Women's sport weekly wrap: Buildcorp backs women's XV product

By Mary Konstantopoulos / Expert

Another week. Another blow for the ARU.

This week the ARU has been under fire after it was announced that Buildcorp had decided to end its role as naming rights sponsor of the National Rugby Championship.

Buildcorp has been a long-standing and proud partner of the NRC since 2014 and is a company that is extremely passionate about rugby and particularly women’s rugby, as demonstrated through its sponsorship of the Women XVs National Championships and being front of jersey sponsor of the Australian Wallaroos.

The reason Buildcorp is no longer continuing its sponsorship of the NRC is because despite multiple requests from Buildcorp for a women’s XVs version of the NRC to be implemented, the request has fallen on deaf ears. Several years after making this request, Buildcorp has seen no further action.

I’m not going to use this article to have a crack at the ARU – it seems that enough people are doing so already.

Instead I want to use this space to congratulate Buildcorp, and in particular its principal and co-founder, Josephine Sukkar, for her continued commitment to women’s rugby and for being brave enough to discontinue a partnership that simply was not working for her company.

Buildcorp wants to work with other organisations that provide equal opportunities for men and women and unfortunately, when it comes to the women’s XV space, rugby is just not there yet. There has certainly been improvement, but there is still plenty of work to do.

The ARU may be struggling – there is discontent from fans, the Western Force are preparing for arbitration and Australia’s role in SANZAAR is being questioned – but until their commitment to the women’s XV product is as noticeable as their support and promotion of the sevens program, questions about the organisation’s commitment to gender equality will continue to be asked.

And speaking of the sevens product, many have queried why Buildcorp wouldn’t just get behind the Aussie Pearls instead.

The ARU is launching a national women’s sevens competition in August. The Aussie Pearls are a recognisable brand in Australian sport, and Charlotte Caslick is a household name.

When I mention the Wallaroos to people, their general response is ‘the who?’.

While the ARU seem to be spending millions of dollars per year on women’s sevens, it does not look like the XV format of the game is being taken as seriously.

Credit to Buildcorp for rolling up its sleeves and demanding that the XV version of the game is remembered and for not taking the easy approach and aligning with the more popular version of the game.

Sukkar may be close to wonder woman, but she cannot champion this format of the game on her own. She needs our help.

If you are someone who loves rugby and is feeling disheartened by the state of play of Australian rugby, then it’s time to throw yourself behind a team that really needs your support.

Today the Australian Wallaroos will line up against England at 10.30am in their first game of the Four Nations tournament. Women’s rugby in this country really needs support, so I encourage all of you to show interest (and if you have the chance, you can live stream the game here).

I also wanted to congratulate the six players who will make their debut – Evelyn Horomia, Victoria Latu, Fenella Hake, Kayla Sauvao, Ashleigh Timoko, and Huia Swannell. Enjoy every moment.

Cricket
In rugby league we have the Australian Kangaroos and the Australian Jillaroos. In football we have the Caltex Socceroos and the Westfield Matildas. In rugby union we have the Australian Wallabies and the Australian Wallaroos.

In cricket we now have the Australian men’s cricket team and the Australian women’s cricket team after an announcement was made this week to change the naming convention for the women’s side.

The Australian women’s cricket team will no longer be formally known as the Southern Stars and will be referred to in exactly the same way as the men’s team.

I found the reaction to this interesting. Some cried political agendas. Some cried political correctness gone mad. Some said it didn’t matter.

This absolutely matters and it makes absolute sense.

Women’s cricket has come a long way in the last couple of years – boosted by the success of the Women’s Big Bash League, the professionalisation of the NSW Breakers and the success of the Southern Stars at an international level. It’s time to reflect this improvement in professionalism and have consistency when it comes to names.

Why should the women’s cricket team be referred to by their nickname and the men’s team have no nickname at all. It does not make sense.

Do not underestimate the power of words and the importance of ensuring that our sports use language that makes them gender neutral and welcoming to all.

The Australian women’s cricket team will have the opportunity to show off their new name when they depart for the United Kingdom on Saturday for the Women’s World Cup.

For those of you longing for sunshine and summer, watching cricket is the next best thing and the Australian women’s cricket team will have their first game against the West Indies on June 26.

This Women’s World Cup will see them looking to claim their seventh world title (after having won six out of the first ten tournaments).

The Crowd Says:

2017-06-10T22:00:48+00:00

Justin Kearney

Guest


I agree but the worry is the ARU is not promoting 15s only 7s for women. Its an easy fix. It should be promoting 15s with 7s as a byproduct. I watched a women's league on the gold coast recently and it was a beauty. 13 a side. 15s rugby and 13s league are the real deal and women should be offered the opportunity to participate in the more credible versions of both games.

AUTHOR

2017-06-10T21:54:02+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


Glad you are watching moaman!

AUTHOR

2017-06-10T21:53:33+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


In this situation I cannot possibly see how Buildcorp is the bad guy.

AUTHOR

2017-06-10T21:51:16+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


Yep! Netball featured in my wrap last week: http://www.theroar.com.au/2017/06/02/womens-sport-weekly-wrap-netball-finals/ And now GIANTS Netball are into the GF!!

AUTHOR

2017-06-10T21:49:47+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


Millions of dollars is being pumped into 7's. It's not the case for XV (and when you compare how much money is being put into the Wallabies versus the Wallaroos it's astonishing). You can't be what you can't see and until women's XV is promoted and pushed in the same way 7's is, you won't have little girls growing up thinking that they can play XVs if they want to.

AUTHOR

2017-06-10T21:48:01+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


Absolutely not. In an ideal world both versions of the game would thrive and people would have the opportunity to play VX or seven's.

AUTHOR

2017-06-10T21:47:20+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


And how sad is that, Cato. I thought about this some more. Query whether Buildcorp would have kept their sponsorship had the ARU demonstrated some planning or some future intent to include a women's NRC? To date, it just doesn't seem that the XV product is being taken as seriously. The Wallaroos got beaten 53-10 on Friday, a completely unsurprising result when you consider that England has over 400 caps and the Wallroos have less than 100.

AUTHOR

2017-06-10T21:45:37+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


I'm beyond lost in this whole thread. Is the idea that we have one national side open to men and women to be selected?

2017-06-10T04:24:06+00:00

Justin Kearney

Guest


Dead right cato. The aru sees womens sevens as a quick fix. It isnt.

2017-06-10T00:47:06+00:00

northerner

Guest


And here I thought hitting sixes would be easier if you had bigger muscles, and running between wickets would be quicker if you could, you know, run faster. Boxing, judo and karate are all about skill, but they don't make the featherweights fight the heavyweights, now do they?

2017-06-09T23:13:42+00:00

Rhys Bosley

Guest


Oh well, initially I thought the withdrawal of NRC sponsorship because there isn't a women's comp was a bit churlish and unrealistic, but if Master's article is anything to go by it could turn out to be a good thing. Pip Marlow and Josephine Sukkar are both accomplished businesswomen and would understand that healthy elite men's rugby is at least for the short to medium term the moneymaker which makes all other ARU activities possible. I can't imagine that such people would kill the goose that lays the golden egg in trying to grow the women's game, even if the NRC decision has that feel to it on face value. Perhaps giving them a go at running the show wouldn't be a bad thing, it might snap the ARU out of the groupthink that has lead to the current mess in Aussie rugby. I just hope that their commitment to universal opportunities to participate in elite rugby extends to Western Australia.

2017-06-09T22:50:59+00:00

moaman

Guest


Good luck to the Walleroos today. Watched yesterday's Canada v NZ and was pretty impressed. Canada play some very decent rugby! They look a very well-coached outfit and I thought the better team on the day...but NZ women hung in there, and aided by some individual flair from Cocksedge in particular, were able to just hold off the challenge.

2017-06-09T22:47:45+00:00

tyrone

Guest


A womens 15's competition would be great, but would it actually be viable? I have strong doubts over the NRC being viable judging by the crowds at games, how many would watch the womens version of the competition? Good on Buildcorp for what they have done and hopefully there will be a way to make a womens comp succeed.

2017-06-09T21:06:05+00:00

Realist

Guest


I'm happy for the women to have their own teams - so long as they are not taking vital funding generated by the men's teams. The women's game is about participation - however it is not something I would encourage my daughter to choose. Touch footy is a great game for women but tackle imo is inappropriate

2017-06-09T07:07:56+00:00

McNaulty

Guest


No. I am saying I would love to see a woman playing with men in a Shield or Test team.

2017-06-09T07:01:31+00:00

iluminati

Guest


Josephine Sukkar also sits on an internal ARU board responsible for nominating ARU board members, a founding director is John Mumm who is the father of Dean Mumm (head of players association); where there is smoke there is fire. "I am not going to have a crack at the ARU ..." yeh right as if that isnt an excuse. so Buildcorp doesnt get its way when it agrees sponsor the NRC under terms which never included a womens comp. It sabotages all the good will the ARU put into developing womens 7s and won a gold medal, hijacks the headlines in the media before the first test because it didnt get its way.

2017-06-09T07:01:20+00:00

McNaulty

Guest


We aren't talking about the football codes here...or even tennis. In cricket (particularly batting but also slow bowling) skill and concentration are way more important than strength and speed. With women taking it up in greater number why don't we wait and see? I'd like the "mens" team to remain open to women.

2017-06-09T06:47:40+00:00

Sydneysider

Guest


"There’s some good stuff happening in womens’ sport." Only if it involves your club mds......

2017-06-09T04:10:58+00:00

northerner

Guest


Oh, but I would think of it as the men's team, not the "open" team. We both know that women players may well be as skillful as men, but are most unlikely to be as strong or as fast. So your "open" team would in fact be closed to women. And with the open team designed to exclude half the population, well, there'd be no national representative team at all, would there? I'd much rather have two national teams representing Australia between them, than your single team representing the Y chromosome.

2017-06-09T04:10:55+00:00

Clash

Roar Pro


Have a feeling that you've either completely misconstrued kaivitis comment or are trying to start a fight. Let's pick up the negatives, screw the positives which is an unfortunate element with some folk on forums. Read Kavaiti's statement again before flying off the handle. It wasn't a very well worded comment from him/her but the last paragraph should tip you off that this person is agreeing that the ARU need to do more to help women's rugby. I do notice all the time that netball is on free to air while rugby is pay tv which is probably why netball is so popular.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar