A tale of two debuts: The Banerjee-Warne story

By Anindya Dutta / Roar Guru

It was one of those exceptional Test matches that did not throw up a victor, but was never short on drama.

The year is 1992 and on a warm January morning, on the only pitch in Australia that has a reputation as a turner, India and Australia clash at the SCG for the third Test match of the series.

And they seem to have vastly different perspectives on the pitch.

In deference to the pitch’s reputation, notwithstanding the hard surface and the sunny skies, Australia favours wrist spin and replaces off-spinner Peter Taylor with debutant leggie Shane Warne.

Meanwhile, India replaces slow left-arm spinner Venkatapathy Raju with a fourth fast bowler, debutant Subroto Banerjee.

On that first day, under the blue skies, and on the hard pitch, India’s decision looks the better one.

With Kapil Dev and Manoj Prabhakar unable to get a breakthrough, captain Mohammad Azharuddin hands the ball to the Banerjee ahead of Javagal Srinath.

Banerjee is immediately effective.

In a debut spell that any fast bowler would be proud of, he first dismisses opener Geoff Marsh, knocking back his stumps. Mark Taylor and David Boon then have almost a century run partnership as Banerjee is taken off by Azhar. As soon as he is brought back in, Banerjee dismisses Taylor, getting him to edge a ball leaving him to wicketkeeper Chandrakant Pandit. Then he gets Mark Waugh to offer a catch to Prabhakar on 5.

In a wonderful 18-over spell, giving away only 47 runs, the unassuming boy from Bihar has dismissed three of the top batsmen in the world.

Boon remains not out on 129 and Australia is finally dismissed the next day for 313, thanks to Boon’s knock.

The Indian batsmen then bat magnificently, with Ravi Shastri scoring a superb double century, and a young Sachin Tendulkar remains not out on a mature 148, becoming the youngest man to score a Test century in Australia.

The weather plays truant with bad light and rain, causing 94.1 overs to be lost on the third and fourth days.

A tired Ravi Shastri is finally dismissed for 206 runs when Dean Jones takes a catch to give the Australian debutant Shane Warne his first Test wicket.

Unlike his fellow debutant, Warne’s figures are not so impressive. He bowls 45 overs and picks up that sole wicket, conceding 150 runs.

India bats on until the fifth morning, before being finally dismissed for 483, taking a 170-run lead. While many believe the tourists have left it too late, Kapil, Prabhakar and Srinath pick up a wicket each, and then Shastri gets into the act on a pitch which is turning and now uneven, picking up four wickets for 45 runs.

Border and Warne manage to bat out the remaining overs to finish at 8-173, just eight runs ahead of India.

Bizarrely, the man who has bowled so well in the first innings, Subroto Banerjee, does not get to bowl a single ball in the second innings.

In fact, he never gets to bowl another ball in Test cricket, and is destined to be forever referred to in cricketing history as a one-Test wonder.

The other debutant, who takes one wicket for 150 runs, retires from Test cricket 15 years later as arguably the greatest spin bowler in the history of the game, having taken an astonishing 708 wickets in 145 Test matches.


(We’ll just leave this here.)

As Rob Steen was to write in an article in Cricinfo earlier this year, “First impressions are always a precarious matter, and never more so than in Sydney in 1992. Given that, of the two debutants, one dismissed Mark Taylor, Mark Waugh and Geoff Marsh cheaply while the other wound up with 1 for 150, one might be forgiven for suspecting that Subroto Banerjee would be the name now celebrated globally. Yet Banerjee never played another Test, while Warne symbolises the embrace of risk that underpins the very best sport has to offer.”

Banerjee ends the tour at the top of the averages with 15 runs per wicket. Javagal Srinath, his fellow pacer, finishes at the bottom, with 55 runs per wicket.

An Australian fan on The Roar tells me many years later, “I was there that day at the SCG when Subroto Banerjee was bowling. And he was so impressive, I remember saying to my mates that India have found another fast bowler in the mould of Kapil Dev. I am still astounded that Banerjee never played another Test for India.”

Was it a case of just being unlucky, or as was often the case in India until recently, was it the lack of a ‘godfather’ in the system and the unfortunate victimisation by the zonal selection quota system in play? We shall never know.

Banerjee eventually decided to give up the fruitless quest to get back into the Indian Test side and after a few years moved to Australia, marrying a local girl. There he qualified to become a coach, to finally have the second innings spell he was denied so many years ago at the SCG.

And that second innings is proving of immense value to both countries.

For a six-month period, Banerjee was a coach to Mitchell Starc, who is currently shattering the stumps of triple centurions in India. He was also instrumental in shaping up the bowling action and style of India’s top fast bowler, Umesh Yadav, who calls Banerjee his mentor.

Yadav, after that stint with Banerjee, has been an unrecognisable bowler over the past year or so.

With the word now out on the street that Banerjee has for some time been giving pointers to a certain Arjun Tendulkar to prepare him for the higher level of the game, besides enjoying his successful assignment as coach of the Jharkhand team, Banerjee’s second innings may well turn out to be even more valuable than his first.

Cricket will surely be the richer for it.

The Crowd Says:

2020-08-18T11:26:14+00:00

Ardeshir Jussavala

Roar Rookie


Agreed. There was only the king of good times, who was keen on records, and not winninh.

2020-08-18T11:24:38+00:00

Vcat

Guest


Agreed.

2018-08-28T04:34:28+00:00

Debojyoti

Guest


For people who are talking about the Indian quato system, let me tell you it's present in almost every phase of the Indian life and system. This method gives certain sections more opportunity than the others, like a non-quota guy can appear for a job/college qualifying examination 3 times while the quota guy can appear for the exam 8 times. Similar case happened here where Javagal Srinath went on to play 67 tests while the other didn't get a second chance inspite of a brilliant debut. Mpre surprising is the fact that a successful first innings bowler doesn't get a ball to bowl in the second innings. The then captain has a lot to answer, about why and under whose instructions the future of a promising player was destroyed and the country was cheated of a bright star.

2017-10-03T19:42:26+00:00

Aniket

Guest


Subroto Banerjee was not a tear away fast bowler. Average medium pace at best. Srinath was the apprentice-in-training. Very expensive but pace at the start of his career. Way too much credit for an average player.

AUTHOR

2017-05-23T01:51:38+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Hi Guys Just a quick note to let you know that my first book - "A Gentleman's Game - Reflections on Cricket History" is now available on Kindle on Amazon everywhere. The link to the Amazon AU site is here. Would love to have your feedback and comments if you happen to pick up a copy. As usual, your support is much appreciated. https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B0725VZJFQ Anindya

AUTHOR

2017-03-20T11:15:53+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Thanks so much Andrew! Glad you enjoyed it.

2017-03-17T00:46:56+00:00

Andrew Young

Roar Guru


Fascinating article, this one. Love the notion of a "second innings", and indeed a very curious matter. Loved it.

AUTHOR

2017-03-13T02:47:58+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Thanks so much Prakul. Well, he is now doing well in his second stint and perhaps gets a stint with the national team sometime in the future. That would be a great outcome.

2017-03-12T11:49:45+00:00

Prakul

Guest


Beautiful article. What a contrasting tale. Sigh.. Read it again. Now I am sad.

2017-03-12T08:54:20+00:00

Satz S

Guest


Does not work that way. Across all conditions,great bowlers have been under 25. Anderson and Broad do not average under 25 despite playing under english conditions.Great fast bowlers from the subcontinent ,imran,waqar and akram all have under 25 averages. Kapil and srinath have a better average at home! So Familiarity with conditions is a leveler! From what i saw i consider Lillee,Mcgrath, Gillespie significantly superior in penetration to kapil, our best ever pacer. Even mcdermott and johnson a bit more. Dont we forget we struggled to find even two fast medium bowlers in the 90's! We have only evolved from the 90's with many more options in fast medium and some genuine pace now. In quality Australia and SA had a historical headstart and still maintain significant superiority. A gap is there..but we are growing every year

AUTHOR

2017-03-12T03:48:22+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


And Shami and Umesh have matured tremendously in the last year. So while their averages may not in the end reflect this, they are a potent pair now bowling together using their brains. My pet peeve has always been indian fast bowlers other than Kapil didn't use their brains. Sri Nath was a culprit for much of his career. Sreesanth of course left his brains under lock and key when he entered the field.

AUTHOR

2017-03-12T03:46:04+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


No arguments on your last point. Clearly the proof of the pudding is in the eating and as I have said multiple times on this forum, when India starts the overseas tests again we shall see how they fare. No point not celebrating today for what they are doing with the angst that they might be crap later. I think this team has it in them to change the performances abroad but time will tell. As far as averages are concerned, to a great degree, it's influenced by the wickets on which they play most of their cricket. So I am not surprised that Indian quicks would suffer in comparison to English or Aussie quicks in that respect. Quality and quantity of fast bowlers produced is an entirely different matter. Purely statistically, this difference in averages is a given .

2017-03-12T02:41:46+00:00

Satz S

Guest


Australia has produced multiple bowlers with averages under 29 and under 25. Not a correct comparison since the difference in background is significant. Our best pace bowler averaged 29 and was fast medium at the start. Shami's objective would be to get closer to kapil's average and umesh towards the early 30's. I dont think we have found a top notch bowler yet. There is talk about thampi, kejroliya, nathu..yet to see them properly. do they have the brains to analyse the game and outwit the best batsmen? that's a big question to me... Remember the likes of kallis, mccullum, chanderpaul have singlehandedly denied us because none of our bowlers could knock them down. Right we have to start winning some matches outside asia like we did between 2002 and 2010

AUTHOR

2017-03-12T02:04:40+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


When Shami is fit, he and Umesh make a fast bowling combination that rivals a Starc-Hazlewood combine. I am looking forward to a period (even if it's brief) when these two play at their current level in tandem. If they can do that, it will be a top period for Indian cricket given the batting and the Ashwin-Jadeja combine.

2017-03-12T01:51:19+00:00

Satz S

Guest


he did not..though the captain's views are important marginal calls always had this zonal aspect shadowing it. Wright talked about it in his book. but ganguly managed to build a team out of a new generation of talent emerging from 2000. Despite our 1983 win,we slumped to a 20-4 disaster in ODI vs pakistan between 1986 and 1996. Against sides like SA and aus we didnt do too much better. A semis of a world cup seemed a maximum achievement at the time. we were stuck for like 15 years at the same level. The team which formed under ganguly from 2000 defeated the great australian side of 2001 and reached the WC final in 2003 and set a platform to challenge top sides finally. Our u19 sides from 2004 to 2008 comprise the current indian team and is even better in quality than the u19 sides of 2000 and 2002. I expect greater things from 2010 sides onwards. The depth in batting just amazing. ofcourse our fast bowling talent is more mortal. In 2000, ganguly was the right guy at the right place for the newer players.

AUTHOR

2017-03-12T01:37:59+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Barun Burman's problem was that despite being undoubtedly the fastest bowler in the country, he was horribly wayward. I remember watching him bowl in a first class match at Eden Gardens and he bowled what to my recall was an 18-ball over because of the no balls and wides.

AUTHOR

2017-03-11T23:42:46+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


I don't know much about Daljit Singh and why he wasn't selected, but Ramesh Saxena did get one chance and he didn't perform. So while it's unfortunate and these days he would have got multiple chances, it was the unfortunate norm then to move on after just an innings or a match. Didn't give a youngster much chance. Did you see any of them perform during your own First class cricket career, Chinmoy?

AUTHOR

2017-03-11T23:36:50+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


What helped thereafter was that when he became captain, he started breaking the norm by selecting any youngsters who were outstanding anywhere in the country. That's how Dhoni came into the team from a small town in eastern india (Ranchi, which will hold its first ever Test match this week!). The other trend Ganguly started was in persisting with young players through a few failures if they were talented enough. That's how you had a Yuvraj Singh becoming who he is as an example.

AUTHOR

2017-03-11T23:31:18+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Haha great one! I can relate to that! ?

2017-03-11T20:59:31+00:00

Satz S

Guest


Our pacers mainly lose their way in evolving as a fast bowler since our ability to develop world class fast bowlers is not proven. The best players also grow better by analysing and solving problems . I dont think any of the pacers were good enough. we struggled to find even two fast medium bowlers even around 1996 Manoj prabhakar also got dropped but he found a way to become a handy swing bowler.He himself said he was insulted too much as a no hoper. If Bannerjee or kulkarni cant fight back life's obstacles, they have only themselves to blame. As for the zonal selection, it was just a case of a zonal selector trying to pushing a player from his zone. A factor in marginal calls.One of which was Ganguly's selection in 1996 after 4 years. but it cant be blamed for long term failures. The more talented people like amarnath or gnaguly found a way back.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar