Why the Indian ODI team needs to experiment

By Giri Subramanian / Roar Guru

The Indian team have had a fabulous year in ODIs since the beginning of the year. Virat Kohli’s team has won 17 out of their last 23 ODI games and have the second-best win-loss ratio for the year, behind only England.

But while the record has been brilliant, the team has failed to build the bench strength in the batting department during that time.

The year for India began with a three-match ODI series against England. The series saw the comeback of Yuvraj Singh, who had not played an ODI for India for a while. He scored a century in that series but, apart from a 50 in the game against Pakistan, he struggled to contribute consistently.

The team also failed to integrate young players into the squad. Rishabh Pant, who was part of the Indian squad to the West Indies, ended up not getting a single game and Lokesh Rahul, who was the third-choice opener for India in the ODI format, finds himself out of favour.

Virat Kohli, who has been excellent in handling the bowling resources at his disposal, has not been very efficient in doing so in the batting department. The team has played safe throughout the year and the captain hasn’t been too keen to experiment in the batting department. The Indian team haven’t tried out any young player except for Lokesh Rahul and Manish Pandey over the last year or so, which is baffling.

(Image: AP Photo/Rui Vieira)

The recently concluded Australian ODI series also did not see much experimentation in terms of the batting. The bowling attack was rotated for one game, but the batting line-up remained the same. The world cup is just under two years from now and the Indian team needs to try out new combinations to make sure they pick the right squad for the tournament.

In recent times players like Shreyas Iyer, Vijay Shankar, Karun Nair, Deepak Hooda and Sanju Samson have impressed on their A tours, and these players deserve a chance to showcase their talent at the international level. The way the Indian team has handled Lokesh Rahul, who was an integral part of the Indian team in all three formats, has been poor as well. Rahul, who was the first-choice backup to Shikhar Dhawan and Rohit Sharma, now finds himself out of favour in the shorter formats.

Even though the team has had a great year, there does not seem to be any planning keeping the future in mind. The Indian team still does not have a proper back-up for MS Dhoni in the ODI squad. Dinesh Karthik has been picked for few games but, again, I don’t think he is the long-term solution.

The team will be playing more ODI games later this year and I hope that the selectors pick some young players in the squad. This will give the team chance to rest their Test players to try out some young batsmen so that they can get some international games under their belt. They would need to gather as much experience as they can get to be prepared if they find themselves in the world cup squad.

The Crowd Says:

2017-10-23T10:35:33+00:00

Shree Jee

Guest


Yeah inclusion of Dinesh Kartik serves no purpose. If age is not the criteria, both Yuvi and Raina have always been better batters and should be given the nod and the DK. Also, its not compulsory that best batsman has to be the captain. Kohli does attend presentation ceremonies as captain but its still Dhoni who runs the show.Time to give Kohli a break for utterly meaningless Sri Lanka series and ask Rohit to captain and try another batsman at 3.

AUTHOR

2017-10-18T22:53:09+00:00

Giri Subramanian

Roar Guru


After seeing the media turn against them since the squad announcement, the selection committee has in a hurry included KL Rahul in the Board President's X1 team to play 2 games against New Zealand. Seeing Prithvi Shaw, Rahul and Nair score runs against an International kiwi attack, it is surprising to see India are going back to Karthik for the number 4 position. There is Shreyas Iyer as well who did brilliantly on the A tour to South Africa.

2017-10-18T18:55:51+00:00

Shree Jee

Guest


Indian order as of now - 1 - Rohit 2 - Dhawan 3 - Kohli 4 - Yuvraj / Raina / Rahane / KL Rahul / Kedar Jadhav / Manish Pandey 5 - Yuvraj / Raina / Rahane / KL Rahul / Kedar Jadhav / Manish Pandey 6- MS Dhoni 7- Hardik Pandya 8 - Ravindra Jadeja 9 - Bhuvneshwar 10 - Bumrah 11 - Ashwin / Chahal / Kuldeep / Mishra Clearly , both middle order spots are yet not decided and Kohli with his "play safe" approach is not doing any good for long term.

AUTHOR

2017-10-15T21:46:55+00:00

Giri Subramanian

Roar Guru


Hello Paul, I agree that Kohli is a pretty defensive captain in term of selection. He likes to go with the tried and tested combination. The selectors did give him an option to include Rishabh Pant in West Indies but he decided to play MS Dhoni in all the games even after India had won the series. Even in the series against Australia Kohli did not rest Dhawan and Rohit to give KL Rahul a chance. The one game he played Umesh and Shami, they went for runs and he dropped them immediately. This might be good for immediate results but again not good for the cricket in India in the long term. Kohli has become too big for even BCCI. His row with Kumble being an example. He got what he wanted in terms of getting Shastri as the coach.

2017-10-14T00:15:58+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


It's not clear to me, as an Australian, the type of influence Kohli has in terms of selections, etc. If he is "in charge", then India has a problem because of his "safety first" mentality. He is very keen to win every game, but that doesn't always benefit the side in the long term. Who runs the selections? If it's the Board, through the selectors, they should be working with Kohli and talking about games where players can be rested, other players tried, etc. Kohli's role will be to win games with the talent on the field. It cold be that India's best batsmen turns out to be their worst enemy, unless he becomes more flexible in his approach to selections.

AUTHOR

2017-10-14T00:09:32+00:00

Giri Subramanian

Roar Guru


Shami and Yadav haven't been playing too many games for India in the recent times. They cannot be faulted for being rusty in that game. Both Yadav and Shami have been relegated to being test bowlers now. Kohli seems to be a captain who wants to play safe. Even if he does experiment, if something fails, he drops it immediately. Examples being Yadav and Shami, Rahul at number 4 etc.. He prefers to play his settled X1 which isn't going to help India in the long run. Lucky that Chahal and Kuldeep worked otherwise we wouldn't have seen them for a long time in the ODI setup.

2017-10-13T23:12:37+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Giri You're right about India needing to try out new players, but I wouldn't be looking at the batsmen only being rotated. In the recent series against Australia, as soon as the front line bowlers were rested, an out of sorts Australia side hammered the guys chosen. The other worrying aspect, from an India point of view are the stats you produced. India has played a series in the West Indies, the Champions Trophy in England and a series in Sri Lanka where conditions are similar to India. All other series have been played at home. The next World Cup will be in England and without doubt, the pitches won't be made for spinners. India needs to make sure it has fast bowling depth with guys used to bowling where the ball moves around. You also need batsmen who can score against a moving ball, which proved to be an issue against Pakistan in the Champions Trophy final. In all, I agree, India has some work to do. In fairness, there are already a lot of pieces in place but backups with experience are essential.

Read more at The Roar