Muscat and Troisi show the A-League how to tango with City

By Evan Morgan Grahame / Expert

As partisan roars rumbled around AAMI Park, and boos from both sets of supporters met in the middle, pouring fuel on a derby contest already sparking and crackling in furious delight, the Melbourne Victory did what most teams have struggled to this season – frighten Melbourne City.

That Kevin Muscat sent his team out to counter-attack against City is no revelation, as most teams have had that approach in mind when they’ve encountered Tim Cahill and co. But the mix of passivity and activity, of disruptive, outward aggression and self-contained, positive planning that Muscat arranged proved the perfect way to challenge City, a team that have rarely looked so tilted by the counter-punch as they did on Saturday.

Sydney FC, in their last two meetings with City, have focused far to closely on spoiling City’s attacking system, fouling and pressing with the primary intent of interference, rather than in support of their own attacking ambitions. Here Victory showed the Sky Blues how it should be done, and their gameplan was built around James Troisi.

Had Besart Berisha, on Saturday, summoned some of the lethal efficiency that saw him smack home his hat-trick against the Wanderers last week, then the contest might well have been over within half an hour. His profligacy meant that the Victory were forced to struggle back from a goal behind, a goal predictably delivered with venom from the head of Tim Cahill.

But before Cahill’s opener, as early as the third minute, Troisi was tearing right through City’s suddenly feeble-looking midfield. Having eased back, inviting Fernando Brandan to dribble up the left wing, the Victory crowded the winger out, forcing a turnover.

Troisi, having trotted back to add to the numbers, was then released, and had to show all of his athletic power to stride away cleanly from Nicolas Colazo, the fleetness of foot to slip the ball through the legs of Neil Kilkenny, and the prophetic technique to curl the ball into the path of Berisha. It was – or should have been had Berisha not screwed his shot wide – a perfect counter-attacking sequence.

The pressure Troisi – and to a slightly lesser extent, Marco Rojas – would then go on to apply on the until-now untested midfield pairing of Luke Brattan and Kilkenny showed just how much damage a powerful, skillful No. 10 like him can wreak against City in that advanced central area.

The series of events that led to Victory’s equaliser were punctuated by a number of varied interventions by Troisi; first, a neat flick with the toe, spooning the ball to Carl Valeri before Bruce Kamau’s leg could jut out and spoil. Then, having continued his run forward, he darted intelligently between the City lines, signalling to receive the ball and showing the poise to turn threateningly towards goal.

Finally, having shifted the ball wide to Jason Geria, Troisi somehow out-jumped the towering Ruon Tongyik when Geria’s half-cleared cross came tumbling out of the sky, nodding the ball straight into the loving feet of Rojas, who slotted home. Again, a rare mixture of technique, forethought and brawn was on show.

It was not coincidental that Troisi found himself at the centre of multiple counter-attacking efforts in the first half. Later, with City preparing a free kick won by Brandan on the left, Troisi was positioning himself in the striker’s spot, glued to the shoulder of the last City defender, on the halfway line.

When City’s set piece was cleared, Rojas speared a curling ball up the left hand channel, straight into the path of Troisi’s muscular run. Another nutmeg was indulged in, and the Victory were nearly in again. Muscat will have asked for this, for his weaponised No. 10 to be locked and spring-loaded in situations where City were lulled into a false sense of security.

City were rattled by all of this. They didn’t quite know whether to try and harry Troisi out of the game, or compress the space in front of him and cut off his passing options. On one occasion they did neither, and Joshua Rose was seen lurching horribly between Troisi and Rojas as a Victory clearance was punched in Troisi’s direction from the left flank.

Troisi simply took the ball down on his chest and struck a volleyed pass over Rose to Rojas, who eventually worked his way into another promising shooting position.

A sharp touch from Troisi, applied first-time, in the 42nd minute allowed Rojas to cross for Berisha, only for the Albanian to miscontrol. Another unbridled surge down the middle, after Lawrence Thomas had saved Bruno Fornaroli’s twisting volley, ended this time with a poor decision to shoot.

A neat, cushioned Troisi header into space in front of Berisha won the Victory a corner with just a minute or so left in the first half. He was the most active player in that opening period, and the chances he – directly, or in concert with others – created were enough for Victory to be unhappy that they entered the break with scores level.

Troisi’s touch map spanned the full width of the pitch, and the roaming brief he was evidently given continued into the second half. As the game became haggard, Troisi’s energy rarely wavered, and – although his activity in attack faded somewhat – he was seen making blocks, clearances and tackles deep in his own half in the final quarter of the match. Eventually, Berisha was presented with a chance he couldn’t contrive to scupper – albeit one that might have seen his kneecap stray into an offside position – and the Victory ended the match deserved winners.

Muscat’s game-plan was designed to utilise Troisi’s full, gleaming arsenal to torch the City central midfielders. Valeri and Bozanic provided the stable platform behind, and Kilkenny and Brattan wilted. Troisi created more chances than Fornaroli, Cahill and Brandan managed as a group, and the teams that plan on troubling City over the remainder of the season should take note of the Victory’s approach.

The Crowd Says:

2016-12-20T22:05:17+00:00

Pauly

Guest


Certainly was MOTM in that derby. Probing City's defensive frailties was what the Victory game plan was all about and it worked a treat.

2016-12-20T20:14:39+00:00

Waz

Guest


The article title is the issue - Glory, Roar (x2) and now victory have maybe shown City aren't actually that good?

2016-12-20T08:44:45+00:00

lesterlike

Guest


Well Perth actually did it best but yeah the point stands. I've been screaming since that first derby that this is exactly how we should have played against them. Playing out against City is madness but pumping it over the top is how Perth destroyed them.

2016-12-20T06:00:57+00:00

Ian

Guest


WAZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Haha, It is that in a nutshell. Don't feel alone in thinking that is the case with any topic.

2016-12-20T04:52:55+00:00

Realist

Guest


Brisbane won 1-0 at home. City never recorded a shot on target in that game.

2016-12-20T01:59:44+00:00

Nemesis

Guest


Agree Jakobsen was a major loss for City. And Troisi who tore City apart on Saturday didn't play in either of the previous 2 matches when City dominated Victory. That's football. You have to make do with the players available on the day.

2016-12-20T01:56:32+00:00

Stevo

Roar Rookie


Agree. We didn't do very well against Brisbane and Perth and for very similar reasons. It was Glory at AAMI who showed that a fast counter attack against City could work very effectively. Aloisi went to town on that example and so Brisbane won 2-1 at home. Not to mention that pre-match JA got into the minds of the refs with the suggestion that El Tuna was going down tooooo easily. He was quoted - “I know that in certain countries … they practice players to go down a little bit easier. That’s not in the Australian culture,­ we don’t want it in our game,” he said. Ahahahahahahahaha

2016-12-20T01:48:01+00:00

Stevo

Roar Rookie


Hmmm, you must be keeping a very fat diary! It's all about the alternatives you have. I mentioned Josh Rose and a very inexperience 19 yo, who did very well mind you, compared to Jakobsen and Malik. Between you, me and the gate post, it was Jakobsen's absence that was crucial IMO.

2016-12-20T01:10:38+00:00

BES

Guest


Was just about to leap on here all righteous indignation and say the same thing Waz - so thank you for saving me the trouble

2016-12-20T00:11:05+00:00

punter

Guest


What you mean the only team this year to destroy Melb City, not Victory, not Brisbane, not even Sydney.

2016-12-20T00:01:10+00:00

pauly

Guest


And then there's Perth Glory

2016-12-19T23:17:21+00:00

Nemesis

Guest


So, you're a big fan of Malik now? I seem to recall your being quite critical of him in the past. Interesting. I'm sure Victory would've enjoyed Malik & Kilkenny next to each other the City XI turning the ball over & making constant mistakes.

2016-12-19T23:12:22+00:00

Midfielder

Guest


Troisi is a special player... he can tear any team apart

2016-12-19T22:26:28+00:00

Jeff milton

Guest


well said Waz

2016-12-19T21:50:23+00:00

Waz

Guest


The perseverance with a back 3 is starting to look like pure stubbornness of behalf of JVS. It didn't work last year and it isn't working this year.

2016-12-19T21:48:24+00:00

Waz

Guest


Muscat and Trousi show the A League how to deal with Melb City do they? Oh that's right, it has to be either a Melbourne or Sydney side to do it before it's worth writing about - best ignore Brisbane besting City over two games this season for crying out loud!! I know the authors don't get to choose the titles but honestly, could 'the roar of the crowd' get someone who actually knows a little bit about A League football to write these titles? We suffer a major quality and quantity problem with news coverage for our code in this country as it is, and what coverage we do get is over-whelming Sydney and Melbourne centric so when specialist football sites (and Fox) perpetuate that bias it's not helping interest in the code grow nationally. Rant over (and I fully expect Mid to slap me down and say "you Brisbane lot, you're lucky ....." lol

2016-12-19T19:36:08+00:00

Stevo

Roar Rookie


As influential as Troisi was MV's job was made easier by the fact that we had Jakobsen and Malik out and had to rely on a paring of Josh Rose and the 19 yo Ruon Tongyik. And of course the rubbish tactic of JVS to persist with a back 3 when we had a makeshift defence was always going to cause problems with the attacking intent of MV.

Read more at The Roar