Height, pace, and raw talent: Billy Stanlake is a potential superstar

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Like Australian superstar Mitchell Starc, towering paceman Billy Stanlake is a truly rare cricketing commodity.

At 204cm, Australia’s latest ODI player is the tallest paceman ever to play for Australia, eclipsing the likes of former ODI cricketer Brett Dorey (203cm), one-Test-wonder Peter George (203cm), supremely gifted left-armer Bruce Reid (203cm), and Western Australia champion Jo Angel (200cm).

Stanlake has one major advantage over all those fellow two-metre beanpoles – he has express pace.

Dorey relied on lovely outswing, George was a back-of-a-length seamer, Reid exploited his angle across right handers, and Angel unsettled batsmen with his steepling bounce.

But none of them were capable of consistently operating well above 140kmh, so they lacked the intimidation factor owned by Stanlake, who can hit 150kmh and has been regularly exceeding 145kmh in the Big Bash League.

Most of the two-metre-plus quicks we’ve seen in international cricket did not have worrying pace.

West Indian legend Joel Garner (203cm) had a lethal bouncer and an even better yorker, but didn’t have the same scorching speed as contemporaries Michael Holding, Malcolm Marshall, Andy Roberts or Jeff Thomson.

England giants Boyd Rankin (203cm), Chris Tremlett (201cm) and Steven Finn (201cm) have toured Australia as part of the past two Ashes. Rankin and Tremlett operated mainly in the mid-to-high 130kmh range. Finn had startling pace early in his career, but lost it as a result of tinkering with his approach, and these days he is merely sharp, rather than express, except for the odd day when everything clicks and he sits in the mid-140s.

West Indian captain Jason Holder (201cm) is gentle in pace despite his soaring frame, often operating in the low-130s.

The only bowler who has the same terrifying combination of extreme height and raw pace as Stanlake is the man who was just withdrawn from the upcoming ODI series – Pakistan’s 216cm freak Mohammad Irfan. Like Stanlake, Irfan can nudge 150kmh. He is even more unusual than the Australian due to his truly incredible height and left-arm angle.

Unlike Stanlake, 34-year-old Irfan came to cricket very late. He was already 27 years old when he played his first professional game. Stanlake had only just turned 21 when he earned his first-class debut for Queensland and now is about to enter international cricket aged just 22.

The last time a bowler with such unique attributes debuted for Australia was back in 2010, when Starc played his first ODI in India. Starc has used his rare skills to become the world’s best limited-overs bowler and among the elite players in the Test format.

When Starc arrived on the domestic scene, he showed himself to be a one-of-a-kind – there was no other bowler like him in world cricket. A 196cm left-armer who was a natural swing bowler at up to 150kmh. It was a freakish package.

The closest bowler in style to Starc was Mitchell Johnson, yet Johnson was significantly shorter and had a much lower, slingier action, which did not allow the consistent swing or sharp lift the younger man earned.

Stanlake is fortunate enough to have a similar shock factor to Starc.

As his Queensland colleague and soon-to-be ODI teammate Usman Khawaja explained this week, Stanlake’s bowling is “very ugly to face”.

“He’s a tall bloke, bowls fast, hits the bat hard and he’s very ugly to face,” Khawaja told the media.

“The selectors think he’s ready and I’m sure that he is and if he gets a chance he’ll do really well. He’s very tall and very fast, and that’s two commodities you don’t get together a lot of times. Either you bowl fast and you’re not as tall, or you’re tall and you’re not as fast. But he can do both which is quite impressive.”

The element of surprise Stanlake possesses thanks to his height and pace will only take him so far, of course. Batsmen will grow more accustomed to his unusual release point and sharp bounce. He’ll need other skills to consistently trouble international batsmen.

Stanlake has shown though, that he doesn’t rely on his speed and lift. He’s not a Shaun Tait-style spray-and-pray express quick. In all three formats, Stanlake has display impressive accuracy and the nous to vary his angles on the crease.

He is, of course, still extremely green, having played just two first-class matches (seven wickets at 21), four List A matches (seven wickets at 25) and seven T20s (eight wickets at 23). His enormous frame will also likely make him more susceptible to injury, particularly at this age while his body is still filling out.

Australia have such a quality battery of ODI quicks – Starc, Josh Hazlewood, Pat Cummins, James Faulkner and John Hastings – that Stanlake is unlikely to become a regular in the team at this stage. Big Billy will, however, add some genuine excitement and intrigue to the five-match series against Pakistan starting tomorrow.

The Crowd Says:

2017-01-12T23:53:39+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


He COULD be. No one is sayinh he IS.

2017-01-12T10:07:12+00:00

jameswm

Roar Guru


I don't see why not. He keeps in BBL and appears clearly better than Wade.

2017-01-12T07:55:43+00:00

JoM

Guest


Totally agree. He is only 22 and has already had plenty of back injuries. They will have to bring him along slowly as they are now with Cummins.

AUTHOR

2017-01-12T07:11:15+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


I agree Nudge I'd be happy to see Handscomb given a crack at keeping in ODIs/T20s at some point but right now Wade's been in good form in ODIs and he deserves his spot.

2017-01-12T06:40:33+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Wash your mouth out. The whingers barrack for West Coast.

2017-01-12T06:30:47+00:00

Nudge

Guest


Don may have already worked that Ronan as I'm pretty sure he is a Pom. Is that right Don??

2017-01-12T06:28:11+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


That can be the only reason. They are our weakest link. Geez I get frustrated when Bell and Klinger are batting, burning balls and there is all this firepower behind them. I'm a bit unfair to Klinger but any of the others could do what he does...just faster and better. Johnson hasn't got to wave the willow, Agar has barely sniffed a bat and no one has seen Richardson...and he can really bat. I love Whiteman in the first 3. He can do the Bell role but way faster. He is a natural for Wade's ODI spot. He has every shot there is.

2017-01-12T06:26:59+00:00

Nudge

Guest


Ronan, I think with Handscomb they wouldn't even be fussed about what he's done in the past with the bat in list A cricket. It would be more if he wants to keep, or if he's good enough with the gloves to be the keeper. You give that guy time, and no doubt he would be a very high quality batsman at one day international level.

AUTHOR

2017-01-12T06:21:23+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


The Scorchers have been obsessed with recruiting current/former England internationals - Bell, Willey, Bresnan, Collingwood, Carberry. I do wonder if it's a marketing ploy to appeal to the enormous population of British expats in Perth.

2017-01-12T06:12:11+00:00

Mike Dugg

Guest


I thought people were crazy for suggesting Cummins should be an immediate in to the test team even though he has played very little first class cricket for many years. This is beyond that. Billy a promising bowler but saying superstar potential is ridiculous considering he has played a grand total of two first class games, 4 domestic one dayers and 7 domestic t20s.

2017-01-12T06:09:22+00:00

Mike Dugg

Guest


Yes a bit in the One dayers for Queensland. He's promising but certainly I don't see superstar material yet

AUTHOR

2017-01-12T06:09:01+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Wade should not be in the Test team, and his ODI returns were very ordinary earlier in his career. But....credit where's it's due....he's been good over the past 6-7 months in ODIs. He has made 389 runs at an average of 35 (SR of 96) in his past 15 ODIs for Australia and his keeping's been ok. The reality is that there is no 50-over keeper banging the door down in domestic cricket - Nevill averages 22 with the bat in List A, Whiteman only averages 20, Hartley has lost his 50-over spot for QLD and didn't play in the Matador Cup. Paine is the best performed keeper-batsman in domestic 50-over cricket but the problem is that he's an old-school, slow-building opening batsman with an extremely slow strike rate of 71 in List A cricket. There is no room for Paine at the top of the order and he's never looked comfortable batting down the order in 50-over cricket for Tas. Paine will also be pushing 35yo by the time the next World Cup comes around so not sure it's worth investing time in him now. As for Handscomb, he could be worth a trial as an ODI keeper-batsman, but he was very poor in the last Matador Cup, averaging just 22 so he's not demanding selection either.

2017-01-12T06:07:08+00:00

Mike Dugg

Guest


yeah if only Billy was a west Australian

2017-01-12T06:01:26+00:00

Nudge

Guest


It would make for an even better team if Handscomb could take the gloves. The guy looks made for one day cricket

2017-01-12T05:59:38+00:00

Nudge

Guest


Get someone to fill in the hole when you jump back in Mike

2017-01-12T05:49:26+00:00

Rob

Guest


Team 4 India - renshaw, warner, kwaja, smithy, handscome(wk), maxwell, falkner, hazelwood, zampa, starc, stanlake . 12 th man lyon We want to win don't we?

2017-01-12T05:18:32+00:00

Nudge

Guest


I'd agree with that team. Handscomb as keeper would make it a heck of a lot stronger with him at 5 and everyone moving down one. Watching Handscomb bat in the tests it was almost impossible to see how he wouldn't have success in one day cricket.

2017-01-12T05:13:01+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Wade? Still? If he can't perform with the bat...and he isn't any more...there is no spot for him. He is the country's worst performing wicket keeper with the bat right now and with the gloves...well, a backstop. Can someone make an argument for him that involves current form? Stats from previous years mean nothing.

AUTHOR

2017-01-12T04:57:46+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


I still think Maxwell, at his best, is streets ahead of Head as a limited overs cricketer. The Champions Trophy is all that matters, so give Maxwell as much time as possible to hit his straps before then. If Maxwell hits form for the Champions Trophy no side will be able to touch Australia, he just makes them so much more dangerous. This, right now, is Australia's best XI and the one I'd be looking to take to the Champions Trophy: 1. Warner 2. Khawaja 3. Smith 4. Lynn 5. M. Marsh 6. Maxwell 7. Wade 8. Starc 9. Cummins 10. Zampa 11. Hazlewood And Faulkner is there waiting in the wings.

AUTHOR

2017-01-12T04:52:26+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Faulkner close to his best is a must in the starting XI. He is a fantastic big game performer, as he showed in World Cup Final, and adds fantastic balance to the side. But geez it's hard to find a spot for him at the moment. Zampa, too, is in Australia's best XI for me, he's such a clever, calm limited overs bowler and accurate leggies are like gold dust in white ball cricket. The variety he adds to the attack if invaluable.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar