Could one little step make Quade a shoe-in at 10?

By Graham Spalding / Roar Rookie

When I was ten years old, my father taught me my first place-kicking set-up: the ridiculously accurate and practical three steps back and two across.

It’s crazy how much less can go wrong in a three-step approach when compared to four.

Unfortunately, three things weren’t in my favour: my talent ceiling wasn’t particularly high, my ten-year-old pop-gun made Bernard Foley’s boot look like a bazooka, and my father wasn’t French.

I thought the French were awesome in the early nineties. It sparked with Philippe Sella tearing holes in the Springbok backline and was exacerbated when my father took me to watch them play against South Africa.

While kickers like Andrew Mehrtens and Dan Carter likely had their feet dipped in Holy Water at birth, where they would have been excellent no matter what approach they used, you would probably describe many a French flyhalf as having his hands and feet marinaded in red wine; they were often an acquired taste, had the potential for greatness, but could just as easily leave you with a nagging headache.

But a young boy doesn’t worry about statistics or being sensible, and I had soon abandoned the three-step run-up for four steps, to try and eke out some distance with various stances and triggers.

My kicking was wayward, to say the least, for a long time.

This brings me to Quade Cooper, the Australian player who could quite easily be described as French. When you look at Quade’s kicking technique, he actually has the very sensible three-step approach. What doesn’t help is that trigger, where there is so much that can go wrong before he gets to the actual three steps.

I’m sure you can all see it in your minds, but Quade sets up with his left shoulder facing the ball, where almost all other kickers have their chests open or towards the ball. He then triggers with one forward step with his right foot and then needs to turn about 20 degrees to his left to straighten his chest out towards the ball. He then gets into his actual three-step stride.

If you stopped Quade just after his turn, it would usually be a great starting point, where you could imagine a more traditional kicker setting off from. The problem is that he hasn’t stopped – and like any good professional who’s overcome a quirky technique through hard work and muscle memory, this can still cause issues in balance or needing to adjust the angle or stride length, let alone the usual variables that kickers need to factor.

When it does occasionally go wrong, these all need to now be corrected in his very sensible three-step run-up.

Many kickers have the side-step, front step and turn as part of their set-up – Carter is an obvious one, but he also has his chest open throughout his side and back stepping process, which helps maintain balance.

So let’s stop Quade at our imaginary spot after his right foot trigger and turn. If he was standing still, what would the ‘new’ trigger be for someone who is comfortable starting off on his right foot? And, you may ask, how do you change something he’s been doing his entire career, and has practiced day-in, day-out?

If you think of South Africa, their ‘French’ players tend to be left-footed fullbacks in the mould of Willie le Roux and before him, Percy Montgomery. Many of you won’t remember the wayward, pink-booted Percy, not too fond of defence and who enjoyed risky forays and loose passes from deep in his own territory (sound familiar?).

When Percy was booed out of South Africa, he found himself in Wales. When he realised that not even his sunbed would let him keep his tan, he got angry, and shoved a touch judge, earning an 18-month ban. I don’t know what happened in this time but Percy came back and went one step further, or shorter, as he had a ridiculously short two-step run-up – and used it to rewrite the South African record books.

Johnny Wilkinson was another fond of just three steps in his run up, but the big difference is that he and Percy are both left-footed. Johnny triggered with his right and Percy his left, and could then just step straight into action with little fuss and little that could go wrong.

If Quade steps straight into action off his right he will get to his target wielding his wrong boot – that’s only the domain of Dan Carter in World Cup finals.

So this brings me back to the boy with the unfortunately low ceiling who realised that no matter his run-up, he was never going to kick them over from half way, nor was he French, and eventually went back to his father’s very first kicking lesson.

I too spent years on a four-step run-up and therefore felt comfortable starting off my right foot. Now imagine our stationary Quade, ready to go, who then triggers with a minor step backwards with his right. This allows the momentum for a full three steps – a left-right-left-kick motion.

But don’t take it from a hack like me – someone who does something similar is his direct opposition, Bernard Foley. Foley uses a four-step run-up, for the same reason as the ten-year-old me: he needs the distance. He however triggers with his left foot in one backwards step, followed by four neat steps directly towards the ball.

The beauty of it is that we’re all different. But there has to be a way for Quade to get comfortable in our imaginary start position, with an already open chest and then a trigger (left or right) that will get him off the starting blocks.

He is only 28, but that is often an age when men begin to mellow; they’ve fought against the tide and made their own way and are now becoming comfortable with themselves and their limitations. Often this is just enough to realise that not everyone is meant to knock them over from the halfway line and that there’s more than one way to skin a cat.

Because, although it’s sad, what history has often shown us is that in Test rugby, red wine players that can cause teammates, coaches and fans headaches are often overlooked for average players that simply make fewer mistakes.

So, like Percy, Quade has come back from France, started to get his body in the line for more tackles, and seems to take fewer risks at the back. But if you have two flyhalves with similar kicking success rates and a kick to win a match, a captain and a coach will always rather throw the ball to the guy who does not have the quirky technique that could be tested in a critical pressure situation, it’s human nature.

Quade, while the rest of us are fattening up on Christmas pudding, now is your chance to get on the pitch, find your three-step start point, get your chest front-on, figure out your trigger, and knock a couple thousand balls over the crossbar before February 24.

Because that’s the most likely way you’ll get a chance to show us the other thing that good red wines do: get better with age.

The Crowd Says:

2017-01-09T04:37:27+00:00

Vic rugby

Guest


Foley will not have too much to worry about in 2017. Mark this comment Quade will be out injured mid way through super rugby and will not be fit to play in first international tests.

2016-12-24T16:35:47+00:00

Taylorman

Guest


Boz, I don't 'constantly' weigh in about Cooper, other than to throw it the odd comment about the never ending debate of the two that seems to whirl regularly here, rarely bringing up anything new on the topic other than the usual reds Tahs biases. And if you'd notice I didn't just mention Cooper here. This is another version of the same. All I am responding to here is Rebellions comments that somehow kiwis are part of all this. I'd say generally, we don't care about either. Both have their goods and bads, neither rocks the rugby world. Frankly, I'd look for someone else at 10.

2016-12-24T14:23:42+00:00

Boz the Younger

Guest


Taylorman, if all your options at ten are that much better, why do you need to constantly weigh in in a derogatory manner on conversations about Cooper? Reasons other than the clear need for you to grow up, that is.

2016-12-23T22:35:07+00:00

puff

Guest


KC, agree, we have hardly seen Cooper this year and there must be a reason for that. The only opinion that matters at this time is Cheika’s and his coaching team. Its common knowledge that Cooper is an unpredictable talent and that is not what the Wallabies require. Without been sarcastic both gents would struggle to make a NZ super team, hence our dilemma. As reiterated, in his early years he displayed uncanny abilities but that is no-longer the norm. He quickly lost momentum at Toulon, why, he failed to live up to expectation according to their management. Do you honestly belief he would have climbed to the dizzy heights in his home land, the answer is no. In my humble opinion the 10 is pivotal at senior level and all successful international teams have such a player. Moving forward, Quade is not the answer as he fails to tick all the boxes and neither does Foley to be fair. Unfortunately Cheika is also capricious and can quickly devalue a team’s winning impetus. Therefore I believe the issues will continue, unit specialist coaches are employed or a talented young player is given an opportunity.

2016-12-23T22:30:51+00:00

Taylorman

Guest


Reb last year we had Carter as World player of the year in the position. In his absence Barrett took that title in the same position. We also have Cruden and Sapoaga, both of whom are far superior to Foley and Cooper. To watch fans squabble over who the worst of better of Cooper or Foley is like watching the stragglers in a Melbourne cup race a minute after it is over. Agree some growing up is needed, just not sure your recommended group are the ones that should be doing it.

2016-12-23T14:08:03+00:00

Kiwi in US

Guest


Great read Graham. I was very successful in the school yard doing the straight poke, but never mastered the round the corner, until my boys started practicing place kicks. Some utube videos and stopping wherever we saw goalpost and practicing was a highlight of a recent trip back to NZ. A memorable one was a winery/restaurant setup that had a big grassy area and rugby balls/goal posts for practice. In high school there was always before practice started officially a mad rush of drop kick practice. I could bang it over from the 40 meter line with a good wind, but I never had the calmness to try it in a game. In any event I enjoyed your article. There must be some young Aussie talent out there coming through at 10.

2016-12-23T11:31:21+00:00

Rebellion

Guest


Quade has been the more consistent performer in 2016 by far. Hasn't set the world on fire but Foley had a few absolute shockers including the whole England series and first half of the RC. Some of the Quade haters and Kiwis ought to think about giving it a rest in 2017. Growing up would be a good start

2016-12-23T05:11:17+00:00

Boz the Younger

Guest


Ta :-)

2016-12-23T05:03:45+00:00

Redsfan1

Guest


I'm a Queenslander and think Foley is by far the better player.

2016-12-23T05:02:27+00:00

Redsfan1

Guest


Quade has failed more times then I can count. He was sacked from Toulon's, failed in Sevens and has more yellow cards then any back in rugby history. Yet he is continually praised in some quarters for his "talent". From what I can gather this essentially means his flick passes look cool when they come off 1/10 Times.

2016-12-23T00:55:11+00:00

Terry

Guest


" Foley is very much meat & potatoes, he may not win you the game but has safe hands, keeps a cool head and is not a yellow or red card expert " You win the funniest comment of the day award..Let`s stick with Foley then on that basis. .hahahahahaha

2016-12-23T00:51:45+00:00

Doubles

Guest


But Bernard Foley hasn't deliverd as requested.He has lost games for the WALLABIES, that is the point.He has done nothing special in 40 tests. He will not get any better.How long do we persist with him..??

2016-12-23T00:42:50+00:00

Doubles

Guest


Straightens the attack ?? hahahaha... When ?? What attack..???...Then he is levelled or gets turned over or throws the ball at someones bootlaces or over their head. .He has had 2 try assists this year for the men in gold. TWO !! To counter that, he has had 3 try assists for other teams so he has 5 try assists all up... Bernards Goalkicking is worse than Quades... His tackling is worse and he panicks under pressure, That`s why even his dad Chieka moved him to 12 because he couldn`t do his role at 10.. He is a good support player, thats about it ..He should go back to sevens because he aint a 15 man a side player and our sevens team needs some help..

2016-12-22T23:50:33+00:00

Morsie

Guest


Straightens the attack Better defense Better goal kicking Doesn't panic under pressure Great support player Cooper runs across field better than any other player in the country. That is his biggest problem. He doesn't like contact, he doesn't tackle anywhere near as well as Foley.

2016-12-22T23:04:23+00:00

Red Kev

Guest


So it's Coopers fault that QLD was rubbish this year? He didn't even play for them! Come on buddy!

2016-12-22T23:02:48+00:00

Red Kev

Guest


Well he did none of that this year buddy!

2016-12-22T22:31:18+00:00

Distrubance

Guest


Foley only makes the team because he has a 8% better kick success rate off the tee.(not mentioning any weird Waratah bias that obviously should not exist)

2016-12-22T21:36:05+00:00

Morsie

Guest


Because Queensland has been rubbish for the last 3 years and Cooper has not played enough rugby to catch anyone's eye.

2016-12-22T20:35:20+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Guest


Puff, we have hardly seen Cooper this year. And when we did he outpointed Foley on key 10 skills. 'Very poor choices in the same three minutes?' What is this? A rerun of Eden Park groupthink from 2011? You blithely state that Foley 'won't win us the game' BUT he is 'safe'?!? And there was me thinking that the goal of rugby was to win. Regarding Cooper's 'unpredictability'. It is not as unpredictable or as unexplainable as his coach's choice not to use him.

2016-12-22T20:22:04+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Guest


Boz, a lot of common sense here.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar