The Wrap: Lions draw series, is rugby’s power shift north on?

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

Anyone who follows rugby knows that commercial power in the game is held in the northern hemisphere and that, historically, the on-field strength resides in the south.

While the drawn series between the All Blacks and the Lions was just another three games of rugby – damn fine ones at that – in time it may come to be seen as an indicator of an on-field power shift as well.

Consider the following. At the 2015 World Cup, SANZAAR provided all four semi-finalists. But in 2016 Australia won only six Tests from 15 and South Africa just four from 12, in a wretched season that included losses to Ireland at home, Italy (for the first time ever) and a record 57-15 home defeat to New Zealand.

Argentina clearly regressed last year and SANZAAR’S flagship competition, Super Rugby, is in a state of chaos.

It is only New Zealand that has stood strong, a loss to an excellent Irish side in Chicago nothing out of the ordinary for a side operating at a 90 per cent win ratio in the Steve Hansen era.

Coming into this Lions series, those with a close eye on rugby in the UK knew that the visitors had enough talent to trouble the All Blacks if they could keep their squad tight and together for the final weeks of a punishingly long season. But even so, there were very few predicting that the speed and ruthless nature of the All Blacks’ game would ensure anything other than a home victory.

As it happened, coach Warren Gatland’s first choice selections stayed largely intact throughout the whole tour, the attrition rate remarkably low. And potential internal problems with team spirit, prevalent on the 2001 tour to Australia and the 2005 tour of New Zealand, were well anticipated and avoided this time around.

There was the usual inflammatory rubbish from a minority of ill-informed local press, aimed at achieving I’m not exactly sure what, but key for Gatland was his ability to keep the UK press onside with his mission. Touring players care nothing for a local New Zealand paper dressing their coach as a clown, but potential insecurities are easily bought to the surface when their own press turns on the playing group.

(AAP Image/David Rowland)

That they never did was due to two things. Gatland got most of his selections right, so there was very little room for dissent among commentators with a different agenda to push. The other reason was that his ‘Saturday’ team performed right from the get-go, the win against the Crusaders crucially establishing a demarcation line where criticism could be made of the lesser performing midweek side without it impacting on the Test side.

Also pivotal was Sean O’Brien’s try in the first Test. Despite the 30-15 loss, the Lions gave themselves and their supporters belief by scoring one of the great Test tries; one that most fans would have expected to have come from the All Blacks.

In the wake of Saturday’s 15-15 result, one telling statistic emerged. Across the three Tests, for 240 minutes of rugby, the Lions led for only three of those minutes. That they were dominated for long periods but were able to escape with a drawn series speaks to a combination of their tenacity, off-key execution by the All Blacks (not totally unrelated to the first point), and some good fortune.

Restricting the All Blacks to five tries across the series was key for the Lions. The All Blacks were tactically innovative in the first Test, too conservative in the second (even with the loss of Sonny Bill Williams) and typically creative in the third. Opportunities came, but they were all hard won, and the Lions’ defence in the secondary field, in particular, was exemplary. This was a team with a heady blend of spirit, desire and sound technique.

Note how superbly the Lions scrambled back when, during a pulsating opening quarter, their own attack was killed dead by a Beauden Barrett intercept. Against any other side, this would have resulted in an All Black try. And when Barrett and Aaron Smith pulled the same move, flat off a scrum, that bought a try in Dublin, this time Conor Murray was in position to shut it down.

The All Blacks will be bitterly disappointed with their lack of clinical precision under pressure when the game was there to be won. Opting to play at the gain line creates pressure in itself, but it is something they welcome, happy to trade-off the risk of some spilt ball against splitting the defence open for tries like the beauty scored by Jordie Barrett.

But there was added pressure in this match. The atmosphere in the stadium resembled the Colosseum, and when the game tensed up it the second half – even more so when Jerome Kaino was sin-binned – the match took on the feel of the knee-trembling 2011 World Cup final.

Some will point to the missed try-scoring opportunities in the first half, with Julian Savea’s early fumble a crucial error. But even so, the All Blacks went to halftime well in control, and it was their inability to convert second-half field position through a series of handling mistakes that cruelled their momentum and kept the Lions in the contest.

(AAP Image/ David Rowland)

In that context, missed opportunities from Wellington also take on heavier importance. How must Beauden Barrett want his second-half grubber kick back again. A touch softer or straighter and Kieran Read scores, and the series is already won.

That outcome would, of course, have denied us the theatre and occasion of a deciding Test, which is everything the brilliant travelling fans, and the Lions concept, deserved. Make no mistake, when the euphoria dies down and the grind of the Premiership starts up again, there will be more agitating against the Lions from clubs who neither see nor care for rugby’s bigger picture.

Ignore also those claiming that this series is somehow diminished by there not being a winner. When two noble sides slug it out to the death, a draw is an entirely valid result, and the images of Read and Sam Warburton holding the trophy together do far more for the enhancement of the highest values of sport than any contrived deciding mechanism could ever do.

That said, the question of whether the match should have ended in a draw cannot be avoided. Like a slow-motion car crash moment, there was a sense of inevitability that the match, and series would hinge on a controversial refereeing call.

Romain Poite, in my view, made two critical errors. In the first, he essentially had to decide between three options – penalty against Read for interference in the air, penalty against Ken Owens for playing the ball in an offside position, or a scrum against Owens for doing so accidentally.

Having ruled the contest in the air fair, Poite somehow chose the third option, when there appeared to be far stronger cases for either of the first two. Owens catching and dropping the ball like a hot potato was no more accidental than any player immediately putting his hand up to acknowledge an unintentional reflex high tackle; it’s still a high tackle and still penalizable. Owens’ catch was instinctive, not accidental.

Poite’s other mistake, one with more important overtones, was to allow an on-field negotiation to take place and to be talked into a review, instead of trusting his instinct as an experienced referee. It was as if he knew how high the stakes were, with only two minutes left to play, but it makes no sense to treat a decision in the 78th minute differently from one in the eighth.

From here, it is a very short and slippery slope into cricket’s world of player challenges, and umpires bottling tough decisions and allowing matches to be determined by video.

As for Poite watching the video and confirming to TMO George Ayoub that he was staying with his original decision of a penalty against Owens, but then, in walking across to the mark, somehow deciding to award a scrum instead? Well, perhaps something was lost somewhere in translation.

Discussion about the ruling in no way assumes that Barrett would have made the kick anyway. I know I wouldn’t have bet my house on it.

It is wrong to consider a drawn series against this Lions side a definite marker of decline in New Zealand rugby. The Wallabies are about to find out how much firepower this side still has in its kit bag. But the world rugby paradigm is shifting and any All Blacks fans who choose to ignore this are simply denying the inevitable.

New Zealand has enjoyed a golden age that, hopefully, still has some time to run yet. But important indicators are stacking up against them. Demographics, economics, the historical development of other professional sports such as football, and the decline of its southern hemisphere allies all point to more difficult days ahead for New Zealand rugby.

If Saturday night’s result feels like a loss for New Zealand it at least should help ensure that the Lions are still around to tour in another twelve years’ time. But don’t be surprised if a drawn series in 2029, in a rugby world dominated by the north, this time feels like a win for New Zealand.

As if to illustrate the point about the fading light of southern hemisphere rugby, Super Rugby in Australia continued its year from hell, with three contrasting matches doing nothing to cheer local fans.

If SANZAAR can change the number of teams mid-stream, surely they can also change the qualifying conditions for the finals. On the evidence of their showing in Brisbane, the Brumbies have no hope of progressing and are wholly underserving of a home final.

It is hard to imagine a worse game of rugby, so deficient of skill, than what the Reds and Brumbies dished up on Friday night. The heavy fog that settled over the match was a telling metaphor for Australian rugby, and I’m sure I wasn’t alone in wishing for it to block out the game altogether.

(AAP Image/Paul Miller)

Over in Perth the Force and Rebels played like two sides angry with themselves, each other and their situation. That the Force were that bit nigglier and their sledging that bit trashier was enough to win them the battle, but perhaps not the war.

Injured Force skipper Matt Hodgson bought the teams together on the field after the match ended in a nice moment of solidarity. Players who had been tearing each other’s headgear off and questioning their respective mother’s morals were suddenly united in sharing an ‘up yours’ to the ARU.

Spurning the opportunity for at least one Australian side to do something positive, the Waratahs could only scrape the bottom of an already sorry barrel, losing 40-27 to the Jaguares who, for a period in the middle of the match, only had 13 players on the field.

When the knives are sharpened for Michael Cheika, as they inevitably will be at some point during the Rugby Championships, critics will do well to look back at this round of matches and consider the raw material he has to work with.

Get in touch with a Daikin dealer today so you don’t sit and suffer through another cold winter while watching the rugby this year. Trusted by many and suitable for the Australian lifestyle, Daikin really is The Best Air Anywhere.

The Crowd Says:

2017-07-17T05:35:40+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


I believe it was the influence of Garces that caused the referee to change his decision.

2017-07-17T05:28:06+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


Rugby Fan ...I asked that you pay careful attention. You should have tried a lot harder because apparently you fell well short.

2017-07-14T07:28:54+00:00

adastra32

Guest


It is amusing how perceptions can change to suit a bias. A while ago, the "Aussie/SH players going north" phenomenon started as a pay check for old lags past their prime. When it grew, it became greed. Now with the threat of serious competition from the previously sub-standard NH, it has become "our boys" who have improved standards "up there". Piffle. I can only think of George Smith as a player who genuinely added value to the players around him at Wasps. If we are talking about just players, you can make some valid arguments about NH sides improving the inferior or out-of-sorts product they hire - Mumm and Skelton spring to mind. Where the argument appears valid is in the coaching talent that NH clubs and countries have hired successfully. Apart from EJ, that talent is largely Unzud.

2017-07-14T07:08:17+00:00

Faith

Guest


RWC '15 served as a wake-up call to NH - get the best from the South. J Schmidt, Jones and Verner have taught the NH and down-loaded some real software for the North. Systems. Fitness etc The SR Jo'burg Lions are successful on the terms of what John Mitchell brought there. Give the Bulls a year where he has gone and they'll become the new Lions. But all that said - NZ and the ABs will adapt. Just like '07 when they became mentally stronger after RWC '15; '09 when the Boks beat them they learnt how to kick; and now the BILs on rush defense ... they will be back with an answer before they play England in '18. In fact, they already had an answer but could not execute thanks to J Savea ... they will work on where they were beaten by BILs strategy. This series just made a J Savea like player redundant ... the error rate on the wings that the ABs have condoned will now be a no.no. But then again if B Smith, Crotty were playing this would have been a non-issue .... And yet with all this let's not forget they were miles better than a combined team of what the North brought together ... just only not on the score-board.

2017-07-12T16:02:58+00:00

Kp

Guest


Carlos, can you explain who from the lions is celebrating the draw as a victory? I've spent a lot of time recently with the travelling lions fans (who were awesome company btw) and watched all the games and didn't see or hear any evidence of them seeing a draw as a victory. Not sure that many kiwis will share your (slightly xenophobic) take on the BILs and supporters.

2017-07-12T06:48:53+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


Yes you can run into a hole but you cannot from a...well a Fox... Geoff :)

2017-07-12T04:16:44+00:00

WQ

Guest


Unfortunately I think so ClarkeG. I don't like it but it certainly works and if it had not been for Sam Warbuton influencing Romain Poite in the final minutes of the 3rd Test, Beauden Barrett would have been taking a shot with the potential of winning the Test!

2017-07-11T22:07:00+00:00

JimmyKip

Roar Rookie


Ahahah, yeah - im one of the few people that have re-watched that game after time to calm down & view dispassionately. I've also read some very interesting statistical breakdowns of the game so I have a very strong opinion of what I consider the truth of what happened during that game. Suffice to stay that re-instating Henry, Hanson & Smith was, I consider, the only just option the NZRU had.

2017-07-11T22:03:35+00:00

JimmyKip

Roar Rookie


If you'd asked me about my opinion on the ABs defensive lines placement maybe you could put those words in my mouth. I may have said it elsewhere, but just to address your presumptions i'll repeat that the referee's policing of the offside line was appalling all tour. Note there's no mention of teams, players or jersey colours in that statement. However, i'll also state that being offside is more beneficial to a rush defence which is trying to prevent the ball from going wide than it is to the the style of defence that the ABs employ. The ABs were able to get up quick & drop the Lions big ball runners behind the gain line, but all the Lions had to do to counter that was pass the ball.

AUTHOR

2017-07-11T21:10:48+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


I've been scratching my head all week to think of who it was Drongo was reincarnated from, and you've nailed it FS!

2017-07-11T18:54:41+00:00

Rugby Fan

Roar Guru


If you want to be left out, then I suggest you don't join in the conversation.

2017-07-11T15:54:06+00:00

David

Guest


"England and Ireland have stepped up enormously while the other NH teams have stayed about the same as they were at the world cup" Scotland have vastly improved, while I personally think Wales have gone backwards. If anyone's stayed the same, I'd point to Ireland- beat New Zealand, lose to Scotland and Wales, then beat England. Can beat the very best on their day, but as inconsistent as ever as well. Scotland have been on a upwards curve since the World Cup and with the talent in their squad I expect this to continue. Wales recently came second bottom in the 6 Nations- only beating Ireland and Italy- and were the only side not to get a bonus point against Italy and lose a home game. Maybe they'll improve with Gatland back, but for now they've gone backwards.

2017-07-11T13:08:52+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


A good counter stat Kirky: In the last FIFA WC (2014), Argentina only trailed the lead for a total of seven minutes during seven full matches, still they "only won" silver...

2017-07-11T12:16:07+00:00

Kirky

Roar Rookie


Geoff, I just read on ''Stuff'' that in the three Tests played, the Lions were ahead of the All Blacks for the sum total of three minutes ~ really kicking butt!

2017-07-11T12:01:23+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


What to make of the WC group draw? AB's and SB's in the same group. New territory. Winner plays Japan/Scotland, loser plays Ireland. Could be a banana skin....

2017-07-11T11:53:41+00:00

Kirky

Roar Rookie


JimmyKip! Exactly mate the Lions spent a great deal of time offside with that rush defence with Itoje the principle culprit, ~ it seemed to me that the Ref' wasn't overly concerned about the offside play as it was rarely whistled and at times the 'offsiders' were two or three metres offside and got away with it! Vunipola, Liam Williams, Sexton, all milked it for a spell as did a few others which really bugs the All Blacks because their preferred method is to play it with pace, also that childish screaming in the lineouts, is that allowed? as I don't think it was ever called by the Ref;!

2017-07-11T11:41:16+00:00

Kirky

Roar Rookie


Jimmy Kip! I doubt it would be wise to go there mate as we all know the story of that quarter final loss! All conjecture now but in normal circumstances I'm sure the All Blacks would've and should've won that game and the Springboks were up to play the All Blacks next game if the Kiwis had prevailed and the Boks up to that stage were floundering along and I doubt they'd have got past the All Blacks who were building up perfectly, ~ But they Jake balled the World Cup with 21 points via the boot! One of the best Stirrers/Journalists Jonathon Kaplan who spruiks every thing negative about the All Blacks in particular, was the Touch Judge running right alongside Freddie Michalack when he threw that three metre forward pass to the guy who scored the try that sealed the game for the French, (can't remember his name) and he, Kaplan never alerted Barnes of the fact and Barnes also conveniently didn't whistle it either, ~ That is the very type of ''imponderable'' happening that can mean the Number 1 team goes out through bad judgement or incompetence, meaning any old team at all can win the World Cup. and that's exactly what happened in 2007. Interesting also is the Referee Wayne Barnes who Refereed that game between the French and Kiwis was stood down for quite a period of time, certainly from International rugby because of the shocking display he put on!

2017-07-11T11:12:34+00:00

adastra32

Guest


First, if the ABs were 10 points better than the Lions then they should have delivered on this. They did not so they weren't. Second, every team can claim injuries and absentees as significant factors: there were significant candidates on both sides. And come RWC 2019, this will not be a sufficient excuse for any team playing. Finally, I think we will be waiting till the end of 2018 before there is real perspective i.e. when No 1 and No 2 have played each other.

2017-07-11T11:10:35+00:00

adastra32

Guest


LOL - it is amazing how everybody turns into Cyclops when things don't go the way they wanted.....

2017-07-11T10:53:53+00:00

Kirky

Roar Rookie


Geoff! True words, if the game in the Northern climes is progressing in the fashion you mention, they are surely on the right track, you know that's the very direction that needs to be taken and good on them because with the player population they must surely have, in a few years or sooner they will be knocking on the door of something good and that's important as we all know! I just can't imagine as to what the Australian rugby scene for the future is going to be, I find it difficult to work out what those that matter will do in the necessary rebuilding and how they intend to attack it. ~ It's blatantly obvious that there's very hard yards ahead of International rugby in Australia. Argentinian, South African and Asian rugby are also in a 'who knows' situation. Liked your piece about schoolboy rugby being strong in New Zealand as I can remember reasonably vividly in 1943 at my first Sports day at School being told to go "over there'' with the rest of the boys are playing rugby!! 5 years old! Your last paragraph is surely the common sense approach and I think particularly for the health of Australian rugby that it would be the logical or similar type format! Who knows, it's all about the correct structure.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar