Funny game, cricket - but Steve Smith isn't laughing

By David Lord / Expert

Australian captain Steve Smith was looking forward to his milestone of 100 ODIs overnight, but the second loss to India killed any celebrations.

Now the Austraiians must win the next three games to win the series, but the way they are batting makes that highly unlikely.

Yet the stats from their 2017 ODIs suggest totals of 281 and 252 were very gettable.

But rain ruined any chance of winning the first at Chennai, losing by 26 under the Duckworth Lewis method. In all honesty that was plain bad luck with Mother Nature dictating terms.

In spite of that, there were worrying signs when Australia had India 3-11 and 5-87, but the locals smacked their way to 7-281 on the back of the bottom half of the order with Kefar Jadhav posting 40, MS Dhoni 79, Hardik Pandya 83, and Bhuknashwar Kumar 32.

Overnight the top order gave India a flying start with Ajinkya Rahane clubbing 55, and skipper Virat Kohli making up for his first ODI duck with a typically polished 92.

Despite the good start, the Australians fought back well, claiming the last six wickets for 46, so 252 was well within Australia’s range, if they batted to their 2017 year-long stats.

Warner – 472 runs – average 52.44
Smith – 367 – 52.43.
Travis Head – 443 – 55.37.
And Marcus Stoinis – 253 – 126.50.

Those stats are very convincing, but the top order haven’t been firing together.

That’s obviously been a problem, but the following are a bigger problem.

Glenn Maxwell – 267 – 29.67.
Matt Wade – 161 – 26.83.
James Faulkner – 99 – 24.75.
And Hilton Cartwright – 2 – 1.00.

Overnight was another failure, with Smith’s 59, and Stoinis’ unbeaten 62, the only standouts.

A funny game alright. and it’s much the same with the bowlers having to compete with no Mitchell Starc, nor Josh Hazlewood.

(AAP Image/Richard Wainwright)

Paceman Nathan Coulter-Nile has has been the most successful Australian with figures of 20 overs 6-96. Stoinis 20 had overs 2-100, and in the one game he’s played, Kane Richardson picked up ten overs 3-55.

But the best bowler by far has been Pat Cummins, yet his figures don’t support that statement with 20 overs four maidens 1-78, yet he’s been the most dangerous bowler often passing the 150 kph mark, and extracting lift from unresponsive tracks.

And that’s not funny from Cummins point of view either.

The Australians need answers.

When, and if, Aaron Finch will overcome a calf injury to resume at the top of the order that’s brittle.

Cartwright must go, and in a perfect world a batting line-up of Warner, Finch, Smith, Head, Stoinis, Maxwell, Wade, Ashton Agar, Cummins, Coulter-Nile, and Adam Zampa would be more competitive.

If Finch is still on the injured list, bring in James Faulkner to bat seven, and promote Head to open.

And knuckle down to the job as a team, not individuals.

Australia need to attack India’s newest record holder, the 22-year-old left arm chinaman bowler Kuldeep Yadav.

Overnight he became India’s third ODI hat-trick taker, bowling Wade, trapping Agar in front, and having Cummins caught behind by Dhoni.

Yadav has joined Chetan Sharma whose hat-trick was against the Kiwis at Nagpur in 1987, and Kapil Dev against Sri Lanka at Calcutta in 1991.

There have only been 43 hat-tricks in 3913 ODIs.

The Crowd Says:

2017-09-22T04:54:37+00:00

AGordon

Guest


so they've played these guys a handful of times and they're mentally beaten? Riiight!! Kuldeep got Wade, Agar and Cummins, the cream of the Australian line up, at a cost of 54 runs. These guys will have sleepless nights worrying about facing him I'm sure

2017-09-22T03:18:53+00:00

Tanmoy Kar

Guest


Australians are mentally beaten against the wrist spinners Chahal and Kuldeep before they actually facing them. They have to overcome that and play positively to get good result.

2017-09-22T02:28:56+00:00

AGordon

Guest


No Handscomb? We need a steady bat in the middle order

2017-09-22T00:56:28+00:00

Brasstax

Guest


I don't think we can hide behind the second string team excuse. Our batting is virtually at full strength barring the injury to Finch. As far as bowling goes Starc's absence is a blow, but I am not sure how effective Josh Hazelwood would have been in these conditions. The way I see it, we are at full strength barring Starc's absence and Finch's injury. The rest is a combination of woeful selection plus uninspiring captaincy from Smith.

2017-09-22T00:16:22+00:00

AGordon

Guest


Australia was never going to win this series with the second string team they took to India. It's important though to treat this series as opportunities for new players and a chance to try out various combinations. The first obvious lesson is the need to do something about the batting to prevent the collapses that are all to common in Australian cricket. People rave about Maxwell but he has no idea how to bat both steadily and consistently, so get rid of him and bring in a Michael Bevan type player. Wade can't bat so play Handscomb as keeper and drop him to 6 or 7 (to give him a rest from keeping). The second obvious issue is to have 5 genuine wicket taking bowlers. In both games, we had the chance to shut down India but failed to do so effectively. In the game over night, some of that must have been because of the heat, but in the first game, it was because we had guys like Faulkner bowling and the Indians took him apart. If Australia can win a toss and bat first things might also be different. Still 3 games to go and anything can happen

Read more at The Roar