Up to six changes for Australia's Test team at Adelaide - who's in?

By Geoff Lemon / Expert

“I’m sick of saying it. It’s not good enough.” This was a different Steve Smith after Australia’s smashing at Hobart.

No more of the measured and reasonable talk about playing roles, executing skills, learning more and getting better, striving to improve.

He had been let down, stranded out in the middle for the best part of two pathetic innings, and he’d had enough.

“I need players that are willing to get in the contest and get in the battle and have pride in playing for Australia and some pride in the baggy green…

“The selectors are going to be getting together and on a bit of a mission to change what’s happening.”

There’s not a lot of grey area there. Changes will be made to the Australian Test team before the day-night contest in Adelaide. That’s no surprise.

If last year is any guide, the Adelaide Oval deck will offer seam and swing, with a bit of extra grass left on the pitch and the square to preserve the pink ball, and the little-known meteorological conditions of a near-summer night.

South Africa’s bowlers have shown how dangerous they are with such assistance. Then will come the seamers of Pakistan in another day-nighter at the Gabba, and if those contests bring more Australian collapses, you don’t like their chances of dragging anything out of the fire come Boxing Day or New Year.

Let’s be clear: recent results are disastrous for the team. Five Test losses on the bounce, the first two of the home summer lost for the first time since 1988. In Hobart, of Australia’s 22 individual innings, five reached double figures.

Smith himself has fought hard while getting little support. David Warner was on a brilliant ODI run in Sri Lanka and South Africa, and has done enough here. Usman Khawaja too, after second-innings resistance in Hobart and Perth.

Mitchell Starc can’t be questioned, he’s too fast and too dangerous, while Josh Hazlewood is his preferred bowling partner, and came good with six wickets in the only bowling innings in Tasmania.

So five spots are locked in. The other six are up for grabs.

Smith wants to stop the rot. But there’s also a lack of obvious options at the next level. As he said: “We need guys in state cricket to jump out of the pack. There’s no one averaging 55 or 60.”

Let’s run through the places in question.

Joe Burns
Australia needs a second opening batsman to partner Warner. Burns was dropped during a hapless tour of Sri Lanka, Shaun Marsh got two picks, made a century and broke a finger. Burns was brought back and made 1 and 0.

While it would be tough to drop him again after one Test, he was totally unconvincing in Hobart. Perhaps his confidence is unsteady after being dropped, which is understandable, but the team needs resilience and results right now.

A lot will come down to the current Shield round, as there are several candidates. Cameron Bancroft has been talked about for over a year, and made the squad for the aborted Bangladesh tour in 2015. He’s also done well for Australia A in India, which might bring more interest with Tests starting there in February. But he hasn’t made a run of late.

Matt Renshaw is a young gun who debuted for Queensland at 18 and topped their run scoring last season. He’s coming back from injury in the Shield this week, so may be unlikely.

Then there’s the perennially mentioned Nic Maddinson, who is discussed every day of every season without getting close enough to crack the squad. Or, if Darren Lehmann wasn’t coach, momentum for a #RealOpeners return for the unsung hero of batting time, Ed Cowan. Offer me Burns versus Cowan on this week’s Bellerive pitch and you know who I’m picking.

Adam Voges and Callum Ferguson
The middle order is borked, let’s be honest. Last year, Voges smashed the West Indies around Bellerive to the tune of 269 unbeaten runs, the fastest score of such magnitude made by anyone bar Virender Sehwag.

This year, he made 0 and 2, and may end up one of the few players to be punted from Test cricket with a batting average in the 60s. He’s bereft of confidence, swaying at the crease like a Jenga tower late into the contest.

As for Ferguson, it may be harsh to go after one Test match, and he’s an Adelaide Oval native who knows the ground. As such, he’s a good chance to be retained.

But he also made scores of 3 and 1, ran himself out in a ridiculous brain fade, then panicked when he couldn’t decide what shot he was playing second time around. There are plenty of one-Test players out there, and his story could go that way.

Who might come in? There’s always the option of older players, who could do a job a la Chris Rogers or early Voges to fill a gap. The evergreen Michael Klinger perhaps, or Cameron White who has started the season well.

George Bailey also gave a job interview on Nine’s Cricket Show this Test, saying that he’s reinvented his red-ball game to good effect, which is borne out by his 259 runs in two games this season to sit second on the scoring list.

Of the younger brigade, Peter Hanscomb is a name we’ve heard a lot, a classy player who can also double as a wicketkeeper. He made the ODI squad in England last year, and is a noted player of spin who could be a forward investment for India.

Another is Kurtis Patterson, who’s already made a ton and is third on the runs list this year. Jake Lehmann has been mentioned, which would be awkward given his dad is the national coach. Darren has already said he’ll excuse himself from any selection meetings if that name comes up, and that he’ll spend any of Jake’s innings getting on the piss in the bar instead of his usual habit of getting on the piss in the dressing room.

Or – dare I say it? Glenn Maxwell? The excitement machine of Australian cricket? A guy with a surprisingly good red-ball record, an average in the 40s, and a score of 81 from his single knock this season?

A quick innings from Maxwell could be the difference in a low-scoring day-night Test, and his fielding could easily save 20 runs an innings. Bit of handy bowling completes the package. Go on, get mad. I dare you.

Peter Nevill
Good keeper, hasn’t made any runs. Simple as that. There’s no confidence when he comes in to bat that anything will change, even if his first-class record is solid.

Matthew Wade is the closest alternative. I’ll be honest: swap Nevill’s keeping for Wade’s, and you’re swapping a delicious deli sandwich for a ball of kebal foil from a bin. Wade drops catches like rappers drop mix-tapes. But he’s more likely to stop a collapse.

It leaves you in that terrible dilemma that Wade will almost certainly miss a chance or two in a match, but those may not end up costing. It’s a dice roll, but at this stage selectors might be spooked enough to take the odds.

Joe Mennie
Nice kid, good bowler, and definitely the wrong pick at Hobart given that Jackson Bird has played so much at the venue, and is exactly the kind of nibbling seam bowler that wrought havoc during this Test.

Vernon Philander wasn’t leaving the 120kph range when he demolished the Aussies, but it didn’t make a difference. Mennie just didn’t look threatening in his first game.

Again, you could say that he’d be unlucky to miss out so soon, and he’s another South Australian local. But so is Chadd Sayers, who is topping the Shield tally. Or Bird will still be an option. In the shake up, Mennie may be collateral damage.

Nathan Lyon
Australia’s most prolific off-spinner, and he’s spent so much of his career in a position of uncertainty that it’s horrible to see him back there. But his confidence is down after a tough Sri Lankan tour and being consistently overlooked for the ODI team.

Lyon has barely threatened this series, and Quinton de Kock whacked him around with contempt down here in Tassie. Maybe a break would allow him to reset and get his venom back.

Steve O’Keefe is the obvious option, as long as he doesn’t have any prior engagements drunkenly yelling at furniture in pubs. A line-up with Maxwell at six, Wade at seven and O’Keefe at eight would substantially strengthen the batting and give two spin options. Worth a thought.

Or there’s a raft of leg-spinners, none of whom has demanded consideration via performance lately: Adam Zampa, Mitch Swepson, Fawad Ahmed, Cameron Boyce.

With Australia needing some threat, that style of bowling may be preferred. Or, if the Adelaide pitch looks green as we expect, perhaps four quicks will be the way forward.

No doubt there are a hundred players I haven’t mentioned – throw in the names on the thread below. Shaun Marsh is injured but Geoff Marsh could fill in? One could argue it wouldn’t hurt.

The Crowd Says:

2016-11-17T15:05:10+00:00

jarijari

Guest


That's as ridiculous a team as I've seen and only includes two frontline bowlers.

2016-11-17T14:59:10+00:00

jarijari

Guest


Handscomb's probably played his way into the team as a replacement for Voges. And Patterson might get a gig. I still like Henriques -- figures aren't great but he looks like he can make the step up. O'Keefe might get Lyon's spot. Nevill's a query. Not sure who would replace him. Wade's a good bat but not a great keeper, not sure about Whiteman, Ludeman, Paine and the others. Sayers or Bird should come in for Mennie. Whoever they pick, it doesn't look good.

2016-11-17T08:31:01+00:00

Rob

Guest


I like your team. At least you have identified the opening position and number 6. M. Marsh could still be an option at 8 for O'Keefe. Smith needs to bowl a little more and if it's really turning he and Maxwell would more than make up a spinners role.

2016-11-17T06:55:13+00:00

Fong Poon

Guest


why is everyone picking Warner in their XI may I suggest Renshaw Cowan Uzzy Rohrer Maxwell Smith Stoinis Hartley Starc Zampa Hazelbook

2016-11-17T06:50:25+00:00

Fong Poon

Guest


t wont matter , even with these young blokes doing well the selectors wont pick em but go to the same tired old bunch who have been terible for ages mate Handscombe, for example, wont even get a sniff We are going to lose 5-0 in india and 5-0 in the ashes if we dont blood these young guys!

2016-11-17T03:01:47+00:00

han

Guest


Tough Last Couple Of Tests But I Think This Could Be The Team Usman Khawaja David Warner Steve Smith George Bailey Peter Handscomb Glenn Maxwell Peter Nevill Mitch Starc Jackson Bird Josh Hazelwood Steve O'Keefe

2016-11-17T02:55:19+00:00

Tanmoy kar

Guest


If not six, at least four players should be replaced as suggested in your article, opener, middle-order, pacer, and spinner.

2016-11-16T22:20:00+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Do we really need an answer to Duminy, Dan? Maxi is way better.

2016-11-16T22:17:29+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


He is not as good as Garry. People calling for his inclusion are not watching Lyon. He is bowling well. Garry just needs support in the field...and a score to bowl at.

2016-11-16T21:21:28+00:00

Dan ced

Guest


If Maxwell is on song he could be our answer to Duminy. Its an experiment that could fail, but in desperate times id accept such a decision. Especially when ppl are suggesting Wade as a standalone bat wtf.. he is fragile when it counts and cannot keep.

2016-11-16T20:58:01+00:00

Basil

Guest


Don, you really dislike SOK don't you? I think most people just want to see the best performed players get selected so we can start winning again. Lyon is out of form. SOK keeps taking wickets. To much bias and I'll feeling toward certain players holding Aussie cricket back.

2016-11-16T20:38:47+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


So our 5 & 7 are meant to be technical grinders. What about the rest? You can't put 85 runs down to Voges and Nevill. You can't put 5 double figure scores from 22 digs down to just those two. My point is that we keep defaulting to these players that can 'change a game in a session' what is lacking in this side is top order batsmen that are content and confident enough to grind out 20-30 ugly runs but keep their wicket in a tough session. They all look like stars on flat tracks but as soon as the ball does anything they fall like nine pins.

2016-11-16T14:36:02+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


You missed him batting through 2 innings in this last test?

2016-11-16T14:35:19+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


As I said...with video umpiring, he would have most LBWs reversed. I really just challenge the blindness of those that push his barrow on the basis of figures. If you watch him play, he needs NSW conditions or he is nothing. There is the GOAT and the SUMP (Spinning Underachiever Most Promoted) Even Test averages and Test aggregates, the Goat wins. No, I'm not recommending Maxi as the spinner. I 'll go with Lyon. It's just that Maxi has performed as well as SOK at Test level. That's the measure of SOK.

2016-11-16T14:27:29+00:00

TheCunningLinguistic

Guest


Oh Don, when it comes to SOK, you just won't see sense, will you? I think you're generally pretty switched on about most things 'cricket', but not when it comes to Australia's front line spinning position. Fact is, in every head to head measure that can be made (including two Tests), SOK's figures are better than Lyon's. There's just no sugar-coating that. Fact is, Lyon has been given every opportunity, and to be fair, has done reasonably well. Would O'Keefe have done better? Well, we'll never know because they decided to persist with Lyon. I, and many others, think Lyon is bowling poorly at the moment. It is time for him to spend some time in the Shield, honing his skills, and SOK to be given a decent run. And seriously, Maxwell? I like him, and he bowls ok, but comparing him to SOK or even Lyon? You lose all credibility there!

2016-11-16T13:59:17+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


I know. I follow the game. Numbers, hey? This year's numbers are every bit as relevant as last year's...or the previous 5. This year's indicates present form, previous years' indicate previous form. Maybe, rather than go on numbers, watch the game with knowledge and make selections based on that. That's why we pick selectors with the kind of experience the current Aussie selectors have. BTW, in that one game, Somerville did better than SOK.

2016-11-16T13:35:20+00:00

Mike Dugg

Guest


Don, o'keefe has played only 1 game this season compared to agar playing 2.

2016-11-16T11:56:07+00:00

Andy

Guest


It seems silly but the more i think about it the more sense it makes, have two guys who dont score, who dont try and even hit balls that are not on the stumps for the first hour and in essence tire out the bowlers and rough the ball up a bit. Its not the stupidest idea. With the regularity of our batting collapses and how often we are going to have lost a series before the final game CA should have a list of stupid/brilliant ideas to try out for the dead rubbers.

2016-11-16T11:52:12+00:00

Andy

Guest


How is Smith a rock? If the team is playing well he is great, but we have been in trouble so many times in the last year and he has hardly ever stood up and taken control of a game by just batting all day or being someone you can bat around. Great front runner but not a rock at all.

2016-11-16T11:37:35+00:00

Joey Johns

Roar Guru


Maxwell's best Shield Innings for Victoria have come amid chaotic batting collapses. If my memory serves correctly, he has ~3 scores of 100 with the team bowled out for 200-odd. If we're collapsing, I want Maxxy in the middle.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar