Tales of the unexpected: The 2018 Six Nations so far

By Jack Colwill / Roar Rookie

The first two weeks of the 2018 Six Nations are in the books, and sadly the highlight of my rugby calendar is already nearly half over.

Instead of giving way to a moment of silence to commiserate that fact, I would like to instead celebrate the two weeks of quite fascinating rugby we’ve seen.

The overriding thing that has struck me from the six games so far is that very little seems to have gone as expected. True, England and Ireland are both two from two, Italy have fallen to two heavy defeats and the other three sides are jostling for mid-table positions, but when you look past the standings and into the games themselves, there have been a number of things that have defied all the pre-tournament expectation.

I would like to examine just a few of them here. I’m not going to spend time looking at England and Ireland because, while they have not been all-powerful through the opening two rounds, they have done what was basically expected of them. I would rather focus on some real talking points.

[latest_videos_strip category=”rugby” name=”Rugby”]

Wales
Let’s start with the most obvious one. Wales were written off across the board before this year’s torunament. They had mounting injury problems, they were missing their talisman halfback Dan Biggar, the form of enduring servant Leigh Halfpenny was under close scrutiny and Warren Gatland was under pressure to change his style of play. Everything seemed stacked against the Welsh coming into their opener against Scotland.

However, what has followed has proved that you do not write off a champion team. Wales have shown once again the mettle and grit that has been installed from the word go under Gatland, but they have also added a renewed attacking spark that saw them put a Scottish side oozing confidence after a fantastic autumn to the sword in a way very few people saw coming.

What’s more, to then go to what must now again be called Fortress Twickenham, face arguably the best England side since 2003 and push that side all the way is a mightily impressive retort to all the criticism they have faced.

Had it not been for a generous video referee call at Twickenham and a superhuman try-saving tackle from Sam Underhill, Wales may have been sitting with a 100 per cent record and a first Twickenham defeat of Eddie Jones’s regime under their belts.

(AP Photo/Scott Heppell)

Scotland
I wrote a piece before this tournament about the fact that Scotland have tended to impress against Southern Hemisphere opposition over a number of years now but have failed to back it up in subsequent Six Nations campaigns.

I prophesied then that this would be the year that Scotland buck the trend and really announce themselves anew as Six Nations threats, but sadly the way they were dismantled by Wales in Cardiff has shown us that they still have a long way to go.

It is true that their injury list, particularly in the front row department, has been a major hindrance for them and that they have reinstalled some hope for themselves by holding on to beat France at Murrayfield, but the fact remains that they have not in either game produced the kinds of performances that saw them demolish Australia and give the All Blacks a mighty scare three months or so ago.

Finn Russell has been trying to do too much, the forward pack was overpowered and they still need to find a way of getting Stuart Hogg regularly involved in attacking positions with space and time to make things happen, for he is and will remain their greatest weapon. These are the simple facts of Scottish rugby now.

(AP Photo/Scott Heppell)

Against southern nations, who play a much looser and free-flowing brand of rugby, Scotland can unleash their weapons like Hogg and Byron McGuigan with space and Russell does not have to overdo anything but merely find the space and exploit it. In Six Nations rugby, when things are tighter, nastier and much more about grinding down your opposition, this Scotland team need to find a plan B.

Given their own way, they want to play fast-paced, explosive, attacking rugby, but a team like theirs rarely gets their way in the Six Nations, and they need to find a way of adapting their style to match it with their counterparts up north.

On a positive side note – this is not countering anyone’s expectations at all – how good is Greig Laidlaw’s game management? The way he orchestrated Scotland’s comeback win over France was nothing short of genius. A real champion performance, even when he was surprisingly shifted to ten.

Watching him pull off a perfect one-on-one strip on his own line on Virimi Vakatawa, the French wing pretty much twice his size in every dimension, was the icing on the cake and a turning-point play in the game.

(AFP)

France’s backbone
Much of France’s rugby so far in this tournament has been predictable. Under a new coach Jacques Brunel they have still flattered to deceive, shown they are capable of moments of magic and proved there are still players of real quality in their side.

Teddy Thomas has been electric in both games and has scored some beautiful tries, Maxime Machenaud has matured into an excellent game manager and a world-class scrumhalf, I liked the look of young Mathieu Jalibert before he was cruelly struck down by injury against Ireland and Guilhelm Guirado must surely now go down as close to if not the outright best hooker in the world.

All this we knew already. However, what’s surprised me about their performances against both Scotland and Ireland is that for the first time in a number of years I saw a French side that was up for the fight. I saw a French outfit who stuck to the grind, who did not give any quarter and who showed real discipline and application in their defence against Ireland in particular. To defend 41 phases in overtime and concede no penalties or errors is quite a feat, whatever may have happened at the end of it.

They looked like a side that played for each other, for their coach and for their fans. They are certainly not one of the great French sides of old, but if they can maintain that determination, fight and sheer backbone in the future, it will finally give them the right foundation to build a new era of French rugby on.

(AP Photo/Alastair Grant)

Sergio Parisse
I will come to Italy – well, their backline – separately in a moment, but I wanted to focus on Parisse this time and obviously not for the expected reasons. Italy have improved markedly as a team under Conor O’Shea already, that much is obvious, but I honestly cannot recall Parisse putting together two more error-strewn performances than he did against England and Ireland. He missed tackles, he dropped balls and he gave bad passes.

The superman we are used to seeing drag Italy along by the collar in big games has honestly been outshone by a number of his teammates so far. In some ways, though, that’s pretty heartening to see. If this Italy team can put together competitive performances without Parisse at his best leading the way, that speaks volumes about the work being laid down by the players around him, which is one of the things Italy have struggled with for years

Italy’s backline
The performances of the Italian forward pack have never been questioned. They may be down on quality but Italy have always been competitive in the forwards to make their opposition work hard. It is in the backline that we find the source of Italy’s marked improvement.

It starts with Tommaso Allan at ten, who has moulded into a very competent game manager far removed from the raw and erratic player who first came into the Italy setup years ago. He has directed his troops around the park well in both games and kicked his goals when asked, and his tactical kicking has been smart in theory if sometimes a little lacking in execution.

The backline outside Allan is showing improvement in every jersey, but I want to highlight two players who have stood out. Firstly, the centre Tommaso Boni, who has been aggressive in defence, particularly against England when he kept Ben Te’o to a limited impact all day long, and has not been afraid of the hard carry in attack.

Boni has shown good instincts with his attacking play too, his distribution has not failed him and he was a marginally forward pass away from picking up a try against England off a really clever short line.

The other player who stands out is Matteo Minozzi at fullback. This guy may be the sprinkling of stardust Italy have long needed in the backs. Armed with good pace, dazzling footwork and a keen eye for a gap, he looks like he could be a real weapon. The way he stood up Kieran Marmion on the way to setting up Eduardo Gori’s try against Ireland was sublime, and he looks like a magical player – he has almost certainly been my player to watch from the tournament so far.

The important thing to bear in mind with all this is that while the scoreboards may not reflect the quality we have seen from these players, England and Ireland, the two best teams in the competition, had to seriously work hard and play really well to break Italy down and get away from them. That is something to be celebrated in itself. They got beaten heavily, yes, but they were beaten heavily by top-drawer teams who had to play really well to do it.

The Crowd Says:

2018-02-21T20:34:45+00:00

lexhamfox

Guest


Hi, I am an England fan and I think they are some ways short of an A-. I think a solid B is about the highest grade that I would give them. Not that I am unhappy, I am thrilled that they remain unbeaten. My concern about the A- is down to the lack of data and real examination. They beat Italy away - good. They beat Wales at home - good.. but not the same as edging a Welsh side glowing red hot in Cardiff..... That was A- stuff. I think England have to win both the coming away fixtures to warrant an A-. I can't see much between Ireland and England at the moment and Wales are taking to their new game plan really well. Makes Scotland and France all the more likely to bounce back at some point and keep everything honest. There are reasons why no team has won three consecutive titles in the modern era. If they win a third title then you can give them an A. Six Nations is nerve wracking fun.

2018-02-20T17:19:20+00:00

Goatee

Guest


@Mmmm..k 'So what exactly are you agreeing with?' Read my post... again. 'That Italy hasn’t or has improved as a team?' If we're judging purely in terms of their win/loss ratio then they clearly, haven't improved... If it's with regard to specific components of their game (and stats are being used to monitor this) then you need to ask COS. I'm unable to confirm what his goals/targets are. 'That stats need context?' Read my post, again. 'That stats can be positive or negative depending on the outcome you are looking for? Read my post, again. 'Then I get a lecture about how I shouldn’t use stats and how stats should be used.' From who?

2018-02-20T14:31:59+00:00

Taylorman

Guest


There’s a missing full stop after points. Otherwise it’s fine. The article was pointing out how ‘surprisingly’ good Italy were. Yet they were hammered. No surprises there. They’ve disappointed completely since joint the 6N, managing two away wins from 46 tests, both against the next lowest in Scotland. Personally I’d replace them with Georgia.

2018-02-20T14:18:12+00:00

Taylorman

Guest


16 kiwi professionals is 16 more professional Irish players than we have in our league. And how many Oz, SA born players are in the 258? Anyway, I hate the idea of the sabbaticals. Using NH rugby to groom our players for test duty across the squad! Nah? Won’t work. Your club comp doesn’t produce AB quality players at the levels or numbers our Super rugby does...nowhere near it, so we’d have an awful hybrid of bad, good habits.

2018-02-20T13:29:22+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


Well, it was you who said those exact words to me when we had a discussion about Maro Itoje's performance in the Lions series.You went about how "poor: he was in the lineouts, and I showed you an example where he "technically" lost the lineout, but he stole the ball before it even had hit the ground. We both agreed that relying on stats only to prove something can be very very risky, and you finished that conversation with that exact quote from Smithy. Maybe I should be more careful in the future trusting you on what you are saying is correct?

2018-02-20T07:39:06+00:00

Mmmmm..k

Guest


So what exactly are you agreeing with? That Italy hasn't or has improved as a team? That stats need context? That stats can be positive or negative depending on the outcome you are looking for? As I said, Italy hasn't improved as a team, they are losing by bigger margins more often, are scoring no more 5 pointers and their for and against is worse under O'Shea. Providing past wins and losses and winning margins when talking about the performance of a team is giving context. But Italy has improved as a team. When I say that I mean that they can all dance better and they fill out the jumpers much nicer. Let's get serious. When somebody claims a teams improved they mean they've improved generally at the game they play. My argument is that they haven't because they're losing bigger and more often. Then I get a lecture about how I shouldn't use stats and how stats should be used. Seriously? OK. The Wallabies have improved since 1999. Now use context and figure out what aspect I'm talking about. Oh, no stats either.

2018-02-20T07:21:23+00:00

Mmmmm..k

Guest


Why am I not allowed to reply to somebody who addresses me? I followed the comments policy but both posts are rejected. Very frustrating. If there are other policies it would be helpful to know them so I don't waste my time writing something that you'll just erase on a whim. I don't get it.

2018-02-20T05:34:39+00:00

Highlander

Guest


you are stating and using quotation marks that smith said stats are for public entertainment - not what he said at all

2018-02-20T03:18:24+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


1. Smith was referring to the stats in the public domain, very different from what he sees – so don’t run off on the wrong tangent Viking What are you on about Highlander? Maybe read what I and others have written before you go on about running off on the wrong tangent.

2018-02-20T00:04:23+00:00

Highlander

Guest


To be clear 1. Smith was referring to the stats in the public domain, very different from what he sees - so don't run off on the wrong tangent Viking 2. Grant Fox summed in up best, when they were working together, We get mountains of stats every week, but I use them to confirm what my eyes are already telling me. Do you really think something pops out of the stats that these guys or their analyst team haven't picked up, wont happen, If anything the stats provide a magnitude to an issue.

2018-02-19T17:44:08+00:00

Derm

Roar Guru


I don't think I am bathing or paddling even - 16 NZ-born players out of 258 is hardly overabundance and most of them are ITM or Super level at best anyway. You need to look more to the east at England France and Japan. Out of curiosity, what do you think of NZRU's possible plan to place players with nominated clubs in Europe for a period of time by way of a sabbatical and that allows them to come back to NZ after 2-3 years?

2018-02-19T14:01:11+00:00

Goatee

Guest


@Mmmmm..k 'Do you think coaches and coaching staff don’t use statistics?' I'm certain they do... and I imagine that the information or data they collect, has no real value or benefit UNLESS viewed within the wider context of the game,OR in terms of what they are working towards (ie,goals/targets) for the future. So, yes, I'm AGREEING that unless 'stats' are viewed within this wider context they are fairly pointless... and when viewed in isolation from 'the bigger picture' (or 'goal', you are working towards) they won't tell you the whole story. There can also be a subjective element when interpreting statistics or data. If I fill a 100 ml jug with 50 ml of water, some may argue that it is half-full, while others will conclude it is half empty. I'm not sure what goals or targets COS has set for himself and the Italian team. Conceivably, this season, it might revolve around developing their attack, and increasing the number of line breaks or try-scoring opportunities in a game? If so (and even at this early stage of the tournament )it would come as no surprise if the 'numbers' for this, were well in advance of what they were at the same stage, last year.

2018-02-19T12:16:26+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


No-one can stop you from calling arguably the greatest rugby thinker the last 20 years naive. I also think Eddie Jones is on the record saying that the only stat he is interested in is how fast players get back in line after a tackle, the rest is not important. For sure top-level coaches are looking at stats, but I seriously doubt they let them decide how they select players and how they set up their team tactics. It is just a tool that can give them some hints, but very few clear answers.

2018-02-19T12:06:33+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


\Well, we all see things different, but it is hard to understand how you can't see improvement. No-one is saying they are world beaters, but on the attack, they are clearly better. I think most of us can agree it much harder to get the attack right, than play ugly arm-wrestle rugby (like they have done as long as I can remember). And they have started the 6N this year against the world number two and three teams, surely the hardest opening ever for any team in the 6N. But such things are of no concern for you? They beat SA 2016 and played a great game against the Wallabies in OZ last year, and they were in it almost for the full 80, and that is better than most NH teams have been able to do the last 10 years.

2018-02-19T11:39:07+00:00

Mmmmm..k

Guest


The Irish game is going to be epic. Ireland have such a good team. Not the greatest depth but still.

2018-02-19T11:28:29+00:00

Mmmmm..k

Guest


Traviso isn't Italy. That's like saying England is not improving because Leisciter hasn't improved. But feel free to drop win/loss statistics if you like.

2018-02-19T11:25:06+00:00

Mmmmm..k

Guest


Have you watched their games? Yes, they have improved. The scorelines against Italy have improved because Italy HASNT improved.

2018-02-19T11:01:39+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


Yeah NB, don't we expect better banter than that from T-man. Love him or hate him, without him the Roar would be a lot more boring. Up your game T-man! ;)

2018-02-19T10:58:05+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


Gonna be fun the when super unpredictable TRC finally starts. Who will come second this year? The Boks or the Wallys? Can't wait! ;)

2018-02-19T10:54:43+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


No comeback Mmmmm..k?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar