Will history repeat in Melbourne?

By Cricket Buffet / Roar Guru

The last time a Test series left Perth locked at 1-1 was the 2010-11 Ashes series. Like this series, the next stop was in Melbourne.

History shows us England finished day one in a virtually unlosable position at 0/157 in reply to Australia’s 10/98. They went on to record an innings-and-157-run win, and by Sydney they were holding the Ashes aloft.

Like in 2010, Australia recorded a victory by batting first and taking advantage of a wearing wicket late in the match.

This Test in Perth was the first at the new Perth Stadium, and although there is room for improvement with the pitch in particularly, it will go down as a success on a wicket that gave a chance to the bowlers throughout the contest.

It will also be remembered for the batting of Virat Kohli, who was a proverbial rock for the Indians, and the bowling of Nathan Lyon, who keeps on climbing the ladder of cricket’s wicket-takers. He is up to 334, and looks set to join the 400+ wicket takers like Harbhajan and Herath in time.

(AAP Image/Richard Wainwright)

Leaving Perth both teams have questions they need to answer. For Australia it revolves around Peter Handscomb. Do they drop a player who has technical flaws and try someone new, or do they persist with him given the team won?

Justin Langer is very old school and loyal about his team. He looks to be a coach who will give one more shot rather than make a call on changing a player who is not in great form. You would have to expect Handscomb to get another chance in Melbourne.

India do not need to panic. Ravi Ashwin will simply replace Umesh Yadav which will give the bowling a better balance and the tail potentially some much-needed runs. No.10s cant be walking out at No.8 and No.11’s at 9 if India are to add valuable lower order runs.

Ravi Shastri and Virat Kohli will need to decide if the flash blade of Hardik Pandya will replace the steady one of Hamuma Vihari. Kohli, being an attacking captain, is likely to lead towards a match winner in Pandya.

That leaves these troublesome Indian openers, in what has been a terrible year for the duo in 2018.

Murali Vijay’s Test career is over. He couldn’t buy a run in England and hasn’t managed 50 in total in Australia.

Prithvi Shaw on one leg would just about be a better option, though Shastri has indicated he should be fit by Boxing Day.

It would be very tempting to make the double change as the middle order have received very little protection all year from India’s openers.

Only the dogged effort from Dhawan and Rahul in the third test against England was of any note during the calendar year.

The significance of their good start should be noted because it was the lone test India won in that series.

India cannot afford to be two wickets down for little continuously, like they were on a couple of occasions in Perth.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

That leaves KL Rahul, who has made 85 runs at a shade over 14 since his big hundred at the Oval against England, or Mayank Agarwal, with a first-class average of 50, to fill the other openers spot.

Kohli and Shastri however will most likely err on the side of caution. Two new openers on the biggest day of the year for Australian cricket might be too big a gamble. So Agarwal will most likely carry the drinks, though the experience will not hurt him.

It’s been an even and excellent series to date. First of all both teams can enjoy some turkey and ham, and perhaps a beverage or two over the Christmas break, before it all starts up again to see who can get their hands on the coveted Border-Gavaskar trophy.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2018-12-21T14:14:39+00:00

Cricket Buffet

Roar Guru


I think Pujara at 3, Kohli 4 and Rahane at 5 is their best option, just need to get the other players around them scoring.

AUTHOR

2018-12-21T14:14:00+00:00

Cricket Buffet

Roar Guru


There is no chance Pant will be dropped and although RAhul has been out of form for most of the year he will have to play with Shaw not available you would think.

AUTHOR

2018-12-21T14:12:10+00:00

Cricket Buffet

Roar Guru


I think Agarwal has to play. Vijay has looked all at sea in 2018. His only contribution i think came against Afghanistan. It's an interesting one either Pandya or Vihari at 6. Kohli would probably like the extra bowler and match winner in Pandya i suspect.

2018-12-21T07:23:20+00:00

Niranjan Deodhar

Roar Pro


Assuming that P Shaw remains unavailable for the third Test, how about team India management give a shot by trying Vijay and Pujara to open the batting? Pujara has opened the batting in the past and since he is your No. 3 anyways, I guess he won’t mind fancy himself opening the batting. Rahane can shift to No.3 , Kohli still remains at 4 and KL Rahul can walk in at No.5. I guess, batting at No. 5, would give Rahul a much needed breather and his aggressive style of batting can be better suited in the middle order where he won’t need to worry about negotiating the new ball anymore. Just the question remains, is Indian think-tank willing to make so many changes in batting order at once or rather they are more happy replacing either Vijay or Rahul and not mess with the rest of the batting order? This, I believe is the make or break Test match of the series, so there is so much to think of and plenty to play for!

2018-12-20T23:29:46+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


With Shaw ruled out, Mayank Agarwal and Kl Rahul may open. I would however prefer Rahul back in India playing domestic cricket as of now. An interesting combination would be Mayank opening with Parthiv Patel and both Vihari and Pandya playing with Ashwin/Jadeja/Kuldeep replacing Umesh Yadav, but Kohli may not want to drop Pant. My line up above would provide enormous solidity to the batting which has been lacking.

2018-12-20T23:19:28+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Shaw has been ruled out for the whole series so one of Vijay and Rahul will have to play, unless they open with Rohit or call Dhawan into the squad. Also, Ashwin wasn't available in Perth due to injury. Is he fit for Boxing Day? If not, Jadeja will slot in. I'd persist with Vihari at 6. He looks like a guy who can set himself to bat for long periods, which is what India needs with Pant at 7 and a long tail.

Read more at The Roar