screwed up games and sometimes deserved a hair-dryer. Just like players get when they miss a sitter or bomb a try, just like managers get when they apply the wrong tactics or mess up team selections, just like Roarers get when we go badly wrong in the comments section.

Afterwards, I told myself several things:

1. To never ever blame the referee again if I don’t like the final score.
2. Referees are a part of the game. Without them we have no game.
3. Referees love the game just as much as we do.
4. Give them some slack. One call very rarely decides a game.
5. Learn the rules inside and out.

In golf, they say, “what the course gives the course takes”. With refereeing it is the same; sometimes you get the wrong call go for you, sometimes you get the wrong call against you. If you can’t accept that, you are in the wrong business. And over time it evens out.

On a more philosophic level, do we really want a sport where every single foul on the field is pinged with 100 percent perfection? Is it even possible? Many times we can watch a try/no try call in slo-mo a hundred times from 20 different angles and still not be able – with certainty – to make the right call.

Is it not better to accept that refereeing decisions are a bit of an oddball that brings X-factor to the game? What the hell should we talk about at the pub or in the comments section if the referees got every call right?

And trust me, mates, from what I saw and heard being close to referees in a professional environment, they are their own hardest critics by a country mile.

No referee enjoys being the centre of attention after a bad call. Just like players and managers, they are highly competitive and strive to be the best. Needless to say, you won’t referee any big finals if you keep messing up, especially if you get big calls wrong repeatedly.

If you want to hear some really insightful comments about the no try call at Eden Park, check out the latest edition of the YouTube show RuggaMatrix. Regular hosts Djuro Sen and Ben Kimber – top pundits both of them – are joined by the one and only Tony Johnson.

Spoiler alert, they don’t agree if the call was right or wrong, but they have a really nice chat about it.

One person who for sure had a very clear view of no try call at Eden Park is Michael Cheika, even if he actually did not say anything direct about it at the post game presser. But sometimes, by saying nothing we say everything.

The majority of pundits and experts worldwide think that Cheika went too far with his outbursts and his victim mentality. That he is a disservice to the sport and to the Wallabies right now. I beg to differ. Maybe because they don’t see (or agree) that Cheika’s bad boy antics is the best thing that has happened Australian rugby in a long time.

First of all, just turn back time to last week before Bledisloe 3. The most common comment was that Bledisloe 3 was a boring dead rubber (I was one of them). Many questioned the need to play the Test at all. Most of the talk before the game – bar the All Blacks’ record attempt – focused on the decline of the Wallabies, how boring Bledisloe Tests are these days and that no one cares about union in Australia anymore.

Come this week, and it seems that everyone in Australia cares about union again. I have never ever seen this much written or heard this much chatter about a rugby game outside a World Cup. Without knowing, I am pretty sure that The Roar has had much better viewership over the last seven days compared to any other week this year.

Emotions are running high and the Bledisloe rivalry feels hot. It really matters again. Just imagine if a Bledisloe 4 in Australia was on the menu this weekend. It would have been bonkers and a guaranteed blockbuster.

Rugby puritans will shake their heads, saying Cheika’s behaviour is not in the spirit of the game. That the game is getting headlines for all the wrong reasons. But seriously, mates, if rugby is going to reach a wider audience in Australia again, it needs drama, it needs stories, it needs hot air. Especially if the Wallabies keep losing against the All Blacks.

I might step on some thin ice now and generalise too much about the Aussie mentality, but I think many Australians like what they see in Cheika. If the Wallabies are going to get beaten up by those Kiwis over and over again, they better put up a fight.

If the Kiwis are so full of themselves and claim their precious All Blacks are unbeatable, Aussies are never going to believe them. They are going to fight til the death to prove them wrong. They are never gonna surrender. Call it idiocy, call it whatever you want, buy Aussies don’t do Kiwi ass kissing.

Deep inside, I think many Kiwis like this about Australia. That they keep pushing on no matter the odds. It keeps the rivalry alive and adds spice to the mix.

And this Aussie grit is a key reason why the Wallabies are such a great rugby team despite many internal obstacles and huge competition from the AFL and NRL (and now even football). They are the bumblebees in the rugby world, pushing way above their weight if one is comparing them with England, South Africa and France, all of whom have much better conditions to be a top dog in the rugby world.

Right now Cheika is the queen bee of Aussie resilience. The more I see of him, the more obvious it is to me how similar he is to Jose Mourinho in his leadership persona. Creating a siege mentality and convincing everyone involved – true or false – that there is a big conspiracy against them. It is never his or his players’ fault when they lose. Anyone who is not with them is against them.

Like Mourinho, Cheika is very good at creating results fast and get everyone on the same page. He knows what buttons to push to fire up old war horses. Don’t forget, when Cheika stepped in, the Wallabies looked pretty soft. After one year at the helm, he had taken them to a World Cup final, won the Rugby Championship, managed a win against the All Blacks (he’s the last coach in the rugby world to do so) and collected the coach of the year title. You could almost call him ‘The Special One’ after that.

But the Mourinho comparison is not all good. Mourinho’s methods have been accused as not working well when building new teams and blooding new players. He needs a foundation before he starts, he needs some veterans who buys into his ethos and police the squad so everyone is on the same page .

Until the Test last week, it looked like Cheika had similar problems while rebuilding the Wallabies. The jury is still out, but we have seen enough signs to consider the Wallabies are about to turn a corner (unlike Mourinho’s Manchester United).

Maybe the Spring Tour to Europe will not be as painful as many thought a week ago. But it will not be pretty. The British media is gonna go hard on Cheika and don’t be surprised if we see football-esque cartoons with clown themes of all sorts.

If the Wallabies lose a few Tests and Cheika blows the pipes when talking with the media, Fleet Street is gonna have a field day and the calls for his head are gonna be loud.

But at least now everyone is on the edge of their seats and is looking forward to the spectacle. A Grand Slam looked impossible a week ago. Now it still looks hard, but not impossible.

And speaking of going north, there are many more questions that will be answered in November, and not only for the Wallabies. Who is gonna be the player and coach of the year?

Regarding player of the year, the list is getting shorter and shorter. For me, both Maro Itoje and Beauden Barrett are out of contention. Itoje is injured with a broken hand and Barrett’s kicking (he has the worst stats in international rugby) is simply not good enough to be in contention (this does not mean Barrett is a bad player, it only means he’s not the best in the world).

I believe Barrett’s poor kicking is going to cost him his starting place very soon. The All Blacks have great alternatives at flyhalf and Barrett is probably the best impact player from the bench in the world. Taking him out of the starting XV makes a lot of sense

Now it is down to Ben Smith, Dan Coles and maybe Owen Farrell. My personal pick is Ben Smith. He is Mr Consistency and I can honestly say I have never seen him play poorly. The only big mistake I have ever seen him make was the yellow card in the World Cup final, but apart from that he has been close to perfect for several years.

I am sure that on Eddie Jones’ top-secret document, ‘How To Beat New Zealand’, taking Smith out of the game was the first thing written down.

Dan Coles is the first superstar hooker and a popular choice. He’s a hooker even young kids want to emulate (hooker is not a position young kids tend to imitate playing backyard rugby, it is a position your body chooses for you). He is probably at the top of the list right now because everyone would love it if a hooker got the prize. And it would be well deserved because he been fantastic this year.

If England clean sweeps all four Tests in November with Farrell as a driving force he could overtake Coles. I have had some reservations about Farrell before, but this year he has convinced me he is world class. His kicking is right up there with the likes of retired champions Jonny Wilkinson and Dan Carter, and lately both his defence and playmaking abilities are also on par with the two greats. But maybe he has been injured a little too much to be in contention this year.

Coach of the year is 100 per cent a dead rubber. Even if the All Blacks drop a Test in November, it will not matter one single bit. What Steve Hansen has done, replacing some of the best players ever, and still improving the team is nothing short of spectacular.

When I tell my Swedish friends – who don’t care at all about rugby – about the All Blacks and what they have done lately, the one thing all of them find hard to believe is that All Blacks actually got stronger after retiring Richie McCaw, Carter, Ma’a Nonu and co. It is unheard of in team sport and all logic says it should be impossible. It is like Barcelona retiring Lionel Messi, Neymar and Andres Iniesta and still coming out stronger the next season.

My friends are also impressed by 18 straight wins, but similar things have been done several times in other team sports. As one of them said: “18 straight win is remarkable, but it is not spectacular”.

Let’s cap this weekly report with a couple of questions:

How come Māori All Blacks can have the toughest racial quota in the rugby world, but still no-one seems to care?

Is Sam Warburton world class, as almost every single Welsh fan says?

Why are the touch judges not the ones calling offside in rugby? They have a better view and it would give the referee on the field a better chance to see what goes in the close combat areas.

A small moment of truth is gonna be delivered on November 26. Scotland plays a home test against Georgia. Are the claims that Georgia deserves a spot in Six Nations real? Well, if they win at Murrayfield, the cries for including them will be louder than ever.

Which All Blacks have played the most minutes during the 18-Test winning streak? My guess would be Brodie Retallick, but I don’t know for sure.

Any finally, some famous last words from one of the coolest footballers ever: Andrea Pirlo. Here are his thoughts about the Champions League Final in Istanbul 2005. Pirlo’s Milan were up 3-0 at halftime against Liverpool, but eventually lost the game after extra time and penalties in what is widely considered the biggest meltdown in football history.

“There are always lessons to be found in the darkest moments. It’s a moral obligation to dig deep and find that little glimmer of hope or pearl of wisdom. You might hit upon an elegant phrase that stays with you and makes the journey that little bit less bitter. I’ve tried with Istanbul and haven’t managed to get beyond these words: for fuck’s sake.”

Over and out.

The Crowd Says:

2016-11-02T00:45:41+00:00

Kiwilion

Guest


Hi Neutral. The Maori All Blacks have been around for such a long time it's just another part of our rugby culture. They have been a great exponent of the level of good rugby I think it would be a shame if the PC world said they shouldn't be allowed. Re Chieka, I thought that the ranting coach went out the window a while ago. It was certainly used back in 'ye olde days' by a lot of local, national and international coaches in various sports. From what I have seen this year, Dane Coles would also be my pick as player of the year, he has been exceptional. While cheering (loudly) for the AB's at Eden Park, I was impressed with how the Wallabies played for a lot of the match, certainly thought it was their best game of the year so far. I think they should not be talking about a grand slam, but just Wales right now. If they start looking too far ahead they won't do well in the earlier games. Similar to what happens to our Black Caps in cricket, not consistent enough. And just some food for thought, and wondering what others thought too, as to why we seem to 'lose' a fair few penalty counts. I think when a ref has an advantage playing we go past the advantage more than other teams so we don't get the penalty where other teams don't get the advantage. Just a thought. My 1st entry on The Roar, but have been reading for a while

2016-10-31T11:05:30+00:00

PiratesRugby

Guest


I posted here about ABs being vulnerable when the scores were close and the Wallabies being unable to capitalise because of inadequate manpower and game plan. I criticised coach clown and his insistence on picking two weak blindsides and a hopeless flyhalf. You know, the usual. I expected an avalanche of Waratah outrage. I got a kiwi who said "what do you mean vulnerable?"

2016-10-31T02:51:24+00:00

Colin Fenwick

Guest


You really didn't get the gist of Neutral's post, did you Jacko.

2016-10-31T00:26:22+00:00

Colin Fenwick

Guest


Okay, I've had enough! If someone hasn't already done so, I'm off to Green & Gold Rugby to report this pro-kiwi conspiracy. Shame.

2016-10-30T17:46:13+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


My now wife tells the story that when she first "saw" me and realized I was from Argentina (she is as American as apple pie, with close to 200 years in the USA coming from Wales, of all places) she said: "I went to a Boca Juniors game!" But I ignored her. I don't remember the comment and I seemed to only have noticed her a few hours later. It makes for great story telling, being embellished over time. It makes for a very funny story as I have never been to the magnificent Bombonera (as she has). Having met Macri and the anecdote is very cool! Really cool! I wish him the best.

AUTHOR

2016-10-30T16:52:48+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


For me it makes total sense for referees to work as team with very clear roles. And in the context of rugby and the ethos, I think team refereeing would work perfect. The more I think about it, the more stupid it feels that rugby has not done more to work towards team refereeing. One can say many things about American sport, but refereeing they are on top of and they are way ahead most other countries and sports. If you have time Carlos, watch that link I posted about referees in NHL. It is 20 minute mini documentary. Great stuff. Referees who are real pros and doing their jobs for all the right reason. Their are some killer moments also you get hear pretty heated conversations between referees and players. And referees handles it so well. Pure class.

AUTHOR

2016-10-30T16:32:38+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


LOL! Someone woke up happy this Sunday morning. I have some ideas why...

AUTHOR

2016-10-30T16:26:51+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


Bostero? Si Claro! But I don't hate Los Galinas a as true Bostero should do. But when I have visited La Bombonera I have pretended to hate them. Rugby ethos about respecting you opposition does not sit so well. Especially not when a Superclasico is on the menu, I have actually been to Mauricio Macris house (2004 when he still sported a mustache) and interviewed him. He was pretty ignorant at first and pretended to speak really bad English until he realized that I was from Sweden and had come all the way to BA to support Boca and write of about them. All the sudden he spoke good English, and the talk about only having 10 minutes for an interview became a three hour visit with lunch and wine. A great memory. Cant believe that he is President for Argentina now. P.S. To everyone who does not understand Carlos extremely flattering use of words, Carlos have just realized I support the same football team - Boca Juniors - as him in Argentina. And the thing about hating chickens (galinas), well chickens is the nickname of Boca's main rival River Plate. If anyone even comes near a chance to see a match between Boca and River, take it. It is by some distance the biggest rivalry in sport and the atmosphere is from another planet. And incredible mix of love and hate and 100 percent passion. Should be on every true sport fan bucket list. .

2016-10-30T16:01:10+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


Bostero? He, NVFS, is a total genius, an enlightened man! A man of distinguished choices, of elegance, class, positive discrimination. As long as he hates "chickens" too.

2016-10-30T15:58:26+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


Is tongue in cheek a Donald thing too? His tongue in her cheek? :-)

2016-10-30T15:57:22+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


After I finished writing this, I was watching with a glance the World Series (mostly hispanics and a few blacks, and some white boys) cheered by the average american from Chicago or Cleveland. The umpires work as a team. In the NFL and college football, referees also work as a team. Maybe, as you say, teams of refs should be developed to gain more confidence....and team work! In MY experience, if you have refereed together, it works better... Obvious!

AUTHOR

2016-10-30T11:29:06+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


No worries mate ("Ingen fara kompis" we say in Swedish). I took some convincing though... LOL!

2016-10-30T11:13:42+00:00

Boomeranga

Guest


Fair enough mate. I'll take your rebuke on the chin and see you for who you say your are. I look forward to your next article.

2016-10-30T11:10:28+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


A perfect example of where a TMO or asst referee should step up to the plate. "Excuse me Lloyd - I think we should have a wee look at this - I'm not sure you have that right"

AUTHOR

2016-10-30T10:59:15+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


Hello again Boomeranga. First I thought you were a troll, but you are actually serious. So you deserve a serious answer. One thing I have in common with Kiwi's is a deep love for rugby (but if you saw me on rugby field you would know right away I am not a Kiwi because I suck badly at playing rugby), hence the reason why I am here reading, writing and discussing rugby (because this is the best site I have come across in the SH about rugby) Most of times I meet new Kiwi's they are dumbfounded how this Swede can know so much about rugby. They are just as confused as you are. Most Aussies I meet don't care too much about union, so we talk about Midnight Oil and ABBA instead to break the ice (my favorite band from Australia is Cut Copy and my favorite band from Sweden is The Tough Alliance). Maybe both Sweden and New Zealand being very small countries in this world gives us somewhat a similar attitude and thinking. I don't know that for sure, I am just guessing. I do know from lots of experience that Swedish people get along really well with both Aussies and Kiwi's. Even if we are in different places of the world geographically, we seem to connect with each other very easy. About me never criticizing Kiwi's... well it is completely wrong. Just in the comments in this thread I wrote about the worst whining I have ever seen on Internet ever (and that is no small thing considering how much whining Internet is filled with) was from Kiwi's after their exit in WC 2007. The only SANZAAR country I have visited is Argentina. And that was in the days when I was deeply in love with Argentinian football. For a while I was even a member (socio) of Boca Juniors (the team that plays in blue and yellow as a little tribute to Sweden). Me liking cricket comes from being a fashionista for many years (now I am much more laid back) and watching old pictures from test match cricket, all the players looked so classy and elegant. Five years ago I started to live much more in SE Asia than Sweden and started to socialize with a lot of expats from "The Commonwealth". In Thailand, Malaysia etc you actually find cricket clubs in almost every city, so I started to play a little bit. Very hard, but also very fun. You are correct about one thing, I don't relate to many things from Sweden here at The Roar, but that is on purpose. This is a Australian site first and foremost and the target audience is Australian. So I try to relate to things that most of the readers here can relate to also. But If you really want to play detective you will see that I relate to Sweden sometimes also. And mate, what are talking about regarding relating to EPL makes me not Swedish? English football has been showed on TV in Sweden since the early 1970's. It is deeply rooted in our sporting culture, especially since football (together with ice hockey) are the national sports in Sweden. I have been in England watching football over 50 times (London is only 1.20 hours away from my hometown Göteborg). Honestly, sometimes I think I write way to much about football in my columns, but so far no one has complained so I guess it is tolerated. If you were educated in the Swedish language you would see right way that my grammar in English borrows too much from the Swedish language (my English is far from perfect which is in plain site for everyone to see). And finally about the name "Neutral". Sweden have been neutral for over 200 years (we are not a member of NATO) and we have a proud history having relationships with every country on earth. But it is also a little bit of innocent joke to call myself "Neutral" here. When I watch rugby - like the test last weekend at Eden Park - I do not support any team per se, I watch rugby because I love the game. Off course I do enjoy an upset (which means I hardly ever backs the All Blacks), but for me the game always comes first and foremost. And that is why I am a keen admirer of the All Blacks. But I am big admirer of the Wallabies also. And Pumas. And Springboks (but right they are poor entertainment). And if you, or anyone else, have any questions about Sweden, you are more than welcome to ask. Tack för kaffet!

2016-10-30T09:46:37+00:00

Boomeranga

Guest


The other thing is I'm suspicion of anyone who calls themselves 'nuetral'. I've yet to meet such a person on a rugby forum.

2016-10-30T09:43:01+00:00

Boomeranga

Guest


You just sound like a kiwi. Maybe get close, but never quite say anything vaguely negative about NZ or the All Blacks or their fans. I think Kiwis are honest about everyone else, just not themselves. You're posting is like that. Plus, surely if you're really from Sweden you would relate things here to circumstances in Sweden rather than to cricket or the EPL. It's a natural thing to do, and you would know all SANZAAR countries are travellers and interested in the world. I don't say stop posting. I read your stuff. I just think you're a kiwi

2016-10-30T09:39:56+00:00

Dave

Guest


Open the other eye

AUTHOR

2016-10-30T09:06:03+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


What makes you think I am a Kiwi? Is it my questions about the racial quota The Maori All Blacks have? Or my defending of Cheika's behavior? Maybe something I comment on in another article? Enlighten me please. And dear Lord, why should anyone lie about being from Sweden? What is "uniquely Nordic"? Really curious about that one. Bring it on Boomeranga, show the world what terrible liar I am.

2016-10-30T08:55:22+00:00

Boomeranga

Guest


I've assumed from the start you're a kiwi who lives, or for the minute lives, in Sweden. I've never noticed any uniquely Nordic take on things to change that view. I'll define 'uniquely Nordic' as a view that doesn't fit with a view you see 20 times a day on the roar.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar