The World XI of unfilled potential

By Ritesh Misra / Roar Guru

Some cricketers are supremely talented. Paradoxically however, often these super talents do not fulfil their awesome potential.

Such people are not being criticised, I am only heaving a sigh of sadness at how much more they could have achieved.

My World XI for unfulfilled potential does not feature players whose career was threatened and cut short by injury, such as Ian Bishop or Shane Bond – only those who did not perform to their perceived potential figure.

I will go in for Mark Ramprakash and Shoaib Mohammed as openers.

Only 25 players have 100 first-class hundreds, and English batting coach Ramprakash is one of them. However, he did not do well in international cricket, where he scored only two hundreds in his 52-Test career – delightful ones at Barbados and the Oval.

Nicknamed ‘Bloodaxe’ for his fearsome temper, Ramprakash has more than 50,000 runs in different formats of the game, but was probably picked too soon.

Hanif Mohammed’s son, Shoaib Mohammed, was dubbed a ‘strokeless wonder’ during his playing days. He played 45 Tests and scored seven hundreds, including a double hundred as well. The fact that he also has an ODI hundred and eight 50s in ODI shows that he could have batted faster.

Like his illustrious father, Shoaib too was a classical Test opener and will provide stability and solidness to my team.

At three is Zimbabwean born Graeme Hick, who debuted in the same Test as Ramprakash. He too has 25 first-class hundreds and he, Graham Gooch and Sachin Tendulkar are the only three players to cross 20,000 runs in List A Cricket (international and domestic ODI).

He has an outstanding first-class record, with over 40,000 runs and 136 tons and 158 half centuries, but he was an underachiever at Test level, with 3383 runs and six hundreds at an average of only 31.32 in his 65 matches.

Could it be that the seven years spent waiting for qualification to play for England reduced his appetite for international cricket? One can only speculate. He definitely was a great the world waited for and never got.

At four is Carl Hooper, who with Jacques Kallis is one of only two players to have scored 5000 runs, taken 100 wickets, held 100 catches and played over 100 matches in both Tests and ODIs. He made batting look easy and was never unfazed by any kind of bowling. Unfortunately, he never performed to his potential. He did score 5700 runs in Test cricket but with only 13 hundreds at an average of 36.46. He should have done much better.

At five is Vinod Kambli, the childhood friend of Tendulkar who had back-to-back 200s in only his third and fourth Test matches. In his first seven Tests Kambli had two 200s and two 100s. However, thereafter his form alarmingly plummeted and after only two years he was dropped from the Test team, never to return. His Test average in 17 Tests is 54.2.

Wicketkeeper is Sadanand Vishwanath. Can anyone forget his mesmerising performance in the World Championship of Cricket in Australia? Indian captain Sunny Gavaskar paid him the ultimate tribute in his book One-Day Wonders, saying, “People will talk about many other reasons why we won the World Championship of Cricket in 1985 but one of the main reasons was the presence of Sadanand Vishwanath behind the stumps.”

Sadly Vishwanath faded away, playing only three Tests and 22 ODIs instead of becoming India’s best ever, as predicted by the Australian media.

My choices for all-rounders are Chris Cairns and Irfan Pathan, who both faded away even though they had potential to play for years.

Steve Harmison and Patrick Patterson occupy ninth and tenth spot in my team. Harmison, an awkward bowler in the Curtly Ambrose mould, ended up playing 63 Test matches and took 226 wickets, once taking 7-12 as the West Indies collapsed to 47 all out.

Harmison played a crucial role in the 2005 Ashes win and was Wisden Cricketer of the Year, but he could have achieved much more.

So also Patrick Patterson, a fearsome fast bowler who took seven wickets on debut but did not go on to even complete 100 Test wickets.

The sole spinner is current commentator Laxman Sivaramakrishnan. He too played a vital role in India’s 1985 win Down Under, and the stumping of Javed Miandad by Vishwanath off Siva’s bowling will always remain etched in memory. Siva was incredibly talented but played only nine Tests and 16 ODIs before fading away.

That rounds up my 11, with Hooper as the captain.

In a 16-man squad are batsmen Marlon Samuels and Ricardo Powell, allrounder Wasim Raja, fast bowler Shaun Tait and spinner Narendra Hirwani.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2017-02-22T07:40:10+00:00

Ritesh Misra

Roar Guru


Good. Typo

AUTHOR

2017-02-22T07:35:38+00:00

Ritesh Misra

Roar Guru


'Over estimation of how goos someone was". Interesting and apt observation

AUTHOR

2017-02-22T07:34:29+00:00

Ritesh Misra

Roar Guru


Shane Bond was awesome, and he reserved some special performances for the Aussies. and that too a super strong Aussie team

2017-02-22T05:08:59+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


Yes. Rutherford was ruined against the WI at their best as a teen - could have been a very good player. Geoff Allot was another who broke down with injury and lets not forget Shane Bond - when he was fit he was arguably the best quick going - he was only fit 3 weeks of any season

AUTHOR

2017-02-21T08:30:56+00:00

Ritesh Misra

Roar Guru


Thanks and excellent suggestions indeed

AUTHOR

2017-02-21T08:30:07+00:00

Ritesh Misra

Roar Guru


JP Duminy indeed is an enigma. he defines unfulfilled potential

AUTHOR

2017-02-21T08:28:45+00:00

Ritesh Misra

Roar Guru


Definitely. Excellent one. And good one too regarding Mitch, food for thought

AUTHOR

2017-02-21T08:27:50+00:00

Ritesh Misra

Roar Guru


Yes JGK You are right, had not thought about that aspect

2017-02-20T14:18:36+00:00

Naresh Sadasivan

Guest


This is a wonderful throwback to those days when we thought we had a winner amongst us, only to discover that they were duds in white or coloured costumes. Shoaib is the only contentious one if I were to produce a list (which incidentally I can would never be able to compile) - he was never test material in my opinion. Would be good if you dissected it to an era - either by decades, or around famous-people era (e.g. Ponting era or Ganguly era). That way, we get to see many many more. I recall that the 70s had India List A player Ashok Mankad who promised so much. So did Sudhakar Rao (bad timing I suppose), and Yajuvendra Singh who seemed to have lost out after promising so much. Again, very nice idea to the article, Ritesh.

2017-02-20T14:00:06+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Excellent piece Ritesh! I would go with Afridi as all rounder and Sylvester Clarke over Patterson actually. Other than that great choices.

2017-02-20T13:53:39+00:00

Rats

Guest


Good write, Ritesh.. How about Brendon Julian? Poor guy couldn't get a game in '99 world cup. Had a decent one year in odi cricket, 6-7 Tests as well. Was a very good prospect to become an all-rounder.

2017-02-20T12:34:01+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


true but they should have played more tests.

AUTHOR

2017-02-20T12:31:38+00:00

Ritesh Misra

Roar Guru


Yes NZ can contribute heavily. What about Dion Nash and Ken Rutherford as well ?

AUTHOR

2017-02-20T12:28:40+00:00

Ritesh Misra

Roar Guru


not too sure about Bobby key. nor about Neil. England XI maybe, but world 11 ?

AUTHOR

2017-02-20T12:26:32+00:00

Ritesh Misra

Roar Guru


Thanks Pope Paul VII. Hick when he played for England already had 57 1st class tons. Thanks for pointing out the 98 not out. That would have been his 1st Ashes ton. good point about Deano. One of my favorite players

2017-02-20T11:44:01+00:00

davSA

Guest


Actually Arky more specifically , Shane Warne got in his head.

2017-02-20T11:35:37+00:00

davSA

Guest


If you want a player of unfulfilled potential Ritesh , look no further than the Proteas J.P Duminy. A class batsman with every shot in the book . He makes batting look easy. Even years ago when he made his first class debut I remember Kepler Wessells waxing lyrical over him on a radio programme. But now years later with a test average of just over 30 you have to say ....unfulfilled potential. On another tack , I watched the late Sylvester Clarke many times over the years playing for Transvaal after his banning from international cricket. He struck fear through opposition batsmen in our Currie Cup comp over all that time. He was a very special bowler.

2017-02-20T11:01:13+00:00

Matt

Guest


For me kambli takes the cake. He was atleast on par with sachin if not better. He could have easily hung up his boots as all time top 5 batter. Sachin and kambli, s coach always believed kambli as a better and more talented batsman and yet he made a mess of it. Bcci did there bit too nonthless.

2017-02-20T10:50:56+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Isn't that the very essence of unfulfilled potential?

2017-02-20T08:55:29+00:00

qwetzen

Guest


What about Fat Cat? He was a goose, but he sure could bat pretty. Unfortunately he had two errr heavyweight enemies. The Oz cricket 'brains' trust who decided that the country's best m-o bat should open, and himself. I don't know how many of the seven deadly sin he committed but gluttony alone would've been worth three.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar