Sydney's recipe for success missing plenty of ingredients

By Samuel Ord / Roar Guru

The eighth round of the Australian Football League season is up and running. In a rivalry that won’t stop producing mirrored results, Sydney have managed to narrowly defeat Hawthorn on Friday night.

Contested in front of a modest number of fans at the MCG, Sydney defeated Hawthorn 12.7 (79) to 10.11 (71) in rain impaired conditions.

It’s the latest in a healthy line of well-publicised close results between the pair, with Hawthorn recording two six-point and one five-point wins against Sydney the last three times they’ve played off in a chain of clashes that harken back to the fire and fury of the 2014 grand final.

I’m still trying to work out if I’m being too cynical but in the glow of a post-match reflection I think this match will be looked back on in a cliched manner – described as a thrilling, classic affair through a set of rose-tinted glasses.

What I’m trying to say is that, as far as matches go, I don’t think it was great.

All the way through the second half, commentator Bruce McAvaney screeched into the microphone long chains of adjectives describing his enjoyment of the match.

“Jesus, this is a high quality game of football,” McAvaney declared halfway through the fourth, his voice breaking like a slipping vinyl towards the end of the statement.

I didn’t agree.

Hawthorn and Sydney struggled to produce an effective style of play right through the contest and against better sides would’ve been mauled.

For Sydney the dramas came in the middle of the ground, with the inability of the team’s midfield to transfer the ball from congestion into well-positioned runners on the outsides of packs becoming more and more evident as the night dragged on.

The players were all in place, Sydney was able to win its fair share of football down low and in tight, but when the final connecting handball would head for its target it would rarely make it.

Either a Hawk would lay a tackle, intercept the ball or knock it in the opposite direction – or even worse, the Swan would miss the target.

As a result the movement forward was slow and cumbersome and often preceded a rushed kick forward in fear of another Hawthorn disruption at the final link in the chain.

The victorious Sydney ended up disposing of the ball at 73 per cent efficiency – a long way from a disgrace, and Hawthorn at 72 per cent.

However with more than 480 uncontested possessions between them I think that level of efficiency runs deserves analysis deeper than pure numbers.

Sydney offered up 84 turnovers for the match and Hawthorn 79.

Hawthorn’s dramas came in just about every part of the ground.

In the literal centre of the ground the Hawks were demolished in the clearances, and inside the forward 50 they produced just 23 shots from 62 inside 50s – while the Swans managed 22 shots from only 39 entries – a strong return.

Down back Hawthorn should’ve had a day out – and key defender James Sicily certainly did – but as a structured team? As a cohesive unit? Wow.

Conceding just 12 goals in a match isn’t a nightmare but to allow a third-gamer (Ben Ronke) to boot seven in the wet – wow.

In the third term Hawthorn lacked a killer instinct and were punished accordingly in the final term – a trend for the Hawks this season.

Sydney are in a funny funk this season – winning the hard games and dropping the ones they should secure.

Heading into the season as the premiership favourites, Sydney began by defeating West Coast away from home – a remarkable result against a side likely to go deep into finals.

After that the Swans got knocked by Port Adelaide in Sydney, a match they should’ve stitched up with a rampaging Lance Franklin, and after that they defeated Greater Western Sydney – a second hard-fought win against a quality opposition.

Sydney then narrowly defeated the Western Bulldogs, dropped the basket against a low-confidence Adelaide and followed it up with an underdog result against Geelong.

(Photo by Michael Dodge/Getty Images)

Sydney then lost to North Melbourne, a side many tipped for the wooden spoon, in Sydney.

Heading into the encounter with Hawthorn the bookies didn’t like the Swans at all, particularly without Franklin, and I think it was still a good call.

Sydney are exhausting themselves early in the campaign by dropping matches they should seal and then fighting twice as hard the week after against quality sides away from home.

Sydney hasn’t lost a game on the road this season yet but has lost nearly every match in New South Wales.

Sydney is in a funk, and I think the biggest indicator of that is the success of Ben Ronke tonight.

Playing in just his third AFL game, Ronke gathered the ball 11 times and booted seven goals.

To go with that monstrous scoreboard haul, bested only by the once-in-a-generation talent of Franklin under coach John Longmire as senior coach, Ronke produced ten tackles.

If the commentary team are to be believed that’s the first time any AFL player has produced seven goals and ten tackles in a single match – a stunning effort for a player with next to no top level experience.

And that in itself is the evidence of Sydney’s funk – the game was won, barely, by a player who is only just a Swan – he hasn’t even completed a fifth of a season in the red and white and by extension could definitely be considered outside of the system.

Sydney’s most experienced forward on the night, Gary Rohan, managed just nine disposals and didn’t kick a goal. Dean Towers, far from a star for sure but an important cog for Sydney, was equally as ineffective.

In the middle of the ground Josh Kennedy managed just 19 touches and spent long passages of play failing to influence the contest.

Kennedy was joined by Kieran Jack and Zak Jones – both with just 18 each and not playing close to the quality they’re capable of.

So what am I saying?

Sydney’s success this season has been set up on a house of sand so far.

Lance Franklin, the LeBron James of the AFL, has individually dragged them to success a handful of times, and in his absence they’ve lost to North Melbourne and relied on a third-gamer to kick seven goals to only narrowly defeat Hawthorn.

Lance Franklin of the Swans (Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

Franklin is expected to miss another handful of games and Sydney should be counting their lucky stars they now face Fremantle, Brisbane and then Carlton – because the good Lord knows they can’t rely on Ronke to break AFL records each and every week until Franklin returns.

Without rookie Ronke Sydney loses this game by six goals, barely manages to kick five goals and in truth – better defensive sides would’ve made this hypothetical a reality by focusing on the young gun when it was clear in the first half he was red hot.

This is an assessment that a lot of fans won’t like. After all, a win is a win, and Sydney is within reach of the top four and has a cruisy three weeks coming up.

But from where I’m standing Sydney’s engine room has some major issues to address moving forward and the next time they face a true, top-four benchmark of the competition, the results may be agonising for the faithful.

In particular I’m looking at a Round 13 clash with West Coast, a Round 15 clash with Richmond followed by a Round 16 clash with Geelong.

It’s a tough run only broken up by the bye and it’s going to be fascinating to see the standard of football the Swans produce with finals football in sight.

The Crowd Says:

2018-05-14T10:08:22+00:00

Mark

Guest


Very odd article.

2018-05-13T06:40:40+00:00

Stewie

Guest


Cunningham came from GWS academy, but they didn't want him, so that's good. I believe Dan Robinson might have, but other than that, that's it. Besides, even if they did come through the academy, it's the Rookie Draft. Literally every other club had the chance to pick them up. Rampe trained with the Bulldogs a year before he was drafted.

2018-05-13T06:37:54+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


You can either see reality or you can’t. You can’t.

AUTHOR

2018-05-12T11:51:49+00:00

Samuel Ord

Roar Guru


That's a fair point and honestly in reflection is a bit of personal bias from myself. I really, really rate Zak Jones as a footballer. I think he's got a super career ahead of him. Halfway through last night I was thinking he might set the contest on fire, like it was primed for him, but felt like he left a bit on the table.

AUTHOR

2018-05-12T09:38:35+00:00

Samuel Ord

Roar Guru


You obviously take issue with the use of the word allow but I'm not sure of your point - are you saying Hawthorn's defence didn't allow him to kick seven? I'm guessing you feel like it strips him of achievement. Don't get me wrong - Ronke was fantastic, just about the only player that made the match worth watching. I do disagree in the characterisation of the match as skilful. I don't think that's true.

2018-05-12T09:34:51+00:00

Doodaswan

Guest


Also I disagree that Zak Jones didn’t produce much quality, he had 18 disposals at 78% and made some piercing runs that really opened up the hawks. He does lack some polish at times but he actually used the ball reaonably well.

AUTHOR

2018-05-12T09:34:11+00:00

Samuel Ord

Roar Guru


Thank you for the feedback. You said it was definitely a high quality contest - would you be able to tell me what parameters you used to judge that?

2018-05-12T09:31:51+00:00

Doodaswan

Guest


Firstly, I didn’t think it was a bad quality game at all. Thoroughly enjoyed the whole spectacle. It was fast paced and generally played at a decent standard. That said, it was not at the same quality that we have seen in previous years between these 2 clubs. As a swans supporter I felt mightily encouraged rather than concerned like you are. I feel like Franklin being injured is a blessing in disguise. Swans have been forced to find other avenues to goals and try different players. When Franklin does return the swans will be less predictable and more dangerous moving the ball forward. I would agree that the engine room is a bit of a concern. It’s not an A grade midfield any more. Kennedy and Parker are the only A graders in there.. Heeney may join them soon. If you shut one of them down you go a long way to beating us. It seems Hanners and Jack are past their best so need one or two of the kids to step up to be in the running this year. Overall a few things to work on but plenty of upside for me

2018-05-12T09:20:19+00:00

Kolah

Guest


Wasn’t raining during the game. Was blowing a swirling gale. I wonder if that affected the game? No matter, lucky Hawthorn let Ronke kick seven goals. Thanks for the expert commentary.

2018-05-12T04:47:10+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


You either understand forward defensive pressure or you don't. I do.

2018-05-12T04:06:59+00:00

Mitcher

Guest


Truly bizarre. I guess swans should keep ‘counting their lucky stars’ theyve beaten Geelong and hawthorn on the road sans buddy. So so lucky that a player on their list brought into play had a good game. I’m dumbstruck.

2018-05-12T04:04:21+00:00

Philip

Guest


If an AFL game on TV is not entertaining enough, I readily change channels. I thought Ronke's 7 goals nil was great entertainment in the context of a likely win by Hawthorn. If this game wasn't so entertaining to watch, I might have watched a movie. The errors and bloopers were all fun - who wants to see 100% robotic football?

2018-05-12T03:44:43+00:00

Lance

Guest


Perhaps the most uninformed AFL article I’ve ever read on The Roar. You don’t know what you’re talking about mate. I was at the game and it was a high quality contest from beginning to end. Clearly, you’re a dill.

2018-05-12T03:42:58+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


I watched the game. Rohan didn't provide much. It isn't just possessions alone that back that up. 55% disposal efficiency is terrible for an outside player. 6 clangers and 6 turn overs is really bad when a player only touches it 9 times.4 frees against means he is turning it over even more. Overall he was one of poorest players in the Swans side last night.

2018-05-12T03:11:30+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


If you measure Rohan's performance by 9 possessions, Samuel, no wonder you didn't think it was a good game. You missed a heck of a lot. Can I suggest you watch the game instead of the stats sheet. Stats-driven responses are the blight on modern footy commentary.

2018-05-12T02:13:05+00:00

sammy

Guest


they have done very well. Like the crows, they have used the rookie draft exceedingly well

2018-05-12T01:53:13+00:00

Zach Kitchen

Roar Rookie


Any chance you know many of those came through their academy?

2018-05-12T01:18:41+00:00

Eddy Jay

Guest


What a strange article. Ronke was “allowed to kick seven goals”? No, he worked very hard, he was in the right place at the right time, Hawthorn didn’t know how to contain him. The writer claims the game wasn’t of a high quality. Might not have witnessed the same game I did, but it was top notch, high pressure, close, skillful - all played with a terrible swirling wind. 22.18 collectively is not a bad result.

2018-05-12T00:07:22+00:00

Aligee

Guest


Swans off the rookie list .... Sydney former rookies tonight: Dane Rampe Heath Grundy Nick Smith Jake Lloyd Harry Cunningham Tom Papley Callum Sinclair (via WCE) Kieren Jack Dan Robinson Ben Ronke Gee it makes the draft so hit and miss, even at the top end. At least 4 are local Sydney boys.

2018-05-11T23:59:47+00:00

MG

Roar Rookie


Ronke was on the Swans list last year and played in the NEAFL. I saw him play in one game and thought he had potential. He has not come from nowhere, he came from the rookie development path. The Swans have played six of the other seven in the top 8, and beaten four of them. Who are the better sides that would’ve mauled them? You are insulting both the Swans and Hawthorn. Apparently there was a lot of rain in Melbourne leading to expectations of a poor game. That's why the commentary team were happy with the quality of the game. When Kennedy has a poor game, the Swans often lose. His form this year has been fairly ordinary except for the Cats game. It's great that the Swans got up despite Kennedy's ordinary game. "Without rookie Ronke Sydney loses this game by six goals, barely manages to kick five goals and in truth – better defensive sides would’ve made this hypothetical a reality by focusing on the young gun when it was clear in the first half he was red hot." Wow. Without Ronke there would have been another player playing - who knows what they would have done??? Ronke spent time on Burgoyne who has a history of playing well against the Swans. You're saying that Clarkson stuffed up - well no one is perfect but Clarkson comes pretty close.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar