Rejuvenated Phoenix need a nine to stitch up attacking woes

By Tim Palmer / Expert

Ernie Merrick’s touchline demeanour is typically mild, but when it has come to speaking publicly about his side this season he has been unexpectedly buoyant.

Every coach feels optimistic going into a new A-League season but Merrick’s enthusiasm felt particularly genuine after an off-season characterised by fresh rejuvenation in Wellington.

The two biggest new faces arrived from the Victory. Kosta Barbarouses and Guilherme Finkler were exciting upgrades in attack. The former, in particular, was a high-profile coup given he had been at the top of his game in Melbourne and was lured home by the promise of the Phoenix project. Unsurprisingly, Merrick has chosen to build his side around the two new attackers.

Merrick’s footballing ideal

Merrick is not shy about his footballing ideals. “I like to have a key decision maker up front supported by two very quick strikers,” he revealed in a fascinating interview with The Guardian‘s Richard Parkin.

“I like to give them a lot of freedom, and not turn them into defenders.”

As Parkin extrapolates, this philosophy was best espoused by Merrick’s great Melbourne Victory side of 2005-06, featuring the twin terrors of Danny Allsopp and Archie Thompson upfront supported by the wonderfully creative Fred. Fred was one of the A-League’s first genuinely great ‘unknown marquees’ – an import that didn’t come with great pedigree but proved his worth on the pitch.

Fred was your typical traditional no.10 – enjoying great freedom in attack to find space to play clever passes into the front third.

Finkler is cut from the same cloth (and not just because he is Brazilian, either). Not exceptionally fast nor positionally versatile, Finkler is a cut-and-dried no.10 – always moving into pockets of space, getting between the lines, and linking the play to wingers and strikers. At the Victory, he thrived first playing as one of the dual 10s in Ange Postecoglou’s 4-2-2-2, before becoming the main man behind Besart Berisha in Kevin Muscat’s first full season.

While his form dipped last season, it is not hard to see why Merrick was so keen to sign him as his ‘key decision-maker’.

McGlinchey and Bonevacia
Interestingly, the arrival of Finkler suggested role changes for two players who were once the stars of the show in New Zealand. Michael McGlinchey and Roly Bonevacia arrived together in the 2014-15 season. Merrick changed tactical systems throughout the season but always with the intent of getting the best out of his two talented midfielders.

McGlinchey was initially used as a false nine, dropping deep from an advanced starting position into midfield, dragging away central defenders to create space for other attackers, such as Fijian flyer Roy Krishna, who blossomed in the system.

So did Bonevacia, who was a revelation driving forward into goalscoring positions despite originally signing as a defender.

Later, Merrick started using McGlinchey and Bonevacia the other way round – so the latter became a #10, freeing up McGlinchey to operate from deeper zones where he could control the tempo of the game.

Then, Merrick moved McGlinchey into a left-wing position, but again with the remit to drift inside into #10 positions. In some ways, the actual zones in which McGlinchey operated in never changed – just his starting position.

Bonevacia, too, was encouraged to move across the pitch to find space, with Krishna charged with making runs in behind. This created space between the lines as opposition back fours dropped deeper, wary of Krishna’s pace, and helped create that necessary target for through balls.

Last season, Wellington’s fluidity became even more pronounced. With Jeffrey Sarpong added to the mix, Wellington’s attackers had great freedom in the attacking third.

Against teams that defended man-to-man, they could cause problems by creating overloads in different zones. However, the biggest issue was that the system defaulted to excessive narrowness, which even attack-minded full-backs could not compensate for. Coupled with off-field licence issues and player troubles, it resulted in a difficult ninth-placed finish.

Wellington’s identity
Results may not have been ideal, but you could not say Wellington had not been built in Merrick’s image. This season has seen yet more tactical intrigue, with the addition of Finkler and Barbarouses to the puzzle.

Wellington’s starting formation has been a 4-4-2 diamond. True to his word, Merrick has utilised Barbarouses and Krishna together as strikers, albeit with unusually wide starting positions. From there, though, they have freedom to move inside, making darting diagonal runs into the channel between opposition full-back and centre-backs.

With Finkler as a #10 rather than a false nine, there is no-one dragging away central defenders, so Krishna and Barbarouses need to position themselves and time their runs to be able to occupy an entire back four.

Helping them that out with that task has been McGlinchey and Bonevacia, playing from the two ‘shuttler’ positions of the midfield diamond. When the ball enters the final third, particularly when Krishna or Barbarouses receive on the outside of the full-back and are looking to cross into the penalty box, both midfielders have been encouraged to dart forward into goalscoring positions. McGlinchey, for example, scored with one such run against Sydney FC, but was correctly ruled offside. Bonevacia aside, however, this is not a natural attribute of McGlinchey or Finkler, which helps explain Wellington’s poor goal return so far this season. They are yet to score in open play after four games.

Wellington’s midfield is also fluid when building up from the back. Bonevacia drops back into the same receiving line as Vince Lia, the holding midfielder at the base of the diamond, with McGlinchey making the opposite, asymmetrical movement, pushing higher into the same receiving line as Finkler. That creates a box in the centre of the pitch, making the formation appear a 4-2-2-2. To create width otherwise absent, full-backs Jacob Tratt and Tom Doyle are encouraged to push forward in support.

Narrowness, though, is the biggest issue of the diamond defensively.

The most glaring issue of the 6-1 mauling in Melbourne was how much freedom Victory left-back Daniel Georgievski had to get forward. With Merrick encouraging his front three to stay high up the pitch – “I want him to cheat a little bit and not track too far back into our back third… I’m trying to get him to work less in defence” says the coach – opposition full-backs have no direct opponent.

Georgievski won the first penalty on Monday night; Zullo crossed for Sydney FC’s late winner and Josh Risdon provided the assist for Perth’s second goal. This is a recurring theme and a direct consequence of the formation, and Merrick’s strategy.

While playing without an out-and-out #9 is of great tactical interest, the reality is so far it has not worked.

On paper, it suits Wellington’s key players, but on the pitch they currently lack balance and solidity both structurally and strategically at both ends of the pitch. There’s no reason it can’t succeed, but more work is needed for the Phoenix to improve their results and performances.

The Crowd Says:

2016-11-04T20:50:41+00:00

Paul

Guest


Wellingtons woes start with its defence. They have an NPL level right back in Tratt, one class centre back in Rossi, left backs Doyle as first choice left back and a converted NPL winger in Parkhouse. They have a perfectly able centre forward in Hamish Watson but not being played. Finkler is being played out of position as the striker not the attacking midfielder. The retirement of Riera has hit them as he has not been replaced. If merrick wants to balance his team he has to put Watson in the starting line up and drop McGlincy or Bonevacia

2016-11-03T00:05:50+00:00

Lionheart

Guest


I don't think it's a luxury Nicholas, to replace players with similar quality. It's recruitment, and the 'Nix operate under the same salary cap, with the same receipt for wages from the FFA. But I would maintain that they are not so bad a team and would not give up on their season just yet.

2016-11-02T10:21:17+00:00

Waz

Guest


When you look st the talent in the team it's surely only a matter of time before they come good?

2016-11-02T07:46:20+00:00

Fadida

Guest


Actually, from memory the latter Merrick years at MV were characterized by incredibly narrow teams, desperate for width and overloads on the wings

2016-11-02T07:43:44+00:00

Fadida

Guest


Thanks Tim. Really enjoyed your tactical discussion. Refreshing on this site, where code war, crowd figures, and childish arguments too often reign. Shame half the responses are about WP right to be in the league. Personally a narrow diamond is one of my most disliked formations, due to the lack of width. See the Japan game for exhibit A. Hard to create overloads in key areas. Hard to stretch opponents.

2016-11-02T07:41:14+00:00

Hillbilly

Guest


To follow your logic, most if not all EPL clubs should be playing in the Spanish first division (La Ligua) or in the Brazilian league. Since when having "Australian players" was a precondition for any other A-League club?

2016-11-02T04:50:00+00:00

Nemesis

Guest


Wellington are fine. They had a shocker on Monday. That happens. Wellington were missing half their team for the opening match due to International commitments. Even though half the team was missing, Melbourne City only won 1-0. Sydney FC were outplayed by Wellington and scored after 90' in stoppage time. In that match, Wellington had a goal disallowed for off-side which was clearly a wrong decision. So, against the 2 early benchmark teams in the competition, Wellington have been more than competitive - they've outplayed the opposition (albeit at home in New Zealand).

2016-11-02T04:40:29+00:00

Realist

Guest


If it is an Australian team, why do they not have the same foreigner rule as the other Australian A-League clubs? Why are they not permitted to play in the ACL if they finished in a position to qualify?

2016-11-02T04:35:34+00:00

Arnold Krewanty

Guest


Yes, 5 Australian players in total, and only one of them sometimes starts. Nix had even less Australian players last season. The only reason nix are still in our Australian league is because corporate Australia is unwilling to back another Australian franchise...yet.

2016-11-02T04:29:06+00:00

Stevo

Roar Rookie


The answer (was) Nathan Burns. 14 goals in 24 appearances for the Nux. The Nux need a key goal scorer to help convert the chances they can create with McGlinchey, Bonevacia, Finkler, Barbarouses and Krishna on the pitch. That's a pretty handy lineup in any team. Unfortunately the rest of the players are not in the same league/experience except for Mossy.

2016-11-02T01:49:25+00:00

144

Roar Guru


A simple question you could ask would be who in their squad would make it into the team that came in 6th position and made the finals (Perth) You'd probably say Glenn Moss, Bonevacia and maybe Mcglinchey (maybe) But the way they play, as Tim explain perfectly, allows them to move the ball quickly with adequate pace and accuracy while also providing decent cover with versatile players like Mcglinchey and Bonevacia. Yes they lack depth, that is an issue and with the aura constantly surrounding the club's relevance it makes it difficult. We saw the antithesis of this against Sydney FC. A game in midweek in which most starting players played in. both marquees were taken off with 30 minutes to go and they were still able to grind out a result. Unfortunately Wellington simply do not have the luxury that other clubs have to replace players with the same or better quality.

2016-11-02T01:42:04+00:00

Mike Chiles

Guest


Are you not aware of how many Australian footballers play for the Phoenix? This is not a N.Z team it is a franchise in an Australian competition and it doesn't matter where it is based. Wouldn't it be better to grow the league rather than shrinking it?

2016-11-01T22:50:55+00:00

hog

Guest


They lack the depth of the better clubs and it shows on the pitch, the bottom half of there roster is where the issue lies, imo.

2016-11-01T22:33:31+00:00

An Outside view

Guest


Not sure this club should be in the A-League. How ridiculous is it that the capital of NZ is playing in our league but not the capital of Australia. Time to pull the plug on this experiment. NZ is only good at one sport, the rest it is utterly hopeless.

Read more at The Roar