Ange Postecoglou must abandon his attacking instincts against Japan

By Evan Morgan Grahame / Expert

Saudi Arabia lost to the UAE on Wednesday, a result that has eased out – if only slightly – the Socceroos’ margin for error against Japan.

The Saudis’ loss now means the following avenues for automatic qualification are open to Australia.

1. Win against Japan, and we qualify automatically.

2. Draw against Japan, and beat Thailand at home, and we qualify automatically.

3. Lose to Japan, and beat Thailand, and we qualify if Japan beat or draw with Saudi Arabia in their final fixture.

4. Draw with Japan and Thailand, and we qualify if Japan beat or draw with Saudi Arabia, or if the Saudis rack up a monstrous win over Japan.

5. Lose to Japan, and draw with Thailand, and we qualify automatically if Japan beat Saudi Arabia.

6. Lose to Japan, and lose to Thailand, and we can only qualify automatically if Japan beat Saudi Arabia by a large margin, pushing us ahead of the Saudis on goal difference (currently both teams are at +6, with Australia holding a game in hand).

There are various goal-difference dependent permutations of these potential outcomes, as well as versions that take into account the dicey third-placed playoff route, but the thrust of all this ushers us to a clear conclusion: we must adopt a conservative, defensive approach to the game tonight against Japan.

There is no need to take the game to the home team, to try and score freely, to attack the Blue Samurai with wild abandon. A tight win or a draw are perfectly satisfactory outcomes, while if a loss is suffered, it must be by the narrowest of margins.

All of the outcomes that rely on other fixtures going our way are not ideal. Yes, we should be confident – a clammy, nervously-laughing sort of confidence – of comfortably beating Thailand at home on 5 September, but we don’t want to pin our automatic qualification hopes on an already-qualified Japan enthusing themselves in their final game, away in Jeddah.

The mantra for our final two fixtures is this: four points won, and the job is done.

[latest_videos_strip category=”football” name=”Football”]

With our priorities set, we must look to our defence, which isn’t quite eye-watering, but it hardly makes for contented viewing.

Australia have managed a clean sheet in just three of the last eight World Cup qualifying matches, and although we haven’t lost a match in this campaign, three of our games – two draws and a win – have included four or more total goals scored. Our inability to shut teams out has hurt us badly, with the score-draws against Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Thailand boring bitter holes in the memory, four points wasted that could so easily have been seized.

The 3-2 win over the Saudis in June was crucial, and though the team should be commended for securing it, the manner in which they did was haphazard at best. The two goals gifted to us by the Saudis in the first half were acts of generosity no one should expect Japan to repeat.

Of all the tactical iterations Ange Postecoglou has come up with since transitioning to his back-three system, none of them are defence-first. His formation should be able to morph into one that’s primary function is to stifle, creating a formidable back-five, with the wing-backs tucked in.

Postecoglou might even play two defensive-minded central midfielders to complement the defence in such a system. He hasn’t really done this yet though, and having selected a team that has no traditional, defensive right-back, one must assume Matt Leckie will start.

Leckie is so athletic, he can usually make up his deficiencies when it comes to defensive positioning and decision-making. Still, it would be wise to firmly remind him of the defensive side of his positional duties, something Ange will be sure to do pre-match.

AAP Image/Lukas Coch

Alex Gersbach must start over Brad Smith on the left. Whether you base the selection on recent form for both club and national team, playing time over the last six months, or the theoretically appropriate player attributes, there’s no argument that Smith should start this match. Simply put, Smith’s continued inclusion is one of Ange’s most puzzling foibles.

There are a few centre back variations that will offer a sense of sturdiness, all of them revolving around Trent Sainsbury. Then, as mentioned, a defensively-capable midfield of, say, Mark Milligan and Mass Luongo would also be pleasing.

This is negative, to be sure, and it departs somewhat from the gaffer’s instincts. Even against Chile, in the Confederations Cup, Australia met the highly potent South Americans head on, running and harrying, transitioning up the pitch at a breakneck speed, rather than sitting back with the intention to frustrate.

Mat Ryan had to make six saves in that game, and there were more than a few moments where last-ditch tackles from Milligan and others saved surefire goals. In what was essentially a glorified friendly competition, Australia’s plucky audacity was to be admired, and it secured a fine – if fortunate – 1-1 result.

But that audacity is not what is needed tonight.

Basically, I’m asking for a little pragmatism, something that demonstrably does not come easily to Postecoglou. This week, Robbie Kruse spoke about how team selection can remain a mystery to the players, right up until the last moment.

“You never know with the boss, sometimes you feel like you might be playing but then you don’t know,” Kruse said. “You find out game day, he [Postecoglou] keeps everyone on their toes. Everyone prepares as if they are going to play.”

Photo: AFP

This may breathe a lovely sense of freshness through the squad, knowing that everyone has a chance at starting, but it hardly promotes a sense of stability, of knowing your role, of feeling at ease and depended on.

A 0-0 draw in Saitama would feel as good as a win, all things considered. It’s also a more realistic ambition, with Japan still snorting from their stumbling 1-1 draw with Iraq in the last round of qualifiers, and having announced a full-strength squad, with Shinji Kagawa, Keisuke Honda, Shinji Okazaki and Maya Yoshida just some of the big names set to start.

It would be unwise to go toe-to-toe with the Blue Samurai, swords and minds sharpened, with so much at stake.

The Socceroos are, of course, no strangers to the big occasion; ten of the current squad members were present for that heart-stopping Asian Cup final against South Korea three years ago – a taught, clenched match that went to extra time.

The intestinal fortitude evident on that night remains in the team, and if it’s on show – and, crucially, is buttressed by the tactical approach – again in Saitama tonight, we can leave Japan with our future still firmly grasped in our own hands.

The Crowd Says:

2017-08-31T06:14:39+00:00

Worlds Biggest

Guest


Big game for the Roos, given there form in the campaign so far ( patchy ) I would happily take a draw, I think that would be a good effort. Have we got the cattle to park the bus ? Come on Socceroos !

2017-08-31T05:47:24+00:00

strawman

Guest


Not all of us did. Only the bogans did.

2017-08-31T05:43:01+00:00

strawman

Guest


That's irrelevant now. Back then a win was 2 points and a draw was quite satisfactory.

2017-08-31T05:40:21+00:00

strawman

Guest


Draw is Ange's middle name. Look how many times the Socceroos drawed lately ;)

2017-08-31T05:15:22+00:00

Phil of Sydney

Guest


Oceania? and I thought Australia were the current Asian Champions.

2017-08-31T03:49:53+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Thanks Caltex, doing the research on the Japanese players is unnerving. A very talented squad.

2017-08-31T02:19:48+00:00

Caltex TEN & SBS support Australian Football

Guest


Good luck tonight Stuart, with your commentary of the match on the ROAR football tab. I hope to post a comment at half time and yes nervy as hell for the boys.

2017-08-31T02:14:23+00:00

Lamby

Roar Rookie


It worked so well against Iran in 1998. 2 nill up with about 45mins to play and we STILL can't park the bus. Australia does not know how to park the bus and play for a draw!

2017-08-31T02:14:20+00:00

Caltex TEN & SBS support Australian Football

Guest


Yep, nothing more to be said.

2017-08-31T02:05:46+00:00

Newie

Guest


No, I don't think he should. No, I don't think the UAE-SA result will change anything in his approach.

2017-08-31T01:16:43+00:00

AGO74

Guest


The Dutch performances since 2010 have been very poor given their storied history. Even then the 2010 team is remembered for its physicality more than its skill. This is potentially concerning for Australia given we have gone down the Dutch path in terms of football development, yet the creators of that pathway are facing significant challenges. Doesn't augur well for the 4-3-3 platform....

2017-08-31T01:14:05+00:00

Midfielder

Guest


Should be a great game

2017-08-31T00:54:02+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Attack. Attack and then Attack some more. He's worked towards this for years now. Must trust it and persist. In saying that, if a point seems likely, of course you protect it, but only late in the game. Anyone a little nervy?

2017-08-31T00:35:41+00:00

Lionheart

Guest


it's not in Ange's dna, and it's not in ours go for it Ange, we can do it

2017-08-31T00:34:12+00:00

Lionheart

Guest


he played 90 minutes v Birmingham just last weekend

2017-08-31T00:23:46+00:00

chris

Guest


"Amazing media contingent" - Any msm journos there? lol

2017-08-31T00:14:32+00:00

reuster75

Guest


The dangers of setting out to secure a draw is what do you do if the opposition score first, especially late on? Your whole mindset has been about defending and all of a sudden you have to shift that to chase the game which is hard to do. The same can be said for scoring first and then trying to hold on - if the opposition equalise this can cause a massive shift in momentum and again means you have to change your mindset. This is something that is very hard to do (ask Atletico Madrid). This approach also give you no margin for error - if you fail in your task the odds are you've lost (see Holland 2010 world cup final). If you go out with an attacking mindset of wanting to win the game if you fail then chances are you may still be able to take a point from the game. I understand the importance of qualifying (not least the financial aspect) but if we are to truly grow the game in Australia then like Ange says we need to aim higher than just qualifying.

2017-08-31T00:13:58+00:00

Nemesis

Guest


Good news & Bad News Good news: Looks like Ange logged in to The Roar & read this article. Bad news: He's not changing his approach Full story: http://www.socceroos.com.au/article/ange-postecoglous-final-message-ahead-of-socceroos-japan-clash/1cvhlpe17hlnc1oatbso6iafbn

2017-08-31T00:02:31+00:00

Mahler

Guest


Ange's ideas would all work out beautifully if only we had the players to bring them to fruition.

2017-08-30T23:57:45+00:00

Fadida

Guest


Agree

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar