No love for the northern states has me disillusioned with the AFL

By Warren Cooper / Roar Guru

Throughout the last few seasons, I’ve found myself falling out of love with the AFL. It’s something I never ever thought would happen.

Along with cricket, it was always the game the got my spark going, and regardless of who was playing, I caught every game.

In 1986 as an 8-year-old kid, I marvelled at the skills of the players and the passion the game drew out from its fans.

Growing up in Goulburn, a pro-rugby league town, much like anyone born and bred in New South Wales, there was the luxury of being able to enjoy both codes – Australian Football and Rugby League – equally.

Generally if you were a “bi-code” fan, naturally there was always a stronger leaning towards one over the other in order preference.

My preference has always been for Australian Football over rugby league, having found it a much more compelling and exciting game to watch, aesthetically speaking.

Nothing beat going to the fish and chip shop, and coming back with a feast big enough for an army – only to single-handedly devour it while the match of the day played.

That doesn’t mean rugby league hasn’t had its moments, it has and does.The last two NRL grand finals have been dead-set classics and will go down as some of the greatest moments in Australian sport. However, much of what made rugby league magical during the 1980s and early 1990s, with the Winfield Cup, has gone.

It doesn’t mean I don’t have an NRL team, the Cronulla Sharks have been with me, just as long as the Sydney Swans have. It has been the latter team which has always got my passion stirred a little bit more – even in the horror years of the early 1990s, when the club couldn’t win a chook raffle.

Rugby league has a history in New South Wales and Queensland equally as rich as the AFL in the rest of the country. Much like where Australian Football is inescapable in its traditional states, it’s the same with rugby league in its heartlands.

Even Western Australia has a reasonable rugby league history, however it’s always ruled the nations north eastern states. It was a game that appealed to the working class in cities where Australian Football did not really catch on, even though the Sydney Football League premiership started before the NSWRL. Perhaps “Aussie Rules” appeared too “aloof” or “too long” and rugby league seemed more leveled. Who knows?

As an Australian Football follower in a non-traditional AFL state, it’s been hard following the game in recent times.

The treatment of the games’ original northern state clubs – the Sydney Swans and the Brisbane Lions – and their successes, has been baffling to see.

Rather than celebrate the inroads the game has made, it has virtually self-destructed in indirectly punishing these clubs for gains they made.

To be frank, both games presently suffer from glaring problems at the administrative level. That said, there is now a valid argument where it could be said the NRL administration is marginally in front of the AFL, even if twelve of the sixteen NRL clubs are not happy with the way the game is being run, with big questions being asked over where the money is going.

AFL club bosses, such as Collingwood supremo Eddie McGuire, have rightly been asking similar questions. Where does all the money the AFL gets from its sponsorship and TV rights go, if it’s not going to the clubs?

After watching the Swans hit the skids in 1993 and nearly die, the club has received nothing but contempt, particularly since 2012, when Sydney won an “against the odds” premiership.

The AFL has given the impression, particularly by clubs in traditional states, the expansion clubs from New South Wales and Queensland can be in the race for the premiership, just don’t be too successful.

It’s almost as if the Swans and the Lions were meant to be nothing more than novelty acts in their respective markets; they would help grow the game in non-traditional states, get the game massive TV rights deals, and appear in finals regularly enough to keep the critics and administrators happy – just don’t get in the way of Collingwood, Hawthorn, the Western Bulldogs or West Coast Eagles.

The AFL must think Swans and Lions fans are idiots, as if we don’t know what’s going on – bloody oath we do! We also know the sporting culture and history of our respective states; both could spit the AFL out in a blink of an eye with one false move – especially in Sydney, which is the toughest sporting market in the country – dominated by the two rugby codes and cricket. In Queensland, the game has largely become snubbed.

The problem has been, there has been more than one false move, starting with the Brisbane Lions, who came from virtually no-where to achieve a three-peat, after finishing last in 1998.

That was followed by a couple of decent seasons in 1999 and 2000 under super coach Leigh Matthews, who oversaw the club’s most glorious period.

From 2001 onwards, Victorian club bosses began crowing that the AFL was propping Brisbane up with salary cap and draft concessions.

From Kevin Sheedy saying the AFL had created a monster, to Eddie McGuire bemoaning a possibility of clubs like Geelong or the Western Bulldogs never winning a premiership ever again (never mind that Geelong had played in three of the first six AFL-era grand finals prior, and would be victorious in the most one sided VFL/AFL grand final in history in 2007.)

The Lions subsequently lost their concessions and have struggled to retain players, either because of homesickness experienced by drafted interstate players, or because they cannot stand the Brisbane weather. Apparently the five-seasons-in-one-day weather of Melbourne is more appealing than sunny Queensland. Or maybe retired NSW Origin skipper Paul Gallen is right – those scary Queenslanders might have two heads after all!

Sure the Lions have had massive problems at boardroom level; however they have also had to endure harsh changes that only add to the challenge of running a club where the Brisbane Broncos are number one and the Queensland State of Origin team is worshipped. In the meantime, the Lions membership numbers have declined to alarming levels.

Meanwhile the Gold Coast Suns are showing signs of going down the great big gurgler that swallowed NRL and A-League teams past – the Gold Coast Titans are barely standing, with the looming possibility of being bought out by the North Sydney Bears.

The AFL is in trouble in Queensland and it has failed to come up with any new innovations to keep the game moving forward there.

The Sydney Swans have been through the ringer. From the terrible treatment of Adam Goodes, which the AFL proved too slow and inept to deal with, to the dramas over the Cost of Living Allowance, brought on by the recruitments of Kurt Tippett and Lance Franklin; the club had to suffer an inexplicable trade ban, while the three-peat winning Hawthorn could recruit whoever they liked, and the Western Bulldogs could go on a spending spree with the millions they’ve accrued at the expense of the AFL’s richest clubs.

Is that how true equalisation works?

Why didn’t the AFL just raise the salary cap of all clubs to the same level as the Swans, and simply say, “We’re raising the cap for all clubs for this reason,” when the COLA was implemented, rather than having it all?

Yes, it would have made it difficult for the poorer clubs to be able to pay it, however such mercy was never afforded to Fitzroy or South Melbourne. It was merge, move, or die.

The AFL introduced a points system in the draft to appease Victorian club bosses who were not happy about the Northern clubs having academies. The big fear was they were making ready-made superstars like Isaac Heeney and Callum Mills, but really they’re there to help grow the game in traditional rugby league and rugby union states. Heeney incidentally would have been lost to rugby league, and possibly to the Newcastle Knights, had it not been for the academies.

The AFL has been clueless in handling expansion in the Northern states; how long will it be before the Greater Western Sydney Giants end up suffering a similar fate to that of the Swans and Lions?

Presently, the AFL cannot do enough for the fledging club, having spent millions. The Giants, who were rushed in, have been propped up to be an instant success, considering they have four NRL Western Sydney heavyweight clubs to deal with. GWS have been given the world at the expense of traditional established clubs, never mind the disregard for the Swans or Lions.

Fortunately for the AFL, Wests Tigers are in a mess with a revolving door of coaches and boardroom dramas, and the Parramatta Eels have been in dire straits for several years. The Eels, however, have one of the healthiest membership bases, as do the Canterbury Bulldogs, while the Penrith Panthers are not performing as well as anticipated.

These clubs know the game the AFL is playing with the Giants and will do whatever it takes to ensure they’re always in front. The Panthers have just established a multi-million dollar academy of their own, even so NRL club bosses are heaping pressure on those running the game, knowing there is real competition for hearts and minds going on.

After the disastrous Super League War, the NRL baulked at expansion. Like the AFL, which has ten Victorian based clubs, the NRL has ten New South Wales based clubs, nine of which are based in Sydney. The NRL learned the hard way in 1995 that if you’re going to expand, there needs to be a plan for the current established clubs.

While the NRL is being tempted to consider Perth again, it has rightly held off, making sure the ground work is being done before it can happen.

The AFL has been brave in expanding into regions that could prove to be a money drain, at the same time it seems to have been done at cost of the integrity of the game, and in the process, it has hurt the brands that helped made expansion into New South Wales and Queensland possible in the first place.

It is a disgrace the AFL has allowed the Lions and the Swans to endure the harsh treatment they have, and if supporters of either club feel cheated and insulted, the game may end up doing irreparable damage to its future in the northern states.

That will have meant expansion was done in vain, nothing more, nothing less. Hence the disillusionment – for me, the AFL is not the same game it once was.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2017-04-30T02:29:06+00:00

Warren Cooper

Roar Guru


That's incorrect. Geelong were one of the clubs that supported the Swans having the COLA - Cats president Colin Carter has been on record as saying so. He is a close personal friend of Richard Colless', but so is Eddie McGuire - the COLA's biggest critic. Carter has had his own battles the Magpies supremo. The Cats also did not support the trade ban imposed on Sydney. Neither did Collingwood. You keep going on about how the Swans abused the COLA, but offer up no evidence to support your claim. Yet, in return, there is more than enough evidence to show how Sydney were able to sign both Tippett and Frankin with various player movements and retirements. I'm more than happy to list the names of those players. Also all clubs signed off on COLA when it was implemented, no one had a problem with it until 2012. Eddie McGuire was on record as complaining about how expensive Sydney is to live in when he was the boss at Nine.

2017-04-29T09:54:14+00:00

Paul2

Guest


"Why didn’t the AFL just raise all salary caps to accomodate Cost of Living issues in Sydney and player retention problems in Brisbane?" The AFL have regularly increased the salary cap since the late 90s, essentially as a consequence of increased revenue: players have consistently achieved gains through the CBA. I don't think you've understood the point. The idea was not that players based in Sydney would fall below the poverty line w/o an additional allowance (see Cat's comment). The idea was that the Swans (and then the Giants) would be at a competitive disadvantage in attracting and retaining players without an additional allowance in view of the higher cost of living in Sydney. Simply raising the cap for all clubs doesn't address that issue. (note: I'm trying to defend the COLA here. Just trying to make clear what the issue was.)

2017-04-29T09:13:43+00:00

Wayne

Guest


Don't forget the salary cap penalties the Storm suffered vice either Canberra in the 90's, Canterbury and recently Parramatta

2017-04-29T01:59:58+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


No one except Sydney ever liked COLA prior to 2012, just no one made a big deal of it because it hadn't been so visibly abused until then.

2017-04-29T01:58:47+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


Because there is no need. If a person cannot live on a six figure salary they don't need to be paid more, they need a financial manager! We're not talking minimum wage slaves here.

AUTHOR

2017-04-28T13:03:42+00:00

Warren Cooper

Roar Guru


Wow, how did I ever let that piece of info elude me? Beats me. It's about 50 / 50 each way in the Riverina with Aussie Rules and rugby league. Some of the biggest names of both codes have come from there - GWS were handed that region because, well it's apparently relative to Western Sydney, just like Canberra.

AUTHOR

2017-04-28T12:54:35+00:00

Warren Cooper

Roar Guru


What you are alleging is pure fantasy: one, the Swans books would have been watched heavily by AFL auditors: two, the simple fact of the matter relating to COLA is that it had to be paid to each player on the list. And because your not privy to the Swans books, all you can rely on is fantasy. Which is funny because Andrew Ireland opened the Swans books to show how the COLA worked and how Sydney were able to recruit Lance Franklin and Kurt Tippett. There were numerous player movements and retirements that occurred to make it happen, but no, don't let the truth get in the way of fantasy and hysteria.

2017-04-28T10:45:03+00:00

GJ

Guest


Complete with reflective strips.

2017-04-28T09:47:21+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


Unsuccessful on the field sure. Hurting for money for a while? Yes. Insolvent like SMFC or Fitzroy? Not even close.

2017-04-28T09:41:10+00:00

ac

Guest


This article surprised me cause I have always thought the AFL favoured northern teams. Whilst the swans get good crowds at the games and why not AFL live us great the tv audience is terrible. The storm achieve decent tv audience but get no coverage by media in Melbourne. Swans get heaps. GWS well just don't have it the appeal that is.

2017-04-28T09:27:59+00:00

I ate pies

Guest


They had two Fitzroy players - Johnson and Lynch. It was hardly a mix of two teams by then.

2017-04-28T09:25:01+00:00

I ate pies

Guest


The Riverina is now the GWS "academy". GWS picking and choosing from that area is akin to Collingwood getting to pick and choose from Bendigo and Ballarat...didn't realise that comment needed explaining.

2017-04-28T09:24:50+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


Okay, which club(s) have been in a similar situation as SMFC was? I can name only one. Fitzroy.

2017-04-28T09:23:36+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


Never been disproved either. All players and managers care about is the bottom line. Whether they get 100k from the Swans or 90k from the Swans and 10k from COLA, it still works out to be 100k. Did the Swans systemically pay players 10% less knowing the bottom line they'd make the same? I can't say and neither can you. We're not privy to the negotiations nor to the contracts themselves. All I know is the Swans effectively had a larger salary cap - how anyone can argue that isn't a competitive advantage is mind-boggling.

AUTHOR

2017-04-28T09:23:05+00:00

Warren Cooper

Roar Guru


Rubbish - Melbourne have been a basket case, as have the Bulldogs. And are you admitting the AFL gave little to no help to South in their initial relocation years, and then in early 1990's as Sydney when the club nearly folded?

AUTHOR

2017-04-28T09:15:22+00:00

Warren Cooper

Roar Guru


Maybe not in your eyes, yet history presents the case itself. A book could be written about it. All I can say is what I have experienced as a Swans supporter and an AFL supporter who has lived in a non-traditional AFL state all his life. Leigh Matthews would have a different view regarding the state of AFL in Queensland - it's not just an admin problem.

AUTHOR

2017-04-28T09:06:36+00:00

Warren Cooper

Roar Guru


Which is a point I raised - why didn't the AFL just raise all salary caps to accomodate Cost of Living issues in Sydney and player retention problems in Brisbane?

2017-04-28T09:05:45+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


I am so sick of this oft repeated manta of 'too many teams'. What exactly is the problem? The 9 clubs in Melbourne are all in better shape now than they have been in several decades at least. Not a one is broke or in danger of being insolvent. Do I think it is time to start scaling back 'extra' funds for a club whose CEO goes out of his way to brag about the record profit they turned? Absolutely. Do I think there will ever be a time (in my lifetime anyway) when no club needs 'extra' help? Nope, won't happen. Did the Bulldogs win a flag because of equalisation measures? Absolutely not, they still had to work within the salary cap, unlike your side. The current equalisation measures are poorly implemented though and need a major overhaul. Collingwood should be paying more, not being capped out at $500k, which incidently is the same amount a much smaller Geelong has to pay.

AUTHOR

2017-04-28T09:05:11+00:00

Warren Cooper

Roar Guru


Same rules? Thanks for the laugh. There was no real problem with COLA until Sydney won the 2012. Had they been just making up the numbers, there would have been no problem, apart from maybe as being seen as being ineffective - like they were in the early 1990's.

2017-04-28T08:57:29+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


You'll get left alone as soon as you play by the same rules. Same draft rules, same salary cap rules, same list rules, etc.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar