Why Sauber-Honda makes sense

By Michael Lamonato / Expert

Rumours of McLaren-Honda’s rocky relationship simmered throughout testing, but at the Australian Grand Prix, the sport’s first competitive meeting of the year, the situation began to boil.

The power unit troubles that prevented almost any meaningful running during the preseason again worked against the famous partnership. One listen to the car circulating around Albert Park — the obviously different engine note, the crunching through the gearbox due to the car vibrations — left no doubt about the seriousness of the team’s plight.

The race briefly teased an against-the-odds points finish for Fernando Alonso, who clung to tenth place for dear life, but in the end the result was predictable — Alonso retired with suspension problems and Stoffel Vandoorne took the flag two laps down.

The Spaniard, after getting out of his broken car, felt no obligation to soften the blow of another poor result.

“It was probably the best race of my life,” he said. “[There are] few times I’ve had such an uncompetitive car … and even so we were in the points.

“But it was probably one of the best races I’ve had.”

While the team struggled on track, rumours off the track of an imminent split between McLaren and Honda intensified. The issue was skirted around by all involved, but news of McLaren sounding out Mercedes for customer engines has been followed by Honda confirming it’s in talks with other teams, if only about a customer relationship.

Sauber, the only team competing with McLaren at the back of the grid, was happy to confirm it was one of the teams talking with Honda as part of its quest to replace its outgunned year-old Ferrari power unit at the end of the year.

The obvious question is to ask why Sauber — or indeed any team — would opt for a Honda power unit so brutally uncompetitive that it’s driving McLaren to consider ending a long-term and highly lucrative works supply contract seven years early.

But the answer is perhaps a little more obvious than the question suggests.

The 2017 season will mark 21 years since Sauber first adopted Ferrari engines, a partnership interrupted only by a four-year blip in 2006–09 during which Sauber partnered BMW.

Sauber at various points has resembled a Ferrari junior team as a result, with a wide range of Sauber youngsters moving south of the Swiss-Italian border to the Scuderia, but in return Sauber has mostly been dealt outdated engines, as is the case this season.

Moreover, as an independent Swiss team operating away from F1’s English hub and in a difficult economic zone outside the European Union, cash flow rather than potential has tended to stymie the team most often. Sauber’s Hinwil headquarters are amongst the best regarded in the sport. They should not be struggling backmarkers in a perfect F1 world.

Then consider that just 10 winless podium places — less than half of its total 27-podium, one-win haul — came to the team outside its BMW era, and the synergies of a Honda partnership start to become more obvious.

Sauber, thanks to its current lowly championship ranking, starts with low expectations, but it remains a squad of fantastic potential waiting to be activated by a manufacturer-size cash injection.

Honda, meanwhile, is reportedly funding McLaren to the tune of around $70 million plus half the driver salaries, the team’s budget shortfall and free engines.

McLaren-Honda might’ve been the dream reunion of two iconic motorsport names from yesteryear, but if management at Woking is ready to give it all up, there could be no better recipient of a works engine deal than the perennial troopers at Sauber.

It would bring financial certainty to Sauber while enabling its owners, which have stated a desire to diversify the team’s engineering output into different fields, to learn from one of the world’s largest automotive manufacturers.

Most saliently, when Honda does eventually deliver the goods, Formula One will be one competitive team richer — and it’ll be one of the sport’s longest-serving teams vaulting up the order to boot.

Honda too could benefit from a relationship that might allow it breathing space to develop without the crushing pressure of expectation to deliver wins immediately. Moreover, it could exercise more power inside the team — for example, by having input on driver selection to best suit its involvement.

There remains a host of reasons the McLaren-Honda relationship remains difficult, and apparently lopsided power balance between the two appears to be one of them, but whatever the case, where McLaren appears to be unable to foster Honda’s F1 re-education, Sauber could prove the perfect sporting classroom — and in the perfect position to reap the maximum reward for its efforts.

Follow @MichaelLamonato on Twitter.

The Crowd Says:

2017-04-10T06:55:08+00:00

Jason Crawford

Roar Rookie


An interesting viewpoint. It takes alot to develop these power units, and whilst we should be seeing some form of progress in reality they never were going to be a front runner at this stage. Honda need time to develop their package, and in Formula 1 that is an extremely long and arduous process. It seems like McLaren walked into this arrangement with unrealistic expectations, so they are the creator of this as much as anyone. The political battles if you will behind closed doors don't help matters. Ron Dennis was notoriously difficult to deal with at times, knew what he was doing but was not the easiest man to get along with and it will be interesting to see if the new McLaren leadership can steady the ship and get things on the right course. I do wonder however is Sauber are the perfect fit. Can they deliver their end if the deal came to fruition?

2017-04-06T12:59:41+00:00

Chancho

Roar Rookie


I totally accept what you're saying re coming into the sport when the other manufacturers are further up the development curve, but surely this would have been part of the due dilligence at the outset; if it wasn't then there is gross incompetance on the sides of both Honda and McLaren and therefore McLaren have no right to be critical of Honda, and if it wasn't considered then this is gross incompetance on the sides of both McLaren and Honda in not negotiating additional testing concessions from the FIA or whomever. Either way, Honda need to have a think about how they engage in a motor racing program at this level

AUTHOR

2017-04-06T02:56:13+00:00

Michael Lamonato

Expert


I think Honda's really just suffering from a late debut. It's probably still a little underappreciated how advanced these power units are and how much they're constantly being developed. Honda might've been building the power unit before the late 2015 entry, but nothing substitutes on-track running, which means the company is effectively one year behind — and probably a little more when you consider how much learning takes place in the first year combined with the fact McLaren is its only customer. Honda's development programme therefore needs to be faster than that of the other manufacturers, but when Mercedes or Renault or Ferrari are already flat-out, catching up is extremely difficult. It doesn't excuse this year's backwards step, but it does explain why the engineers are taking on so much development risk. That doesn't mean a review of the motorsport programme isn't in order — I think another part of the problem is that Honda approaches motorsport as a technical exercise executed over a number of years, which is something that could be realigned.

AUTHOR

2017-04-06T02:48:06+00:00

Michael Lamonato

Expert


Absolutely right — striking a new engine formula that entices new manufacturers is valuable because (a) it varies the field from a sporting perspective, but also (b) means the technology mix is attractive to road car manufacturers in the first place. Whether or not we think F1 needs to be strictly relevant to the motoring world is a little beside the point — one way or another we need engine suppliers, so the sport needs to ensure enough are engaged by the model.

2017-04-05T11:52:37+00:00

Chancho

Roar Rookie


Do Honda just need to step back and have a look at their motorsport program in general? Clearly their reentry into F1 has been a disaster, and really how far did they think they had come post the Honda Racing days in 2008? In addition, their Indycar program has been lacking over the last few years... I'd be pretty suspect if I were a team owner and wer wondering about getting into bed with Honda

2017-04-04T05:10:16+00:00

armchair expert

Guest


Hopefully Liberty and the FIA can put together a package that would both keep the current teams/ manufacturers and lure new ones with the new regulations being touted in the last week. Whilst F1 should be the peak of motorsport, with the latest tech and best drivers, engineers etc. I cant help but think there should be a "dumming down" of the latest hybrid systems. Honda aren't mugs, they just haven't been able to come to grasp with this latest iteration. Lets face it, Hybrid technology is only around because we are in a phase between fossil fuel and newer energy sources. They need to make it more attractive, cost effective and entertaining to new teams. The fact that only 3 manufacturers supply the engines for the whole field bar one team, is a sad reflection of the current state of F1.

Read more at The Roar