Mixing sport and entertainment at the Australian Open

By Kate Smart / Expert

The lines between sport and entertainment are becoming increasingly blurred, but is this necessarily a bad thing?

Every facet of the entertainment sector is under increasing pressure to attract our eyeballs and take our hard-earned cash, and the sports industry is no different.

The question of why should we watch, let alone attend live, sports events when there are so many other demands on our time and our wallets, is not lost on the organisers of an event such as the Australian Open.

The pressure isn’t just on the athletes to perform, there’s also pressure on events to produce an entertainment product that is as attractive to knowledgeable fans as it is to casual observers.

Each year the Australian Open sets new attendance records. In 2017, 728,763 patrons attended the tournament, up by around 8000 on the previous year.

But do these healthily increasing attendance figures suggest a growth in the popularity of the sport itself, or is the merging of entertainment with sport responsible?

Today, a trip to the tennis is very different to what it once was, even as recently as the turn of the century. Gone are the days when your options were either a pre-purchased seat in one of the arenas, or a ground pass.

Today, a visit to the may involve seeing no tennis played whatsoever. In some ways, this isn’t necessarily different from a day at the races during Melbourne’s Spring Carnival, where many punters are lucky to leave the betting ring and see a nag run along the straight.

And this point is not lost on the Australian Open’s organisers. Tournament commercial director Richard Heaselgreave explained that a key part of the strategy in attracting more patrons and television viewers, particularly from overseas, is in developing the Open into a festival as opposed to a mere tennis event. They have focused on celebrating tennis and the Australian summer.

After all, overseas audiences are shivering through a bleary winter, and what better antidote can there be than watching a few hours of tennis from much sunnier climes?

The Australian Open is also able to take advantage of the large complex it is housed in, with Tennis Australia harnessing Melbourne Park’s sprawling nature by careful event planning.

Heaselgreave says the layout of Melbourne Park is not dissimilar to that of a theme park, with a clear segmentation of areas.

“The site is very clear now. It’s over two and a half kilometres from one point to another and we segment different areas,” Heaselgreave says.

It is this segmentation of the site that separates the more adult activities of the bands on the AO Oval, just up from the Birrarung Marr entrance, to the laid-back atmosphere of Grand Slam Oval, which is separate to the kids’ area that is now situated behind Rod Laver Arena.

The danger in expanding events like the Australian Open with its offerings of food, music and a party atmosphere is that the tennis gets lost. It’s easy to be a cynical spectator who harks back to the good old days, when sports events were a lot less commercial and people attended to see the world’s best tennis players in action rather than to party the day away nowhere near a court.

However, Heaselgrave is adamant that “the tennis content is sacrosanct” and not a sideshow.

Obviously, tennis is not the only sport merging with entertainment in order to attract the casual fan.

Cricket Australia’s strategy with the Big Bash League has successfully engaged younger and more casual audiences. Over at the AFL, the focus is on introducing a women’s league as its most likely point of expansion.

But the stadiums they are played in constrict these sports in developing an entertainment package that allows fans to dip in and out of the action, unlike the Australian Open. It’s hard to have a festival atmosphere on the forecourt of the MCG.

Another important element to the growth of events such as the Australian Open is in engaging fans through social media. This is especially important for reaching out to the casual fans who may not be tweeting the tennis action, but are instead Instagramming the event’s atmosphere.

According to Sean Callanan of SportsGeek.com.au, “Developing the ambiance and fun vibe is vital. It will ensure people return as well as amplifying the event on patrons social media.”

Some of us may hark back to the days when sport was less commercial, and attending live was the domain of the knowledgeable fan.

But in the 21st century, sport is entwined with entertainment, and it is the growth of the casual fans’ dollars that will be central to the success of events such as the Australian Open.

And of course the increased revenue Tennis Australia earns from the Open finds its way back into the game’s grassroots, which can only be a good thing.

The Crowd Says:

2017-02-26T05:22:05+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Good point, in many ways modern day professional sport is becoming a sad event for the traditionalists and the pursuits and die hards. And the casual fans/bandwagon fans needs are becoming first priority as there are more of them who watch big major events. And it seems the causal fans want entertainment and add ons and extras rather than a pure sport experience. And the money makers who run pro sport leagues/and tours only care about there bottom line the money, so the purists and traditionalists get shafted. We also see this in rule changes as well that deviate from the pure forms of the sport to lure a wider audience etc. It's sad as I am a traditionalist with sport rather than wanting a casual fan experience. But it seems i'm not in the majority. I'd have no objection to going back to timeless tests in Test-cricket, and banning T-20 and One day cricket, and everyone wearing white clothing like at Wimbledon, rest days for sport on sundays, and rest days in test cricket, but hay Im a purist who has no concern for the modern fan. I like ST Andrews Golf course as it's still one of the few pure golf links design courses left.

AUTHOR

2017-02-22T21:22:14+00:00

Kate Smart

Expert


Thanks Tristan. Agreed, racing does have some different issues in that there's only X number of races each day and not a lot else to do between races. Whereas the tennis has matches on the outside courts continuously. This is where the management of the physical space of Melbourne Park is so well handled by Tennis Australia. The 'adult' areas are clearly defined but patrons can take a break and go out to watch some tennis. I think the way we consume sports now, whether be live at the event or through the media is really interesting. Very different to the olden days, which sadly I'm old enough to remember!!

2017-02-22T20:03:54+00:00

Tristan Rayner

Editor


Interesting article, Kate. The problem for racing is the race-goers who have no interest in racing as you can't get them back aside from the big carnival days. That makes it different to the AO which is that big one time two-weeks only event, giving them more of an opportunity... or perhaps racing just needs to scale back just a little! :)

AUTHOR

2017-02-22T05:44:17+00:00

Kate Smart

Expert


Thanks for your comment, Clipper. Agreed, I think the activities for the kids at the AO are great and if it gets them interested in the sport then that's even better. The reality is that there are only so many people who are die hard fans and it's through attracting casual fans that these events can grow. I think it's easy to be cynical but the AO did a great job this year.

2017-02-21T23:57:34+00:00

clipper

Guest


Good article, Kate. I agree that the crux is to get as many in as possible to increase takings which flow on to Tennis in all states. Without this, it would be even harder to stay where we are participation wise and also at the elite level. More fun for the kids as well, parents will be more likely to go again if they aren't complaining and who knows, a few might even take it up after the experience.

Read more at The Roar