Nathan Lyon: From near zero to hero

By Glenn Mitchell / Expert

Ten months ago Nathan Lyon’s Test career was hanging by a thread.

Today, once again, he is firmly ensconced as his nation’s number one spinner.

In the past two weeks he has leapt over Richie Benaud (248 wickets) and Jason Gillespie (259) to sit seventh on the all-time Test wicket-taking list for Australia.

The man who heads that exultant list is Shane Warne, the only spinner above Lyon.

2017 has been his year.

Presently playing his seventh Test of the year, he has 38 wickets at 24.7.

Since 1 January he has claimed four five-wicket hauls, including a career-best 8-50 against India at Bengaluru.

(AAP Image/Dan Himbrechts)

Yet, in November last year, Lyon was on the cusp of being dropped from the side.

He was struggling to make an impact with the ball and, in the process, had seemingly lost the confidence of his skipper, Steve Smith.

In the opening Test of last summer, against South Africa at Perth, he went the journey.

After capturing 2-38 in the first innings, he was bizarrely handled by Smith when South Africa batted a second time.

He was not used at all in the opening session on the third day despite the fact that the rest of the attack could not conjure a breakthrough.

At stumps, on a 37-degree day, he had sent down only a dozen overs.

The likes of Warne were scathing in their attitude towards Smith’s use of him.

On day four, he sent down a further 22 overs, ending the innings with 0-146.

South Africa won the Test by 177 runs.

They sewed up the series at Hobart, winning the second Test by an innings and 80 runs after Australia was shot out for 85 on the opening day.

Lyon finished with 0-57 from 17 overs in South Africa’s innings.

The selectors were under intense pressure to make changes for the final Test of the series at Adelaide.

Many felt Lyon should be one of those jettisoned.

He likely would have been dropped had the man touted to replace him, Steve O’Keefe, not gone down with injury just prior to the selectors naming their squad.

Lyon captured 4-105 in the third Test.

He survived the summer, albeit without setting the world on fire, capturing 11 wickets at 45.6 in the three Tests against Pakistan.

In February, he headed to India where he and O’Keefe went head-to-head.

On spin friendly decks the pair each claimed 19 wickets – Lyon at 25.3 and O’Keefe 23.3.

When the selectors sat down to choose the squad for the current tour of Bangladesh they faced a conundrum.

O’Keefe had been suspended by New South Wales for next month’s Matador Cup and fined $20,000 for offensive comments while intoxicated at the Steve Waugh Medal presentation.

They opted to leave him at home and chose a spin trio of Lyon, Ashton Agar and Mitchell Swepson.

In the first Test loss, Lyon held up his end of the bargain with hauls of 3-79 and 6-82.

Australia went into the current Test at Chittagong with three specialist spinners for the first time since 2006.

O’Keefe was on the plane and straight back into the side for an injured Josh Hazlewood.

Lyon , however, was clearly the standout.

(AP Photo/Aijaz Rahi)

Opening the bowling with Pat Cummins, he claimed the first four wickets.

He chimed in late in the day with the second new ball to add a fifth scalp, finishing the day with 5-77 from 28 overs – O’Keefe returned figures of 20-0-70-0 and Agar 17-6-46-1.

Where the first Test at Dhaka was played on a surface that provided abundant spin and variable bounce, the deck at Chittagong was a tough one for the bowlers on the opening day.

There was minimal turn, even bounce and all-in-all, it was a pitch favourable to the batsmen.

Lyon bowled an impeccable length with his first four wickets all coming as a result of beating the batsman on the inside and removing them leg before – a mode of dismissal that has beset so many Australian batsmen in that part of the world.

It marked the first time in history that the same bowler trapped the top-four leg before wicket.

It was a highly intelligent display of off-spin bowling as he quickened his pace and bowled a consistently questioning length.

Had it not been for Lyon, Australia would likely be in a particularly parlous position.

As a finger spinner, Lyon is 120 wickets clear of his Australian counterpart – Hugh Trumble – hence his sobriquet, GOAT.

Traditionally, finger spinners have never been as potent a force on the hard, bouncy Australian pitches as their wrist-spinning colleagues.

In terms of aggregate wickets for spinners, Lyon is the only non-wrist spinner in Australia’s top-six.

Some of the game’s finest off-spinners have struggled on Australian pitches – Muttiah Muralitharan averaged 75.4; Harbhajan Singh 73.2; and Graeme Swann 52.6.

Given those performances, Lyon’s home bowling average of 34.6 is highly commendable.

He is the most experienced member of this current Australian team with 69 Tests under his belt.

Yet, in spinner’s terms, he is still a young man at 29.

With 261 wickets already to his name he is every chance to finish ahead of Dennis Lillee’s career total of 355, which would leave him third overall behind two other legends of the game in Glenn McGrath (563) and Warne (708).

Speaking of Warne, it is interesting to compare his record on the sub-continent with Lyon.

To date, Lyon has taken his 72 wickets at 28.9 compared to Warne’s 111 wickets at 29.3.

Presently, he is doing the job for his country and doing it very well.

And, he is destined to continue for quite some time yet.

The Crowd Says:

2017-09-05T15:37:09+00:00

Chris Love

Roar Guru


Not blinkered just open to the fact that SOK is head and Shoulders above Lyon in Australian conditions and has been for a very long time. And Jason it wasn't just one bad test. It was a very long string of sub-standard tests. Prior to India, if memory serves me correctly it was 2013 Adelaide when he last had bowled us to victory? Look at the record going back to that test he'd been serviceable but when you've got SOK averaging in the low 20's for years then he comes out and blows them away in his first real crack in a long time it was understandable..

2017-09-05T08:02:37+00:00

Simoc

Guest


There's no reason other than lack of results why Lyon shouldn't be in the test team to 40 years if he is motivated. Good spinners generally get better with age. James Anderson seems to think he has potentially another down-under Ashes series in him in 4 years time. Reckons he is bowling as well as he has ever bowled, now at a reduced pace.

2017-09-05T07:14:13+00:00

matth

Guest


Our batsmen lately must beware of all the ones.

2017-09-05T07:13:05+00:00

matth

Guest


And if they were going to fly in a spinner, why not Jon Holland who actually played in the Darwin warm up, and from all reports was very good?

2017-09-05T06:06:36+00:00

justin

Roar Rookie


good article

AUTHOR

2017-09-05T04:37:13+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


Hearty apologies Giri. Auto correct does have a mind of its own.

2017-09-05T04:02:56+00:00

Giri Subramanian

Roar Guru


Warne's record is poor in subcontinent only because he struggled against India. His record against the rest of the three teams is brilliant. In 13 tests against Bangladesh, Pakistan and Srilanka, Warne took 66 wickets at 24.21. Nathan Lyon did not play in Pakistan but his record is bound to improve. He bowled really well in India earlier this year which was a huge improvement from his previous tour. Both are almost neck and neck in the subcontinent otherwise. In UAE though Shane Warne averaged 9 and Lyon 140. So that is something he would like to correct.

2017-09-05T03:39:18+00:00

Giri Subramanian

Roar Guru


Lol...The spell check or auto correct always does that to my name.

2017-09-05T03:36:53+00:00

jameswm

Roar Guru


That was a good and useful comment - so good you should have posted it twice.

2017-09-05T02:30:28+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


very funny q, Glenny bringing the sass.

2017-09-05T02:06:59+00:00

qwetzen

Guest


Careful there Glenn. Giri looks a bit macho. He may not take kindly to being called "Girl"...

2017-09-05T02:02:57+00:00

qwetzen

Guest


"In SOK’s defence, he hasn’t played for yonks so very, very harsh to be judged on this match." Hmmm. So if he succeeds it's a selection masterstroke and undeniable proof that he's The Real Deal, but if he fails it's because "...he hasn't played for yonks." Win-win for SUK there. Anyways... The fact that "he hasn't played for yonks" makes his selection even more bizarre. And even bizarrier (todays' new word) is another fact. In a game that Oz *must* win, why pick a bowler whose main claim to fame is his defensiveness? Isn't taking wickets what leggies are supposed to do? And what *is* Swepson thinking now? Once again the NSP has over-thought the squad instead of just picking the players Most Likely.

AUTHOR

2017-09-05T01:45:16+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


Girl, the headline 'zero' relates to the fact that he was close to going back to square one last summer by being omitted.

2017-09-05T01:43:49+00:00

dangertroy

Roar Rookie


Good on him for his continued development as a bowler. He should be hitting his prime as a spinner and he already has 270 wickets behind him. He's the same age now as Graeme Swann was when he made his test debut. While I was one questioning his place in the side last summer, in hindsight lots of Lyons issues stemmed from the fact that the batting was in a terrible place at that point in time. Lyons a more attacking spinner by nature with the way he gives the ball extra flight. When the batting was failing, he didn't have the totals to bowl at that let him pursue his attacking nature. This is why he performs well in the first innings of a match when there is no scoreboard pressure.

2017-09-05T01:43:43+00:00

dangertroy

Roar Rookie


Good on him for his continued development as a bowler. He should be hitting his prime as a spinner and he already has 270 wickets behind him. He's the same age now as Graeme Swann was when he made his test debut. While I was one questioning his place in the side last summer, in hindsight lots of Lyons issues stemmed from the fact that the batting was in a terrible place at that point in time. Lyons a more attacking spinner by nature with the way he gives the ball extra flight. When the batting was failing, he didn't have the totals to bowl at that let him pursue his attacking nature. This is why he performs well in the first innings of a match when there is no scoreboard pressure.

2017-09-05T01:16:48+00:00

George

Guest


In SOK's defence, he hasn't played for yonks so very, very harsh to be judged on this match. Although we've seen with Khawaja that non-favourites are judged harshly. Perhaps they've set up SOK to fail.... Regardless, Agar isn't especially good.

2017-09-05T00:52:28+00:00

Giri Subramanian

Roar Guru


Good read but I don't think he was ever a zero. Probably few Aussie fans thought that about Lyon but he has been one of the prominent spinners of this era and is rated pretty high among neutral fans.

2017-09-05T00:51:13+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Apart from replacing Nevill with Wade, it is the silliest selection of the year. They had already flown Swepson over to replace a quick. Swepson must have done something naughty at training for SOK to bypass him.

2017-09-05T00:18:42+00:00

Lord Dudley

Guest


Good read. Any sportsman that gets to Lyon's level has to be persistent. My wife gets annoyed when I say "a saint is a sinner that kept on trying.

2017-09-05T00:10:56+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


270 wickets in 67 Tests is pretty consistent.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar