Should the NRL introduce a post-season transfer window?

By Tom Rock / Expert

The current system of player transfers is flawed. Dialogue around contract negotiations has become an ongoing distraction, and it’s impacting performance on the field.

The introduction of a free agency period would remove this distraction without hindering a player’s ability to achieve their fair market value.

I understand the fascination. Rugby league loves a transfer rumour. Our morbid curiosity pays Danny Weidler’s mortgage. But this year the appetite for innuendo is insatiable. The action on the field has taken a backseat to stories about the ‘Big Four’, and the recent availability of Cooper Cronk will only intensify this speculation.

I don’t blame the players. They’re simply operating within the framework dictated by the NRL. They aren’t setting out to populate James Hooper’s Twitter feed, it’s just an unavoidable consequence of doing business. But it comes at a cost.

Take Mitchell Moses for example. He’s an ascending player whose struggles on the field seem to directly correlate with increased media chatter around his contract. When questioned regarding his form, the young Tiger openly attributed his poor start to the season to difficulties with the mental side of his game. The anxiety surrounding his contract surely can’t be helping matters.

And Moses is hardly an isolated case. Wayne Bennett has conceded that contract talks are distracting Anthony Milford and impacting his performance, while former Tigers coach Jason Taylor agreed that the ongoing speculation around their future has affected the form of the ‘Big Four’.

A solution to this problem could be the introduction of a post-season free agency period, similar to the model used in the NFL. Prior to this period, players and agents would be permitted to negotiate contract extensions with their existing club, but would not be eligible to communicate with rival teams. However once the free agency period begins, it’s open season.

This would have several immediate benefits. First, clubs would be afforded the time to conduct an extensive review of their roster, and make recruitment decisions based on actual needs. The ability for clubs to negotiate exclusively with their own players would also encourage the development and retention of home grown talent.

Secondly, it would remove much of the distraction associated with in-season contract negotiations, and allow players to keep their focus on the field.

And finally, the NRL could leverage off the obvious interest in player transfers to create an additional opportunity for fan engagement after the conclusion of the season. The NFL does an exceptional job of hyping their Draft and Free Agency periods, creating a year-round news cycle. Both the NRL and its fans could benefit from a similar approach.

When recently approached about this topic, CEO Todd Greenberg was open to discussing a free agency period, but was sceptical as to whether it would have the backing of the players. “They enjoy free-trade at the moment and that’s a big part of their negotiation,” Greenberg said.

There are several potential hurdles to this approach, and convincing the players of its value may be the hardest to clear. The current system favours the players. Clubs are often forced to pay players above their market rate for fear of missing out. However I don’t think the introduction of a free agency period would adversely impact player value. If anything, the additional time and opportunity to impress teams could potentially drive up their value.

Another obstacle is time. Historically speaking, shifting clubs has been a long and complicated process, with players needing time to get their affairs in order. But times have changed. In others sports, players shift continents at the drop of a hat. So it’s a tad cheeky for players to suggest they need 12 months to relocate from Penrith to Manly.

A further issue would be enforceability. Rugby league was built on shonky back rooms deals, and agents will attempt to flout the rules at any given opportunity. It’s the job of the NRL to enforce these rules, and punish those who break them. Heavy financial penalties would quickly eradicate any shenanigans.

Concerns about player transfers aren’t new, and the NRL has made half-hearted attempts to fix the problem in the past. But with the saturating media coverage beginning to affect the on-field product, the league can’t ignore this issue any longer.

The introduction of a post-season free agency period is a solution that benefits players, clubs and fans alike.

Quarter season review
Hard to believe it, but the conclusion of Round 6 marks the quarter post of the 2017 NRL season. Here are some of the best bits so far.

Best Game – Round 1, Cowboys 20 def Raiders 16. An instant classic. End to end action in attack, bone-jarring collisions in defence, and even a couple of punches thrown. The game had something for everyone. And then that finish. Johnathan Thurston at his very best. It was a privilege to watch.

Worst Game – Round 6, Broncos 32 def Roosters 8. That was a junkie hot performance by the Roosters. No other team can look so good while playing so poorly. The Broncos weren’t great, but they didn’t have to be. A staggering 47 missed tackles, 11 errors and eight penalties by the Roosters ensured Brisbane were never out of the game.

Most Surprising Team – St George Illawarra Dragons. I doubt even Nostradamus would have included St George Illawarra in his pre-season multi. Yet the Dragons are breathing fire this season. The Red V have erupted to the tune of 163 points (27ppg) in only six games, which is the highest among any club in the competition. Can they keep it up?

Most Disappointing Team – Wests Tigers. What a mess. From the Tim Simona scandal, to the sacking of Jason Taylor, the ongoing drama surrounding the Big Four and the poor performances on the field; not even HBO could pack this much drama into six weeks of programming. Good luck Ivan.

Best trend – Less structure. Finally, the boys are actually playing some footy. More teams are adopting the old ‘play what’s in front of you’ approach, and the game is better for it.

Best Buy – Jamie Buhrer. Buhrer has given the Newcastle Knights respectability. His professional approach and consistent effort has served as the perfect template for an inexperienced forward pack. The Knights have been much more competitive in 2017, and Buhrer is a big reason why.

Worst Buy – Jamal Idris. I love Jamal Idris the person. His frank honesty and unique personality are in stark contrast to the clichéd conformity chorused by his compatriots. But he’s too nice for rugby league. He plays like a bloke that doesn’t like physical aggression, and is only on the field to fund his next pilgrimage.

Best Rookie – Coen Hess. I’ve got my suspicions that Paul Green has implemented some Mendelian methods in North Queensland. Coen Hess is such a physically imposing force, at times I think he was created from a Matt Scott buccal swab. Hess will slot straight onto the bench for Queensland, and haunt NSW for the next decade or so.

Best Coach – Paul McGregor. Mary has done an outstanding job with the Dragons. He was written off as a lame duck this season, just keeping the seat warm until a successor was named. But with the Dragons entrenched in the Top 8, McGregor is set to pen a contract extension.

Comeback Player – Billy Slater. Who else? The legendary Queenslander has silenced his critics and cast aside any doubts about whether he still has what it takes. Billy will waltz straight back into the Maroons line-up.

Most Disappointing Player – Jarryd Hayne. Not disappointing in terms of performance, but rather return on investment. Too much talk, not enough footy.

Most Valuable Player – Cody Walker. The spider riddled five eighth has been a constant threat for the vacillating Rabbitohs. Walker is sitting near the top of the charts for line breaks, line break assists and try assists, and his elastic running style makes him harder to capture than Malcolm Naden. No player has done more for his team in 2017.

5th Tackle Option
Here are five quick thoughts on the action from Round 6.

1. Outstanding win by the Tigers. In the face of such immense adversity, that win against the Cowboys will do wonders for the club. Nothing unites a team more than winning football games. Jason Taylor must be shaking his head somewhere.

2. Another strong performance from Matt Frawley. Just when you thought the Bulldogs’ halves situation couldn’t get any more convoluted, Frawley starts winning games. This is a perfect example of why I believe a free agency period would be beneficial. Let Canterbury see what they’ve got in Frawley, and make a decision once they’ve got all the facts.

3. Something’s still missing at Penrith. They have such a talented roster, with an enviable mix of youth and experience, but they lack leadership. While I believe that Matt Moylan will be an excellent captain one day, he isn’t there yet. For Penrith the take the next step in their development, I believe they need a veteran leader to help direct the team around the park.

4. Unbelievable effort by Nathan Ross against the Bulldogs. Ross latched onto a cross field kick from Trent Hodkinson, had his legs taken out from under him while airborne, yet still had the presence of mind to get the ball down. Remarkable stuff.

5. Horrible call against Manly on Saturday afternoon. While Cherry-Evans played his part in the incident, he was held off the ball, and the try should never have been awarded. Kudos to Trent Barrett for not imploding in the coach’s box. Imagine if it had been Craig Bellamy?

Follow Tom on Twitter @_TomRock_

The Crowd Says:

2017-04-11T22:09:06+00:00

Norad

Guest


What a dopey idea this article pushes. So while NRL clubs are locked out from negotiations the players and agents will be be getting offers from RU clubs and AFL. One day peeps will work out that NRL is not AFL and it doesn't exist in AFL vacuum facing the Antarctic with no competition for players.

2017-04-11T20:48:39+00:00

Mushi

Guest


Without looking at the motivations behind the status quo you'll never effect change. Saying oh you could just give up any open market is a laughably ridiculous suggestion. Imagine that was tabled to you at the negotiation table if you weren't torn between open hysterical laughter and a slap to the face of the other party then you don't understand high school level economics. What happens if their team doesn't want to resign... or knowing they have massive leverage... Or the team situation sucks... Again you are simply giving something up for no return. Now the players association may do this, because I find NRL has terrible administrators and advisers, but it would be completely illogical

2017-04-10T20:23:19+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Do you think it's enforceable? How many meetings do you think player managers have with clubs? How do you stop managers and clubs not discussing a new deal in the last five minutes if their meeting? Particularly when it's in the best interests of both parties to get a head start on negotiations. Its all well and good saying "enforce it" but how? Greenberg poking a satellite dish through NRL club windows? Sorry, this just creates an unenforceable rule that some will follow at the start, the smart ones won't and eventually no one will.

2017-04-10T20:17:03+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Six weeks is less than six months...

2017-04-10T20:16:13+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


But we have Tom. The June 30 deadline was in place for a long time and it was the least respected rule in rugby league (and that's saying something). It also did nothing to end speculation about player movement - if anything it kept it current for the first half of the season. The window is only an extended version of that.

2017-04-10T15:08:55+00:00

Matt Jones

Guest


that only takes 20 hours a day, leaving 4 spare

2017-04-10T12:48:12+00:00

B-Unit

Guest


"What would RL be like if we had lost a Thurston , a Cronk or a Johns at a young age." It probably has, maybe that's why NSW can't find a halfback, maybe there's a parallel universe where Cameron Smith is captaining the Wallabies, we have no way of knowing. But what we do is replace them with a Thurston , Cronk or Johns, and then maybe a Morgan, Taylor or Munster, there's plenty more where they came from. All we can look at are the players who go after already making the NRL, all they seem to take these days are wingers. I think the NRL will be OK...

2017-04-10T12:34:24+00:00

Bugs

Guest


Yeah, but my point is no one had a gun to their head, making them offer a contract before they knew their budget. They took a calculated risk; it might backfire, it might not. So far as I know, the NRL has not made an announcement and then back-tracked. The $10mil figure has always been speculative to my knowledge. And all 16 clubs are in the same boat, so St George were under no duress to get the deal done. They could have simply waited until the cap was finalised. Or chucked a clause in saying that package was dependent on cap size. Whatever. They were in control of the situation. To say that the NRL is to blame for a club over-spending is a stretch, unless the NRL deliberately mislead regarding future salary cap size.

2017-04-10T12:28:23+00:00

Alan

Guest


I thought South's were going OK?

2017-04-10T12:26:08+00:00

Alan

Guest


Which wasn't enforced... Key word being "enforce".

2017-04-10T12:24:24+00:00

Alan

Guest


League would be where Rugby is currently. League has "out scouted" Union for years and Tom's comment is right in that League will continue to produce a stream of talent that will replace today's stars.

2017-04-10T12:17:42+00:00

Alan

Guest


Geo, there is help available for your issues. In fact you can get 10 appointments for free if your GP will write the referral.

AUTHOR

2017-04-10T08:36:51+00:00

Tom Rock

Expert


Evening AGO74. Sorry, but can't agree with your statement regarding NFL free agency being the domain of peripheral/squad players. That simply isn't true. Yes, the majority of big name off-contract players are resigned by their existing club prior to hitting the open market, but that is exactly the system I am advocating for. Teams that spend the time and money to develop a player should get first shot at retaining their talent, and this is one method to achieve this. And yes, some top tier players who don't immediately resign with their existing teams can have the franchise tag applied. However this is simply a means for a club to be given more time to work out a long-term deal with that player. And it doesn't prevent a rival club from still signing the franchised players, providing they are willing to spend the necessary draft picks as compensation. And finally, every season there are a list of very talented players who are snapped up in free agency by rival teams. In the last five years, the likes of Peyton Manning, Ndamukong Suh and Darrelle Revis have been signed during this process. Two of these gentleman were large contributors to their teams Super Bowl winning seasons. The start of free agency generates huge media hype in the US, and dominates the news cycle for several weeks. I see no good reason why the NRL couldn't institute a similar system and reap similar rewards.

AUTHOR

2017-04-10T08:11:49+00:00

Tom Rock

Expert


The problem is that it doesn't get sorted out sooner. The Tigers rubbish has dragged on for months now, and dominated the news cycle for the first 6 weeks of the season. The Bulldogs will remain on the radar, which can't please you I imagine, based on their off-contract players and their potential new signings. And then we have Cooper Cronk and Kieran Foran, which is just getting started. I still maintain the current system doesn't work, so what not give something else a go.

2017-04-10T07:59:33+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Worked like a charm for the old 30 June deadline...

2017-04-10T07:59:17+00:00

AGO74

Guest


Remember the June 30 deadline that ended 10 or so years ago. There was a reason that it ended 10 years ago. This thing with the Tigers 4 X players coming off contract (refuse to call them big 4 because they are nowhere near it) is basically a product of tigers own incompetence not because of a broken system.

2017-04-10T07:58:05+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


I've had that before and its the reality. As I say, it's not ideal but cheer while they're wearing your colours regardless of where they're going next year. We're all going to win some and lose some. I would rather have it sorted sooner than have my club dragged over the back page for 9 months. I don't think there's any evidence that the media would leave it alone until the end of season trade window.

2017-04-10T07:56:33+00:00

AGO74

Guest


Disagree with this as the term free agency is very limited in nfl - usually limited to peripheral/squad players. The big players are tied up as "franchise" players and are effectively unable to exercise any form of free trade. Plus player movement is usually at the whim of teams trading players for their own benefit as opposed to players making that choice. Look at the current Richard Sherman situation where the Seahawks are entertaining trading him so they can cash in via other players and/or draft picks. Players can earn big $$$ if good enough but ultimately they are at the behest of the club owners.

2017-04-10T07:48:34+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


There's some massive leaps. It also assumes that if you tell players that rather than sorting out their contract details and forcing them to wait until the end of the season will automatically mean they're more settled and less uncertainty. I've been on both sides of the early transfer and as you've said Bugs re Ben Hunt, this year you cheer, next year you don't.

2017-04-10T07:45:08+00:00

Bugs

Guest


Footballers are no different to me eh Tommy? Um...the ones we're talking about - Hunt, Milford, Moses, Tedesco, Woods, Cronk et al - indeed are different, because of the stratified air they live in. Good luck to them I say. So, comparing my workplace to theirs is inequitable. At the majority of my workplaces, I was one of the best performing workers, and never would have felt pangs of anxiety if jobs were on the line. Even if I was/am delusional about my job security, the fact I felt secure meant it wouldn't have affected performance. At the couple of workplaces I struggled in, then yes, I would have felt those pangs, and maybe it would have affected my performance. (But, in which way? Would I strive harder in order to please??) Now let's return to our footy stars. Milf's job is as secure as he could wish. His only contract saga is "Will they offer me $750k p.a.or $900k p.a." "Do I turn down fantastic job offer # 1 in order to take slightly more fantastic job offer # 2?" Mitch Moses, the Big 4, Ben Hunt are/were in the same place. Hardly worth having palpitations over. If any footy players are going to get anxious about contract security, its the guys on the fringes, not the stars. And their contracts are not soap operas like the aforementioned, because our morbid curiosity about those players wouldn't pay Danny Wiedler's mortgage! ;-)

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar