McMahon should get first crack at replacing the 'Pooper'

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

The ‘Pooper’ is no more. Suddenly Australian rugby is without the crutch upon which it has relied for so long, outstanding openside flank David Pocock.

Pocock is due to spend three seasons in total with the magnificently-named Panasonic Wild Knights in Japan, bookending a six-month sabbatical away from the game beginning in February 2017. He will only return to the Brumbies in time for the beginning of the 2018 Super Rugby season.

With Liam Gill now plying his trade on the Côte D’Azur, like-for-like replacements are not exactly clamouring for his place. In all probability, the structure of the Wallaby back row will have to change significantly, with all the leading candidates with Test experience – the two Scotts, Fardy and Higginbotham, and Sean McMahon – having played the vast majority of their rugby at either number 6 or 8.

Unquestionably, Michael Cheika will not want to lose any more of the synergy the Pocock/Hooper combination enjoyed over the tackle ball and in defence than he needs to. As I highlighted in this article back in September 2016, they formed a one-two punch and hunted as a pair.

Eighteen of the 21 Wallaby turnovers in the three games examined in that article involved the duo and resulted in a nine per cent turnover ratio, well ahead of the curve in international rugby.

In games without Pocock in the back row with Hooper, the Wallabies’ turnover percentage has tended to drop off significantly, often down to as much as one-third of their typical standard of production in that area.

With Scott Fardy coming to the end of a solid international career and the expectation level regarding Scott Higginbotham uncertain on his return to Australian shores, I believe the Melbourne Rebels’ Sean McMahon should be in pole position to replace Pocock on the side of the scrum, with Lopeti Timani retained in the number 8 spot.

Let’s take a look at a couple of games in 2016 where McMahon had the opportunity to start in the Australian back row – firstly with Michael Hooper in the 7 jersey against England in the third Test of the summer series:

First, the raw stats: on attack, McMahon carried the ball 12 times, eight of which resulted in positive yardage after the initial contact, while also making two successful offloads. On defence, he completed 13 tackles with no misses and generated no less than five turnovers. This was the game Sean McMahon came of age in international rugby.

Ball-carrying and YAC (yards after contact)
The biggest highlight of McMahon’s ball-carrying is the yards he made through the England defence after first contact.

At 16:11, he runs into a double hit by two of England largest forwards (Billy Vunipola and Maro Itoje) one metre behind the advantage line, sheds both tacklers and is only taken to ground ten yards further downfield by Dylan Hartley.

At 22:15, he first sheds Teimana Harrison before towing Dan Cole for fully five extra yards until the Tigers prop finally brings him to earth. At 34:48, he survives an attempted choke tackle by three English forwards to drive the ball forward over the advantage line and make the presentation.

The two examples at 40:34 and 63:45 demonstrate his ability to dominate defensive inside backs, often on the ‘second wave’ carry. The combination of Ben Youngs and George Ford (in the first example) or Ford and Owen Farrell (in the second) are not enough to stop McMahon’s phenomenal leg-drive powering through contact to set Australia up on the front foot both on attack and in exit situations.

McMahon showcases exemplary ability to run through England tight forwards and loosies, two or three at a time, and handle both the high-and-square tackling preferred by many press defences and the choke tackle.

The idea of either using McMahon as a second-wave runner coming off the initial carry by Timani and digging into the opposition inside backs (from set-piece), or of having them swap roles from wide channel to tight pod to spread the load (in phases), could have the Wallabies’ attack coaches licking their lips in 2017.

Defensive variety – techniques and turnovers
McMahon clearly has the ability to adopt a variety of techniques in defence. He is able to implement the hold-up or choke tackle (see the slow-downs in release at 0:26 and 29:16), compete on the deck (65:27), and is in at both the start and the finish of the counter-ruck sequence at 13:53.

Synergy with Michael Hooper – Australian restarts
Assuming Michael Hooper is perceived by Cheika to be one of the bedrock players in his run-on side, it’s important the player picked to replace Pocock has some of the same synergy with him.

The last counter-ruck example (13:57) and the Wallaby kick-offs at 25:48 and 70:19 illustrate just that quality. First, Hooper knocks down Jonathan Joseph and McMahon gets over the ball to win a turnover penalty, then the favour is returned with McMahon hitting England fullback Mike Brown and Hooper infiltrating the tackle zone to hack the ball out and generate another Australian penalty.

The recent match between Australia and Ireland showed the importance of having more than one method of skinning the cat at defensive contact situations – and McMahon appears comfortable with a variety of techniques.

He is one of the few Australian forwards who has been schooled in the choke tackle well enough to implement it at Test level. His ability to combine with Michael Hooper at restarts is an important sign that too much of the Pocock/Hooper synergy need not be lost.

I also like the way McMahon was able to win the debate against England’s best young forward, Maro Itoje, on three separate occasions and in three very different scenarios – on the carry (16:11), in the air (55:47) and on the floor (25:52). That sheer hunger to win the individual battle against such a worthy opponent augurs well for the future.

The second match against France during the end of year tour displayed more facets and improvements in McMahon’s all-round game, with the Australian coaches confident enough to expand his role within the team:

Against the French, McMahon carried the ball nine times, completed ten tackles with one miss, won two turnovers and two lineouts while making one offload until he went off in the 67th minute.

Outside his now-familiar great second effort on the carry (28:29 and 46:50) and his ability to jackal on the deck (34:39 and the final untimed clip), McMahon was trusted by the coaching staff to plug into the wide attacking role usually played by Hooper, and to develop his potential as a lineout player on the Wallaby throw.

McMahon and lineout potential
McMahon is a regular target in the Rebels’ lineout. Like fellow Melburnian Lopeti Timani, this was an untapped resource up until the European tour. At 40:43 and 23:09 he looks like a ‘light lift’ for his two support players, and is able to gain elevation quickly into the air.

This is enough to make him a legitimate lineout option. In the 23:09 example, he forms a solid ‘head’ for the drive, staying in contact with the second layer all the way up to the France goal-line – at which point the ref rightly awards Australia a penalty try.

Putting it all together
In the scoring sequence beginning at 40:42 and finished by Bernard Foley at 42:42, McMahon made three critical contributions – first winning the lineout ball, then coming around on the second wave carry off Foley at 40:53 to win penalty, and finishing with a decisive double cleanout (along with Kyle Godwin) on the penultimate phase, punching Sebastien Vahaamahina back off the ball and creating the seam for Foley to run through off Will Genia’s pass.

Summary
In the absence of David Pocock, and given that both Fardy and Higginbotham are now in their thirties, it makes sense to drive forward Sean McMahon’s development to the next stage in 2017.

Although he is by no means huge at 6’1″ and around 100 kgs, McMahon appears to have some of the ‘intangibles’ that make undersized players both look and play big on the international stage.

He has the power to shed much larger defenders on the carry and the speed to reach the inside backs, and he has that invaluable variety of technique on the defensive side of contact situations.

Moreover, he has flashed the ability to work well with Michael Hooper on the ‘tackle and jackal’, and shown that Australia need not lose too much of the ‘Pooper’ synergy with his replacement.

The Wallabies have only just begun to explore his lineout potential. If they can get both McMahon and Timani up to speed in that department of the game, Australia will be able to boast four solid options (along with Adam Coleman/Rob Simmons/Rory Arnold in the second row) and a fifth occasional outlet in Hooper.

Sometimes, when you lose a player considered essential to success and the team structure, it can force you towards a deeper re-evaluation of your resources and push development on at a quicker rate. I would not be at all surprised to see that effect occurring in the Wallabies in 2017.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2017-01-10T07:31:23+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I'd agree wholeheartedly with Bob Dwyer's sentiments Fin, and in every aspect. Especially Nick Phipps at the end. It's easy to see why Phipps inspires such loyalty from Michael Cheika (there's a lot to like) but some basics of 9 play are not up to scratch. as I've tried to demonstrate in previous articles.

2017-01-10T06:21:22+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, This was Bob Dwyer's view on the Wallabies 6 months ago. With the benefit of hindsight do you think it was an accurate assessment from Dwyer? Bob Dwyer sees hope for the future and says the emergence of some of the new capped players gives Australia reason to believe they will get back to their best. "Australia should be concerned about the results, definitely," Dwyer said. "They should be concerned about the result of every game. But I think we have a lot of next-generation players who aren't far away. "Rory Arnold's one, Samu Kerevi and Luke Morahan are others. There are a few players who will become part of the next generation. "We're not badly placed. We've lost quite a few players to Europe and we've managed to lure a couple back and a few more are still there but that has made a few holes in positions. But we're pretty well off and my take is that by the end of the year we'll be right." “At the moment some of our players aren’t up to that level, but new guys rarely are up to that level in their first few Tests. “The question is whether the selectors see something in them that gives them the indication that they can reach that level pretty quickly. I see some more real talent coming through. Dwyer urged Wallabies coach Michael Cheika to give Melbourne Rebels second-rower ­Lopeti Timani an opportunity, saying he had the potential to become a world-class lock. “Second row is a worry because the ones we’ve got coming through are quite inexperienced, especially (Rory) Arnold and (Adam) Coleman,” Dwyer said. “But I do think we have a number of locks coming through that are pretty good. “I’d like to see Lopeti Timani get some sort of a shot at it. He is one of those guys that has got the ability to be world class. Whether he’s got the temperament and the commitment and all those things to be world class I’m not sure, because we haven’t put him to the test, but often what is needed for those guys is somebody else believes in them. “If he can translate his natural talent into a committed performance at the highest level, then I think he can be a world-class player. “He can offer size, pace and ­aggression, which are important qualities.” Wallabies halfback Nick Phipps has come under fire for his performances, but Dwyer said it was up to the coaching staff to ensure his play was of an acceptable standard. “Nick’s personal qualities are beyond question. He has miles of courage. Miles of commitment. Miles of fitness,” he said. “But for me his scrumhalf play was way below what’s acceptable. Quite honestly, it’s up to the coaching staff to make sure that his scrumhalf play is acceptable. “That’s well within the reach of the coaching staff to affect.”

2017-01-09T07:49:08+00:00

Crash Ball2

Guest


Whatever.

AUTHOR

2017-01-09T07:34:47+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I think Neil's response sums it up neatly CB. I was open to any new evidence you could provide, but as it turns out the conversation been a cul-de-sac and a time-waster for me.

AUTHOR

2017-01-09T07:22:37+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


It's a balance isn't it Fin? Thinking about the game off the field and then letting your body put it into action on it. It's a great dynamic!

AUTHOR

2017-01-09T07:13:57+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Agreed Jimmy.

2017-01-09T03:45:54+00:00

jimmyc

Guest


Nick, I completely agree regarding the coaches philosophy being shaped by the cattle available. Ewen McKenzie at the Waratahs (03-08) compared to Ewen McKenzie at the Reds (10-13) is a perfect example. If it wasn't for one poor tactical lineout option (seriously a 2 ball drive 5m out - what were they thinking) Eddie Jones would have coached the Stormers to an average Super Rugby result in 2016.

2017-01-09T00:08:42+00:00

Crash Ball2

Guest


It would appear that our interaction on this thread has riled you somewhat. Please know, this wasn't my intention from the outset. And given we had reached a semblance of entente, "you know who you are" seems slightly unnecessary. Anyone casually reading even portions of the comments knows perfectly well to whom your arrow is aimed. The Bat Signal is more ambiguous. The language I use is deliberate. The approach I use is of my own choosing. Across the 3 coaching regimes and 5-6 years I've given my thoughts on The Roar, I've provided countless examples, occasional video links, and yes, was even compelled to pen a rare article based upon a topic close to my heart about the team I love: http://www.theroar.com.au/2015/06/18/the-irresistible-case-for-george-smith/ My views are strong (and often unpopular given the general editorial flavour of the publication and a large faction of the readership) and over the years, have elicited a range of responses from exceeding positive to those similar to yours. But no one has previously suggested to me that only one form and one structure of rugby commentary is acceptable. No one person has deemed themselves the voice of the critical masses of The Roar readership and exclusively designated what approach enriches a dialogue for all, and what detracts from it. I accept that you are not interested in entertaining my offering based upon your stated criteria - and that's OK. Perhaps "everyone else" can make up their own minds.

2017-01-08T23:36:35+00:00

Neil

Guest


Give it a rest, Crash Ball. You have put across your point of view with erudite style but, without giving any real evidence to support it, it simply that, a point of view. You’ve had a good run and, to my mind, Nick has been incredibly patient in responding to your diatribe. This was a good article and engendered some great discussion, however yours has done nothing but clog up the works. If and when you have some actual facts to back up your position, I’m sure we would all love to see it. Until then, time to change Clydesdales.…………………………..

2017-01-08T23:14:28+00:00

Fin

Guest


No worries Nick. I just love rugby. Wish I could still play. If I could I would play less on instinct and try and think about the game a bit more. When I played I used to think it was all about aggression and instinct but I now realise it's so much more than that. Reading your analysis often opens up ways for me to think differently about the game. Ideas which I hope to pass onto my son when he is old enough to play.

AUTHOR

2017-01-08T21:02:30+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Whether you believe it or not CB, it's all about rugby for me. You write compellingly, but as you pointed out in your very first comment, that can be 'dangerous' - if not allied to real observations about the game.

2017-01-08T20:08:11+00:00

Crash Ball2

Guest


We clearly disagree and that's OK. Our respective points are now (extensively) platformed and I'd thought we'd reached a point of non-aggression if not accord. As you've suggested, I'll understand if you chose not to listen or respond to me personally if your defined criteria are not met moving forward. But just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in. Why the need for a final haughty dig? The question of rugby is a now a distant sideline and there's a full stable of horses galloping about. We're just comparing Clydesdale dimensions at this point.

AUTHOR

2017-01-08T18:54:11+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I agree fully Carlos. Happy New Year to you! - good to hear your voice again....

2017-01-08T18:19:16+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


Nicholas, and this is why I rarely post on the Roar anymore. Happy New year to you.

AUTHOR

2017-01-08T16:18:30+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Get off your high horse, and come up with some actual examples of what you mean, and I'll happily listen! - as I do with everyone...

2017-01-08T12:20:51+00:00

Crash Ball2

Guest


Tough to resist the departing salvo innit. Mental note: agree = enhance. Disagree = non-lively mind. Got it.

AUTHOR

2017-01-08T06:53:25+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Hi Fin I think that's a reasonable summary. Every player, without exception and however good they may be, has weaknesses. So the trick is to find combinations in every area that 'gel' - in other words mask weaknesses and enhance strengths. That applies to the balance in the coaching group too! Although unorthodox, the Fardy-Pocock-Hooper unit has worked well overall, and the main problem Cheika has had this season is covering the loss of so much experience at one go - No Giteau, no AAC, Genia back and forth etc... Whether someone like McMahon can do the same job is open to question, and it will probably be answered in 2017. But I do feel Hooper has been unfairly vilified by one or two on these pages (you know who you are!) ultimately without a shred of evidence. That is why your good self, and many others like you are so important to the health of threads like this. You always come with pieces of your own experience, links to interviews or videos, or examples, and that enriches the experience of the forum for me and everyone else. That is why it has been my pleasure to respond and interact with all of you... Long may it continue!

2017-01-08T02:41:01+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, When you think about it the way Cheika treats MH is the same philosophy he adopts for his own coaching. Like any good CEO he knows his own coaching limitations and recruits coaches externally to fill in his areas of weakness which frees him up to concentrate on the areas that he is good at. With MH he puts other players around him (ie. Pocock) to cover his area of weakness (the breakdown) so that MH can concentrate on the areas that he is good at. In terms of the bigger picture he has adopted the same approach to build successful teams. For example he needed Giteau to strengthen his team for the World Cup so he convinced the ARU to change their policy towards selecting overseas based players. In order to win the Super Rugby title at the tahs with the style he wanted to play he needed more power up front and more attacking skills out wide so he recruited Jacques Potgieter & KB. And I beleive his recruitment of Rocky Elsom was also instrumental in Leinster's road towards winning in Europe as well. In summary Cheika Recognises the limitations then finds solutions to rectify them and even turn those weaknesses into strengths.

2017-01-07T13:24:51+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Akari the NH has fully embraced the new rules. Here's probably the best example. One of the best games ever played in any era. Crowds from Aus, NZ would love it. Naturally SA Argentina too. Nine try nail biter. Ulster Clermont a few weeks ago. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibrmrdSyHwQ

2017-01-07T07:17:15+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Who, I like Michael Gunn as a like for like replacement at 7. Ironically another no. 7 out of the Churchie stable. His game and development will hopefully go to another level having played off the bench for the Reds behind Liam Gill last season and George Smith this coming season. Here's a brief clip showing some of his talents in the NRC. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=S6bnIULMP2k

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar