Josh Jackson dismayed by Bulldogs City-Country ban

By Scott Bailey / Wire

Canterbury forward Josh Jackson admits he is disappointed the Bulldogs won’t allow him to represent Country in this year’s clash with City Origin.

Jackson grew up just down the road from the venue for this year’s Mudgee fixture, in Gulgong, and was expected to be picked as one of the marquee players for the representative match.

However with the Bulldogs due to take on North Queensland in Townsville just four days after the May 7 fixture, Canterbury coach Des Hasler told his players last week they’d be unavailable for selection.

“I really wanted to be a part of the game so it’s definitely disappointing,” Jackson said.

“But I’ve got to respect the club and the fact it’s a four-day turnaround and got to look after the body.”

The NSW Origin second rower played his first representative game for Country in 2013, and is upset the concept will be scrapped at the end of the season.

He still plans on going out to watch this year’s clash, and admits he had been eying it since the draw was released for it to be played just 33 kilometres from where he grew up in the state’s central west.

“It would be enormous to go home and play in front of family and friends,” Jackson said.

“Pulling on that country jersey is a very proud moment for me.

“The bush people get right behind their footy and love their footy. They don’t get to see many quality games. It would have been great to be a part of.”

There is nothing in the current Collective Bargaining Agreement to guarantee players the right to a five-day turnaround, however that is accepted as the minimum rest period between games for NRL clubs.

Intriguingly, the Bulldogs play in New Zealand just two days after the second Origin clash in Sydney, where both Jackson and prop David Klemmer are likely to be involved.

Jackson refused to speculate on that matter on Wednesday, but was instead frustrated the scheduling problem after the representative round hadn’t been addressed earlier.

“They probably should have had a look at that four-day turnaround before,” he said.

Meanwhile former NSW Country player, Matthew Johns, called on the NRL to force Bulldogs players made unavailable for the fixture to stand them down for the Cowboys match.

“This is a real test of Todd Greenberg and the NRL,” Johns told Triple M.

“(Former ARL chief) John Quayle would of – that was his system. If you pulled out of a representative fixture, you didn’t play that weekend. You were out of that NRL match.”

The Crowd Says:

2017-04-26T22:54:03+00:00

Oingo Boingo

Guest


Greenburg will be out of sight while attempting to stay out of mind , the man is the Malcolm Turdball of league. Puffs his chest up and big notes himself when no leadership is required, then puts his head in the sand when the guns are firing . A genuine sheep in wolves clothing.

2017-04-26T22:08:09+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Agreed. Hard to expect clubs to treat this fixture with respect when the NRL doesn't.

2017-04-26T07:32:59+00:00

Andrew

Guest


I am not sure what to think of this; angry with the NRL for the scheduling for starters. I am a avid believer that country league needs to stop supporting the current city centric format. What does the NRL offer supporters in rural australia? Its no wonder aussie rules and soccer are smashing it. This is another slap in the face of country league.

2017-04-26T07:01:04+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


A lot of players say backing up 24-48 hours later is easier than 3-4 days. I've traditionally been a big supporter of city v country but supporting a team where every win will be crucial I'm not unhappy with Des' stance. Particularly given we're playing a Qld team who will have test players backing up with two days extra rest, but won't be providing players for city v country.

2017-04-26T04:09:44+00:00

Scott Pryde

Expert


To be fair, Des has thrown the toys out of the cot here. Players used to back up from these games 24 or 48 hours later... Josh Jackson would have been right.

2017-04-26T03:53:22+00:00

Big Daddy

Guest


The NRL should step in and take action. But they have made their own grave by discontinuing the city v country program. You can't blame the clubs so why should they make player's available when they (NRL) won't support this match.

2017-04-26T03:33:08+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Ridiculously poor scheduling. I can understand the NRL ban if players are pulling out of tests or origin but for city v country? Is the priority a quality NRL competition or a rinky dink rep fixture that won't be around next year?

Read more at The Roar