Picking Mitch Marsh over Maxwell is madness

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Australia’s batting is its major shortcoming in Tests, so it makes no sense to further weaken the top six by selecting tried-and-failed all-rounder Mitchell Marsh for the third Ashes Test this week.

All-rounders typically are picked to enhance the balance of a cricket team, but in the case of Marsh, the effect is opposite. Given the supreme strength of Australia’s bowling attack, their fifth bowler need only be a modest performer capable of keeping things reasonably tight while the specialists rest.

Unlike teams such as England, who rely heavily on a fifth bowler to help them take 20 wickets, Australia have shown they can win games handsomely with just four.

Between Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood, Pat Cummins and Nathan Lyon, Australia have such firepower that the fifth bowler likely would only be required to send down a meagre six to eight overs per day. Marsh has delivered only eight overs per innings on average across his 21-Test career, and having just returned from a serious shoulder injury it seems improbable he would be asked to exceed that workload.

A quota of eight overs per innings does not necessitate fielding a high-quality fifth bowler like Marsh. All that is needed is someone who has plenty of experience bowling in professional cricket, someone who isn’t a rank part-timer.

It just so happens that this description fits a man who is dominating the Sheffield Shield with the bat and who was frightfully unlucky to be dropped for the first Ashes Test.

(AP Photo/Aijaz Rahi)

Glenn Maxwell is not in the same league as Marsh with the ball, but he is a much, much more accomplished first-class batsman. Over the past two years, Marsh has made 943 runs at 26 in first-class cricket. In that same period, Maxwell has made 1,438 runs at 48.

Those in favour of picking Marsh will point to the fact Maxwell averages 160 with the ball in the current Shield season. What’s more relevant is Maxwell’s impressive economy rate of 2.85 runs per over across the 56 overs he’s bowled for the Bushrangers.

The role Maxwell has played with the ball for Victoria is exactly the one he could perform for Australia. Just like the national team, Victoria have a powerful frontline attack, with Chris Tremain, Scott Boland and Jon Holland each averaging between 18 and 24 with the ball this season. All they’ve asked of Maxwell is to chip in, sending down seven overs an innings on average while not allowing the pressure to be released.

Victoria don’t need wickets out of Maxwell and nor would Australia. Both teams have frontline attacks that have no problem running through the opposition; the fifth bowler just helps keep those guys fresher.

Similar to the way a nightwatchman’s main job is to protect specialist batsmen rather than to make runs, a fifth bowler’s role in such a potent attack is to ease the bowling load of the frontliners rather than to make breakthroughs.

Australia cannot afford to weaken a batting line-up which has collapsed with alarming frequency in recent times. Despite cruising to a 2-0 scoreline in this Ashes, the side’s batting has been far from commanding.

In the first dig at Brisbane, they were 4/76 before being rescued by Steve Smith. In the first innings at Adelaide, they were vulnerable at 5/209 when Shaun Marsh and Tim Paine put them back on track before they were then rolled for 138 batting a second time.

(AAP Image/David Mariuz)

Looking beyond the Ashes, Australia’s next series is in South Africa in less than three months from now against one of the greatest pace units ever assembled in Dale Steyn, Vernon Philander, Kagiso Rabada and Morne Morkel. The Proteas destroyed Australia’s batting line-up last summer despite missing Morkel and Steyn getting injured midway through the first Test.

That South African bowling attack would be licking their lips if Australia were to arrive in their country with a number six in Mitch Marsh, who currently averages 21 with the bat in Tests.

The presence of Marsh in the batting line-up would also ratchet up the pressure on new gloveman Tim Paine to make runs. Paine already has a stiff enough challenge to adapt to Tests having not played a great deal of first-class cricket in recent years, having struggled badly with the bat during those limited appearances. He doesn’t need to be given a greater batting burden.

While I understand the concerns about Peter Handscomb’s form and the need for a fifth bowling option on an expected flat deck at Perth, Australia would be overcorrecting by picking Marsh. Australia have looked more balanced in his absence.

If Australia feel they need to replace Handscomb with a batsman who is a reasonable bowler, then Maxwell is the obvious choice. Unfortunately the Victorian has been stiffed once more and Marsh appears set to be gifted another unjustified Test cap.

The Crowd Says:

2018-12-25T05:22:11+00:00

Pieman

Guest


Mitch Marsh must know people in high places.

2017-12-17T05:37:01+00:00

Rob

Guest


C)250? Out 2nd ball of the day.

2017-12-17T01:58:57+00:00

Huddo

Guest


In...bloody..,deed

2017-12-17T01:58:12+00:00

Huddo

Guest


So Ronan, He's a hundred and change not out overnight. He's outscored God in a 300 run partnership. He almost killed an umpire twice Are you going to: A) focus on the fact England's bowlers are hopeless away from home and even Maxwell could get over 40 B) Flame him if he gets out early this morning C) wait till he gets to 250 before admitting the selectors got it right D) Or admit that the poor bugger has actually worked on his game and genuinely improved contrary to your expert knowledge of the game?

2017-12-16T23:12:56+00:00

Andrew Thompson

Guest


Oops.

2017-12-13T03:09:28+00:00

Alan

Guest


Nanufactured?

2017-12-13T00:10:45+00:00

Stephen

Guest


PS. I think Watson's Test days are over.

2017-12-13T00:09:41+00:00

Stephen

Guest


Dexter, that's a balanced view. He is only 26 years old M Marsh. Huge talent and upside IMHO. But select him on merit and within context of others competing for a game. I don't see much evidence of that. And ironically, the one who may suffer most - is M Marsh himself - if he is over-promoted and before time.

2017-12-13T00:00:51+00:00

Stephen

Guest


True Ronan. Whilst Maxwell's seven Test opportunities have all been on foreign soil. Reminds me of Churchill sending the 'colonials' to the frontline to protect his own troops. He hasn't had an easy run Maxwell. Before this season commenced - the national selectors insisted he needs to score big hundreds..... Still not enough.

2017-12-12T22:42:58+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Much of the media have been doing that all week. It doesn't matter, though. Very few on this thread read each other's posts. Hardly any will have noticed I have been recommending Handscomb and Maxwell over Marsh. They won't allow their eyes to over ride their assumptions.

2017-12-12T14:59:45+00:00

Dexter The Hamster

Guest


The point is, 2 test matches ago, if you said that Handscomb would be dropped in the very near future, you would have been laughed at and derided. Now, after a couple of poor showings, he is out the door. Big Daddy could have used a 100 comparisons to illustrate this (maybe Chappell wasn't the best) but the point remains. We used to pick a team and stick with it. Feels like we are in the Tinder/Snapchat/Instagram generation now, where we want results today, or else someone new will take over.

2017-12-12T14:52:34+00:00

Dexter The Hamster

Guest


I'd still pick Watson at #6 today if the choice was him or MMarsh. Still going OK is Watto. In saying that, there is a similar feel to the anti MMarsh brigade, to the anti Watson brigade of a few years ago. MMarsh has so much upside, just wish the selectors would let him show it over a season or so in the Shield before recalling him.

2017-12-12T14:19:50+00:00

Dexter The Hamster

Guest


"Moderate keyboard plodders ranking themselves ahead of selectors" Sorry Don, but you have described me so well. So many quiet moments on "the can", going over in my head, explaining to the selectors why they have its so wrong. Its one the of things I love about cricket. We all support the same team, so have to argue over the selections (unlike the footy codes, where we just support our individual teams).

2017-12-12T14:13:30+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


That qualifier might make a difference. There would be hundreds of #6s that never got to 20 tests because they were worse than Mitch. In the context of Mitcher's claim, he is way off track.

AUTHOR

2017-12-12T14:02:33+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Watson is maybe the most maligned Australian Test cricketer in history, yet MMarsh's Test numbers are miles worse: After 21 Tests, same as MMarsh, Watson averaged 40 with the bat and 28 with the ball.

AUTHOR

2017-12-12T13:58:30+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


When MMarsh got picked to come back into the team for the 2015 Ashes he was coming off some hot batting form in FC cricket but then flopped badly in Tests, averaging 17 with the bat from his next 17 Tests (up to present).

2017-12-12T13:54:49+00:00

Dexter The Hamster

Guest


Joe Mennie is a better bat than Bird, he is the man for sure......

AUTHOR

2017-12-12T13:54:20+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Cheers Stuart!

AUTHOR

2017-12-12T13:52:31+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Seems like you were wrong on that Don, media now reporting MMarsh will replace Handscomb.

AUTHOR

2017-12-12T13:49:50+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Haha I wish this wasn't a joke Noel, I miss the old WACA pitch so much

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar