Four key moments from Day 1, fourth Test - India v Australia

By Nav / Roar Rookie

Respected journalist Robert Craddock lamented that the opening day of the fourth Test between India and Australia was one where “Australia lost their aura.”

While that can be debated, what was certain was India finished the day on top with the Australian bowlers utterly deflated.

The visitors finished the day in a commanding position on 4/303 with Pujara batting on 130* as they look to win their first ever test series in Australian soil.

Here were four key moments that defined the day’s play:

1. Win the toss and Kohli doesn’t lose a game
In Test cricket at least Virat Kohli has never yet lost a Test match after winning a toss. It is a record that spans 21 matches and includes 18 wins. In 2018, India’s away wins in Nottingham and Melbourne were on the back on Kohli calling correctly. India drew first blood and it was ominous signs for Australia.

Virat Kohli of India (Photo by Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

2. Tale of two openers: One fails and the other flourishes
KL Rahul is going through a torrid time even as his good friend and Karnataka team-mate Mayank Agarwal is amongst the runs. Rahul’s technique is being exposed and his mind is wavering.

It was in Sydney in 2015 that Rahul scored his maiden Test century. Any hopes of reliving those memories were short-lived as he was dismissed edging for nine off the bowling of Hazlewood.

Since the start of 2018 across 23 innings, almost 70 per cent of Rahul’s innings have yielded less than 20 runs. Over this period he has managed only two scores above 50; one of them being against Afghanistan.

In his last ten completed innings, six have been single digit scores.

Numbers unfortunately don’t lie and teams can ill-afford an opener out of touch. Minutes after being dismissed, Rahul went straight to the nets and received throw downs from Raghu. There is no denying the work ethic and he may yet have one more innings on tour to showcase his talent.

Every cricketer goes through these phases and Rahul can take inspiration from his skipper.

Kohli famously had a wretched tour of England in 2014 when he averaged 13.50 across 10 innings. But he came back stronger and in 2018 turned it around in remarkable fashion topping the run charts in challenging conditions scoring 593 runs.

Mayank Aggarwal, the other Indian opener, meanwhile looked assured and positive at the crease. The secret? Apparently plenty of eggs for breakfast every single day!

The confidence from a successful debut on Boxing Day showed as he brought up his second half century in only his third innings.

His penchant for spin was again evident as he hit Lyon for multiple sixes down the ground. However it was Lyon that had the last laugh dismissing Aggarwal on the long-on boundary for 77 when a century was there for the taking.

3. Second spinner? Australia falls short on selection again
Australia’s team selection and strategy appears to be in a state of confusion of late.

Peter Handscomb, criticised for his technique in Test cricket, finds himself back in the XI after sitting out the Boxing Day Test. Aaron Finch and Mitchell Marsh were rightly axed, but Marnus Labuschagne’s inclusion raised more eyebrows than answers.

Was he in as a number three batsman or as the team’s second spinner? It appears more the former as Labuschagne was hit for 12 runs off his opening over and finished the day only bowling four relatively wayward overs.

Matthew Wade has been in commanding form with the bat averaging 63.44 in Shield Cricket but is not considered for selection. Marcus Stoinis too presents a case to the selectors if Australia are looking ahead to the Ashes, and certainly on current form a better prospect than Mitch Marsh.

Glenn Maxwell meanwhile might have been a more aggressive option in this Test match with conditions more suited to his style of play and could have offered several overs of spin.

Fawad Ahmed would have been the x-factor if Australia wanted to play two spinners. His limited overs form has been commendable of late and in terms of spin bowling experience after Lyon, with 62 first class matches and 205 wickets, he is right up there.

Glenn Maxwell celebrates a century. Was it his last in the baggy green? (AP Photo/Aijaz Rahi)

4. The monk that bats and bats and bats
In an era of flamboyance, aggression and the glitz and glamour associated with T20 cricket – Cheteshwar Pujara is a throw-back to cricket how it used to be played. He doesn’t have an IPL contract and only plays Test cricket for India.

After finishing the day with 130*, it is safe to say the opening day of the fourth Test belonged to Pujara. He’s India’s version of a batting monk that knows only to keep batting and batting for extended periods.

The man has been out in the middle for over 28 hours this series and has faced 1135 deliveries – the most by any player. Australia’s bowlers are left with no answers.

He started this innings in his usual circumspect way grinding out the opposition. Patience is a virtue for Pujara and he stuck it out no matter what the Australian bowlers threw at him.

More than half of all deliveries he faced were good length, yet his overall control at the crease was 90 per cent. He averages less than a run an over to balls pitched in good length but leverages his strength to great effect.

Against spin, Pujara is a machine. Since his debut in 2010 only four other players have scored more test runs against spin.

Against Lyon, he frequently uses his feet – more so than anyone else in this Indian XI. Today 10 out of his 16 boundaries were against the spin of Lyon and Labuschagne and he scored over 70 per cent of his runs on the leg side.

Pujara is still at the crease having consumed 250 deliveries on the opening day. He already has 458 runs in this series. The longer he bats, the closer India will be to finishing up with a mammoth first innings total.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2019-01-07T00:39:51+00:00

Nav

Roar Rookie


Agree - the Australian team selections have been a bit perplexing. Defense can also be used as an attacking weapon as Pujara has shown! I don't agree with the recent sentiment in Australia that T20 & short form cricket is eroding the quality of cricket being played at the Shield or test level. I think the current Australian model and selection process needs some tweaking. Just look at India - apart from Pujara, everyone else has an IPL contract and most also play in ODIs / T20s as well. Yet the Indian team is #1 in Tests.

AUTHOR

2019-01-07T00:32:37+00:00

Nav

Roar Rookie


Thanks Baz! Glad you liked it, much appreciated :)

AUTHOR

2019-01-07T00:31:21+00:00

Nav

Roar Rookie


Agree with your views on KL Rahul. I believe he is a class player, but mentally out of sorts currently. In any case, going forward with Prithvi Shaw returning, I'd expect Mayank Agarwal to retain his place as the 2nd opener. As for Kuldeep - well, he has justified his selection with a terrific display of wrist spin bowling! The weather will ultimately be the difference between a 3-1 or a 2-1 scoreline.

2019-01-04T21:32:54+00:00

Extra Short Leg

Roar Rookie


Spot on. Australia - ignoring Shield performance, shun batsmen who can bat time, too many overs spent in the field, mentally and physically exhausted. Pujara has quietly destroyed us but would our selectors have picked him? "Doesn't show enough intent." We're getting it wrong.

2019-01-04T02:20:46+00:00

Niranjan Deodhar

Roar Pro


Yes indeed, India had a perfect opening day in the office to kick start their new year on a high note. But they were lucky too, to win the toss and bat first. It's still yet to be seen, but I guess Kohli has erred in picking Kuldeep Yadav over third pacer Umesh Yadav. And had they been bowling first, we would have had two spinners bowling from both ends right at the 10th or 12th over mark. May be the day's outcome would not have been that fruitful for India had that been the case. And in my opinion, KL Rahul has looked completely out of sorts throughout this series and it would have been far better had M Vijay been picked over Rahul. He looked quite promising in the second innings at Perth, he is a much experienced campaigner and may be he won't have scored lot of runs but at least he would have spent some time in middle, blunting the new ball and opposition bowlers. So it was better option to recall M Vijay over Rahul, at least as per my perspective.

2019-01-03T20:44:27+00:00

bigbaz

Roar Guru


Welcome Nav , good article, agree with all .

Read more at The Roar