Why Michael Hooper is the Six Million Dollar Man

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

The Six Million Dollar Man was one of the most popular television series on the box in the 1970s.

The show was a sci-fi fantasy featuring an opening reel with footage of a plane crashing in the desert: “Flight com, I can’t hold her! She’s breaking up… she’s break–” from the voice of the pilot. Then the transmission goes dead.

Cut to the operating table, and the body of our hero: “Steve Austin, astronaut, a man barely alive”, played by Hollywood actor Lee Majors.

Cue the voiceover: “Gentlemen, we can rebuild him. We have the technology. We have the capability to build the world’s first bionic man. Steve Austin will be that man. Better than he was before. Better, stronger, faster.”

Steve Austin has his left eye, right arm and both legs replaced by bionic transplants so that he can see in infrared at much greater magnification, run a lot faster (at least 60 miles per hour) and hit with the power of a rhino.

The show, and its sister series, The Bionic Woman, were both wildly successful at the time, and an important early chapter of Hollywood’s ongoing fascination with cyborgs, superheroes and otherwise enhanced human beings was written with it.

The phrase “We can rebuild him. We have the technology,” passed into popular folklore at the same time. Wallaby captain Michael Hooper may not have been rebuilt, but he has certainly been repaid for his loyalty to Australian rugby with his handsome new five-year deal worth $6 million.

The contract is in line with Australia’s other top players. David Pocock is said to be on $4 million over three years, while Israel Folau will be looking to negotiate an extension to his reported $2 million per year, three-year flexi-deal which finishes in 2018.

The deal secures Hooper’s service for the next two World Cup cycles, and there was no hint of a move to Europe.

“I didn’t entertain anything else. I was wearing a Wallabies jersey when I was five years old. To keep [doing] that for as long as possible is something that is super exciting to me,” Hooper said.

It allows Australian rugby to evolve at both international and Super Rugby level secure in the knowledge that its masthead figures will be part of the development process.

The size and length of Hooper’s contract has also predictably reignited the debate about whether he should be seen as one of Australia’s core players, whether he is Australia’s best number 7, and whether he and Pocock should be playing together in the same run-on team.

The answer to two of those questions is clearly ‘yes’, while the demonstrable success of the Hooper-Pocock dovetail in the back-row makes the second query irrelevant.

(AP Photo/Matt Dunham)

The old knock on the ‘Pooper’ combination – that it lacks lineout presence with two non-jumpers in the back row – lost credibility during the Ireland series in June. After a shaky start in the first Test, the Wallaby lineout settled down to win 90 per cent of its own ball over the course of the series.

Australia even won more ball against the throw than Ireland during the second and third matches, despite the presence of 6’11” Dev Toner and a full hand of five lineouts targets for the men in green.

The character of Australia’s outstanding defensive performance at Suncorp stadium showed how well Pocock and Hooper can work together in concert. Pocock made 15 tackles, Hooper 16. While Pocock was rightly lauded for his herculean four-turnover defensive breakdown effort in the first Test, Hooper’s three forced fumbles in the tackle and two successful counter-ruck turnovers received far less media attention but were equally important.

That is why the synergy between the two works in defence. Pocock provides the endurance and ‘stickability’ in contact at the breakdown, Hooper leads the line-speed in the Wallaby defence opposite the first receiver. Without either, it would not be the same.

Throughout the match, Michael Hooper targeted probably Ireland’s most powerful forward ball-carrier, second-rower Iain Henderson, and dominated him in the physical stakes. It was no coincidence that Henderson was not selected for the final two Tests after he had been ‘Hoopered’:

Hooper also worked in combination with Pocock to achieve favourable outcomes when the Ulsterman carried the ball. In the next example, Hooper’s tackle drives Henderson away from his support and into a poor setup situation where the ball goes to ground closer to Pocock than the Irish cleanout players. Pocock’s extraordinary ability on the deck does the rest:

It is Hooper’s unique mix of qualities in his position which persuades the Wallaby defensive coach Nathan Grey to innovate and find new ways of using them. Most rugby enthusiasts are aware of Hooper replacing Bernard Foley in the 10 channel from first-phase lineouts. Less obvious is his role on kick-chase:

Kicking teams will often try to bracket a receiver with two fast main chasers coming from either side, like the ‘gunners’ on a punt return chase in American football. It is the task of these gunners to contain the return yardage on the outside and tackle the receiver deep in his own end.

The outside gunner is usually a winger running down the sideline while the inside chaser is typically one of the centres. The Wallabies tend to use Hooper’s remarkable field coverage and tackling ability in the same vital role:

Hooper is the inside man in the bracket on Ireland winger Jacob Stockdale, Israel Folau is coming from the outside. He is able to not only bump Stockdale hard in the first contact – forcing a fumble which goes backwards – but then run onto Rob Kearney one pass further out to complete the tackle a long way upfield.

This is another area where the selection of two number 7s in the same side allows for better continuity. When Hooper is out of play, David Pocock can fill in on the same role – albeit without quite the same foot-speed.

Australia scored their first try of the game on the other side of the field after Pocock’s fumble recovery near the right-hand touch.

One of the most outstanding features of Hooper’s defensive play is his ability to create ‘double involvements’ on the same sequence of play. He reloads from one play to the next very quickly and that allows him to make more than one significant contribution. It is like volley fire compared to sporadic single shots. The Stockdale/Kearney chase was just one of a number of examples in Brisbane:

Hooper leads the Wallaby defence up with a crushing hit on Joey Carbery which leaves the Ireland outside-half in a crumpled heap on the ground, but one breakdown later he has wrapped around to mark Henderson (again) and ensure that Australia has the right defensive numbers down the short-side:

It is a remarkable piece of work that most number 7s could only dream of emulating.

Late in the second half, Hooper was still going strong:

Kurtley Beale’s crossfield kick is bracketed by Hooper and Folau, with Folau winning the ball back over Stockdale.

When Will Genia puts in a second kick all the way up to the Ireland goalline on the next phase, it is Hooper who drives the counter-ruck on Stockdale and forces the penalty. Australia scored the game-winning try on the following sequence:

Summary
Michael Hooper is worth every bit of his $6 million contract, and his loyalty to Australian rugby has been rightly repaid by Rugby Australia.

He is probably as close to the bionic man as you will find on an international rugby field. He triggers Wallaby line-speed defensively, and his quickness off the mark and on the reload means that he is often able to overwhelm players who are far bigger than him.

As the legendary American football coach Bill Walsh once said of his own smart but undersised players at the San Francisco 49ers, you have to be able to beat your opponent to the punch. Speed and dynamism count for more than pure size and strength.

Hooper’s field coverage and tackling ability is also key to the Wallaby lineout defence in the 10 channel and their kick-chase. His double involvements within the same sequence are class-leading.

The combination with David Pocock in the same back row is still a sweet option for Australia. When they are defending on the same side of field, there is the classic danger of a Hooper tackle/Pocock jackal turnover. On opposite sides, opponents have to choose between the threats of Pocock on-ball, or Hooper bringing the line up with him fast. It is a good place for Australia to be.

Why worry about who is the superior number 7, or who fits an imaginary profile of the ideal openside flanker better, when you can have both on the field at once? Just like the six million dollar man on TV, that back-row profile has already been rebuilt, but better than it was before.

The Crowd Says:

2018-08-22T01:30:35+00:00

Jacko

Guest


well John the PAID PROFESSIONAL got it all wrong and the egregiously arrogant novice got it right eh John the Worshiper...Try having an original thought of your own instead of following along on the coattails of a NH rughy scribe

AUTHOR

2018-08-20T11:23:53+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


On Wednesday I hope to show that the lineout issues are fixable with the same people in the team. What does Dave Giffin think? :)

2018-08-20T10:59:05+00:00

Fin

Guest


Yes Nick. The lineout problem cannot be down to Pooper when you start the game with 3 lineout specialist locks in the back five. Very few teams in the world would have the lineout luxury of 3 second rows in their pack of 8 forwards.

AUTHOR

2018-08-20T09:58:40+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


No - just poor execution with the people you do have Rob. Poorest lineout performance I've seen for some time, and not typical of Adam Coleman either... Better to put the problems right rather than scapegoat the Pooper.

AUTHOR

2018-08-20T09:54:23+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Hoopers negatives far out-weigh his positives. Yes 'blinkered' would be an apt description of this view :)

2018-08-20T07:25:04+00:00

adam_smith@hotmail.co.nz

Guest


Expert he maybe, but Nick Bishops failure to consider the negatives of Hoopers play, is his folly just like yours, and is proven by the Wallabies dreadful results during Hoopers career. I have no agenda, and no bias, just a balanced perspective that doesn't take in to consideration only one aspect of Hoopers style, but the negative too. Keep being blinkered, and accusing others of bias etc, but the results speak volumes, regardless of any of our opinions. Hoopers negatives far out-weigh his positives. Until others are afforded the same opportunities as Hooper, the Wallabies will continue to struggle.

2018-08-19T23:22:59+00:00

Fionn

Guest


The lifting was poor, the calling was poor and the throwing was poor. I think Rob Simmons has to start and run the line out. I also really hope that Sio and Tupou are back as someone yesterday said Robertson's lifting technique is average.

2018-08-19T22:19:52+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


yes mate. Starting with two shorties, ripe for the pickings! ;) Kiwis do love those low hanging grapes.

AUTHOR

2018-08-19T06:32:21+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Not at all Fionn. Sure you're going to gain something with another genuine jumper, is it worth the sacrifice of one of the highest work-rates and most important role players in the team? My own opinion is that the WB lineout was poorly organized and did not respond well to pressure during the game, so I'd probably look at ways of improving the structure, calling and possibly personnel etc - with Hooper and Pocock still in the team (if Hooper is still fit).

2018-08-19T06:15:55+00:00

Fionn

Guest


So you don't attribute it purely to the pooper like some here, Nick?

AUTHOR

2018-08-19T05:46:20+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


That's what happens when you prepare and execute a lineout poorly Rob!

2018-08-19T02:23:40+00:00

Ian Ballantyne

Guest


Rubbish!

2018-08-18T11:35:38+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


And the attack was as lousy as June vs Irish. The result is in full display. What a shambles

2018-08-18T11:16:26+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Nick. The pooper is a big pooper WB massacred via LO

AUTHOR

2018-08-18T06:15:20+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Good article - thanks Fin!

2018-08-17T22:59:54+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, Here's an article I think you will find of interest. https://www.foxsports.com.au/rugby/wallabies/wallabies-stand-to-benefit-in-bledisloe-cup-from-having-fulltime-coaching-team-in-place/news-story/df9d83aa7533f65a760ee97aabc640df

2018-08-17T15:18:21+00:00

Banjo Kelly

Roar Rookie


Ps With Pooper on board I thought the big story was no NedHanigan as a genuine linout option off the bench. Is it that Hooper’ s lack of match fitness will mean that he will probably be the one replaced not Tui? your thoughts?

2018-08-17T15:12:22+00:00

Banjo Kelly

Roar Rookie


Outstanding. Finally someone explains how Hooper does his job, his way. As an open side it’s not just about the fetcher winning turnovers. Just because he can run the ball better than most centres doesn’t mean his in the wrong position, it just means he is a freak!

2018-08-17T10:04:56+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, What are your thoughts on the speculation that Cheika may end up coaching in the NRL after the World Cup? Would you take a passing interest in his progress if that scenario eventuated?

2018-08-17T01:40:36+00:00

John R

Roar Guru


I know you haven't been paid for your thoughts on rugby due to the way your poorly presented and worded thoughts play out on these pages. I'm not trying to limit anyone's comments, but saying your opinion is just as valid as a paid professional ("I have my truth". HAHAHAHA. Seriously, who talks like that? What reality do you live in?) is egregiously arrogant, and Nick is far too nice to call you out on it, so I will, you ?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar