The Roar
The Roar

Geoff Parkes

Expert

Joined October 2012

2.71m

Views

613

Published

27.9k

Comments

Geoff is a Melbourne based sports fanatic and writer, who started contributing to The Roar in 2012, originally under the pen name Allanthus. His first book, A World in Conflict; the Global Battle For Rugby Supremacy was released in Dec 2017 to critical acclaim. For details on the book visit www.geoffparkes.com Meanwhile, his twin goals of achieving a single figure golf handicap and owning a fast racehorse remain tantalisingly out of reach.

Published

Comments

Harry’s never been back to Sydney since he got gouged for extra tomato sauce…

Five surprises, five disappointments and five things to figure out as Super Rugby 2024 reaches the end game

I think everyone is on side with this sentiment BB. But what I’d also say is that refs have improved markedly in this area, this year, trying very hard to make fast decisions based on one look, and we should commend them for that.

Five surprises, five disappointments and five things to figure out as Super Rugby 2024 reaches the end game

Love the precision in your post, ORF.
1.56 minutes.
If you’d said 2 minutes the post would have lost all its impact!

Five surprises, five disappointments and five things to figure out as Super Rugby 2024 reaches the end game

Just by chance? You’re a kind man, Bodger. I hope if I’m ever up on a charge I get you on the jury…

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

Not sure if it makes a difference if he’s in the crowd or with the team woodart, but this isn’t a free speech issue. Of course he’s allowed to make the gesture if he wants. And – based on SANZAAR’s non-response to date – it seems like there’s no consequence for it.

But the obvious point to be made is that by doing so – and choosing to do so – he is making a mockery of the judicial system, where he was granted a discounted sentence for pleading guilty and showing remorse. What remorse?

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

No doubt teams would be coached to do this, acjj.
And the game would be far poorer for it.

This is actually one of the areas in which World Rugby has listened and acted to complaints from coaches, players and fans, all looking to promote/reward positive play over negative.

But because referees did overreach, many people quickly forgot about the benefits and highlighted the failings. As mentioned above, I think the refs now have this much more in hand, and I really don’t rate this as an area of any concern for rugby at all.

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

They do Doctor, but as we all know, they’re nothing like rugby scrums – they’re generally set much faster and there are very few resets.

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

Sotutut going great Fox, and yes, those guys are all benefitting from the direct approach they’ve adopted.

Doesn’t hurt the loose forwards too when you’ve got guys like Heem and Clarke, and also Plummer, not scared to carry hard into contact.

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

I get it wb, somebody should have cut him off low. But gee… he came from a mile back at high speed and there was a sense that nobody was stopping him.

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

Most players in that situation smile and wave, Colvin.
Very disappointing.

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

Cheers cs, yes important distinction. Thanks for correcting.

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

😂

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

Try around 57.30 on the TV clock, Joey.

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

What’s different about those sports Piru is that they don’t stop as a result, to have a scrum.

The very reason this law (disincentive) was brought in, was because fans everywhere were bleating and pleading for fewer scrums.

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

Sometimes but not always.

Rebs v Highlanders, Jacob R-K received a YC and gave up a penalty try for deliberately knocking a pass down. It wasn’t a controversial decision, he was the last defender, there was no cover, and Anderson would have had an easy run-in for a try.

If there was no YC/penalty try option in this situation, then we’d see a lot more tries blocked, and a lot more scrums because of the ball going forward from the defenders knock.

I accept the argument that this introduces a degree of subjective decision making on the part of the referee. But if the alternative is simply to allow passes to be blocked like this, I can’t imagine that being a better outcome for fans and for the game. Fewer tries and more scrums? Who is asking for that?

My take is that referees have eased back a bit this year, they aren’t binning so many players automatically, and I think they’ve struck a good balance between what is inadvertent and what is deliberate spoiling.

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

Yeah…. nah.

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

Just on the conditions OB, even more reason to keep the scoreboard ticking over with penalty kicks on offer. And what about the tap play variation they took, instead of going for line out or goal? I don’t think I’ve ever seen a Brumbies side take that option.

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

Or rhyming slang for 5h1thouse?

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

It’s around 57.30 in the match feed, Paddy.

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

Spot on, Paul.

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

I’ll back you up, ATW. When I first came to Aus a tradie told me his job was ‘Mickey Mouse’, meaning ‘schmick’, and I did the same as you, wondered why he’d be so proud of shoddy work.
So it’s there, but I think has long been superseded by the understanding that it really does mean bad, not good.

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

Billy Harmon puts in a big effort every time, Muzzo. As did Withy.
But as a team, they’re all over the place at the moment. No carry and no support. Parkinson looked like he was operating at 40%.

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

Very glad you spelled ears correctly, ATW…

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

I don’t think it matters James, what his intent was.
Just the fact that he did it is enough to show his contempt for the situation.

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

Hi Goady

I think the Brumbies had plenty of opportunity early in the match. Also, we should be careful with the ‘time in possession’ stat. What can be interesting is number of possessions.

Obviously, if a side is make errors early in those possessions, or is perhaps kicking the ball away, it can skew that total ‘time’ stat.

Conversely, if a side isn’t competing well at the breakdown, and the opposition is racking up multiple phase possessions, that’s going to skew things as well.

What I’m sure we can agree on, is that they were well beaten!

The Wrap: Why SANZAAR must hold Frank Lomani accountable for 'going back for his hat'

close