What does the future hold for the Wallabies' scrum?

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

Historically, the set scrum has always been regarded as the Achilles heel of the Australian team in the Northern Hemisphere. For every ‘Topo’ Rodriguez, Andy McIntyre and Richard Harry Australia has produced, there have been two or three Matt Dunnings, Guy Shepherdsons and Al Baxters.

But that perception is already in the process of change, and by 2019 it could become obsolete. Even allowing for the absence of some top front-rowers plying their trade in Europe, like Paul Alo-Emile and Greg Holmes, there is a crop of youngsters coming through to the top level who will give Wallabies coach Michael Cheika an enviable pool of talent from which to select in the build-up to the next World Cup.

There are some logistical problems to solve, but if Cheika and the ARU can get the players they want playing in the right positions during the coming Super Rugby season, the future looks promising.

The following questions will need to be answered in the course of the 2017 season. The purpose of this article is to give a picture of what some of the answers to those questions might be.

• Has Scott Sio improved since his yellow card in the first Test of the summer series against England?
• Can Sekope Kepu maintain peak form with the Waratahs?
• Which side of the front row should Allan Alaalatoa and Tom Robertson be playing on?
• Can James Slipper keep his place in the match-day quartet of Wallaby props?

The key tour game in assessing Scott Sio’s progress was the final end-of-year tour international against England. Sio had been singled out for the Romain Poite ‘treatment’ in the first Test of the summer series and yellow-carded in his personal duel with crafty Leicester veteran Dan Cole. He lost face so much that Michael Cheika de-selected him from the match-day 23 for the following week entirely.

Since then, Sio has quietly returned to the starting line-up, but the repairs to his scrummaging technique were to be fully road-tested by his old nemesis in the final major international of 2016.

Honours were roughly even while the starting front-rows remained on the field. England won the penalty count 2-1 at scrum time, but Australia won a crucial ball against the feed which led directly to their first try at 6:28.

That first scrum of the game distilled both the essence of the scrummaging contest and Scott Sio’s progress since June. England win the initial engagement and Cole is in a lower and more dynamic position than Sio at 6:29, forcing the Wallaby loose-head to ‘give’ with his outside foot a couple of seconds later, after England kick the ball through into the Australian scrum.

However, both Sio and Kepu come back strongly in the final phase of the set-piece, with Sio in the lower and more compact position at 6:33 – so it is the Wallabies who finish the more convincingly of the two scrums.

This was not the only occasion that the Wallabies scrum provided a solid foundation for back-line attacks. Early in the game (at 11:15 and 12:25) Australia twice crossed the England goal-line to score ‘tries’ without a clear grounding of the ball, and at 36:58 another clean scrum win enabled Dane Haylett-Petty to break past Ben Youngs and create a clear attacking opportunity.

Sio and Australia also defended well at a dangerous five-metre scrum situation at 25:30. In my article before the June series, I noted England’s bread and butter on their own feed is a left-to-right movement with Dan Cole walking around the opposing loose-head to create the impression of ‘dominance’:

This is the manoeuvre that cost Sio a warning from Poite, and ultimately a yellow card and the temporary loss of place in the Australian run-on side. But when Cole attempts to shift his right leg outside at 25:32, this time Sio has the solution. He makes sure he stays on the outside and that Cole’s right hip remains inside his right shoulder, so that no ‘walk-around’ is possible. Michael Hooper completes the sequence with a thunderous hit to uproot England’s biggest ball-carrier, 125kg number 8 Nathan Hughes.

Sio can still become over-extended under pressure, which makes him vulnerable to a tight-head with a ‘jackhammer’ right-arm bind (see the examples at 42:48 and 53:35 with Cole dropping down and inside to the floor as soon as he feels Sio over-extend, and Rabah Slimani repeating the same action in the final scrum of the France reel) but the incidences are far less frequent than they were earlier in the season – one penalty conceded against Cole and an escape without punishment in the final critical moments of the game against France.

So the answer to the first two questions is ‘yes’ on both counts. Sio has improved to the level where he can at least match wits with a wily old operator like Cole, and Kepu is still functioning near the peak of his powers at the age of 30 years old – see his dominant eruption through Dylan Hartley’s bind on Mako Vunipola at 12:30.

The scenario with the two youngest and most inexperienced members of Australia’s match-day squad in the front row, Tom Robertson and Allan Alaalatoa, is rather more complicated.

Alaalatoa spent all of the 2016 Super Rugby season alternating with Scott Sio on the Brumbies’ loose-head, while Robertson was part of a revival in front row fortunes for the Waratahs in the second half of their season, but playing at tight-head.

With the Wallabies, and presumably on Mario Ledesma’s advice, both have been required to swap sides, with Alaalatoa moving to number 3 and Robertson shifting over to number 1.

Alaalatoa made his first start at tight-head for the Wallabies against France on tour, after several promising cameos off the bench which formed part of this article.

There were no problems on Alaalatoa’s side of the scrum throughout the match, and his performance at scrum time ranged from satisfactory to excellent. Perhaps his finest scrum of the game occurred at 50:15, with France defending a feed only five metres out from their own goal-line.

The tight-head’s job in this situation is to make the life of his opposite number (Toulouse debutant Cyrille Baille) as uncomfortable as possible. At 50:15, Baille is steady in his initial set, sitting on the shoulders of his second rower (number 4) and the openside flanker (number 7). One jolt of power from Alaalatoa two seconds later and the situation is not the same at all. Suddenly Baille’s inside leg has slipped back behind the shoulder of his lock, and the number 7 has lost his support shape on the other side. Alaalatoa drills through and France are struggling to get the ball away cleanly.

Unfortunately, matters did not go so well on the other side of the scrum for Australia, or when Alaalatoa was pulled off and replaced by Tom Robertson. The starting Wallabies loose-head, James Slipper, had trouble containing the huge bulk and power of Uini Atonio (all 154 kilograms of him) even though Atonio has no great reputation in France as a scrummager.

Slipper was continually forced inwards and downwards (sometimes to the point of complete disappearance, as at 59:30) and conceded two penalties as a result. When Tom Robertson replaced Alaalatoa, the aerial shots at 78:25, 79:34 and 81:03 confirmed the huge disparity in size between him and his opposite number, Toulon’s Xavier Chiocci. Robertson is listed at 111 kgs while Chiocci is closer to 125 kgs, and it requires superb technique for a tight-head to offset such a basic disadvantage in weight.

Both Slipper’s difficulty in holding up against opponents on a strong angle inside, and Robertson’s issues with technique and size on the tight-head were observed in the article about play off the bench (in the two Rugby Championship matches against the Springboks), so this was a case of deja vu.

I believe switching Robertson to loose-head, and gaining Alaalatoa further experience at tight-head, are two ‘must-haves’ for the Wallabies coaching staff in the upcoming Super Rugby season. But it will be a test of what Ben Darwin calls the cohesion of Australian rugby whether both are given that opportunity.

The Waratahs already have Paddy Ryan successfully reinventing himself at number 1, and the Brumbies can already field Ben Alexander and Les Makin on the other side. In New Zealand, the national requirements would be prioritised and both Robertson and Alaalatoa would get the exposure they need, and in the position they need it in 2017. In Australia, ‘the pyramid of priority’ is less clear-cut.

Overall, this does not detract from a very promising situation in terms of Australian propping stocks. Despite the loss of seasoned front-rowers to Europe, a solid corps is emerging within the country in the build-up to Japan 2019.

Sekope Kepu is playing near the peak of his powers and will still be in the frame at 33 years of age then, while the upward curve of Scott Sio’s progress has resumed after the mid-year setbacks of 2016.

James Slipper has the experience but will come under pressure for his bench spot from the ‘twin Tah’ pincer attack of Tom Robertson and Paddy Ryan, while Alaalatoa and Taniela Tupou both have breathing space in which to develop their games in the comforting shadow on Kepu’s excellence.

It is a positive scenario the Wallabies have not experienced for some time.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2017-01-25T09:40:52+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I think those who have reached 100 caps, and have had their value recognized over a numbers of years by a raft of different coaches, tend to be exactly that - world-class. If you take a look at this list https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rugby_union_Test_caps_leaders , I'd guess that about 90% of them have been ranked in the global top three in the world in their position for a considerable body of time. IMO Stephen Moore has been among the top three hookers for the majority of his career.

2017-01-25T01:21:06+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


I am not a beliver that just because you have played x- amount of test that equates to you being world class...it may equate to you consistently being the best in your position in your nation I could name you several players in international squads who have played a large number of test that I would call world class Nick but consistently just below it. I put Moore in that category. I also agree with Eddie Jones who recently said there are very few genuine world class players out of the number playing and he went on to say that he thinks the term is branded around too easily, and that one of the reasons the AB's are so consistently the best is that they regularly produce more "genuine world class" players across their squad. I can only agree with his sentiments.

AUTHOR

2017-01-24T10:55:47+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Very wise that these changes have been situated in the scrum-sophisticated culture in Argentina NB!

AUTHOR

2017-01-24T10:54:29+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


This will be a huge boost, with two years for TT to bed in before 2019 WC...

AUTHOR

2017-01-23T08:22:25+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I'd agree with you all the way up to the middle of last season! But since then, he seemed to 'get' his new position and began to thrive - Good on him!

2017-01-23T00:25:50+00:00

Terry

Guest


Paddy Ryan.... AAAAAAAARGH!!

AUTHOR

2017-01-22T09:02:53+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


So you almost concurred with my argument Nick Did I Fox? :) Your original comment was that you believe the NZ, Ireland and England tight fives to be "world class". Although I'd agree there are world-class elements within each of them, only Jack McGrath and (possibly) Maro Itoje would break into the AB tight forwards right now - though I'm pretty sure NZ would keep their current second row combination and see Itoje as a long-term replacement for Jerome Kaino at 6! Kepu and Moore are both world-class players in their positions - you don't win over 100 caps for your country without being outstanding for a long period of time. The locks still need some sorting but show promise, so the base is there. They just need experience now.

2017-01-22T00:41:25+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


So you almost concurred with my argument Nick - you mention that Ireland - England and NZ have at least one "genuine" world class player in their tight five. In my opinion Australia don't. They have strong workmanlike players like Steven Moore but I certainly would not call him genuine world class. And again when I talked about a world class tight five - I am talking about how they operate as a unit that also have at least one world class player in there. You may disagree but I think Australia at the moment does not have this, Cheika's never ending revolving locking combinations last season has hindered this actually happening as well This is a pity because Arnold and Coleman have huge potential as a combination if they can improve certain areas of their game respectively. But for now I stand by what I say I am not sure I agree with you with regard to Owen Franks either. I know who I would rather have in my team. Kepu is bit too hit & miss for me and he sometimes makes poor defensive reads but powerful with his hits at the same time. But that old Wallaby consistency problem is his problem, and Franks is one of the best scrummagers in the game and often picked in World 15's even in English newspapers I notice and his defense is just bone crushing at times (ask some of his victims after he has hit them in front on tackle!) and he has made some very good off-loads in his time. But hey that's just my opinion.

2017-01-22T00:12:23+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


I said "rarely" . I didn't say never did I ? Your other comments yes fair call and lineout throwing is an Achilles heel for Australia I think it needs to be said

2017-01-20T15:10:26+00:00

mzilikazi

Guest


Would not agree he is woefull in all areas........good in contact, especially at laying ball back well, and fast. I will be interested to see how he develops after the Saracens stint.

AUTHOR

2017-01-20T08:23:03+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Yep Simmons is a tight-head lock at root - and the best S/R scrummager tends to be spotted there...

AUTHOR

2017-01-20T08:19:51+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


One feature of the Aussie scrum I didn't have the space to comment on in the article is the number of short-arm pens they give up for early engagements or pushing before the feed. This suggests that they favour a dynamic rather than a 'locked' approach and are looking to get impetus as early as poss. I also think that approach has helped make a LH like Slipper viable during his Test career - he is much better suited to a dynamic, momentum-based policy...

2017-01-20T06:06:01+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


As mentioned above a 'snap' to get it moving is great. After as we are all saying getting into good position and if going forward taking small steps is the ideal. On a stationary scrum I still advocate bent knees over straight - straight legs are purely a defensive position - it is impossible to put pressure on the opposition after the legs are straight as you are at full extension. It cedes all initiative to the opposition and leaves you at risk.

2017-01-20T05:58:09+00:00

Fin

Guest


And at the Reds Greg Holmes used to get very cranky whenever Simmons was not there locking the scrum behind him.

2017-01-20T05:32:04+00:00

mzilikazi

Guest


Thanks for the comments and clarifications Jez, Browny...In guess I did perhaps not make really clear what I was saying, and I therefore take your points, Browny. especially the short, quick steps......I would see the knee lock as part of the sequence in these steps....very effective, especially on moving the opposition backwards, and hopefully up to "destorying" their scrum. I don't see the locked knees as a "set in concrete"position...merely an often very brief one, with the players adjusting leg position easily and quickly. as needed. The locking of the knees I would coach as being used to give scrum stability on one's own put in. It is then very hard to shift such a scrum backwards, Try taking a sharpened wooden stake, stick it into the ground at, say, 45 degrees, and try pushing it back...won't get very far ! Then take the stake, cut it in two and add a hinge in the middle. Keep the stake straight, and you still will get no place...but, bend it just a little at the hinge, and pushing back is easy.... I am only dealing with the leg positions and leg use here...the upper body positions and techniques are vital too...but won't go into that now........one could write a book on the subject. My comments come from playing in the second row behind a very good tight head, and later in life coaching, mainly at First XV level, and producing very dominant and destructive scrums

2017-01-20T01:13:09+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


Browny - good comment. I get Mzilikazi's call for a snap with all 8 straightening their legs at once but fully agree with your comment that all players should then be returning to back and shins parallel to the ground with thighs perpendicular. And little baby steps are definitely the way forward once you've created that initial momentum!

2017-01-19T21:26:26+00:00

Browny

Guest


Mzilikazi, I was always taught that 'locked knees' was something to avoid at all times. Thighs perpendicular to the body and ground, that burst-power comes through short, quick steps, always trying to 'resolve' the legs back to that perpendicular position so you've got movement either way (forward or back) depending on the movement of the scrum as a whole. Also keeps the contact area for the locks and flankers to drive through, as the body position elongates with the legs straighter you open up the possibility of one of the two driving from behind to slip up (towards the back) which instantly removes the stability and power from the scrum. Not to mention that locked knees have nowhere to go if the shove comes on from the opposition... my old man learnt that one the hard way filling in at hooker (from the openside) and he's got the scars on his knees to prove it.... That's the one thing I'm not feeling with your comments and Jez is right on the money with the binding laws.

2017-01-19T09:35:50+00:00

RubberLegs

Guest


Yes Simmo carried he ball in with speed and power but not recklessly so as to lose possession like competitors for his position who are off seeing their doctor after a handful of tests.

AUTHOR

2017-01-19T09:27:54+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Completely agree - and thanks for the clarification J.

2017-01-19T08:57:06+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


The infringement isn't shifting - being in a 4th prop position is plain illegal. 20.1 (f) Binding by all other players. All players in a scrum, other than front-row players, must bind on a lock’s body with at least one arm prior to the scrum engagement. The locks must bind with the props in front of them. No other player other than a prop may hold an opponent. Sanction: Penalty kick Backrower's must bind on a lock's body - the actual law mentions an arm but the definition of bind means shoulder on. Is not the way I coach my flankers as I insist they focus on the nexus point that mzilikazi references being the top of the hamstring/bottom of the glute - what I like to call the scrummer's nook or shelf. By ensuring the shoulder is in that little cranny and then the arm across the neighbouring lock then the spirit if not the definition of the law is obeyed. Slipping off the lock and up next to the prop clearly breaks the bind required by law and should be penalised every time.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar