Dominated and destroyed: Is there any hope for the British Lions?

By The Doc / Roar Guru

After seeing the All Blacks sweep all before them over the last few years, I was eagerly anticipating the series against the British and Irish Lions.

An amalgamation of the greatest players from Great Britain and Ireland seemed the only hope of bringing down this mighty giant of the game. But alas, our hopes were merely a pipe-dream as the All Black juggernaut rolled on, dismantling the Lions with ruthless efficiency and reminding us once again why they are the greatest rugby team on the planet.

The Lions had built up momentum during the course of this tour. The much derided ‘Warrenball’ was embraced by media and fans alike as results turned their way against the Super Rugby franchises and the New Zealand Maori team.

It was a gameplan built on doing the basics to an extremely high level – forward pack dominance both at the breakdown and set pieces and using that as the platform to win penalties and generate cohesive backline play.

The Lions forwards had no trouble getting over the gainline and when they didn’t achieve that, their aerial dominance meant they were still going forward, winning territory and dominating possession. Their defence was suffocating, they were competing strongly at the breakdown thus slowing down distribution from the base of the ruck which allowed the rush defence to swarm all over the opposition.

I felt that it was a strong gameplan. No one in the world can match the All Blacks at their fast-based, running brand of rugby and to do so with a group of players that have come together for only six weeks would be fool-hardy.

It was a gameplan that played to their strengths and one that can be instilled and learnt by the squad. The big question was could the Lions translate that into a victory against the All Blacks? The answer was a resounding no. It was hardly a contest and the Lions were dominated in all areas of the game bar the lineout.

The All Blacks came out on fire. Their close quarter passing and handling was brilliant and they played a fast tempo that the Lions would have expected but could do little to stop.

Everyone got over the gainline, Aaron Smith was getting super-quick ball and his decision making and distribution was as always first class. The go ahead that the New Zealand pack had all game meant that the Lions rush defence was nullified.

The breakdown contest was also won by the All Blacks. On offense, they cleaned out well and that meant quick supply to their backs and fringe runners. On defence, they were always winning the gainline, generated numerous turnovers and most importantly managed to slow the ball down.

Murray and Farrell had to go to the air a bit more than they would have liked and this meant handing over more possession to NZ. I always felt that the Lions had to dominate possession for as long as possible but the statistics show that New Zealand dominated possession (61 to 39 per cent) and if this is replicated, the Lions have no chance for the remainder of the series.

The set piece was supposed to be an area where the Lions hoped to assert some dominance over the All Blacks. The lineout was excellent with only one throw being stolen and this was after the game was effectively over and they stole another two throws. But perhaps what was missed here was the ability of the New Zealand defence to shut down the Lions maul.

The Lions rolling maul has been a huge strength in the lead up games but on this occasion the New Zealand forwards did a fantastic job of never allowing the maul to get going.

Credit must go to Steve Hansen and the forwards for their careful planning and execution of the New Zealand maul defence.

(AP Photo/Mark Baker)

The Lions scrum has been dominant in the majority of the lead up games but the Lions met their match here. For the most part they held up well on their own feed but they were dominated on the New Zealand feed and were unable to put any pressure on the New Zealand backrow and backline.

This was exemplified in the All Blacks second try when a scrum penalty lead to a brilliant offload by Read which eventually lead to Rieko Ioane scoring in the corner. Warren Gatland and the Lions would have been bitterly disappointed to have been smashed in that scrum and then concede a try from a piece of Kieren Read magic.


So, were there any positives for the Lions?

There were moments of brilliance that lead to several line breaks, one of which lead to the first try. Liam Williams was immense and justified his selection over Leigh Halfpenny with his performance. He took the game on, beat players, broke the lines and created running lanes for other players to slide into.

Elliot Daly and Jonathan Davies looked dangerous on the few occasions they had the ball. Connor Murray was again deadly with his box kicking and Lions had some success with the aerial ball. Everyone clearly tried hard and had a go but were smashed by a New Zealand team that was relentlessly outstanding in all areas of the game.

So what can the Lions do to change things?
Based on this performance, this series is as good as over but that really is not much help to anybody. It is difficult to change the gameplan halfway into the series with a group of players that have only been together for several weeks, so the answer is personnel changes, minor tweaks and competing better at the basics of the game.

On offence, Rhys Webb may be a positive change at the scrum base. Connor Murray is excellent with his box kicking but is not as dangerous running around the ruck edges. Rhys Webb will provide quick and crisp service and could be more creative running the ball.

The Lions struggled to get over the gain line and without that, they will not get close to the All Blacks all series. I would start Courtney Lawes and Maro Itoje as the locks.

Itoje was brilliant after coming on and Lawes was excellent with ball in hand against the Chiefs. I do not think you lose much in the set pieces with this change but gain much more around the field in terms of dynamism, support and running play.

Faletau was solid but unable to make a dent in the defensive line and perhaps a change to CJ Stander might be an option.

(AAP Image/SNPA, David Rowland)

I would also bring back Sam Warburton at blindside flanker. Peter O’Mahoney put in a fantastic shift but they need speed and players that can compete more effectively at the breakdown. A Warburton/O’Brien or even Tipuric tandem may be way to go because if they cannot slow the play the ball down, the rush defence cannot get in the faces of the New Zealand line.

The support play needs to be better. There were too many turnovers at the breakdown or just before the ruck was formed. Players were isolated at times resulting in several penalties for not releasing and several times Lions players were stripped by the opposition. Turnovers limited their ability to maintain possession, build continuity or control the tempo of the game.

Only the most optimistic or delusional of supporters would predict a Lions series victory here but most of us are just hoping for a contest. Lets hope the Lions can make some adjustments and compete.

The Crowd Says:

2017-07-10T09:41:00+00:00

Andy

Guest


I suppose the Lions weren't dominated and destroyed after all. A good lesson in not jumping to conclusions eh?

2017-07-01T11:45:41+00:00

Larry

Guest


So my guess is you're less chirpy this week Doc?

2017-07-01T11:43:06+00:00

Larry

Guest


Let me guess, you're blaming this on SBW? Hahahahaha

2017-06-28T01:14:26+00:00

zhenry

Guest


Obviously from the corporate media: Not telling me directly but implying I am unpleasant, I undermine, pretty obnoxious and should not talk about it; apart from the familiar name calling, there is an absolutist 'I know' vein running through your comment: In keeping wth the corp media's presentation of politics and economics, it unfortunately spills over into sports reporting. The food poisoning of the 1995 RWC ABs are hard facts, not fake facts, and it's NZRU failing to officially report it, that encourages comments from people like you Fionn.

2017-06-28T00:42:38+00:00

zhenry

Guest


Please do reply, your not alone, British journalists have been name calling and generally dumping on the ABs for years. It's good that you are going to be specific but not, unfortunately, look at the ref calls that should not have gone the Lion's way: This is an endemic bias failure of many UK journalists, M Reason covers himself in glory in this regard, and I also, will comment later on this issue.

2017-06-28T00:38:22+00:00

Jibba Jabba

Roar Guru


The All Blacks were all over that competition, without suzy they would have won by 15 plus in the final, with suzy and a dozen vomiting ABs they lost by 3.

2017-06-28T00:36:15+00:00

Jibba Jabba

Roar Guru


He blocked him pure and simple..

2017-06-28T00:27:13+00:00

Fionn

Guest


It's pretty unpleasant to try and undermine the Boks' great 1995 triumph. Reminds me a bit of when people bring up Joubert's refereeing of the 2011 final in order to say that France would have if it had been refereed "fairly". It's pretty obnoxious and both topics should be parked immediately. The Boks were the best team in 1995, they won fair and square and that is what history will record; as did the All Blacks in 2011.

2017-06-28T00:20:29+00:00

zhenry

Guest


You can go on and on about how well the 1995 Boks played in 1995, but the hard fact remains that during the RWC 1995 final ABs were spewing their guts out on the sideline. You said it Charging Rhino fitness is vital in RWC games especially finals, and it was appalling NZRU policy not to lay a complaint (re most of the team spewing re a probable food poisoning issue just before the game) before the IRB: I am sure the Boks would have done so had the 'boot been on the other foot'. And if commenters say 'get over it' then it's up to Bok supporters to 'get over it' and not try and rewrite history.

AUTHOR

2017-06-27T21:22:18+00:00

The Doc

Roar Guru


THanks moaman. I did go over some of the 2nd half scrum footage and have to concede that the dark arts of scrummaging are beyond me. Happy to defer to my much more esteemed colleagues on this one

2017-06-27T06:01:43+00:00

Akari

Roar Rookie


The furthest north I've been is to the Great Wall of China as a uni student, Waxhead, and I never had the desire to travel any further west of that then and since. I might be tempted for rugby reasons. @Neil I was expecting Halfpenny to be the FB, a Gatland favourite I think. North was pretty good in the Welsh tour last year and out played Julian Savea. I'd have him way ahead of Daly. As it turned out, Daly was dud for failing to score an easy try and then giving away 2 others.

2017-06-27T05:48:51+00:00

Akari

Roar Rookie


Just saw the Canes team list and I very much doubt that the Lions will belt them. In fact, I am expecting a close but Canes win if the tight 5 can hold their own.

2017-06-26T23:25:22+00:00

Northkiwi

Guest


Don't forget the unforgettable Jean Condom.....

2017-06-26T20:40:35+00:00

moaman

Guest


Enjoyed this piece Doc and the comments too. I just rewatched the 2nd half having been up for the Americas Cup race. Once again I was struck with how often the Lions scrum seemed to go down and then get awarded a reset---I was thinking to myself 'what would a French Ref make of this?' Have you had a look at the scrums and what were your thoughts on who had the edge and the collapses in particular?

2017-06-26T20:21:17+00:00

Geoff

Guest


Colin N You mean the maul that eventuated off the ridiculously not straight lineout from the Lions? Wouldve or should've been a scrum regardless And furthermore, Retallick isnt the tackler, he's the first man in and has right to go for the ball. The lions player gets to his feet (lucky he wasn't penalised for that but i assume Peyper decides he's being driven rather than under his own steam so he's allows it) and Reatllick goes for the ball. You're wrong in every assessment of this situation.

AUTHOR

2017-06-26T19:37:42+00:00

The Doc

Roar Guru


Great question JW89. I went back over the footage of each of the 6 mauls that the Lions attempted on the back of attacking lineout throws: 1. first maul made 10m inside the Lions half and was solid 2. The maul got pulled down before it got going - unclear if NZ managed to tackle catcher or it just collapsed 3. Penalty against NZ 4. Maul went to ground and turnover after warburton stripped 5. Maul collapsed but play continued - NZ players were pushing in from the side before they stepped away but probably did enough to splinter the maul. 6. Penalty against NZ for tackling Faletau whilst in the air Its a fine line but essentially on the 3 occasions that the maul failed to get any metres, it collapsed. Whether that was just accidental or whether the NZ forwards were able to tackle and bring the lineout catcher down before the ball could be fed back was hard to gather from the footage. I think the maul will still be factor but they need to mix it up. Would love to see the lines throw it deep and let the centres and wingers go to work - didnt see much of that in the game. I am not a maul defence expert so this is pretty rudimentary analysis. Love to see what some of the resident experts have to say.

2017-06-26T11:37:08+00:00

JW89

Roar Rookie


Thanks Doc, I really enjoyed the article as a good summary so thanks. You touched upon the rolling maul - having been such a big talking point for both teams in the build up to the match, it was interesting to see neither able to get it working well. What do you think was the reason for this? Do you see it changing for the 2nd test? Or is it simply not going to be the weapon it was talked about before the series... JW

AUTHOR

2017-06-26T11:11:17+00:00

The Doc

Roar Guru


Thanks for the comment JW89. Cant argue with any of what you said. Win the breakdown, get over the gainline and they might be a chance

AUTHOR

2017-06-26T11:06:03+00:00

The Doc

Roar Guru


Thanks for the kind words SAKiwi!

2017-06-26T11:04:10+00:00

JW89

Roar Rookie


Doc, A fair summary of the game I feel, although possibly slightly harsh on the Lions in some areas as already highlighted. I feel the main differences between the teams can be condensed into two areas: 1. Forward dominance. Clearly won by the ABs, highlighted by the number of turnovers won, and the inability of Lions pack to make much of an impact in the game. 2. Clinical finishing. As you mentioned, the Lions had their breaks and chances but couldn't finish them. The ABs had 3 opportunities and scored 3, ruthless. That is what you would expect from World Champions and an area which the Lions need to improve on if they are to score a win this series. Overall, slightly disappointed as a NH fan with the result and the lack of punch from the Lions pack. The ABs were good value for the win, but this sets the series up nicely I feel; if the Lions lacked back-line cutting edge then I would be worried for our prospects. Looking forward to next Saturday already! JW

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar