"We probably can't compete": Inside Wayne Bennett's mind games

By Dane Eldridge / Expert

In a bid to clear the manufactured smoke hanging over tonight’s World Cup final, I have conducted a deep dive inside Wayne Bennett’s mind.

Following England’s semi-final triumph over Tonga, Bennett was quizzed on whether his side could compete with Australia, to which he confidently replied “probably not.”

The coach’s seemingly normal declaration of speech was dismissed as more mind games, chiefly because nobody in footy trusts him. This is for two reasons: because he has repeatedly fleeced us, and because he is a non-drinker.

Ever since, my team of psychologists and I have worked around the clock on the England coach to determine what he really means when he claims to have stuff-all chance in the decider.

But let me begin with this warning; delving inside the mind of a sexagenarian football coach is not a task for the faint-hearted. There’s all sorts of weird shit in there, with entire lobes dedicated to Darius Boyd and burning images of Gorden Tallis. Frankly, now it’s over, I feel like a highly-strung returned serviceman.

So what does Bennett mean when he says ‘Probably not’? Is it mental gymnastics? Is it even English?

Is his glib concession a ploy to influence the officials? Is he attempting to position his team as the underdog, thus coaxing the Australian players in to complacency to leave them exposed to an unlikely ambush from a team enraged on the words of their own coach? Is he just needling the crap out of Mal Meninga again?

After weighing up his vital behavioural traits – a love of subterfuge, tap water and naming TBA for Origin – we came up to this concerning psychoanalytical outcome: Wayne Bennett is being honest.

(AAP Image/Action Photographics, Renee McKay)

Here is the complicated rationale why.

Our extensive mining of Bennett’s head revealed he still gets footy, despite being a manipulative madman who’s reasoning is clouded by uncontrollable cravings for psychological warfare. The provisional diagnosis was a weak bout of Brian Smith syndrome.

Nevertheless, when his side is set to push shit uphill without key personnel against a stingy opponent they haven’t defeated in decades, he knows he’s probably screwed.

Further investigation also uncovered Bennett to bear chronically shallow levels of confidence in his own team, as evidenced by his continual public savagings of Sam Burgess and ceaseless selections of Australians.

Combine these factors with Aussie conditions and a hometown referee, and Bennett’s “probably not” is simply an earnest hypothesis, not some cerebral alt-tactic that will somehow inspire his side to stick it up the haters, like himself.

So cast off these words as mind games. While Bennett may have sabotaged Meninga, reneged on the Roosters, blindsided Wally Lewis, betrayed Kevin Walters and once served as a Queensland cop, we can trust him on this one.

The Crowd Says:

2017-12-02T08:36:46+00:00

republican

Guest


......we live in hope Dane.......

AUTHOR

2017-12-02T07:23:27+00:00

Dane Eldridge

Expert


Nice take, Thomas. A solid showing would be somewhat of a victory. If Wayne could achieve that, and somehow let down Mal’s tyres in the carpark, I’m sure he’d class the night as a W.

AUTHOR

2017-12-02T07:19:26+00:00

Dane Eldridge

Expert


Are we including reserve grade?

2017-12-02T06:40:46+00:00

thomas c

Guest


it's realistic and he'd be crucified if he said they'd win by 30 and they lost by 40. Plus England being able to physically compete would be a relative victory that they (and the English comp) could build on. They didn't hand the reins to an Australian because the English team was going from strength to strength.

2017-12-02T05:18:27+00:00

Greg Ambrose

Guest


I wonder how many of there poms would make his Broncos outfit of the early 90's Dane? Probably find room for Aussie Sam Burgess but after that I'm not sure.

AUTHOR

2017-12-02T02:20:58+00:00

Dane Eldridge

Expert


Big call, republican! Hoping they celebrate by banishing us from the monarch, I assume?

AUTHOR

2017-12-02T02:19:25+00:00

Dane Eldridge

Expert


True, Greg. This team is nothing like his old Broncos. Probably cap compliant, for a start

AUTHOR

2017-12-01T23:51:53+00:00

Dane Eldridge

Expert


Good morning Max, and Happy RLWC Final to you. Feels great to have ‘stripped’ the master coach, and I will be ordering this appear on my tombstone. Also share your fears of a potential blowout tonight. Carn the refs.

2017-12-01T23:26:16+00:00

republican

Guest


.......its an old ploy but a tried and tested one that is very effective against any Australian team at the top of their game, i.e. the Kangaroos. Will it be wet? If it is the Sassenachs should be odds on to take this one out I reckon........

2017-12-01T22:26:15+00:00

MAX

Guest


Hi Dane, Wayne Bennett was born to have a start on the field. DOB 1 January, 1950. Wayne is also a great angler. The equal of Andrew Ettingshausen, Rex Hunt and Robson Green. You have brilliantly stripped the emperor to fish in the nude. Only Sutton's weird sense of keeping it close can save England from a total.

2017-12-01T21:47:11+00:00

Greg Ambrose

Guest


Wayne isn't silly. He won everything on offer in his early days at the Broncos because he had the best team in town. He knows the shoe has been on the other foot for the second half of his career and he now meets big Mal who has the better roster. He also knows the underdog gets up now and again and that is powerful motivation, nothing is better than winning when you're not meant to.

Read more at The Roar